An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries

Background The last two decades saw an extensive effort to design and implement integrated and multidimensional healthcare evaluation systems in high-income countries. However, in low/middle-income countries, few experiences of such systems implementation have been reported in the scientific literat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)
Hauptverfasser: Tavoschi, L, Belardi, P, Mazzilli, S, Manenti, F, Pellizer, G, Abebe, D, Azzimonti, G, Nsubuga, JB, Dall'Oglio, G, Vainieri, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 32
creator Tavoschi, L
Belardi, P
Mazzilli, S
Manenti, F
Pellizer, G
Abebe, D
Azzimonti, G
Nsubuga, JB
Dall'Oglio, G
Vainieri, M
description Background The last two decades saw an extensive effort to design and implement integrated and multidimensional healthcare evaluation systems in high-income countries. However, in low/middle-income countries, few experiences of such systems implementation have been reported in the scientific literature. We developed and piloted an innovative tool to assess the performance of health services provision for communicable diseases in three African countries. Methods A total of 42 indicators, 14 per each communicable disease care pathway (Tuberculosis, Gastroenteritis, and HIV/AIDS), were developed. A sub-set of 23 indicators was included in the evaluation process. The indicators assessed four care phases: prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. All indicators were calculated for the period 2017-2019, while performance evaluation was performed for 2019. The analysis involved four health districts and their relative hospitals in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Results Substantial variability was observed over time and across the four different districts. In the TB pathway, the majority of indicators scored below the standards and below-average performance was mainly reported for prevention and diagnosis phases. Along the Gastroenteritis pathway, excellent performance was instead evaluated for most indicators and the highest scores were reported in prevention and treatment phases. The HIV/AIDS pathway indicators related to screening and outcome phases were below the average score, while good or excellent performance was registered within the treatment phase. Conclusions The bottom-up approach and stakeholders' engagement increased local ownership of the process and the likelihood that findings will inform health services performance and quality of care. Despite the intrinsic limitations of data sources, this framework may contribute to promoting good governance, performance evaluation and accountability in settings characterised by multiple healthcare service providers. Key messages * A successful experience in developing and implementing a communicable diseases performance evaluation systems in three sub-Saharan African countries using a bottom-up approach. * The communicable diseases performance evaluation tool helped the data sharing between local healthcare providers and the development of competencies in data collection, analysis and interpretation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854901265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2854901265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1534-8f74ef0fcc4f9a9db9514c88acb482e7205b6dde6b285273ab20ede12b57d5be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisXZrO3Yey6riJVViAxI7y48JuKRxsGMQf49R-gGsZhbn3tEchK4pWVHSlmtIYUx6bT6UoSVdMc5P0ILyiuOyIq-neaeEYsoqdo4uYtwTQkTdsAUym6FwwwRvQU1gi3cfRzepHlsXp-DMVMCX6pOanB-KzofC-MMhDc4o3UORIVARYm4oev-9Pjhre8BuyBRkNA25A-IlOutUH-HqOJfo5e72efuAd0_3j9vNDhsqSo6brubQkc4Y3rWqtboVlJumUUbzhkHNiNCVtVBp1ghWl0ozAhYo06K2QkO5RDdz7xj8Z4I4yb1PYcgnZU7wluT_RabYTJngYwzQyTG4gwo_khL5J1POMuVRpswycwjPIZ_G__C_nyJ8mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854901265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tavoschi, L ; Belardi, P ; Mazzilli, S ; Manenti, F ; Pellizer, G ; Abebe, D ; Azzimonti, G ; Nsubuga, JB ; Dall'Oglio, G ; Vainieri, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavoschi, L ; Belardi, P ; Mazzilli, S ; Manenti, F ; Pellizer, G ; Abebe, D ; Azzimonti, G ; Nsubuga, JB ; Dall'Oglio, G ; Vainieri, M</creatorcontrib><description>Background The last two decades saw an extensive effort to design and implement integrated and multidimensional healthcare evaluation systems in high-income countries. However, in low/middle-income countries, few experiences of such systems implementation have been reported in the scientific literature. We developed and piloted an innovative tool to assess the performance of health services provision for communicable diseases in three African countries. Methods A total of 42 indicators, 14 per each communicable disease care pathway (Tuberculosis, Gastroenteritis, and HIV/AIDS), were developed. A sub-set of 23 indicators was included in the evaluation process. The indicators assessed four care phases: prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. All indicators were calculated for the period 2017-2019, while performance evaluation was performed for 2019. The analysis involved four health districts and their relative hospitals in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Results Substantial variability was observed over time and across the four