The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada
Climate change is increasing stream temperatures and thereby changing habitat suitability for a variety of freshwater fishes. We investigate how suitable stream habitat for rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), a valuable cold-water species, may change in British Columbia, Canada, currently near th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional environmental change 2023-09, Vol.23 (3), p.108, Article 108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | Regional environmental change |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Sánchez, Carolina Gregr, Edward J. Parkinson, Eric A. Chan, Kai M.A. |
description | Climate change is increasing stream temperatures and thereby changing habitat suitability for a variety of freshwater fishes. We investigate how suitable stream habitat for rainbow trout (
Oncorhynchus mykiss
), a valuable cold-water species, may change in British Columbia, Canada, currently near the north end of their range. We examine a no-mitigation climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), and one with moderate mitigation (RCP 4.5). We used a watershed-scale regression model incorporating topographic, hydrological and climatic variables to estimate current and projected maximum weekly average stream temperatures throughout the province. We then calculated the potential change in suitable habitat within rainbow trout’s native range, in low- and high-relief watersheds and watersheds with lakes traditionally stocked for recreational fishing. We considered deviations from the species
optimal growth
and
biotic community
temperature ranges, as well as exceedances of its
survival threshold
. We found that future warming will shift suitable rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia to higher relief areas, with the no-mitigation scenario leading to a loss of 39 to 61% of total kilometres of suitable stream habitat. The moderate mitigation would dramatically reduce climate change effects, resulting in minor changes to the amount of suitable stream habitat (+ 2 to − 8% from current conditions). About half (41% to 53%) of the current range is retained under the moderate mitigation scenario, and much of this is close to population centres reliant on the ecosystem services provided by rainbow trout. Our analysis offers guidance for watersheds that might be prioritized for adaptation measures, e.g., stocked watersheds are projected to suffer large losses in suitable habitat under both scenarios. Our work shows the regional value of climate mitigation and how at-risk watersheds can be identified and targeted for management interventions. Our work provides a template for such assessments for other geographies and species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2852171480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A761355636</galeid><sourcerecordid>A761355636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-82735d673f4030a372b268fce2d4816b90a5062be33ce17736458b8b1eaffe8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LAzEQxRdRsFa_gKeAV7dOkt0kPdbiPxC8VPAWkm3STWmTmqSI397UFb1JCBOG98sM71XVJYYJBuA3CQPGtAZyuDDlNRxVI9xQVlMu3o5_31NxWp2ltAbAnHEYVf2iN0gbb6zLCQWLuo3bqmxQ1yu_Mmjrslup7IJHOaBosnLe-RWKperwgXIM-4x6pV1WGTmPbmMhUo_mYbPfaqeu0Vx5tVTn1YlVm2Qufuq4er2_W8wf6-eXh6f57LnuKExzLQin7ZJxahugoCgnmjBhO0OWjcBMT0G1wIg2lHYGc05Z0wotNDbKWiMsHVdXw7-7GN73JmW5Dvvoy0hJREswx42AopoMqpXaGOm8DTmqrpyl2bouHOwo_RlnmLYto6wAZAC6GFKKxspdLEbFT4lBHiKQQwSyRCC_I5CHKXSAUhEXN-PfLv9QX-6TiOs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852171480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sánchez, Carolina ; Gregr, Edward J. ; Parkinson, Eric A. ; Chan, Kai M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Carolina ; Gregr, Edward J. ; Parkinson, Eric A. ; Chan, Kai M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change is increasing stream temperatures and thereby changing habitat suitability for a variety of freshwater fishes. We investigate how suitable stream habitat for rainbow trout (
Oncorhynchus mykiss
), a valuable cold-water species, may change in British Columbia, Canada, currently near the north end of their range. We examine a no-mitigation climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), and one with moderate mitigation (RCP 4.5). We used a watershed-scale regression model incorporating topographic, hydrological and climatic variables to estimate current and projected maximum weekly average stream temperatures throughout the province. We then calculated the potential change in suitable habitat within rainbow trout’s native range, in low- and high-relief watersheds and watersheds with lakes traditionally stocked for recreational fishing. We considered deviations from the species
optimal growth
and
biotic community
temperature ranges, as well as exceedances of its
survival threshold
