Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change
Background Climate change and its mitigation have significant health implications. Hence, medical associations call on physicians to inform the population about health risks of climate change and possible health co-benefits of climate action. However, so far it is unclear what preferences the genera...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Supplement_3 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | European journal of public health |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Krippl, N Mezger, NCS Fischer, H Schildmann, J Mikolajczyk, R Danquah, I Kantelhardt, EJ Herrmann, A |
| description | Background
Climate change and its mitigation have significant health implications. Hence, medical associations call on physicians to inform the population about health risks of climate change and possible health co-benefits of climate action. However, so far it is unclear what preferences the general public has about climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC). Therefore, we developed a survey tool to a) characterize experiences of CSHC, b) identify preferences about communication methods and themes, and c) determine associations of socioeconomic characteristics and climate change attitudes with CSHC preferences.
Methods
The tool development for this cross-sectional online-based survey was embedded in a bigger research project on the conceptualization of CSHC, which follows an exploratory mixed-methods design. Results of preceding qualitative interviews about CSHC were integrated into the tool development. After two pilot tests, the tool was administered from April to June 2022 through the population-based HeReCa panel (Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany), comprising 3200 participants from 5 federal states. Sociodemographic data is available for all participants.
Results
The final tool entails 46 items, sorted into 7 sections. Two sections serve as dependent variables for the association analysis: 13 items about the acceptability of different communicative approaches of CSHC and 18 items on preferences for themes in CSHC. Three sections serve as independent variables for the analysis: attitudes on climate change, level of engagement, and sociodemographic data. Two sections assess experiences with CSHC and preferred information channels to serve as descriptive results.
Conclusions
A rigorous methodology proved helpful for survey development within a mixed methods study. In triangulation with qualitative data, results of the survey will help physicians to deliver CSHC tailored to the preferences of different sociodemographic groups.
Key messages
We developed a survey tool to measure the general public's preferences regarding climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) of physicians.
Our study will provide guidance for physicians on how to offer CSHC to specific patient subgroups based on socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes towards climate change. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854902976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2854902976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-23df8c2ca4cfb3817d46a49287b93871e0649ac79f9b8b3ef2d4235e3a3969853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7rVxybHap4SZXYgNSd5TiTNiUkqR1X6t9jCB_AamZx7p3RQeiWkgUlmi8h-iGWS_dpHeVkQaQ-QzMqpMi4JJvztFNCM8oku0RXIewJIXmh2AxtVm3zZUfIAnShGZsj4B3Ydtxh18cuQNs23fYeW3yIthub0f4iIfojnHDfYVtVHkJIEHZTE3Y7223hGl3Utg1w8zfn6OPp8X31kq3fnl9XD-vMMcJ0xnhVK8ecFa4uuaJFJaQVmqmi1FwVFIgU2rpC17pUJYeaVYLxHLjlWmqV8zm6m3oH3x8ihNHs--i7dNIwlQudjhQyUWyinO9D8FCbwadv_clQYn4Mmsmg-TNoksEUyqZQH4f_8N-dm3cn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854902976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krippl, N ; Mezger, NCS ; Fischer, H ; Schildmann, J ; Mikolajczyk, R ; Danquah, I ; Kantelhardt, EJ ; Herrmann, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Krippl, N ; Mezger, NCS ; Fischer, H ; Schildmann, J ; Mikolajczyk, R ; Danquah, I ; Kantelhardt, EJ ; Herrmann, A</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Climate change and its mitigation have significant health implications. Hence, medical associations call on physicians to inform the population about health risks of climate change and possible health co-benefits of climate action. However, so far it is unclear what preferences the general public has about climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC). Therefore, we developed a survey tool to a) characterize experiences of CSHC, b) identify preferences about communication methods and themes, and c) determine associations of socioeconomic characteristics and climate change attitudes with CSHC preferences.
