Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective

AbstractPrevious research has recognized that the successful realization of megaproject social responsibility (MSR) relies heavily on the cooperation of a variety of stakeholders. However, the process of stakeholders conducting MSR exchanges reciprocally to achieve MSR goals has not been fully revea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of construction engineering and management 2023-11, Vol.149 (11)
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Xian, Chen, Jiaying, Xia, Bo, Skitmore, Martin, Zeng, Saixing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Journal of construction engineering and management
container_volume 149
creator Zheng, Xian
Chen, Jiaying
Xia, Bo
Skitmore, Martin
Zeng, Saixing
description AbstractPrevious research has recognized that the successful realization of megaproject social responsibility (MSR) relies heavily on the cooperation of a variety of stakeholders. However, the process of stakeholders conducting MSR exchanges reciprocally to achieve MSR goals has not been fully revealed, hindering the consistent implementation of interorganizational and cooperative MSR. To bridge these gaps, based on social exchange theory (SET), stakeholder theory, and network theory, this study used the stakeholder value network (SVN) to unravel MSR exchanges with multiple types and their contribution to social value. Given that, we can identify the critical stakeholders, MSR exchanges, and types to facilitate achieving social responsibility goals in megaprojects. A qualitative MSR network was first developed based on seven stakeholders with 77 MSR flows involving four MSR types, which was further quantified through a survey of 216 managers involved in 133 megaprojects. The results demonstrate that when owners act as the focal organization, the government and the general contractors act as critical external and internal stakeholders to promote reciprocal exchanges in the MSR network. Eleven critical MSR exchanges (i.e., five restricted exchanges and six generalized exchanges) are identified to facilitate the reciprocal and joint implementation of MSR to obtain high megaproject social values. It is also suggested that stakeholders should pay particular attention to political MSR to guarantee a stable environment for reciprocal MSR exchanges among primary stakeholders. This research intends to guide the efforts of stakeholders to engage in effective MSR to satisfy their partners mutually, contributing to realizing high megaproject social value.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2854318390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2854318390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5653dfa0866077efc7467334a389937c3e9e082535441b68889dd9ef28564c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFTwjAQhTOOzojoH_DUGc-FpEnTxBtTEXVAHJFzJ6RbKJSmNEXl3xuoM9487WHf9_btQ-iW4B7BnPRf4uHkgfXi6fB15BPKGDtDHSIZ9SPBg3PUwRGlvqScXaIra9cYE8Zl2EG7eZlCbRtVpnm59JoVeBNYqqo2a9CNNzM6V4X3DrYypc0XeZE3B-8Vmi9Tbzy1NY6ZNWoDK1Mcfe69gRPr3PFaFf7wW69UuQTvze0qZ5h_wjW6yFRh4eZ3dtH8cfgRP_nj6eg5Hox95VI2fshDmmYKC85xFEGmI8bdD0xRISWNNAUJWAQhDRkjCy6EkGkqIQtEyJmOQtpFd62vy7Lbg22StdnXpTuZOA2jRFCJnSpoVbo21taQJVWdb1V9SAhOjtUmbbXJqdrkVK2D-i2krIY_23-IH0jxfCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854318390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Zheng, Xian ; Chen, Jiaying ; Xia, Bo ; Skitmore, Martin ; Zeng, Saixing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xian ; Chen, Jiaying ; Xia, Bo ; Skitmore, Martin ; Zeng, Saixing</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractPrevious research has recognized that the successful realization of megaproject social responsibility (MSR) relies heavily on the cooperation of a variety of stakeholders. However, the process of stakeholders conducting MSR exchanges reciprocally to achieve MSR goals has not been fully revealed, hindering the consistent implementation of interorganizational and cooperative MSR. To bridge these gaps, based on social exchange theory (SET), stakeholder theory, and network theory, this study used the stakeholder value network (SVN) to unravel MSR exchanges with multiple types and their contribution to social value. Given that, we can identify the critical stakeholders, MSR exchanges, and types to facilitate achieving social responsibility goals in megaprojects. A qualitative MSR network was first developed based on seven stakeholders with 77 MSR flows involving four MSR types, which was further quantified through a survey of 216 managers involved in 133 megaprojects. The results demonstrate that when owners act as the focal organization, the government and the general contractors act as critical external and internal stakeholders to promote reciprocal exchanges in the MSR network. Eleven critical MSR exchanges (i.e., five restricted exchanges and six generalized exchanges) are identified to facilitate the reciprocal and joint implementation of MSR to obtain high megaproject social values. It is also suggested that stakeholders should pay particular attention to political MSR to guarantee a stable environment for reciprocal MSR exchanges among primary stakeholders. This research intends to guide the efforts of stakeholders to engage in effective MSR to satisfy their partners mutually, contributing to realizing high megaproject social value.