. We found that future warming will shift suitable rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia to higher relief areas, with the no-mitigation scenario leading to a loss of 39 to 61% of total kilometres of suitable stream habitat. The moderate mitigation would dramatically reduce climate change effects, resulting in minor changes to the amount of suitable stream habitat (+ 2 to − 8% from current conditions). About half (41% to 53%) of the current range is retained under the moderate mitigation scenario, and much of this is close to population centres reliant on the ecosystem services provided by rainbow trout. Our analysis offers guidance for watersheds that might be prioritized for adaptation measures, e.g., stocked watersheds are projected to suffer large losses in suitable habitat under both scenarios. Our work shows the regional value of climate mitigation and how at-risk watersheds can be identified and targeted for management interventions. Our work provides a template for such assessments for other geographies and species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-378X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Climate Change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Fishes ; Fishing ; Fresh water ; Freshwater fish ; Geography ; Global temperature changes ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Hydrology ; Lakes ; Nature Conservation ; Oceanography ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; Original Article ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Regression models ; Salmon ; Seafood industry ; Sport fishing ; Trout ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Regional environmental change, 2023-09, Vol.23 (3), p.108, Article 108</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-82735d673f4030a372b268fce2d4816b90a5062be33ce17736458b8b1eaffe8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0693-9532 ; 0000-0002-7804-3276 ; 0000-0002-9419-8788 ; 0000-0003-2755-4591</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregr, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada</title><title>Regional environmental change</title><addtitle>Reg Environ Change</addtitle><description>Climate change is increasing stream temperatures and thereby changing habitat suitability for a variety of freshwater fishes. We investigate how suitable stream habitat for rainbow trout (
Oncorhynchus mykiss
), a valuable cold-water species, may change in British Columbia, Canada, currently near the north end of their range. We examine a no-mitigation climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), and one with moderate mitigation (RCP 4.5). We used a watershed-scale regression model incorporating topographic, hydrological and climatic variables to estimate current and projected maximum weekly average stream temperatures throughout the province. We then calculated the potential change in suitable habitat within rainbow trout’s native range, in low- and high-relief watersheds and watersheds with lakes traditionally stocked for recreational fishing. We considered deviations from the species
optimal growth
and
biotic community
temperature ranges, as well as exceedances of its
survival threshold
. We found that future warming will shift suitable rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia to higher relief areas, with the no-mitigation scenario leading to a loss of 39 to 61% of total kilometres of suitable stream habitat. The moderate mitigation would dramatically reduce climate change effects, resulting in minor changes to the amount of suitable stream habitat (+ 2 to − 8% from current conditions). About half (41% to 53%) of the current range is retained under the moderate mitigation scenario, and much of this is close to population centres reliant on the ecosystem services provided by rainbow trout. Our analysis offers guidance for watersheds that might be prioritized for adaptation measures, e.g., stocked watersheds are projected to suffer large losses in suitable habitat under both scenarios. Our work shows the regional value of climate mitigation and how at-risk watersheds can be identified and targeted for management interventions. Our work provides a template for such assessments for other geographies and species.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Seafood industry</subject><subject>Sport fishing</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1436-3798</issn><issn>1436-378X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9LAzEQxRdRsFa_gKeAV7dOkt0kPdbiPxC8VPAWkm3STWmTmqSI397UFb1JCBOG98sM71XVJYYJBuA3CQPGtAZyuDDlNRxVI9xQVlMu3o5_31NxWp2ltAbAnHEYVf2iN0gbb6zLCQWLuo3bqmxQ1yu_Mmjrslup7IJHOaBosnLe-RWKperwgXIM-4x6pV1WGTmPbmMhUo_mYbPfaqeu0Vx5tVTn1YlVm2Qufuq4er2_W8wf6-eXh6f57LnuKExzLQin7ZJxahugoCgnmjBhO0OWjcBMT0G1wIg2lHYGc05Z0wotNDbKWiMsHVdXw7-7GN73JmW5Dvvoy0hJREswx42AopoMqpXaGOm8DTmqrpyl2bouHOwo_RlnmLYto6wAZAC6GFKKxspdLEbFT4lBHiKQQwSyRCC_I5CHKXSAUhEXN-PfLv9QX-6TiOs</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Sánchez, Carolina</creator><creator>Gregr, Edward J.