Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?

Highlights Drainageways contain fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils conducive for denitrification. NO 3 -N concentrations in drainageway groundwater were 70% lower than observed in cropped fields. A new grass waterway design connects subsurface water from upland cropped fields to the drai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the ASABE 2022, Vol.65 (5), p.985-995
Hauptverfasser: Schilling, Keith, Streeter, Matthew, Pierce, Sophie, Brennan, Greg, St. Clair, Marty
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 995
container_issue 5
container_start_page 985
container_title Journal of the ASABE
container_volume 65
creator Schilling, Keith
Streeter, Matthew
Pierce, Sophie
Brennan, Greg
St. Clair, Marty
description Highlights Drainageways contain fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils conducive for denitrification. NO 3 -N concentrations in drainageway groundwater were 70% lower than observed in cropped fields. A new grass waterway design connects subsurface water from upland cropped fields to the drainageway deposits for NO 3 -N remediation. Abstract. Efforts to reduce nutrient export from agricultural crop production in the U.S. Midwest are leading to development of new conservation practices. In this study our objectives were to: (1) characterize subsurface soils and hydrogeology found in two main drainageway areas in eastern Iowa, (2) compare groundwater quality to upland agricultural fields, and (3) utilize a groundwater flow model to assess the capacity of drainageways to provide additional NO3-N processing in agricultural watersheds. Using data obtained from a network of 12 shallow wells installed across six different waterways, we found that the waterways contained fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils derived from erosion and deposition of upland loess and till. Concentrations of NO3-N in waterway groundwater (3.1 mg/l) were 70% lower compared to groundwater beneath nearby cropped fields (10.5 mg/l). A shallow water table in the organic-rich drainageway soils provides the requisite organic carbon, anaerobic soil conditions, and nitrogen supply for denitrification to occur. Numerical modeling suggested that groundwater from the surrounding catchment discharges approximately 53 m3/day into the waterways and reduces NO3-N mass by 144.3 kg/yr, or 7.8 kg/ha. Results suggest that drainageways could be better exploited for additional NO3-N reductions from subsurface drainage if the flow could be diverted into these areas. Keywords: Denitrification, Grass waterway, Nitrate-nitrogen, Saturated buffer.
doi_str_mv 10.13031/ja.15116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857141258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857141258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c147t-4bebe34bf08c64c9fda753c0579fb6180119b8944d61f7b31531ef53b1429a4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGoP_oOAJw_VfTfZLy9S6ycUK1rPy5vsmzbF7q5JFtl_b2kVepo5PDMDw9g5RFcgIgHXa7yCBCA9YoM4S4uxiPPs-MCfspH3VkUyL0DEkA5Y_9Ep3zmDmvirDQ4D8TfXaNpy9ZLfUU0YVvzeoa1xST_Y-xs-ccQXK-r5DOvKa2yJz9u2caGrbbDkuWkcPyj-T_N32lBlMdimvj1jJwa_PI3-dMg-Hx8W0-fxbP70Mp3MxhpkFsZSkSIhlYlynUpdmAqzROgoyQqjUsgjgELlhZRVCiZTAhIBZBKhQMYFSi2G7GLf27rmuyMfynXTuXo7WcZ5koGEOMm31OWe0q7x3pEpW2c36PoSonJ3brnGcneu-AWHKm15</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857141258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?</title><source>ASABE Technical Library</source><creator>Schilling, Keith ; Streeter, Matthew ; Pierce, Sophie ; Brennan, Greg ; St. Clair, Marty</creator><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Keith ; Streeter, Matthew ; Pierce, Sophie ; Brennan, Greg ; St. Clair, Marty</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights Drainageways contain fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils conducive for denitrification. NO 3 -N concentrations in drainageway groundwater were 70% lower than observed in cropped fields. A new grass waterway design connects subsurface water from upland cropped fields to the drainageway deposits for NO 3 -N remediation. Abstract. Efforts to reduce nutrient export from agricultural crop production in the U.S. Midwest are leading to development of new conservation practices. In this study our objectives were to: (1) characterize subsurface soils and hydrogeology found in two main drainageway areas in eastern Iowa, (2) compare groundwater quality to upland agricultural fields, and (3) utilize a groundwater flow model to assess the capacity of drainageways to provide additional NO3-N processing in agricultural watersheds. Using data obtained from a network of 12 shallow wells installed across six different waterways, we found that the waterways contained fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils derived from erosion and deposition of upland loess and till. Concentrations of NO3-N in waterway groundwater (3.1 mg/l) were 70% lower compared to groundwater beneath nearby cropped fields (10.5 mg/l). A shallow water table in the organic-rich drainageway soils provides the requisite organic carbon, anaerobic soil conditions, and nitrogen supply for denitrification to occur. Numerical modeling suggested that groundwater from the surrounding catchment discharges approximately 53 m3/day into the waterways and reduces NO3-N mass by 144.3 kg/yr, or 7.8 kg/ha. Results suggest that drainageways could be better exploited for additional NO3-N reductions from subsurface drainage if the flow could be diverted into these areas. Keywords: Denitrification, Grass waterway, Nitrate-nitrogen, Saturated buffer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2769-3287</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2769-3295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2769-3287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13031/ja.15116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Joseph: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural watersheds ; Alluvial deposits ; Alluvial soils ; Anaerobic conditions ; Conservation practices ; Crop production ; Drainage ; Drainageways ; Geology ; Groundwater ; Groundwater flow ; Groundwater quality ; Hydrogeology ; Loess ; Nitrogen ; Numerical models ; Nutrients ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Shallow water ; Shallow wells ; Soil conditions ; Subsurface drainage ; Water quality ; Water table ; Waterways</subject><ispartof>Journal of the ASABE, 2022, Vol.65 (5), p.985-995</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Clair, Marty</creatorcontrib><title>Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?</title><title>Journal of the ASABE</title><description>Highlights Drainageways contain fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils conducive for denitrification. NO 3 -N concentrations in drainageway groundwater were 70% lower than observed in cropped fields. A new grass waterway design connects subsurface water from upland cropped fields to the drainageway deposits for NO 3 -N remediation. Abstract. Efforts to reduce nutrient export from agricultural crop production in the U.S. Midwest are leading to development of new conservation practices. In this study our objectives were to: (1) characterize subsurface soils and hydrogeology found in two main drainageway areas in eastern Iowa, (2) compare groundwater quality to upland agricultural fields, and (3) utilize a groundwater flow model to assess the capacity of drainageways to provide additional NO3-N processing in agricultural watersheds. Using data obtained from a network of 12 shallow wells installed across six different waterways, we found that the waterways contained fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils derived from erosion and deposition of upland loess and till. Concentrations of NO3-N in waterway groundwater (3.1 mg/l) were 70% lower compared to groundwater beneath nearby cropped fields (10.5 mg/l). A shallow water table in the organic-rich drainageway soils provides the requisite organic carbon, anaerobic soil conditions, and nitrogen supply for denitrification to occur. Numerical modeling suggested that groundwater from the surrounding catchment discharges approximately 53 m3/day into the waterways and reduces NO3-N mass by 144.3 kg/yr, or 7.8 kg/ha. Results suggest that drainageways could be better exploited for additional NO3-N reductions from subsurface drainage if the flow could be diverted into these areas. Keywords: Denitrification, Grass waterway, Nitrate-nitrogen, Saturated buffer.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural watersheds</subject><subject>Alluvial deposits</subject><subject>Alluvial soils</subject><subject>Anaerobic conditions</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainageways</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater flow</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Shallow water</subject><subject>Shallow wells</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Subsurface drainage</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><issn>2769-3287</issn><issn>2769-3295</issn><issn>2769-3287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWGoP_oOAJw_VfTfZLy9S6ycUK1rPy5vsmzbF7q5JFtl_b2kVepo5PDMDw9g5RFcgIgHXa7yCBCA9YoM4S4uxiPPs-MCfspH3VkUyL0DEkA5Y_9Ep3zmDmvirDQ4D8TfXaNpy9ZLfUU0YVvzeoa1xST_Y-xs-ccQXK-r5DOvKa2yJz9u2caGrbbDkuWkcPyj-T_N32lBlMdimvj1jJwa_PI3-dMg-Hx8W0-fxbP70Mp3MxhpkFsZSkSIhlYlynUpdmAqzROgoyQqjUsgjgELlhZRVCiZTAhIBZBKhQMYFSi2G7GLf27rmuyMfynXTuXo7WcZ5koGEOMm31OWe0q7x3pEpW2c36PoSonJ3brnGcneu-AWHKm15</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Schilling, Keith</creator><creator>Streeter, Matthew</creator><creator>Pierce, Sophie</creator><creator>Brennan, Greg</creator><creator>St. Clair, Marty</creator><general>American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?