Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges

AbstractFollowing the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge due to an aeroelastic instability, it has been common practice to test cable-supported bridges in a wind tunnel to check the soundness of bridge designs with respect to wind dynamic actions. Due to their simplicity, versatility and cost eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.149 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Maheux, Sébastien, King, J. Peter C., El Damatty, Ashraf, Brancaleoni, Fabio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 149
creator Maheux, Sébastien
King, J. Peter C.
El Damatty, Ashraf
Brancaleoni, Fabio
description AbstractFollowing the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge due to an aeroelastic instability, it has been common practice to test cable-supported bridges in a wind tunnel to check the soundness of bridge designs with respect to wind dynamic actions. Due to their simplicity, versatility and cost effectiveness, section model tests have become the standard approach for testing bridges. More advanced testing techniques, like full-aeroelastic model tests, are only utilized for validation purposes toward the end of the design process. Nevertheless, some generalizations with regard to the behavior of the bridge are necessary in section model tests in order to reach such simplicity. One of them is that they assume a linear structural behavior of the bridge structure. This might be inaccurate for very long cable-supported bridges as the structural behavior of such bridges is governed by their cable system, which is geometrically nonlinear. Considering that span lengths are getting longer, it is believed that it is needed to develop a better understanding of the influence of geometric nonlinearities on the wind response of bridges. Thus, this paper presents an experimental assessment of the effect of structural nonlinearities on the aeroelastic stability and wind response of cable-supported bridges. At first, the development of a new experimental apparatus for nonlinear section model tests of bridges is discussed. Then, the results of nonlinear section model tests conducted using the experimental apparatus are presented. Three different suspension bridge configurations are tested. The first one is for a single-box girder suspension bridge, and the second and third ones are for two twin-box girder suspension bridges having different span lengths. By comparing the results of linear tests to those of nonlinear tests, it is possible to assess the effect of structural nonlinearities. It is found that structural nonlinearities can have an effect on the critical velocity for flutter.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2845340850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2845340850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-8caf9e72e7af1f821c40488662e7c81c5ecbf72e5a82f190f0d7269eacaeb4663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5giMbv1OY7jjFBKC6rC0CDYLNc5o1QhCXYz8O8JDRIb00l37717-gi5BjYDJmH-tF3m9-vZtljmKwocRHpCJpCJmCYC3k7JhKVxTDMhknNyEcKeMZYmoCZE5m1TVw0aH71WTRkVfdNgHRUYDiFqXbQwuxrptu-61h-wjO58Vb5juCRnztQBr37nlLw8LIvFmm6eV4-L2w01kMkDVda4DFOOqXHgFAcrmFBKymFjFdgE7c4N58Qo7iBjjpUplxkaa3AnpIyn5GbM7Xz72Q-l9L7tfTO81FyJJBZMJWxQ8VFlfRuCR6c7X30Y_6WB6R8-euSjj3z0kc9gmo8mEyz-xf7j-AZ9L2e3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2845340850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Maheux, Sébastien ; King, J. Peter C. ; El Damatty, Ashraf ; Brancaleoni, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Maheux, Sébastien ; King, J. Peter C. ; El Damatty, Ashraf ; Brancaleoni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractFollowing the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge due to an aeroelastic instability, it has been common practice to test cable-supported bridges in a wind tunnel to check the soundness of bridge designs with respect to wind dynamic actions. Due to their simplicity, versatility and cost effectiveness, section model tests have become the standard approach for testing bridges. More advanced testing techniques, like full-aeroelastic model tests, are only utilized for validation purposes toward the end of the design process. Nevertheless, some generalizations with regard to the behavior of the bridge are necessary in section model tests in order to reach such simplicity. One of them is that they assume a linear structural behavior of the bridge structure. This might be inaccurate for very long cable-supported bridges as the structural behavior of such bridges is governed by their cable system, which is geometrically nonlinear. Considering that span lengths are getting longer, it is believed that it is needed to develop a better understanding of the influence of geometric nonlinearities on the wind response of bridges. Thus, this paper presents an experimental assessment of the effect of structural nonlinearities on the aeroelastic stability and wind response of cable-supported bridges. At first, the development of a new experimental apparatus for nonlinear section model tests of bridges is discussed. Then, the results of nonlinear section model tests conducted using the experimental apparatus are presented. Three different suspension bridge configurations are tested. The first one is for a single-box girder suspension bridge, and the second and third ones are for two twin-box girder suspension bridges having different span lengths. By comparing the results of linear tests to those of nonlinear tests, it is possible to assess the effect of structural nonlinearities. It is found that structural nonlinearities can have an effect on the critical velocity for flutter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Aeroelastic stability ; Box girder bridges ; Bridge failure ; Cable-stayed bridges ; Cost effectiveness ; Critical velocity ; Geometric nonlinearity ; Model testing ; Stability analysis ; Structural engineering ; Suspension bridges ; Technical Papers ; Wind effects ; Wind tunnel testing</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.149 (10)</ispartof><rights>2023 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-8caf9e72e7af1f821c40488662e7c81c5ecbf72e5a82f190f0d7269eacaeb4663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7509-1379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,76203,76211</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maheux, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, J. Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Damatty, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancaleoni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractFollowing the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge due to an aeroelastic instability, it has been common practice to test cable-supported bridges in a wind tunnel to check the soundness of bridge designs with respect to wind dynamic actions. Due to their simplicity, versatility and cost effectiveness, section model tests have become the standard approach for testing bridges. More advanced testing techniques, like full-aeroelastic model tests, are only utilized for validation purposes toward the end of the design process. Nevertheless, some generalizations with regard to the behavior of the bridge are necessary in section model tests in order to reach such simplicity. One of them is that they assume a linear structural behavior of the bridge structure. This might be inaccurate for very long cable-supported bridges as the structural behavior of such bridges is governed by their cable system, which is geometrically nonlinear. Considering that span lengths are getting longer, it is believed that it is needed to develop a better understanding of the influence of geometric nonlinearities on the wind response of bridges. Thus, this paper presents an experimental assessment of the effect of structural nonlinearities on the aeroelastic stability and wind response of cable-supported bridges. At first, the development of a new experimental apparatus for nonlinear section model tests of bridges is discussed. Then, the results of nonlinear section model tests conducted using the experimental apparatus are presented. Three different suspension bridge configurations are tested. The first one is for a single-box girder suspension bridge, and the second and third ones are for two twin-box girder suspension bridges having different span lengths. By comparing the results of linear tests to those of nonlinear tests, it is possible to assess the effect of structural nonlinearities. It is found that structural nonlinearities can have an effect on the critical velocity for flutter.</description><subject>Aeroelastic stability</subject><subject>Box girder bridges</subject><subject>Bridge failure</subject><subject>Cable-stayed bridges</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Critical velocity</subject><subject>Geometric nonlinearity</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Suspension bridges</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><subject>Wind tunnel testing</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5giMbv1OY7jjFBKC6rC0CDYLNc5o1QhCXYz8O8JDRIb00l37717-gi5BjYDJmH-tF3m9-vZtljmKwocRHpCJpCJmCYC3k7JhKVxTDMhknNyEcKeMZYmoCZE5m1TVw0aH71WTRkVfdNgHRUYDiFqXbQwuxrptu-61h-wjO58Vb5juCRnztQBr37nlLw8LIvFmm6eV4-L2w01kMkDVda4DFOOqXHgFAcrmFBKymFjFdgE7c4N58Qo7iBjjpUplxkaa3AnpIyn5GbM7Xz72Q-l9L7tfTO81FyJJBZMJWxQ8VFlfRuCR6c7X30Y_6WB6R8-euSjj3z0kc9gmo8mEyz-xf7j-AZ9L2e3</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Maheux, Sébastien</creator><creator>King, J. Peter C.</creator><creator>El Damatty, Ashraf</creator><creator>Brancaleoni, Fabio</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-1379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges</title><author>Maheux, Sébastien ; King, J. Peter C. ; El Damatty, Ashraf ; Brancaleoni, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-8caf9e72e7af1f821c40488662e7c81c5ecbf72e5a82f190f0d7269eacaeb4663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aeroelastic stability</topic><topic>Box girder bridges</topic><topic>Bridge failure</topic><topic>Cable-stayed bridges</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Critical velocity</topic><topic>Geometric nonlinearity</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Suspension bridges</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><topic>Wind tunnel testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maheux, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, J. Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Damatty, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancaleoni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maheux, Sébastien</au><au>King, J. Peter C.</au><au>El Damatty, Ashraf</au><au>Brancaleoni, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><abstract>AbstractFollowing the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge due to an aeroelastic instability, it has been common practice to test cable-supported bridges in a wind tunnel to check the soundness of bridge designs with respect to wind dynamic actions. Due to their simplicity, versatility and cost effectiveness, section model tests have become the standard approach for testing bridges. More advanced testing techniques, like full-aeroelastic model tests, are only utilized for validation purposes toward the end of the design process. Nevertheless, some generalizations with regard to the behavior of the bridge are necessary in section model tests in order to reach such simplicity. One of them is that they assume a linear structural behavior of the bridge structure. This might be inaccurate for very long cable-supported bridges as the structural behavior of such bridges is governed by their cable system, which is geometrically nonlinear. Considering that span lengths are getting longer, it is believed that it is needed to develop a better understanding of the influence of geometric nonlinearities on the wind response of bridges. Thus, this paper presents an experimental assessment of the effect of structural nonlinearities on the aeroelastic stability and wind response of cable-supported bridges. At first, the development of a new experimental apparatus for nonlinear section model tests of bridges is discussed. Then, the results of nonlinear section model tests conducted using the experimental apparatus are presented. Three different suspension bridge configurations are tested. The first one is for a single-box girder suspension bridge, and the second and third ones are for two twin-box girder suspension bridges having different span lengths. By comparing the results of linear tests to those of nonlinear tests, it is possible to assess the effect of structural nonlinearities. It is found that structural nonlinearities can have an effect on the critical velocity for flutter.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-1379</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9445
ispartof Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.149 (10)
issn 0733-9445
1943-541X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2845340850
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Aeroelastic stability
Box girder bridges
Bridge failure
Cable-stayed bridges
Cost effectiveness
Critical velocity
Geometric nonlinearity
Model testing
Stability analysis
Structural engineering
Suspension bridges
Technical Papers
Wind effects
Wind tunnel testing
title Nonlinear Wind Tunnel Tests of Cable-Supported Bridges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonlinear%20Wind%20Tunnel%20Tests%20of%20Cable-Supported%20Bridges&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Maheux,%20S%C3%A9bastien&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2845340850%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2845340850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true