Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data
Reliable stock assessments are essential for successful and sustainable fisheries management. Advanced stock assessment methods are expensive, as they require age‐ or length‐structured catch and detailed fishery‐independent data, which prevents their widespread use, especially in developing regions....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2023-09, Vol.24 (5), p.744-758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 758 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 744 |
container_title | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Lancker, Kira Voss, Rudi Zimmermann, Fabian Quaas, Martin F. |
description | Reliable stock assessments are essential for successful and sustainable fisheries management. Advanced stock assessment methods are expensive, as they require age‐ or length‐structured catch and detailed fishery‐independent data, which prevents their widespread use, especially in developing regions. Furthermore, modern fisheries management increasingly includes socio‐economic considerations. Integrated ecological‐economic advice can be provided by bio‐economic models, but this requires the estimation of economic parameters. To improve accuracy of data‐limited stock assessment while jointly estimating biological and economic parameters, we propose to use price data, in addition to catches, in a new bio‐economic stock assessment (‘BESA’) approach for de‐facto open access stocks. Price data are widely available, also in the Global South. BESA is based on a state‐space approach and uncovers biomass dynamics by use of the extended Kalman filter in combination with Bayesian estimation. We show that estimates for biological and economic parameters can be obtained jointly, with reliability gains for the stock assessment from the additional information inherent in price data, compared to alternative assessment methods for data‐poor stocks. In a real‐world application to Barents Sea shrimp (Pandalus borealis, Pandalidae), we show that BESA benchmarks well also against advanced stock assessment results. BESA can thus be both a stand‐alone approach for currently unassessed stocks as well as a complement to other available methods by providing bio‐economic information for advanced fisheries management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/faf.12759 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2849782567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2849782567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-87be3f28ced4b5554d371a2b6aaf9edb38f513b630c96c7e975d1eec63829e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQxi0EEqUw8AaWWOiQNrYT_2ErVQtIlRgoc-TYF5LSxCV2VXXjEXhGnoRAEBu33A2_--67D6FLEo9JV5NCF2NCRaqO0IAkXERUCXX8N_P4FJ15v47jmEuSDFD57KvmBYcScA4-YFfgsHd479qN9Td4ivPKfb5_gHGNqyuDfXDmFWvvwfsamoCvb-dP0xGuIZTO4t2PmtHBlFg3Fm_bygC2OuhzdFLojYeL3z5Eq8V8NbuPlo93D7PpMjKMURVJkQMrqDRgkzxN08QyQTTNudaFApszWaSE5ZzFRnEjQInUEgDDmaQKJBuiq15227q3XfdRtna7tukuZlQmSkiactFRo54yrfO-hSLrjNa6PWQkzr5zzLocs58cO3bSs_tqA4f_wWwxXfQbX_jHdLE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2849782567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lancker, Kira ; Voss, Rudi ; Zimmermann, Fabian ; Quaas, Martin F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lancker, Kira ; Voss, Rudi ; Zimmermann, Fabian ; Quaas, Martin F.</creatorcontrib><description>Reliable stock assessments are essential for successful and sustainable fisheries management. Advanced stock assessment methods are expensive, as they require age‐ or length‐structured catch and detailed fishery‐independent data, which prevents their widespread use, especially in developing regions. Furthermore, modern fisheries management increasingly includes socio‐economic considerations. Integrated ecological‐economic advice can be provided by bio‐economic models, but this requires the estimation of economic parameters. To improve accuracy of data‐limited stock assessment while jointly estimating biological and economic parameters, we propose to use price data, in addition to catches, in a new bio‐economic stock assessment (‘BESA’) approach for de‐facto open access stocks. Price data are widely available, also in the Global South. BESA is based on a state‐space approach and uncovers biomass dynamics by use of the extended Kalman filter in combination with Bayesian estimation. We show that estimates for biological and economic parameters can be obtained jointly, with reliability gains for the stock assessment from the additional information inherent in price data, compared to alternative assessment methods for data‐poor stocks. In a real‐world application to Barents Sea shrimp (Pandalus borealis, Pandalidae), we show that BESA benchmarks well also against advanced stock assessment results. BESA can thus be both a stand‐alone approach for currently unassessed stocks as well as a complement to other available methods by providing bio‐economic information for advanced fisheries management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/faf.12759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian estimation ; Benchmarks ; data‐poor ; Econometric models ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Economics ; Estimation ; Extended Kalman filter ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery data ; Fishery management ; Kalman filter ; Kalman filters ; Marine crustaceans ; Mathematical models ; open access ; Parameters ; Probability theory ; state space modeling ; Stock assessment ; Stocks ; Sustainable fisheries</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2023-09, Vol.24 (5), p.744-758</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-87be3f28ced4b5554d371a2b6aaf9edb38f513b630c96c7e975d1eec63829e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-87be3f28ced4b5554d371a2b6aaf9edb38f513b630c96c7e975d1eec63829e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4299-8791 ; 0000-0001-8787-1148 ; 0000-0003-0812-8829</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffaf.12759$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffaf.12759$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lancker, Kira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaas, Martin F.