COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities
Background Recent studies have identified important social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and related COVID-19 outcomes in the Belgian population. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium. Methods We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Cavillot, L Van Loenhout, J Catteau, L Van den Borre, L De Pauw, R Blot, K Speybroeck, N Devleesschauwer, B Hubin, P |
description | Background
Recent studies have identified important social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and related COVID-19 outcomes in the Belgian population. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among 5,341,584 adults (≥ 18 years) tested for COVID-19 in Belgium until August 31, 2021. We integrated four national data sources: the Belgian vaccine registry (vaccination status), COVID-19 Healthdata (laboratory test results), STATBEL (socioeconomic/-demographic data) and the Common Base Registry for HealthCare Actors (people licensed to practice a healthcare profession in Belgium). Unvaccinated and vaccinated people (with at least one dose) were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
During the study period, 53,887 people (10%) did not receive the first COVID-19 vaccine dose in Belgium. Migrant background was associated with vaccine uptake (e.g., non-Europeans were almost three times [2.96-3.00] more likely to be unvaccinated compared to Belgian nationals). Single parents (OR 1.27 [1.26-1.28]) and people living alone (OR 1.18 [1.17-1.19]) were more likely to be unvaccinated compared to couples with children. Having a low or moderate education level (OR 1.36 [1.35-1.38] for low; OR 1.30 [1.29-1.32] for moderate) and income (OR 2.36 [2.34-2.38] for low; OR 1.54 [1.52-1.55] for moderate), being unemployed, (OR 1.50 [1.49-1.51), and having low health literacy (OR 1.41 [1.39-1.43]) led to a greater likelihood of being unvaccinated.
Conclusions
Migrants, people living alone, single parents or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium. The identification of these socioeconomic and -demographic disparities is critical to develop strategies guaranteeing a more equitable COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Belgium.
Key messages
• The study highlight important determinants in the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
• These results highlight the importance to focus efforts on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups currently under-represented in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854901810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2854901810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2026-e835cc5588806b0947612ab61f6814fe0f67ef824c706b34c07b3d02d78f60413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwA5wicU676ziOww1KgUqVeoGKm-U4TnHbxMFOkPh7gtIP4LSr2Zkd6RFyizBDyJO56X3bF3N9UBppPgPGz8gEGWdxwuHjfNgRMEbK6SW5CmEPAGkm6IRsF5vt6inGPPpWWttGddY1Ud926mAi20SP5rizfX0fBaetM9o1rrY6Uk05KqWp3c6r9nMQSxta5W1nTbgmF5U6BnNzmlPy_rx8W7zG683LavGwjjUFymMjklTrNBVCAC8gZxlHqgqOFRfIKgMVz0wlKNPZcE-YhqxISqBlJioODJMpuRv_tt599SZ0cu963wyVkoqU5YACYXDR0aW9C8GbSrbe1sr_SAT5x0-O_OSJnxz4DaF4DLm-_Y__F44MdKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854901810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cavillot, L ; Van Loenhout, J ; Catteau, L ; Van den Borre, L ; De Pauw, R ; Blot, K ; Speybroeck, N ; Devleesschauwer, B ; Hubin, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavillot, L ; Van Loenhout, J ; Catteau, L ; Van den Borre, L ; De Pauw, R ; Blot, K ; Speybroeck, N ; Devleesschauwer, B ; Hubin, P</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Recent studies have identified important social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and related COVID-19 outcomes in the Belgian population. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among 5,341,584 adults (≥ 18 years) tested for COVID-19 in Belgium until August 31, 2021. We integrated four national data sources: the Belgian vaccine registry (vaccination status), COVID-19 Healthdata (laboratory test results), STATBEL (socioeconomic/-demographic data) and the Common Base Registry for HealthCare Actors (people licensed to practice a healthcare profession in Belgium). Unvaccinated and vaccinated people (with at least one dose) were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
During the study period, 53,887 people (10%) did not receive the first COVID-19 vaccine dose in Belgium. Migrant background was associated with vaccine uptake (e.g., non-Europeans were almost three times [2.96-3.00] more likely to be unvaccinated compared to Belgian nationals). Single parents (OR 1.27 [1.26-1.28]) and people living alone (OR 1.18 [1.17-1.19]) were more likely to be unvaccinated compared to couples with children. Having a low or moderate education level (OR 1.36 [1.35-1.38] for low; OR 1.30 [1.29-1.32] for moderate) and income (OR 2.36 [2.34-2.38] for low; OR 1.54 [1.52-1.55] for moderate), being unemployed, (OR 1.50 [1.49-1.51), and having low health literacy (OR 1.41 [1.39-1.43]) led to a greater likelihood of being unvaccinated.
Conclusions
Migrants, people living alone, single parents or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium. The identification of these socioeconomic and -demographic disparities is critical to develop strategies guaranteeing a more equitable COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Belgium.