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Exchanging ; Social exchange theory ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of construction engineering and management, 2023-11, Vol.149 (11)</ispartof><rights>2023 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5653dfa0866077efc7467334a389937c3e9e082535441b68889dd9ef28564c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5653dfa0866077efc7467334a389937c3e9e082535441b68889dd9ef28564c753</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7135-1201</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skitmore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Saixing</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective</title><title>Journal of construction engineering and management</title><description>AbstractPrevious research has recognized that the successful realization of megaproject social responsibility (MSR) relies heavily on the cooperation of a variety of stakeholders. However, the process of stakeholders conducting MSR exchanges reciprocally to achieve MSR goals has not been fully revealed, hindering the consistent implementation of interorganizational and cooperative MSR. To bridge these gaps, based on social exchange theory (SET), stakeholder theory, and network theory, this study used the stakeholder value network (SVN) to unravel MSR exchanges with multiple types and their contribution to social value. Given that, we can identify the critical stakeholders, MSR exchanges, and types to facilitate achieving social responsibility goals in megaprojects. A qualitative MSR network was first developed based on seven stakeholders with 77 MSR flows involving four MSR types, which was further quantified through a survey of 216 managers involved in 133 megaprojects. The results demonstrate that when owners act as the focal organization, the government and the general contractors act as critical external and internal stakeholders to promote reciprocal exchanges in the MSR network. Eleven critical MSR exchanges (i.e., five restricted exchanges and six generalized exchanges) are identified to facilitate the reciprocal and joint implementation of MSR to obtain high megaproject social values. It is also suggested that stakeholders should pay particular attention to political MSR to guarantee a stable environment for reciprocal MSR exchanges among primary stakeholders. This research intends to guide the efforts of stakeholders to engage in effective MSR to satisfy their partners mutually, contributing to realizing high megaproject social value.</description><subject>Exchanging</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0733-9364</issn><issn>1943-7862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFTwjAQhTOOzojoH_DUGc-FpEnTxBtTEXVAHJFzJ6RbKJSmNEXl3xuoM9487WHf9_btQ-iW4B7BnPRf4uHkgfXi6fB15BPKGDtDHSIZ9SPBg3PUwRGlvqScXaIra9cYE8Zl2EG7eZlCbRtVpnm59JoVeBNYqqo2a9CNNzM6V4X3DrYypc0XeZE3B-8Vmi9Tbzy1NY6ZNWoDK1Mcfe69gRPr3PFaFf7wW69UuQTvze0qZ5h_wjW6yFRh4eZ3dtH8cfgRP_nj6eg5Hox95VI2fshDmmYKC85xFEGmI8bdD0xRISWNNAUJWAQhDRkjCy6EkGkqIQtEyJmOQtpFd62vy7Lbg22StdnXpTuZOA2jRFCJnSpoVbo21taQJVWdb1V9SAhOjtUmbbXJqdrkVK2D-i2krIY_23-IH0jxfCg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Zheng, Xian</creator><creator>Chen, Jiaying</creator><creator>Xia, Bo</creator><creator>Skitmore, Martin</creator><creator>Zeng, Saixing</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-1201</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective</title><author>Zheng, Xian ; Chen, Jiaying ; Xia, Bo ; Skitmore, Martin ; Zeng, Saixing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-5653dfa0866077efc7467334a389937c3e9e082535441b68889dd9ef28564c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Exchanging</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skitmore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Saixing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Xian</au><au>Chen, Jiaying</au><au>Xia, Bo</au><au>Skitmore, Martin</au><au>Zeng, Saixing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>0733-9364</issn><eissn>1943-7862</eissn><abstract>AbstractPrevious research has recognized that the successful realization of megaproject social responsibility (MSR) relies heavily on the cooperation of a variety of stakeholders. However, the process of stakeholders conducting MSR exchanges reciprocally to achieve MSR goals has not been fully revealed, hindering the consistent implementation of interorganizational and cooperative MSR. To bridge these gaps, based on social exchange theory (SET), stakeholder theory, and network theory, this study used the stakeholder value network (SVN) to unravel MSR exchanges with multiple types and their contribution to social value. Given that, we can identify the critical stakeholders, MSR exchanges, and types to facilitate achieving social responsibility goals in megaprojects. A qualitative MSR network was first developed based on seven stakeholders with 77 MSR flows involving four MSR types, which was further quantified through a survey of 216 managers involved in 133 megaprojects. The results demonstrate that when owners act as the focal organization, the government and the general contractors act as critical external and internal stakeholders to promote reciprocal exchanges in the MSR network. Eleven critical MSR exchanges (i.e., five restricted exchanges and six generalized exchanges) are identified to facilitate the reciprocal and joint implementation of MSR to obtain high megaproject social values. It is also suggested that stakeholders should pay particular attention to political MSR to guarantee a stable environment for reciprocal MSR exchanges among primary stakeholders. This research intends to guide the efforts of stakeholders to engage in effective MSR to satisfy their partners mutually, contributing to realizing high megaproject social value.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-1201</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9364
ispartof Journal of construction engineering and management, 2023-11, Vol.149 (11)
issn 0733-9364
1943-7862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2854318390
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Exchanging
Social exchange theory
Social responsibility
Stakeholders
Technical Papers
title Understanding the Megaproject Social Responsibility Network among Stakeholders: A Reciprocal-Exchange Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20Megaproject%20Social%20Responsibility%20Network%20among%20Stakeholders:%20A%20Reciprocal-Exchange%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20construction%20engineering%20and%20management&rft.au=Zheng,%20Xian&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=0733-9364&rft.eissn=1943-7862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854318390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854318390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true