Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia
Dairy production is an important livelihood source for smallholder dairy farmers who produce the majority of milk consumed and traded in Ethiopia. Dairy production is, however, constrained by livestock diseases that impact farm productivity, food safety, and animal welfare. Biosecurity measures (BSM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transboundary and emerging diseases 2023-08, Vol.2023, p.1-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Transboundary and emerging diseases |
container_volume | 2023 |
creator | Nyokabi, Ndungu S. Berg, Stefan Mihret, Adane Almaw, Gizat Worku, Gizachew Gemechu Lindahl, Johanna F. Wood, James L. N. Moore, Henrietta L. |
description | Dairy production is an important livelihood source for smallholder dairy farmers who produce the majority of milk consumed and traded in Ethiopia. Dairy production is, however, constrained by livestock diseases that impact farm productivity, food safety, and animal welfare. Biosecurity measures (BSM) include all risk reduction strategies designed to avoid the introduction of pathogenic infections from outside and minimise the spread of diseases within dairy herds. This study used a cross-sectional survey to investigate the adoption of BSM in dairy farms in Addis Ababa and Oromia regions of Ethiopia. Using a questionnaire, scores for adopted external and internal BSM were calculated based on the Ghent’s University Biocheck tool to compare the performance of different farms in Ethiopia. The weighted external biosecurity score was 49.1%, which was below average (below 50% adoption), while the weighted internal biosecurity score was 55.5%. Low adoption of crucial BSM increases the risk of disease introduction into dairy farms and transmission within herds. Adoption of BSM at the farm level was driven by individual, demographic, and socio-economic drivers, including education, farming system, milk value chain, and farming experience among others. Results of this research reveal low adoption of BSM and the imperative to encourage farmers to implement BSM can lead to a reduction in disease pressures and, thus, a reduction in antibiotic use and increased dairy farms productivity, and improved animal health and welfare. Farmers can be encouraged through proactive engagement with veterinarians and extension professionals. Moreover, creating a favourable policy environment can support farmers to adopt and implement BSM, given the known fact that “prevention is better and cheaper than curing diseases.” |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2023/2277409 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857678405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857678405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-ac7254c0d2d6950cb81df8432214d64f9a2c29a727490cf2b502d8d3ad1bff373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs7f0DApY5NXj5nWWtrhYKCuh7SZEJTppMxmSL997ZWXLp6F97hXjgIXVNyT6kQIyDARgBKcVKeoAHVUhRUajj9y4qfo4uc14RIUkoxQPOxi10fYoujxw8h5tpuU-h3-DUZ2wdbZxxa_LYxTbOKjasTfjQh7fDMpM3Pa9qvQuyCuURn3jS5vvq9Q_Qxm75P5sXi5el5Ml4UljHVF8YqENwSB06Wgtilps5rzgAod5L70oCF0ihQvCTWw1IQcNox4-jSe6bYEN0ce7sUP7d17qt13KZ2P1mBFkoqzYnYU3dHyqaYc6p91aWwMWlXUVIdXFUHV9Wvqz1-e8RXoXXmK_xPfwOOzWe6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857678405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>Research Library</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Nyokabi, Ndungu S. ; Berg, Stefan ; Mihret, Adane ; Almaw, Gizat ; Worku, Gizachew Gemechu ; Lindahl, Johanna F. ; Wood, James L. N. ; Moore, Henrietta L.</creator><contributor>Casal, Jordi ; Jordi Casal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyokabi, Ndungu S. ; Berg, Stefan ; Mihret, Adane ; Almaw, Gizat ; Worku, Gizachew Gemechu ; Lindahl, Johanna F. ; Wood, James L. N. ; Moore, Henrietta L. ; Casal, Jordi ; Jordi Casal</creatorcontrib><description>Dairy production is an important livelihood source for smallholder dairy farmers who produce the majority of milk consumed and traded in Ethiopia. Dairy production is, however, constrained by livestock diseases that impact farm productivity, food safety, and animal welfare. Biosecurity measures (BSM) include all risk reduction strategies designed to avoid the introduction of pathogenic infections from outside and minimise the spread of diseases within dairy herds. This study used a cross-sectional survey to investigate the adoption of BSM in dairy farms in Addis Ababa and Oromia regions of Ethiopia. Using a questionnaire, scores for adopted external and internal BSM were calculated based on the Ghent’s University Biocheck tool to compare the performance of different farms in Ethiopia. The weighted external biosecurity score was 49.1%, which was below average (below 50% adoption), while the weighted internal biosecurity score was 55.5%. Low adoption of crucial BSM increases the risk of disease introduction into dairy farms and transmission within herds. Adoption of BSM at the farm level was driven by individual, demographic, and socio-economic drivers, including education, farming system, milk value chain, and farming experience among others. Results of this research reveal low adoption of BSM and the imperative to encourage farmers to implement BSM can lead to a reduction in disease pressures and, thus, a reduction in antibiotic use and increased dairy farms productivity, and improved animal health and welfare. Farmers can be encouraged through proactive engagement with veterinarians and extension professionals. Moreover, creating a favourable policy environment can support farmers to adopt and implement BSM, given the known fact that “prevention is better and cheaper than curing diseases.