</creatorcontrib><title>Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><description>Reliable stock assessments are essential for successful and sustainable fisheries management. Advanced stock assessment methods are expensive, as they require age‐ or length‐structured catch and detailed fishery‐independent data, which prevents their widespread use, especially in developing regions. Furthermore, modern fisheries management increasingly includes socio‐economic considerations. Integrated ecological‐economic advice can be provided by bio‐economic models, but this requires the estimation of economic parameters. To improve accuracy of data‐limited stock assessment while jointly estimating biological and economic parameters, we propose to use price data, in addition to catches, in a new bio‐economic stock assessment (‘BESA’) approach for de‐facto open access stocks. Price data are widely available, also in the Global South. BESA is based on a state‐space approach and uncovers biomass dynamics by use of the extended Kalman filter in combination with Bayesian estimation. We show that estimates for biological and economic parameters can be obtained jointly, with reliability gains for the stock assessment from the additional information inherent in price data, compared to alternative assessment methods for data‐poor stocks. In a real‐world application to Barents Sea shrimp (Pandalus borealis, Pandalidae), we show that BESA benchmarks well also against advanced stock assessment results. BESA can thus be both a stand‐alone approach for currently unassessed stocks as well as a complement to other available methods by providing bio‐economic information for advanced fisheries management.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian estimation</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>data‐poor</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Extended Kalman filter</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery data</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Kalman filter</subject><subject>Kalman filters</subject><subject>Marine crustaceans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>open access</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>state space modeling</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Sustainable fisheries</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQxi0EEqUw8AaWWOiQNrYT_2ErVQtIlRgoc-TYF5LSxCV2VXXjEXhGnoRAEBu33A2_--67D6FLEo9JV5NCF2NCRaqO0IAkXERUCXX8N_P4FJ15v47jmEuSDFD57KvmBYcScA4-YFfgsHd479qN9Td4ivPKfb5_gHGNqyuDfXDmFWvvwfsamoCvb-dP0xGuIZTO4t2PmtHBlFg3Fm_bygC2OuhzdFLojYeL3z5Eq8V8NbuPlo93D7PpMjKMURVJkQMrqDRgkzxN08QyQTTNudaFApszWaSE5ZzFRnEjQInUEgDDmaQKJBuiq15227q3XfdRtna7tukuZlQmSkiactFRo54yrfO-hSLrjNa6PWQkzr5zzLocs58cO3bSs_tqA4f_wWwxXfQbX_jHdLE</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Lancker, Kira</creator><creator>Voss, Rudi</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Fabian</creator><creator>Quaas, Martin F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-8791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-1148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-8829</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data</title><author>Lancker, Kira ; Voss, Rudi ; Zimmermann, Fabian ; Quaas, Martin F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-87be3f28ced4b5554d371a2b6aaf9edb38f513b630c96c7e975d1eec63829e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian estimation</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>data‐poor</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Extended Kalman filter</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery data</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Kalman filter</topic><topic>Kalman filters</topic><topic>Marine crustaceans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>open access</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>state space modeling</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Sustainable fisheries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lancker, Kira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaas, Martin F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lancker, Kira</au><au>Voss, Rudi</au><au>Zimmermann, Fabian</au><au>Quaas, Martin F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>744</spage><epage>758</epage><pages>744-758</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>Reliable stock assessments are essential for successful and sustainable fisheries management. Advanced stock assessment methods are expensive, as they require age‐ or length‐structured catch and detailed fishery‐independent data, which prevents their widespread use, especially in developing regions. Furthermore, modern fisheries management increasingly includes socio‐economic considerations. Integrated ecological‐economic advice can be provided by bio‐economic models, but this requires the estimation of economic parameters. To improve accuracy of data‐limited stock assessment while jointly estimating biological and economic parameters, we propose to use price data, in addition to catches, in a new bio‐economic stock assessment (‘BESA’) approach for de‐facto open access stocks. Price data are widely available, also in the Global South. BESA is based on a state‐space approach and uncovers biomass dynamics by use of the extended Kalman filter in combination with Bayesian estimation. We show that estimates for biological and economic parameters can be obtained jointly, with reliability gains for the stock assessment from the additional information inherent in price data, compared to alternative assessment methods for data‐poor stocks. In a real‐world application to Barents Sea shrimp (Pandalus borealis, Pandalidae), we show that BESA benchmarks well also against advanced stock assessment results. BESA can thus be both a stand‐alone approach for currently unassessed stocks as well as a complement to other available methods by providing bio‐economic information for advanced fisheries management.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/faf.12759</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-8791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-1148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-8829</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2960 |
ispartof | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2023-09, Vol.24 (5), p.744-758 |
issn | 1467-2960 1467-2979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2849782567 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Bayesian estimation Benchmarks data‐poor Econometric models Economic analysis Economic models Economics Estimation Extended Kalman filter Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery data Fishery management Kalman filter Kalman filters Marine crustaceans Mathematical models open access Parameters Probability theory state space modeling Stock assessment Stocks Sustainable fisheries |
title | Using the best of two worlds: A bio‐economic stock assessment (BESA) method using catch and price data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A46%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20best%20of%20two%20worlds:%20A%20bio%E2%80%90economic%20stock%20assessment%20(BESA)%20method%20using%20catch%20and%20price%20data&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Lancker,%20Kira&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=744&rft.epage=758&rft.pages=744-758&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/faf.12759&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2849782567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2849782567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |