Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton
Archean gneiss domes are a very common structure in old cratons, these are different from the structural patterns in the post‐Archean linear orogenic belts related to subduction and collision. There are two tectonic models in Archean tectonics: horizontal tectonism and vertical tectonism. The format...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2023-08, Vol.58 (8), p.3181-3190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3181 |
container_title | Geological journal (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Liu, Boran Liu, Yongjiang Li, Sanzhong Neubauer, Franz Liang, Chenyue Guan, Qingbin |
description | Archean gneiss domes are a very common structure in old cratons, these are different from the structural patterns in the post‐Archean linear orogenic belts related to subduction and collision. There are two tectonic models in Archean tectonics: horizontal tectonism and vertical tectonism. The formation mechanisms of Archean gneiss domes are still debated. Here we present data from the Anziling gneiss dome, a typical gneiss dome structure from the eastern North China Craton, which was formed dominantly by vertical tectonism during Neoarchean times (2554–2452 Ma). The Anziling gneiss dome is located in the east of Shuangshanzi, East Heibei Province and consists of the Anziling gneiss (a diopside‐monzonitic gneiss) in the center outwards surrounded by the Jiguanshan gneiss (hornblende‐plagioclase gneiss) and the Niuxinshan gneiss (trondhjemitic gneiss), together showing an irregular elliptical shape with a NE‐ward extending tail on the surface. But in the cross‐section, it represents a deflective dome, both north‐western and south‐eastern limbs dip approximately to the west. The dome suffered inhomogeneous ductile shear deformation, much stronger with more displacement in the north‐western half (especially close to the margin) than that in the eastern half. The core area shows only a relatively weak deformation. Therefore, we suggest that the Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG (trondhjemite, tonalite, granodiorite) pluton rising obliquely up towards the east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontal emplacement towards the north and then to the north‐east associated with clockwise rotation in the second stage. The Anziling gneiss dome and its neighbouring Shuangshanzi shear zone were formed simultaneously, indicating that the Anziling gneiss dome was driven by both gravitational forces and magma diapirism.
The Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG pluton rising obliquely up towards east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontally emplacing towards north then north‐east with clockwise rotation in the second stage, which was driven by both gravitational force and magma diapirism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/gj.4771 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2846820748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2846820748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3121-7b64a45257076da344f154fb55839ef463ce6f823ad28c43eb290185ad8d06643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpiFewxMCAUq5_4jgjimgBVYUBWC3XuWkStXGxU6G-PSllZbp3-HSOdAi5ZjBhAPx-1U5klrETMmKQ5wkDIU_JCCDjw5_CObmIsQVgDCQbkbdPDH3j7Jr26HrfNS5SX1FLF-htcDXajq46bGKkpd8gbTra10jRxh5DRxc-9DUt6qaztAh2CLgkZ5VdR7z6u2PyMX18L56S-evsuXiYJ1YwzpJsqaSVKU8zyFRphZQVS2W1TFMtcqykEg5VpbmwJddOClzyHJhObalLUEqKMbk55m6D_9ph7E3rd6EbKg3XUmkOmdSDuj0qF3yMASuzDc3Ghr1hYA5zmVVrDnMN8u4ov5s17v9jZvbyq38Aa1hoVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2846820748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Liu, Boran ; Liu, Yongjiang ; Li, Sanzhong ; Neubauer, Franz ; Liang, Chenyue ; Guan, Qingbin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Boran ; Liu, Yongjiang ; Li, Sanzhong ; Neubauer, Franz ; Liang, Chenyue ; Guan, Qingbin</creatorcontrib><description>Archean gneiss domes are a very common structure in old cratons, these are different from the structural patterns in the post‐Archean linear orogenic belts related to subduction and collision. There are two tectonic models in Archean tectonics: horizontal tectonism and vertical tectonism. The formation mechanisms of Archean gneiss domes are still debated. Here we present data from the Anziling gneiss dome, a typical gneiss dome structure from the eastern North China Craton, which was formed dominantly by vertical tectonism during Neoarchean times (2554–2452 Ma). The Anziling gneiss dome is located in the east of Shuangshanzi, East Heibei Province and consists of the Anziling gneiss (a diopside‐monzonitic gneiss) in the center outwards surrounded by the Jiguanshan gneiss (hornblende‐plagioclase gneiss) and the Niuxinshan gneiss (trondhjemitic gneiss), together showing an irregular elliptical shape with a NE‐ward extending tail on the surface. But in the cross‐section, it represents a deflective dome, both north‐western and south‐eastern limbs dip approximately to the west. The dome suffered inhomogeneous ductile shear deformation, much stronger with more displacement in the north‐western half (especially close to the margin) than that in the eastern half. The core area shows only a relatively weak deformation. Therefore, we suggest that the Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG (trondhjemite, tonalite, granodiorite) pluton rising obliquely up towards the east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontal emplacement towards the north and then to the north‐east associated with clockwise rotation in the second stage. The Anziling gneiss dome and its neighbouring Shuangshanzi shear zone were formed simultaneously, indicating that the Anziling gneiss dome was driven by both gravitational forces and magma diapirism.
The Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG pluton rising obliquely up towards east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontally emplacing towards north then north‐east with clockwise rotation in the second stage, which was driven by both gravitational force and magma diapirism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.4771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Calcium magnesium silicates ; Cratons ; Deformation ; Diapirism ; Diopside ; Domes ; dome‐and‐keel ; ductile deformation ; Gneiss ; gneiss dome ; Gravity ; Lava ; Magma ; Neoarchean ; North China Craton ; Orogeny ; Plagioclase ; Plate tectonics ; Plutons ; Shear deformation ; Shear zone ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Tectonics ; Vertical tectonics</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-08, Vol.58 (8), p.3181-3190</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3121-7b64a45257076da344f154fb55839ef463ce6f823ad28c43eb290185ad8d06643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3121-7b64a45257076da344f154fb55839ef463ce6f823ad28c43eb290185ad8d06643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4269-5010 ; 0000-0002-9409-3425 ; 0000-0002-3436-2793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgj.4771$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgj.4771$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Boran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chenyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Qingbin</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>Archean gneiss domes are a very common structure in old cratons, these are different from the structural patterns in the post‐Archean linear orogenic belts related to subduction and collision. There are two tectonic models in Archean tectonics: horizontal tectonism and vertical tectonism. The formation mechanisms of Archean gneiss domes are still debated. Here we present data from the Anziling gneiss dome, a typical gneiss dome structure from the eastern North China Craton, which was formed dominantly by vertical tectonism during Neoarchean times (2554–2452 Ma). The Anziling gneiss dome is located in the east of Shuangshanzi, East Heibei Province and consists of the Anziling gneiss (a diopside‐monzonitic gneiss) in the center outwards surrounded by the Jiguanshan gneiss (hornblende‐plagioclase gneiss) and the Niuxinshan gneiss (trondhjemitic gneiss), together showing an irregular elliptical shape with a NE‐ward extending tail on the surface. But in the cross‐section, it represents a deflective dome, both north‐western and south‐eastern limbs dip approximately to the west. The dome suffered inhomogeneous ductile shear deformation, much stronger with more displacement in the north‐western half (especially close to the margin) than that in the eastern half. The core area shows only a relatively weak deformation. Therefore, we suggest that the Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG (trondhjemite, tonalite, granodiorite) pluton rising obliquely up towards the east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontal emplacement towards the north and then to the north‐east associated with clockwise rotation in the second stage. The Anziling gneiss dome and its neighbouring Shuangshanzi shear zone were formed simultaneously, indicating that the Anziling gneiss dome was driven by both gravitational forces and magma diapirism.
The Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG pluton rising obliquely up towards east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontally emplacing towards north then north‐east with clockwise rotation in the second stage, which was driven by both gravitational force and magma diapirism.</description><subject>Calcium magnesium silicates</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Diapirism</subject><subject>Diopside</subject><subject>Domes</subject><subject>dome‐and‐keel</subject><subject>ductile deformation</subject><subject>Gneiss</subject><subject>gneiss dome</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Neoarchean</subject><subject>North China Craton</subject><subject>Orogeny</subject><subject>Plagioclase</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Plutons</subject><subject>Shear deformation</subject><subject>Shear zone</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Vertical tectonics</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpiFewxMCAUq5_4jgjimgBVYUBWC3XuWkStXGxU6G-PSllZbp3-HSOdAi5ZjBhAPx-1U5klrETMmKQ5wkDIU_JCCDjw5_CObmIsQVgDCQbkbdPDH3j7Jr26HrfNS5SX1FLF-htcDXajq46bGKkpd8gbTra10jRxh5DRxc-9DUt6qaztAh2CLgkZ5VdR7z6u2PyMX18L56S-evsuXiYJ1YwzpJsqaSVKU8zyFRphZQVS2W1TFMtcqykEg5VpbmwJddOClzyHJhObalLUEqKMbk55m6D_9ph7E3rd6EbKg3XUmkOmdSDuj0qF3yMASuzDc3Ghr1hYA5zmVVrDnMN8u4ov5s17v9jZvbyq38Aa1hoVQ</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Liu, Boran</creator><creator>Liu, Yongjiang</creator><creator>Li, Sanzhong</creator><creator>Neubauer, Franz</creator><creator>Liang, Chenyue</creator><creator>Guan, Qingbin</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4269-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-3425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-2793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton</title><author>Liu, Boran ; Liu, Yongjiang ; Li, Sanzhong ; Neubauer, Franz ; Liang, Chenyue ; Guan, Qingbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3121-7b64a45257076da344f154fb55839ef463ce6f823ad28c43eb290185ad8d06643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Calcium magnesium silicates</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Diapirism</topic><topic>Diopside</topic><topic>Domes</topic><topic>dome‐and‐keel</topic><topic>ductile deformation</topic><topic>Gneiss</topic><topic>gneiss dome</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Neoarchean</topic><topic>North China Craton</topic><topic>Orogeny</topic><topic>Plagioclase</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Plutons</topic><topic>Shear deformation</topic><topic>Shear zone</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Vertical tectonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Boran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yongjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sanzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chenyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Qingbin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Boran</au><au>Liu, Yongjiang</au><au>Li, Sanzhong</au><au>Neubauer, Franz</au><au>Liang, Chenyue</au><au>Guan, Qingbin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3181</spage><epage>3190</epage><pages>3181-3190</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>Archean gneiss domes are a very common structure in old cratons, these are different from the structural patterns in the post‐Archean linear orogenic belts related to subduction and collision. There are two tectonic models in Archean tectonics: horizontal tectonism and vertical tectonism. The formation mechanisms of Archean gneiss domes are still debated. Here we present data from the Anziling gneiss dome, a typical gneiss dome structure from the eastern North China Craton, which was formed dominantly by vertical tectonism during Neoarchean times (2554–2452 Ma). The Anziling gneiss dome is located in the east of Shuangshanzi, East Heibei Province and consists of the Anziling gneiss (a diopside‐monzonitic gneiss) in the center outwards surrounded by the Jiguanshan gneiss (hornblende‐plagioclase gneiss) and the Niuxinshan gneiss (trondhjemitic gneiss), together showing an irregular elliptical shape with a NE‐ward extending tail on the surface. But in the cross‐section, it represents a deflective dome, both north‐western and south‐eastern limbs dip approximately to the west. The dome suffered inhomogeneous ductile shear deformation, much stronger with more displacement in the north‐western half (especially close to the margin) than that in the eastern half. The core area shows only a relatively weak deformation. Therefore, we suggest that the Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG (trondhjemite, tonalite, granodiorite) pluton rising obliquely up towards the east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontal emplacement towards the north and then to the north‐east associated with clockwise rotation in the second stage. The Anziling gneiss dome and its neighbouring Shuangshanzi shear zone were formed simultaneously, indicating that the Anziling gneiss dome was driven by both gravitational forces and magma diapirism.
The Anziling gneiss dome was formed by the TTG pluton rising obliquely up towards east by diapirism in the first stage, followed by sub‐horizontally emplacing towards north then north‐east with clockwise rotation in the second stage, which was driven by both gravitational force and magma diapirism.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.4771</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4269-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-3425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-2793</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0072-1050 |
ispartof | Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2023-08, Vol.58 (8), p.3181-3190 |
issn | 0072-1050 1099-1034 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2846820748 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Calcium magnesium silicates Cratons Deformation Diapirism Diopside Domes dome‐and‐keel ductile deformation Gneiss gneiss dome Gravity Lava Magma Neoarchean North China Craton Orogeny Plagioclase Plate tectonics Plutons Shear deformation Shear zone Subduction Subduction (geology) Tectonics Vertical tectonics |
title | Vertical tectonics of a Neoarchean gneiss dome in the eastern North China Craton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20tectonics%20of%20a%20Neoarchean%20gneiss%20dome%20in%20the%20eastern%20North%20China%20Craton&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Liu,%20Boran&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3181&rft.epage=3190&rft.pages=3181-3190&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.4771&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2846820748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2846820748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |