Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts & Sovereign Default

The Russian Federation stands on the edge of financial abyss – excommunicated from the world economy and facing an "imminent" default on its sovereign debt. Just deserts. This Article is the first comprehensive, multi-disciplinary analysis of Russia's sovereign debt and the consequenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The San Diego law review 2023-01, Vol.60 (1), p.107
1. Verfasser: Breydo, Lev E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title The San Diego law review
container_volume 60
creator Breydo, Lev E
description The Russian Federation stands on the edge of financial abyss – excommunicated from the world economy and facing an "imminent" default on its sovereign debt. Just deserts. This Article is the first comprehensive, multi-disciplinary analysis of Russia's sovereign debt and the consequences of a potential default. It makes a number of critically important findings with immediate implications for policy makers and practitioners navigating these wholly unchartered waters. Based on an in-depth analysis of a quarter-century of Russian debt contracts, this Article posits a clear, geopolitically-driven evolutive patten and corresponding taxonomy. Starting with relatively 'standard' terms in late-1990s vintage bonds, as Russia's foreign relations deteriorated, its contracts grew unusual, bordering towards lawless – aggressively incorporating provisions calibrated for counteracting future sanctions. Indeed, it is difficult to parse the contractual evolution without inferring premeditation. Yet, the aggressor badly underestimated both Ukrainian valor and global outrage. An "unprecedented" sanctions regime froze $300 billion of Russian reserves – and, as atrocities worsened, the U.S. leveraged global financial infrastructure to effectively "force" a Russian sovereign default. A sanctions-driven sovereign default raises novel legal issues, much complicated by Russia's jurisdictionally unmoored bonds. Yet, while the contracts' idiosyncrasies – and defenses predicated on U.S. actions – may strengthen Russia's arguments against non-payment, as the Article details, the sovereign has more likely than not breached other covenants, giving creditors multiple legal avenues. The bigger challenges, undoubtedly, will be enforcement and ultimately resolution of claims. Beyond the legal issues, a Russian default raises profound normative and policy implications. First, as a result of Russia's war, additional sovereign defaults – including Ukraine and Belarus – are very likely to follow. Second, the 'weaponization' of global financial infrastructure to effectuate Russia sanctions raises questions regarding the future efficacy of such measures, as nations consider preemptively hedging their exposure, including by reducing dollar reliance. Finally, and perhaps most ominously, a Russian default may create a distributive conflict over Russian assets, pitting opportunistic investors against a devastated nation desperate for the restitution needed to rebuild. Hedge funds elbowing ahead of Uk
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2845707582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2845707582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28457075823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissKwjAQAHNQsD7-YUHQi4X0ZavXqnhuei-hbEtLSTS78fvtwQ_wNAMzCxFImZzDVCb5SqyJRimjKL5EgSgrTzToI0Fl_YTMeAWlTcuDNXQCxU6bHqG0ZraWCQ6g7AcdDr2BG3baT7wVy05PhLsfN2L_uNflM3w5-_ZI3IzWOzOnJi7SLJd5VsTJf9cXP445BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2845707582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts &amp; Sovereign Default</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Breydo, Lev E</creator><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><description>The Russian Federation stands on the edge of financial abyss – excommunicated from the world economy and facing an "imminent" default on its sovereign debt. Just deserts. This Article is the first comprehensive, multi-disciplinary analysis of Russia's sovereign debt and the consequences of a potential default. It makes a number of critically important findings with immediate implications for policy makers and practitioners navigating these wholly unchartered waters. Based on an in-depth analysis of a quarter-century of Russian debt contracts, this Article posits a clear, geopolitically-driven evolutive patten and corresponding taxonomy. Starting with relatively 'standard' terms in late-1990s vintage bonds, as Russia's foreign relations deteriorated, its contracts grew unusual, bordering towards lawless – aggressively incorporating provisions calibrated for counteracting future sanctions. Indeed, it is difficult to parse the contractual evolution without inferring premeditation. Yet, the aggressor badly underestimated both Ukrainian valor and global outrage. An "unprecedented" sanctions regime froze $300 billion of Russian reserves – and, as atrocities worsened, the U.S. leveraged global financial infrastructure to effectively "force" a Russian sovereign default. A sanctions-driven sovereign default raises novel legal issues, much complicated by Russia's jurisdictionally unmoored bonds. Yet, while the contracts' idiosyncrasies – and defenses predicated on U.S. actions – may strengthen Russia's arguments against non-payment, as the Article details, the sovereign has more likely than not breached other covenants, giving creditors multiple legal avenues. The bigger challenges, undoubtedly, will be enforcement and ultimately resolution of claims. Beyond the legal issues, a Russian default raises profound normative and policy implications. First, as a result of Russia's war, additional sovereign defaults – including Ukraine and Belarus – are very likely to follow. Second, the 'weaponization' of global financial infrastructure to effectuate Russia sanctions raises questions regarding the future efficacy of such measures, as nations consider preemptively hedging their exposure, including by reducing dollar reliance. Finally, and perhaps most ominously, a Russian default may create a distributive conflict over Russian assets, pitting opportunistic investors against a devastated nation desperate for the restitution needed to rebuild. Hedge funds elbowing ahead of Ukrainian victims would be a morally unacceptable outcome – preventing it imperatively necessitates legislative action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-4037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: University of San Diego, School of Law</publisher><subject>Default ; International finance ; International relations ; Sanctions ; Sovereign debt</subject><ispartof>The San Diego law review, 2023-01, Vol.60 (1), p.107</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of San Diego, School of Law 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><title>Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts &amp; Sovereign Default</title><title>The San Diego law review</title><description>The Russian Federation stands on the edge of financial abyss – excommunicated