different districts. In the TB pathway, the majority of indicators scored below the standards and below-average performance was mainly reported for prevention and diagnosis phases. Along the Gastroenteritis pathway, excellent performance was instead evaluated for most indicators and the highest scores were reported in prevention and treatment phases. The HIV/AIDS pathway indicators related to screening and outcome phases were below the average score, while good or excellent performance was registered within the treatment phase. Conclusions The bottom-up approach and stakeholders' engagement increased local ownership of the process and the likelihood that findings will inform health services performance and quality of care. Despite the intrinsic limitations of data sources, this framework may contribute to promoting good governance, performance evaluation and accountability in settings characterised by multiple healthcare service providers. Key messages * A successful experience in developing and implementing a communicable diseases performance evaluation systems in three sub-Saharan African countries using a bottom-up approach. * The communicable diseases performance evaluation tool helped the data sharing between local healthcare providers and the development of competencies in data collection, analysis and interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; Data collection ; Data quality ; Diagnosis ; Disease prevention ; Districts ; Evaluation ; Gastroenteritis ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health services ; HIV ; Hospitals ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Income ; Indicators ; Medical treatment ; Ownership ; Performance assessment ; Performance evaluation ; Phases ; Prevention ; Public health ; Quality of care ; Systems analysis ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavoschi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzilli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manenti, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellizer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abebe, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzimonti, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nsubuga, JB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dall'Oglio, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainieri, M</creatorcontrib><title>An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Background The last two decades saw an extensive effort to design and implement integrated and multidimensional healthcare evaluation systems in high-income countries. However, in low/middle-income countries, few experiences of such systems implementation have been reported in the scientific literature. We developed and piloted an innovative tool to assess the performance of health services provision for communicable diseases in three African countries. Methods A total of 42 indicators, 14 per each communicable disease care pathway (Tuberculosis, Gastroenteritis, and HIV/AIDS), were developed. A sub-set of 23 indicators was included in the evaluation process. The indicators assessed four care phases: prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. All indicators were calculated for the period 2017-2019, while performance evaluation was performed for 2019. The analysis involved four health districts and their relative hospitals in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Results Substantial variability was observed over time and across the four different districts. In the TB pathway, the majority of indicators scored below the standards and below-average performance was mainly reported for prevention and diagnosis phases. Along the Gastroenteritis pathway, excellent performance was instead evaluated for most indicators and the highest scores were reported in prevention and treatment phases. The HIV/AIDS pathway indicators related to screening and outcome phases were below the average score, while good or excellent performance was registered within the treatment phase. Conclusions The bottom-up approach and stakeholders' engagement increased local ownership of the process and the likelihood that findings will inform health services performance and quality of care. Despite the intrinsic limitations of data sources, this framework may contribute to promoting good governance, performance evaluation and accountability in settings characterised by multiple healthcare service providers. Key messages * A successful experience in developing and implementing a communicable diseases performance evaluation systems in three sub-Saharan African countries using a bottom-up approach. * The communicable diseases performance evaluation tool helped the data sharing between local healthcare providers and the development of competencies in data collection, analysis and interpretation.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Districts</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gastroenteritis</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisXZrO3Yey6riJVViAxI7y48JuKRxsGMQf49R-gGsZhbn3tEchK4pWVHSlmtIYUx6bT6UoSVdMc5P0ILyiuOyIq-neaeEYsoqdo4uYtwTQkTdsAUym6FwwwRvQU1gi3cfRzepHlsXp-DMVMCX6pOanB-KzofC-MMhDc4o3UORIVARYm4oev-9Pjhre8BuyBRkNA25A-IlOutUH-HqOJfo5e72efuAd0_3j9vNDhsqSo6brubQkc4Y3rWqtboVlJumUUbzhkHNiNCVtVBp1ghWl0ozAhYo06K2QkO5RDdz7xj8Z4I4yb1PYcgnZU7wluT_RabYTJngYwzQyTG4gwo_khL5J1POMuVRpswycwjPIZ_G__C_nyJ8mw</recordid><startdate>20221021</startdate><enddate>20221021</enddate><creator>Tavoschi, L</creator><creator>Belardi, P</creator><creator>Mazzilli, S</creator><creator>Manenti, F</creator><creator>Pellizer, G</creator><creator>Abebe, D</creator><creator>Azzimonti, G</creator><creator>Nsubuga, JB</creator><creator>Dall'Oglio, G</creator><creator>Vainieri, M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221021</creationdate><title>An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries</title><author>Tavoschi, L ; Belardi, P ; Mazzilli, S ; Manenti, F ; Pellizer, G ; Abebe, D ; Azzimonti, G ; Nsubuga, JB ; Dall'Oglio, G ; Vainieri, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1534-8f74ef0fcc4f9a9db9514c88acb482e7205b6dde6b285273ab20ede12b57d5be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Districts</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gastroenteritis</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavoschi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belardi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzilli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manenti, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellizer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abebe, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzimonti, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nsubuga, JB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dall'Oglio, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainieri, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavoschi, L</au><au>Belardi, P</au><au>Mazzilli, S</au><au>Manenti, F</au><au>Pellizer, G</au><au>Abebe, D</au><au>Azzimonti, G</au><au>Nsubuga, JB</au><au>Dall'Oglio, G</au><au>Vainieri, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-10-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Background The last two decades saw an extensive effort to design and implement integrated and multidimensional healthcare evaluation systems in high-income countries. However, in low/middle-income countries, few experiences of such systems implementation have been reported in the scientific literature. We developed and piloted an innovative tool to assess the performance of health services provision for communicable diseases in three African countries. Methods A total of 42 indicators, 14 per each communicable disease care pathway (Tuberculosis, Gastroenteritis, and HIV/AIDS), were developed. A sub-set of 23 indicators was included in the evaluation process. The indicators assessed four care phases: prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. All indicators were calculated for the period 2017-2019, while performance evaluation was performed for 2019. The analysis involved four health districts and their relative hospitals in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Results Substantial variability was observed over time and across the four different districts. In the TB pathway, the majority of indicators scored below the standards and below-average performance was mainly reported for prevention and diagnosis phases. Along the Gastroenteritis pathway, excellent performance was instead evaluated for most indicators and the highest scores were reported in prevention and treatment phases. The HIV/AIDS pathway indicators related to screening and outcome phases were below the average score, while good or excellent performance was registered within the treatment phase. Conclusions The bottom-up approach and stakeholders' engagement increased local ownership of the process and the likelihood that findings will inform health services performance and quality of care. Despite the intrinsic limitations of data sources, this framework may contribute to promoting good governance, performance evaluation and accountability in settings characterised by multiple healthcare service providers. Key messages * A successful experience in developing and implementing a communicable diseases performance evaluation systems in three sub-Saharan African countries using a bottom-up approach. * The communicable diseases performance evaluation tool helped the data sharing between local healthcare providers and the development of competencies in data collection, analysis and interpretation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2854901265
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
Data collection
Data quality
Diagnosis
Disease prevention
Districts
Evaluation
Gastroenteritis
Health care
Health care industry
Health services
HIV
Hospitals
Human immunodeficiency virus
Income
Indicators
Medical treatment
Ownership
Performance assessment
Performance evaluation
Phases
Prevention
Public health
Quality of care
Systems analysis
Tuberculosis
title An integrated hospital-district evaluation for communicable diseases in low/middle-income countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A37%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20integrated%20hospital-district%20evaluation%20for%20communicable%20diseases%20in%20low/middle-income%20countries&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Tavoschi,%20L&rft.date=2022-10-21&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854901265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854901265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.244&rfr_iscdi=true