Methods
The tool development for this cross-sectional online-based survey was embedded in a bigger research project on the conceptualization of CSHC, which follows an exploratory mixed-methods design. Results of preceding qualitative interviews about CSHC were integrated into the tool development. After two pilot tests, the tool was administered from April to June 2022 through the population-based HeReCa panel (Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany), comprising 3200 participants from 5 federal states. Sociodemographic data is available for all participants.
Results
The final tool entails 46 items, sorted into 7 sections. Two sections serve as dependent variables for the association analysis: 13 items about the acceptability of different communicative approaches of CSHC and 18 items on preferences for themes in CSHC. Three sections serve as independent variables for the analysis: attitudes on climate change, level of engagement, and sociodemographic data. Two sections assess experiences with CSHC and preferred information channels to serve as descriptive results.
Conclusions
A rigorous methodology proved helpful for survey development within a mixed methods study. In triangulation with qualitative data, results of the survey will help physicians to deliver CSHC tailored to the preferences of different sociodemographic groups.
Key messages
We developed a survey tool to measure the general public's preferences regarding climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) of physicians.
Our study will provide guidance for physicians on how to offer CSHC to specific patient subgroups based on socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes towards climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Association analysis ; Attitude change ; Attitudes ; Climate action ; Climate change ; Concept formation ; Counseling ; Data ; Dependent variables ; Environmental risk ; General public ; Health risks ; Independent variables ; Measures ; Physicians ; Polls & surveys ; Public health ; Qualitative analysis ; Research projects ; Sociodemographics ; Socioeconomics ; Subgroups ; Surveys ; Triangulation ; Variables</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-23df8c2ca4cfb3817d46a49287b93871e0649ac79f9b8b3ef2d4235e3a3969853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krippl, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezger, NCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildmann, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolajczyk, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danquah, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantelhardt, EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, A</creatorcontrib><title>Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Background
Climate change and its mitigation have significant health implications. Hence, medical associations call on physicians to inform the population about health risks of climate change and possible health co-benefits of climate action. However, so far it is unclear what preferences the general public has about climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC). Therefore, we developed a survey tool to a) characterize experiences of CSHC, b) identify preferences about communication methods and themes, and c) determine associations of socioeconomic characteristics and climate change attitudes with CSHC preferences.
Methods
The tool development for this cross-sectional online-based survey was embedded in a bigger research project on the conceptualization of CSHC, which follows an exploratory mixed-methods design. Results of preceding qualitative interviews about CSHC were integrated into the tool development. After two pilot tests, the tool was administered from April to June 2022 through the population-based HeReCa panel (Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany), comprising 3200 participants from 5 federal states. Sociodemographic data is available for all participants.
Results
The final tool entails 46 items, sorted into 7 sections. Two sections serve as dependent variables for the association analysis: 13 items about the acceptability of different communicative approaches of CSHC and 18 items on preferences for themes in CSHC. Three sections serve as independent variables for the analysis: attitudes on climate change, level of engagement, and sociodemographic data. Two sections assess experiences with CSHC and preferred information channels to serve as descriptive results.
Conclusions
A rigorous methodology proved helpful for survey development within a mixed methods study. In triangulation with qualitative data, results of the survey will help physicians to deliver CSHC tailored to the preferences of different sociodemographic groups.
Key messages
We developed a survey tool to measure the general public's preferences regarding climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) of physicians.