</title><author>Schilling, Keith ; Streeter, Matthew ; Pierce, Sophie ; Brennan, Greg ; St. Clair, Marty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c147t-4bebe34bf08c64c9fda753c0579fb6180119b8944d61f7b31531ef53b1429a4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural watersheds</topic><topic>Alluvial deposits</topic><topic>Alluvial soils</topic><topic>Anaerobic conditions</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainageways</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater flow</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Shallow water</topic><topic>Shallow wells</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Subsurface drainage</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Clair, Marty</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the ASABE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schilling, Keith</au><au>Streeter, Matthew</au><au>Pierce, Sophie</au><au>Brennan, Greg</au><au>St. Clair, Marty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the ASABE</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>995</epage><pages>985-995</pages><issn>2769-3287</issn><issn>2769-3295</issn><eissn>2769-3287</eissn><abstract>Highlights Drainageways contain fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils conducive for denitrification. NO 3 -N concentrations in drainageway groundwater were 70% lower than observed in cropped fields. A new grass waterway design connects subsurface water from upland cropped fields to the drainageway deposits for NO 3 -N remediation. Abstract. Efforts to reduce nutrient export from agricultural crop production in the U.S. Midwest are leading to development of new conservation practices. In this study our objectives were to: (1) characterize subsurface soils and hydrogeology found in two main drainageway areas in eastern Iowa, (2) compare groundwater quality to upland agricultural fields, and (3) utilize a groundwater flow model to assess the capacity of drainageways to provide additional NO3-N processing in agricultural watersheds. Using data obtained from a network of 12 shallow wells installed across six different waterways, we found that the waterways contained fine-textured and nutrient rich alluvial soils derived from erosion and deposition of upland loess and till. Concentrations of NO3-N in waterway groundwater (3.1 mg/l) were 70% lower compared to groundwater beneath nearby cropped fields (10.5 mg/l). A shallow water table in the organic-rich drainageway soils provides the requisite organic carbon, anaerobic soil conditions, and nitrogen supply for denitrification to occur. Numerical modeling suggested that groundwater from the surrounding catchment discharges approximately 53 m3/day into the waterways and reduces NO3-N mass by 144.3 kg/yr, or 7.8 kg/ha. Results suggest that drainageways could be better exploited for additional NO3-N reductions from subsurface drainage if the flow could be diverted into these areas. Keywords: Denitrification, Grass waterway, Nitrate-nitrogen, Saturated buffer.</abstract><cop>St. Joseph</cop><pub>American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers</pub><doi>10.13031/ja.15116</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2769-3287
ispartof Journal of the ASABE, 2022, Vol.65 (5), p.985-995
issn 2769-3287
2769-3295
2769-3287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2857141258
source ASABE Technical Library
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural watersheds
Alluvial deposits
Alluvial soils
Anaerobic conditions
Conservation practices
Crop production
Drainage
Drainageways
Geology
Groundwater
Groundwater flow
Groundwater quality
Hydrogeology
Loess
Nitrogen
Numerical models
Nutrients
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Shallow water
Shallow wells
Soil conditions
Subsurface drainage
Water quality
Water table
Waterways
title Subsurface Nitrate Processing Beneath Drainageways: Are They Landscape Opportunities for Subsurface Drainage Remediation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subsurface%20Nitrate%20Processing%20Beneath%20Drainageways:%20Are%20They%20Landscape%20Opportunities%20for%20Subsurface%20Drainage%20Remediation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20ASABE&rft.au=Schilling,%20Keith&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=995&rft.pages=985-995&rft.issn=2769-3287&rft.eissn=2769-3287&rft_id=info:doi/10.13031/ja.15116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857141258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857141258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true