Key messages
• The study highlight important determinants in the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
• These results highlight the importance to focus efforts on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups currently under-represented in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adults ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Demographics ; Demography ; Disadvantaged ; Disadvantaged groups ; Health care ; Health services ; Immunization ; Laboratory tests ; Migrants ; Minority groups ; Parents ; Population studies ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Single parents ; Social inequality ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2026-e835cc5588806b0947612ab61f6814fe0f67ef824c706b34c07b3d02d78f60413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1598,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavillot, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Loenhout, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catteau, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Borre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Pauw, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blot, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speybroeck, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devleesschauwer, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubin, P</creatorcontrib><title>COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Background
Recent studies have identified important social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and related COVID-19 outcomes in the Belgian population. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among 5,341,584 adults (≥ 18 years) tested for COVID-19 in Belgium until August 31, 2021. We integrated four national data sources: the Belgian vaccine registry (vaccination status), COVID-19 Healthdata (laboratory test results), STATBEL (socioeconomic/-demographic data) and the Common Base Registry for HealthCare Actors (people licensed to practice a healthcare profession in Belgium). Unvaccinated and vaccinated people (with at least one dose) were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
During the study period, 53,887 people (10%) did not receive the first COVID-19 vaccine dose in Belgium. Migrant background was associated with vaccine uptake (e.g., non-Europeans were almost three times [2.96-3.00] more likely to be unvaccinated compared to Belgian nationals). Single parents (OR 1.27 [1.26-1.28]) and people living alone (OR 1.18 [1.17-1.19]) were more likely to be unvaccinated compared to couples with children. Having a low or moderate education level (OR 1.36 [1.35-1.38] for low; OR 1.30 [1.29-1.32] for moderate) and income (OR 2.36 [2.34-2.38] for low; OR 1.54 [1.52-1.55] for moderate), being unemployed, (OR 1.50 [1.49-1.51), and having low health literacy (OR 1.41 [1.39-1.43]) led to a greater likelihood of being unvaccinated.
Conclusions
Migrants, people living alone, single parents or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium. The identification of these socioeconomic and -demographic disparities is critical to develop strategies guaranteeing a more equitable COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Belgium.
Key messages
• The study highlight important determinants in the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
• These results highlight the importance to focus efforts on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups currently under-represented in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Disadvantaged groups</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Single parents</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwA5wicU676ziOww1KgUqVeoGKm-U4TnHbxMFOkPh7gtIP4LSr2Zkd6RFyizBDyJO56X3bF3N9UBppPgPGz8gEGWdxwuHjfNgRMEbK6SW5CmEPAGkm6IRsF5vt6inGPPpWWttGddY1Ud926mAi20SP5rizfX0fBaetM9o1rrY6Uk05KqWp3c6r9nMQSxta5W1nTbgmF5U6BnNzmlPy_rx8W7zG683LavGwjjUFymMjklTrNBVCAC8gZxlHqgqOFRfIKgMVz0wlKNPZcE-YhqxISqBlJioODJMpuRv_tt599SZ0cu963wyVkoqU5YACYXDR0aW9C8GbSrbe1sr_SAT5x0-O_OSJnxz4DaF4DLm-_Y__F44MdKA</recordid><startdate>20221021</startdate><enddate>20221021</enddate><creator>Cavillot, L</creator><creator>Van Loenhout, J</creator><creator>Catteau, L</creator><creator>Van den Borre, L</creator><creator>De Pauw, R</creator><creator>Blot, K</creator><creator>Speybroeck, N</creator><creator>Devleesschauwer, B</creator><creator>Hubin, P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221021</creationdate><title>COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities</title><author>Cavillot, L ; Van Loenhout, J ; Catteau, L ; Van den Borre, L ; De Pauw, R ; Blot, K ; Speybroeck, N ; Devleesschauwer, B ; Hubin, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2026-e835cc5588806b0947612ab61f6814fe0f67ef824c706b34c07b3d02d78f60413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Disadvantaged groups</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Single parents</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavillot, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Loenhout, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catteau, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Borre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Pauw, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blot, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speybroeck, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devleesschauwer, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubin, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavillot, L</au><au>Van Loenhout, J</au><au>Catteau, L</au><au>Van den Borre, L</au><au>De Pauw, R</au><au>Blot, K</au><au>Speybroeck, N</au><au>Devleesschauwer, B</au><au>Hubin, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-10-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Background
Recent studies have identified important social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and related COVID-19 outcomes in the Belgian population. This study aims to investigate socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics associated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among 5,341,584 adults (≥ 18 years) tested for COVID-19 in Belgium until August 31, 2021. We integrated four national data sources: the Belgian vaccine registry (vaccination status), COVID-19 Healthdata (laboratory test results), STATBEL (socioeconomic/-demographic data) and the Common Base Registry for HealthCare Actors (people licensed to practice a healthcare profession in Belgium). Unvaccinated and vaccinated people (with at least one dose) were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
During the study period, 53,887 people (10%) did not receive the first COVID-19 vaccine dose in Belgium. Migrant background was associated with vaccine uptake (e.g., non-Europeans were almost three times [2.96-3.00] more likely to be unvaccinated compared to Belgian nationals). Single parents (OR 1.27 [1.26-1.28]) and people living alone (OR 1.18 [1.17-1.19]) were more likely to be unvaccinated compared to couples with children. Having a low or moderate education level (OR 1.36 [1.35-1.38] for low; OR 1.30 [1.29-1.32] for moderate) and income (OR 2.36 [2.34-2.38] for low; OR 1.54 [1.52-1.55] for moderate), being unemployed, (OR 1.50 [1.49-1.51), and having low health literacy (OR 1.41 [1.39-1.43]) led to a greater likelihood of being unvaccinated.
Conclusions
Migrants, people living alone, single parents or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups have lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium. The identification of these socioeconomic and -demographic disparities is critical to develop strategies guaranteeing a more equitable COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Belgium.
Key messages
• The study highlight important determinants in the uptake of the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine in Belgium.
• These results highlight the importance to focus efforts on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups currently under-represented in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3) |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2854901810 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adults COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Demographics Demography Disadvantaged Disadvantaged groups Health care Health services Immunization Laboratory tests Migrants Minority groups Parents Population studies Public health Regression analysis Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Single parents Social inequality Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics Vaccines |
title | COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Belgium: socioeconomic and sociodemographic disparities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A13%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19%20vaccination%20uptake%20in%20Belgium:%20socioeconomic%20and%20sociodemographic%20disparities&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Cavillot,%20L&rft.date=2022-10-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854901810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854901810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.046&rfr_iscdi=true |