Our study will provide guidance for physicians on how to offer CSHC to specific patient subgroups based on socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes towards climate change.</description><subject>Association analysis</subject><subject>Attitude change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Climate action</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>General public</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Triangulation</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7rVxybHap4SZXYgNSd5TiTNiUkqR1X6t9jCB_AamZx7p3RQeiWkgUlmi8h-iGWS_dpHeVkQaQ-QzMqpMi4JJvztFNCM8oku0RXIewJIXmh2AxtVm3zZUfIAnShGZsj4B3Ydtxh18cuQNs23fYeW3yIthub0f4iIfojnHDfYVtVHkJIEHZTE3Y7223hGl3Utg1w8zfn6OPp8X31kq3fnl9XD-vMMcJ0xnhVK8ecFa4uuaJFJaQVmqmi1FwVFIgU2rpC17pUJYeaVYLxHLjlWmqV8zm6m3oH3x8ihNHs--i7dNIwlQudjhQyUWyinO9D8FCbwadv_clQYn4Mmsmg-TNoksEUyqZQH4f_8N-dm3cn</recordid><startdate>20221021</startdate><enddate>20221021</enddate><creator>Krippl, N</creator><creator>Mezger, NCS</creator><creator>Fischer, H</creator><creator>Schildmann, J</creator><creator>Mikolajczyk, R</creator><creator>Danquah, I</creator><creator>Kantelhardt, EJ</creator><creator>Herrmann, A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221021</creationdate><title>Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change</title><author>Krippl, N ; Mezger, NCS ; Fischer, H ; Schildmann, J ; Mikolajczyk, R ; Danquah, I ; Kantelhardt, EJ ; Herrmann, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2029-23df8c2ca4cfb3817d46a49287b93871e0649ac79f9b8b3ef2d4235e3a3969853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Association analysis</topic><topic>Attitude change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Climate action</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>General public</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Triangulation</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krippl, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezger, NCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildmann, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolajczyk, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danquah, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantelhardt, EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krippl, N</au><au>Mezger, NCS</au><au>Fischer, H</au><au>Schildmann, J</au><au>Mikolajczyk, R</au><au>Danquah, I</au><au>Kantelhardt, EJ</au><au>Herrmann, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-10-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Background
Climate change and its mitigation have significant health implications. Hence, medical associations call on physicians to inform the population about health risks of climate change and possible health co-benefits of climate action. However, so far it is unclear what preferences the general public has about climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC). Therefore, we developed a survey tool to a) characterize experiences of CSHC, b) identify preferences about communication methods and themes, and c) determine associations of socioeconomic characteristics and climate change attitudes with CSHC preferences.
Methods
The tool development for this cross-sectional online-based survey was embedded in a bigger research project on the conceptualization of CSHC, which follows an exploratory mixed-methods design. Results of preceding qualitative interviews about CSHC were integrated into the tool development. After two pilot tests, the tool was administered from April to June 2022 through the population-based HeReCa panel (Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany), comprising 3200 participants from 5 federal states. Sociodemographic data is available for all participants.
Results
The final tool entails 46 items, sorted into 7 sections. Two sections serve as dependent variables for the association analysis: 13 items about the acceptability of different communicative approaches of CSHC and 18 items on preferences for themes in CSHC. Three sections serve as independent variables for the analysis: attitudes on climate change, level of engagement, and sociodemographic data. Two sections assess experiences with CSHC and preferred information channels to serve as descriptive results.
Conclusions
A rigorous methodology proved helpful for survey development within a mixed methods study. In triangulation with qualitative data, results of the survey will help physicians to deliver CSHC tailored to the preferences of different sociodemographic groups.
Key messages
We developed a survey tool to measure the general public's preferences regarding climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) of physicians.
Our study will provide guidance for physicians on how to offer CSHC to specific patient subgroups based on socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes towards climate change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
| ispartof | European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
| issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2854902976 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Association analysis Attitude change Attitudes Climate action Climate change Concept formation Counseling Data Dependent variables Environmental risk General public Health risks Independent variables Measures Physicians Polls & surveys Public health Qualitative analysis Research projects Sociodemographics Socioeconomics Subgroups Surveys Triangulation Variables |
| title | Climate-sensitive health counselling: a quantitative survey on addressing climate change |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Climate-sensitive%20health%20counselling:%20a%20quantitative%20survey%20on%20addressing%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Krippl,%20N&rft.date=2022-10-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854902976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854902976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.069&rfr_iscdi=true |