</creator><creator>Parkinson, Eric A.</creator><creator>Chan, Kai M.A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-9532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-4591</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada</title><author>Sánchez, Carolina ; Gregr, Edward J. ; Parkinson, Eric A. ; Chan, Kai M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-82735d673f4030a372b268fce2d4816b90a5062be33ce17736458b8b1eaffe8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Seafood industry</topic><topic>Sport fishing</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregr, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez, Carolina</au><au>Gregr, Edward J.</au><au>Parkinson, Eric A.</au><au>Chan, Kai M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada</atitle><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle><stitle>Reg Environ Change</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>108</spage><pages>108-</pages><artnum>108</artnum><issn>1436-3798</issn><eissn>1436-378X</eissn><abstract>Climate change is increasing stream temperatures and thereby changing habitat suitability for a variety of freshwater fishes. We investigate how suitable stream habitat for rainbow trout (
Oncorhynchus mykiss
), a valuable cold-water species, may change in British Columbia, Canada, currently near the north end of their range. We examine a no-mitigation climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), and one with moderate mitigation (RCP 4.5). We used a watershed-scale regression model incorporating topographic, hydrological and climatic variables to estimate current and projected maximum weekly average stream temperatures throughout the province. We then calculated the potential change in suitable habitat within rainbow trout’s native range, in low- and high-relief watersheds and watersheds with lakes traditionally stocked for recreational fishing. We considered deviations from the species
optimal growth
and
biotic community
temperature ranges, as well as exceedances of its
survival threshold
. We found that future warming will shift suitable rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia to higher relief areas, with the no-mitigation scenario leading to a loss of 39 to 61% of total kilometres of suitable stream habitat. The moderate mitigation would dramatically reduce climate change effects, resulting in minor changes to the amount of suitable stream habitat (+ 2 to − 8% from current conditions). About half (41% to 53%) of the current range is retained under the moderate mitigation scenario, and much of this is close to population centres reliant on the ecosystem services provided by rainbow trout. Our analysis offers guidance for watersheds that might be prioritized for adaptation measures, e.g., stocked watersheds are projected to suffer large losses in suitable habitat under both scenarios. Our work shows the regional value of climate mitigation and how at-risk watersheds can be identified and targeted for management interventions. Our work provides a template for such assessments for other geographies and species.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-9532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-4591</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-3798 |
ispartof | Regional environmental change, 2023-09, Vol.23 (3), p.108, Article 108 |
issn | 1436-3798 1436-378X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2852171480 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Analysis Climate Change Climate change mitigation Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Earth and Environmental Science Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environment Fishes Fishing Fresh water Freshwater fish Geography Global temperature changes Habitat changes Habitats Hydrology Lakes Nature Conservation Oceanography Oncorhynchus mykiss Original Article Regional/Spatial Science Regression models Salmon Seafood industry Sport fishing Trout Watersheds |
title | The benefits of climate change mitigation to retaining rainbow trout habitat in British Columbia, Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T09%3A16%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20benefits%20of%20climate%20change%20mitigation%20to%20retaining%20rainbow%20trout%20habitat%20in%20British%20Columbia,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Regional%20environmental%20change&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez,%20Carolina&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=108&rft.pages=108-&rft.artnum=108&rft.issn=1436-3798&rft.eissn=1436-378X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10113-023-02097-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA761355636%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852171480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A761355636&rfr_iscdi=true |