from the world economy and facing an "imminent" default on its sovereign debt. Just deserts. This Article is the first comprehensive, multi-disciplinary analysis of Russia's sovereign debt and the consequences of a potential default. It makes a number of critically important findings with immediate implications for policy makers and practitioners navigating these wholly unchartered waters. Based on an in-depth analysis of a quarter-century of Russian debt contracts, this Article posits a clear, geopolitically-driven evolutive patten and corresponding taxonomy. Starting with relatively 'standard' terms in late-1990s vintage bonds, as Russia's foreign relations deteriorated, its contracts grew unusual, bordering towards lawless – aggressively incorporating provisions calibrated for counteracting future sanctions. Indeed, it is difficult to parse the contractual evolution without inferring premeditation. Yet, the aggressor badly underestimated both Ukrainian valor and global outrage. An "unprecedented" sanctions regime froze $300 billion of Russian reserves – and, as atrocities worsened, the U.S. leveraged global financial infrastructure to effectively "force" a Russian sovereign default. A sanctions-driven sovereign default raises novel legal issues, much complicated by Russia's jurisdictionally unmoored bonds. Yet, while the contracts' idiosyncrasies – and defenses predicated on U.S. actions – may strengthen Russia's arguments against non-payment, as the Article details, the sovereign has more likely than not breached other covenants, giving creditors multiple legal avenues. The bigger challenges, undoubtedly, will be enforcement and ultimately resolution of claims. Beyond the legal issues, a Russian default raises profound normative and policy implications. First, as a result of Russia's war, additional sovereign defaults – including Ukraine and Belarus – are very likely to follow. Second, the 'weaponization' of global financial infrastructure to effectuate Russia sanctions raises questions regarding the future efficacy of such measures, as nations consider preemptively hedging their exposure, including by reducing dollar reliance. Finally, and perhaps most ominously, a Russian default may create a distributive conflict over Russian assets, pitting opportunistic investors against a devastated nation desperate for the restitution needed to rebuild. Hedge funds elbowing ahead of Ukrainian victims would be a morally unacceptable outcome – preventing it imperatively necessitates legislative action.</description><subject>Default</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sovereign debt</subject><issn>0036-4037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNissKwjAQAHNQsD7-YUHQi4X0ZavXqnhuei-hbEtLSTS78fvtwQ_wNAMzCxFImZzDVCb5SqyJRimjKL5EgSgrTzToI0Fl_YTMeAWlTcuDNXQCxU6bHqG0ZraWCQ6g7AcdDr2BG3baT7wVy05PhLsfN2L_uNflM3w5-_ZI3IzWOzOnJi7SLJd5VsTJf9cXP445BA</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Breydo, Lev E</creator><general>University of San Diego, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts &amp; Sovereign Default</title><author>Breydo, Lev E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28457075823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Default</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sovereign debt</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breydo, Lev E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts &amp; Sovereign Default</atitle><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><pages>107-</pages><issn>0036-4037</issn><abstract>The Russian Federation stands on the edge of financial abyss – excommunicated from the world economy and facing an "imminent" default on its sovereign debt. Just deserts. This Article is the first comprehensive, multi-disciplinary analysis of Russia's sovereign debt and the consequences of a potential default. It makes a number of critically important findings with immediate implications for policy makers and practitioners navigating these wholly unchartered waters. Based on an in-depth analysis of a quarter-century of Russian debt contracts, this Article posits a clear, geopolitically-driven evolutive patten and corresponding taxonomy. Starting with relatively 'standard' terms in late-1990s vintage bonds, as Russia's foreign relations deteriorated, its contracts grew unusual, bordering towards lawless – aggressively incorporating provisions calibrated for counteracting future sanctions. Indeed, it is difficult to parse the contractual evolution without inferring premeditation. Yet, the aggressor badly underestimated both Ukrainian valor and global outrage. An "unprecedented" sanctions regime froze $300 billion of Russian reserves – and, as atrocities worsened, the U.S. leveraged global financial infrastructure to effectively "force" a Russian sovereign default. A sanctions-driven sovereign default raises novel legal issues, much complicated by Russia's jurisdictionally unmoored bonds. Yet, while the contracts' idiosyncrasies – and defenses predicated on U.S. actions – may strengthen Russia's arguments against non-payment, as the Article details, the sovereign has more likely than not breached other covenants, giving creditors multiple legal avenues. The bigger challenges, undoubtedly, will be enforcement and ultimately resolution of claims. Beyond the legal issues, a Russian default raises profound normative and policy implications. First, as a result of Russia's war, additional sovereign defaults – including Ukraine and Belarus – are very likely to follow. Second, the 'weaponization' of global financial infrastructure to effectuate Russia sanctions raises questions regarding the future efficacy of such measures, as nations consider preemptively hedging their exposure, including by reducing dollar reliance. Finally, and perhaps most ominously, a Russian default may create a distributive conflict over Russian assets, pitting opportunistic investors against a devastated nation desperate for the restitution needed to rebuild. Hedge funds elbowing ahead of Ukrainian victims would be a morally unacceptable outcome – preventing it imperatively necessitates legislative action.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>University of San Diego, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-4037
ispartof The San Diego law review, 2023-01, Vol.60 (1), p.107
issn 0036-4037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2845707582
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Default
International finance
International relations
Sanctions
Sovereign debt
title Russia's Roulette: Sanctions, Strange Contracts & Sovereign Default
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Russia's%20Roulette:%20Sanctions,%20Strange%20Contracts%20&%20Sovereign%20Default&rft.jtitle=The%20San%20Diego%20law%20review&rft.au=Breydo,%20Lev%20E&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.pages=107-&rft.issn=0036-4037&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2845707582%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2845707582&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true