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/2277409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Animal diseases ; Animal health ; Animal welfare ; Biosecurity ; Cattle ; Consumers ; Dairy farming ; Dairy farms ; Disease prevention ; Ethics ; Farmers ; Farming systems ; Farms ; Feeds ; Food safety ; Health risks ; Livestock ; Milk ; Mortality ; Pest control ; Productivity ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Tuberculosis ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023-08, Vol.2023, p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Ndungu S. Nyokabi et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Ndungu S. Nyokabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-ac7254c0d2d6950cb81df8432214d64f9a2c29a727490cf2b502d8d3ad1bff373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-ac7254c0d2d6950cb81df8432214d64f9a2c29a727490cf2b502d8d3ad1bff373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4985-1047 ; 0000-0002-3470-7579 ; 0000-0003-3183-4772 ; 0000-0001-8278-490X ; 0000-0002-0258-3188 ; 0000-0002-1175-0398</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2857678405/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2857678405?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12745,12774,21388,21389,21390,21391,21392,23256,27924,27925,33452,33530,33703,33744,34005,34314,34334,36265,43616,43659,43787,43805,43953,44067,44073,44404,64385,64389,72469,74051,74104,74283,74302,74473,74590,74596,74936</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Casal, Jordi</contributor><contributor>Jordi Casal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyokabi, Ndungu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihret, Adane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaw, Gizat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worku, Gizachew Gemechu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindahl, Johanna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, James L. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Henrietta L.</creatorcontrib><title>Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia</title><title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><description>Dairy production is an important livelihood source for smallholder dairy farmers who produce the majority of milk consumed and traded in Ethiopia. Dairy production is, however, constrained by livestock diseases that impact farm productivity, food safety, and animal welfare. Biosecurity measures (BSM) include all risk reduction strategies designed to avoid the introduction of pathogenic infections from outside and minimise the spread of diseases within dairy herds. This study used a cross-sectional survey to investigate the adoption of BSM in dairy farms in Addis Ababa and Oromia regions of Ethiopia. Using a questionnaire, scores for adopted external and internal BSM were calculated based on the Ghent’s University Biocheck tool to compare the performance of different farms in Ethiopia. The weighted external biosecurity score was 49.1%, which was below average (below 50% adoption), while the weighted internal biosecurity score was 55.5%. Low adoption of crucial BSM increases the risk of disease introduction into dairy farms and transmission within herds. Adoption of BSM at the farm level was driven by individual, demographic, and socio-economic drivers, including education, farming system, milk value chain, and farming experience among others. Results of this research reveal low adoption of BSM and the imperative to encourage farmers to implement BSM can lead to a reduction in disease pressures and, thus, a reduction in antibiotic use and increased dairy farms productivity, and improved animal health and welfare. Farmers can be encouraged through proactive engagement with veterinarians and extension professionals. Moreover, creating a favourable policy environment can support farmers to adopt and implement BSM, given the known fact that “prevention is better and cheaper than curing diseases.”</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Biosecurity</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1865-1674</issn><issn>1865-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKs7f0DApY5NXj5nWWtrhYKCuh7SZEJTppMxmSL997ZWXLp6F97hXjgIXVNyT6kQIyDARgBKcVKeoAHVUhRUajj9y4qfo4uc14RIUkoxQPOxi10fYoujxw8h5tpuU-h3-DUZ2wdbZxxa_LYxTbOKjasTfjQh7fDMpM3Pa9qvQuyCuURn3jS5vvq9Q_Qxm75P5sXi5el5Ml4UljHVF8YqENwSB06Wgtilps5rzgAod5L70oCF0ihQvCTWw1IQcNox4-jSe6bYEN0ce7sUP7d17qt13KZ2P1mBFkoqzYnYU3dHyqaYc6p91aWwMWlXUVIdXFUHV9Wvqz1-e8RXoXXmK_xPfwOOzWe6</recordid><startdate>20230814</startdate><enddate>20230814</enddate><creator>Nyokabi, Ndungu S.</creator><creator>Berg, Stefan</creator><creator>Mihret, Adane</creator><creator>Almaw, Gizat</creator><creator>Worku, Gizachew Gemechu</creator><creator>Lindahl, Johanna F.</creator><creator>Wood, James L. N.</creator><creator>Moore, Henrietta L.</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-1047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-7579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-490X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-3188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-0398</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230814</creationdate><title>Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia</title><author>Nyokabi, Ndungu S. ; Berg, Stefan ; Mihret, Adane ; Almaw, Gizat ; Worku, Gizachew Gemechu ; Lindahl, Johanna F. ; Wood, James L. N. ; Moore, Henrietta L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-ac7254c0d2d6950cb81df8432214d64f9a2c29a727490cf2b502d8d3ad1bff373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Biosecurity</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nyokabi, Ndungu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihret, Adane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaw, Gizat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worku, Gizachew Gemechu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindahl, Johanna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, James L. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Henrietta L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nyokabi, Ndungu S.</au><au>Berg, Stefan</au><au>Mihret, Adane</au><au>Almaw, Gizat</au><au>Worku, Gizachew Gemechu</au><au>Lindahl, Johanna F.</au><au>Wood, James L. N.</au><au>Moore, Henrietta L.</au><au>Casal, Jordi</au><au>Jordi Casal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle><date>2023-08-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1865-1674</issn><eissn>1865-1682</eissn><abstract>Dairy production is an important livelihood source for smallholder dairy farmers who produce the majority of milk consumed and traded in Ethiopia. Dairy production is, however, constrained by livestock diseases that impact farm productivity, food safety, and animal welfare. Biosecurity measures (BSM) include all risk reduction strategies designed to avoid the introduction of pathogenic infections from outside and minimise the spread of diseases within dairy herds. This study used a cross-sectional survey to investigate the adoption of BSM in dairy farms in Addis Ababa and Oromia regions of Ethiopia. Using a questionnaire, scores for adopted external and internal BSM were calculated based on the Ghent’s University Biocheck tool to compare the performance of different farms in Ethiopia. The weighted external biosecurity score was 49.1%, which was below average (below 50% adoption), while the weighted internal biosecurity score was 55.5%. Low adoption of crucial BSM increases the risk of disease introduction into dairy farms and transmission within herds. Adoption of BSM at the farm level was driven by individual, demographic, and socio-economic drivers, including education, farming system, milk value chain, and farming experience among others. Results of this research reveal low adoption of BSM and the imperative to encourage farmers to implement BSM can lead to a reduction in disease pressures and, thus, a reduction in antibiotic use and increased dairy farms productivity, and improved animal health and welfare. Farmers can be encouraged through proactive engagement with veterinarians and extension professionals. Moreover, creating a favourable policy environment can support farmers to adopt and implement BSM, given the known fact that “prevention is better and cheaper than curing diseases.”</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/2277409</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-1047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-7579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-490X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-3188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-0398</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-1674 |
ispartof | Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023-08, Vol.2023, p.1-12 |
issn | 1865-1674 1865-1682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2857678405 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; Research Library; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Animal diseases Animal health Animal welfare Biosecurity Cattle Consumers Dairy farming Dairy farms Disease prevention Ethics Farmers Farming systems Farms Feeds Food safety Health risks Livestock Milk Mortality Pest control Productivity Public health Questionnaires Risk assessment Risk management Tuberculosis Zoonoses |
title | Adoption of Biosecurity Practices in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Ethiopia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adoption%20of%20Biosecurity%20Practices%20in%20Smallholder%20Dairy%20Farms%20in%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Transboundary%20and%20emerging%20diseases&rft.au=Nyokabi,%20Ndungu%20S.&rft.date=2023-08-14&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1865-1674&rft.eissn=1865-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/2277409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857678405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857678405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |