Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles

Lower back pain is experienced by approximately 70% of the world's population, contributing to the worldwide burden of disease. Americans experience lower back pain at an estimated economic cost of $560–$635 billion. One contributing factor for back pain is posture, and more particularly, lack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.) Colo.), 2020-10, Vol.48 (3), p.62-67
Hauptverfasser: Peper, Erik, Krüger, Björn, Gokhale, Esther, Harvey, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 3
container_start_page 62
container_title Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.)
container_volume 48
creator Peper, Erik
Krüger, Björn
Gokhale, Esther
Harvey, Richard
description Lower back pain is experienced by approximately 70% of the world's population, contributing to the worldwide burden of disease. Americans experience lower back pain at an estimated economic cost of $560–$635 billion. One contributing factor for back pain is posture, and more particularly, lack of awareness of dysfunctional posture. For example, many people sit in a slouched or forward-bent position, exacerbated by poor ergonomics while sitting or extended use of handheld digital devices while standing, such as looking down at a smartphone for long periods of time. This report describes a stacksitting technique that is one of the components of the Gokhale Method® for healthy, relaxed sitting and increased awareness of posture. The stacksitting process is illustrated with a case study, where the shape of the spine and the muscle activity are analyzed in parallel during three sitting styles: slouching, arched, and stacksitting. The spine curvature was characterized by the Gokhale SpineTracker™ wearable, which consists of five sensor units attached along the subjects' spines that are used to plot the spinal curve on a digital device such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) recordings were made from the right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right midback, and left midback with a second device (Myoscan Pro sensors recorded with Biograph Procomp Infinity) while participants were seated in three postures: a slouched (forward-bent) position, an upright arched position, and an upright stacksitting position as trained by a Gokhale Method teacher. The case observations showed no significant difference in trapezius SEMG activity during each of the three positions. There was a slight increase in SEMG activity of the midback during stacksitting (1.1 μV) as compared with when slouched (0.64 μV), and a significant increase in SEMG activity when sitting arched (4.9 μV). As expected, the spinal activity tracking device showed significant straightening of the lower spine during the stacksitting position as compared with the slouched and arched positions. The observations suggest that the stacksitting position can be taught to others in a way that allows the vertebrae to be parallel to each other with very low levels of corresponding muscle activity. In contrast, sitting in an arched or slouched position could increase asymmetrical pressure on the disks, contributing to vertebral wedging, which could also contribute to spinal disk bulg
doi_str_mv 10.5298/1081-5937-48.3.03
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2845207843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2845207843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1183-ce6671645a423477a62d7f19ce0081773d589a867e265cf28629c047260e9ce13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAURYMoWEd_gLuA69R8J10OxS8YcVEVdyGkqWbotDVphf57W0ZcvcU9793HAeCa4FzQQt8SrAkSBVOI65zlmJ2AjBKhEeP64xRk__k5uEhpjzHnStAMlGV_GGwM3Sd8npJrPdy6MfyEcYa2q2E1hM7D6ssOHoYOvi9kPyVYhXFcV6pxbn26BGeNbZO_-psb8HZ_91o-ot3Lw1O53SFHiGbIeSkVkVxYThlXykpaq4YUzuPlOaVYLXRhtVSeSuEaqiUtHOaKSuwXiLANuDneHWL_Pfk0mn0_xW6pNFRzQbHSnC0UOVIu9ilF35ghhoONsyHYrK7M6sKsLgzXhhnM2C9HkVno</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2845207843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peper, Erik ; Krüger, Björn ; Gokhale, Esther ; Harvey, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Peper, Erik ; Krüger, Björn ; Gokhale, Esther ; Harvey, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Lower back pain is experienced by approximately 70% of the world's population, contributing to the worldwide burden of disease. Americans experience lower back pain at an estimated economic cost of $560–$635 billion. One contributing factor for back pain is posture, and more particularly, lack of awareness of dysfunctional posture. For example, many people sit in a slouched or forward-bent position, exacerbated by poor ergonomics while sitting or extended use of handheld digital devices while standing, such as looking down at a smartphone for long periods of time. This report describes a stacksitting technique that is one of the components of the Gokhale Method® for healthy, relaxed sitting and increased awareness of posture. The stacksitting process is illustrated with a case study, where the shape of the spine and the muscle activity are analyzed in parallel during three sitting styles: slouching, arched, and stacksitting. The spine curvature was characterized by the Gokhale SpineTracker™ wearable, which consists of five sensor units attached along the subjects' spines that are used to plot the spinal curve on a digital device such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) recordings were made from the right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right midback, and left midback with a second device (Myoscan Pro sensors recorded with Biograph Procomp Infinity) while participants were seated in three postures: a slouched (forward-bent) position, an upright arched position, and an upright stacksitting position as trained by a Gokhale Method teacher. The case observations showed no significant difference in trapezius SEMG activity during each of the three positions. There was a slight increase in SEMG activity of the midback during stacksitting (1.1 μV) as compared with when slouched (0.64 μV), and a significant increase in SEMG activity when sitting arched (4.9 μV). As expected, the spinal activity tracking device showed significant straightening of the lower spine during the stacksitting position as compared with the slouched and arched positions. The observations suggest that the stacksitting position can be taught to others in a way that allows the vertebrae to be parallel to each other with very low levels of corresponding muscle activity. In contrast, sitting in an arched or slouched position could increase asymmetrical pressure on the disks, contributing to vertebral wedging, which could also contribute to spinal disk bulging and eventual back injury. The observations suggest that proper coaching may foster a stacksitting position of the spine, which could foster a healthier posture than slouched or arched spinal positions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-5937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-348X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5298/1081-5937-48.3.03</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: Allen Press Inc</publisher><subject>Back injuries ; Back pain ; Coaching ; Electromyography ; Ergonomics ; Low back pain ; Muscle function ; Posture ; Smartphones ; Spine ; Teachers ; Tracking ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.), 2020-10, Vol.48 (3), p.62-67</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Inc. Fall 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1183-ce6671645a423477a62d7f19ce0081773d589a867e265cf28629c047260e9ce13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1183-ce6671645a423477a62d7f19ce0081773d589a867e265cf28629c047260e9ce13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,27922,27923,30997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peper, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokhale, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles</title><title>Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.)</title><description>Lower back pain is experienced by approximately 70% of the world's population, contributing to the worldwide burden of disease. Americans experience lower back pain at an estimated economic cost of $560–$635 billion. One contributing factor for back pain is posture, and more particularly, lack of awareness of dysfunctional posture. For example, many people sit in a slouched or forward-bent position, exacerbated by poor ergonomics while sitting or extended use of handheld digital devices while standing, such as looking down at a smartphone for long periods of time. This report describes a stacksitting technique that is one of the components of the Gokhale Method® for healthy, relaxed sitting and increased awareness of posture. The stacksitting process is illustrated with a case study, where the shape of the spine and the muscle activity are analyzed in parallel during three sitting styles: slouching, arched, and stacksitting. The spine curvature was characterized by the Gokhale SpineTracker™ wearable, which consists of five sensor units attached along the subjects' spines that are used to plot the spinal curve on a digital device such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) recordings were made from the right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right midback, and left midback with a second device (Myoscan Pro sensors recorded with Biograph Procomp Infinity) while participants were seated in three postures: a slouched (forward-bent) position, an upright arched position, and an upright stacksitting position as trained by a Gokhale Method teacher. The case observations showed no significant difference in trapezius SEMG activity during each of the three positions. There was a slight increase in SEMG activity of the midback during stacksitting (1.1 μV) as compared with when slouched (0.64 μV), and a significant increase in SEMG activity when sitting arched (4.9 μV). As expected, the spinal activity tracking device showed significant straightening of the lower spine during the stacksitting position as compared with the slouched and arched positions. The observations suggest that the stacksitting position can be taught to others in a way that allows the vertebrae to be parallel to each other with very low levels of corresponding muscle activity. In contrast, sitting in an arched or slouched position could increase asymmetrical pressure on the disks, contributing to vertebral wedging, which could also contribute to spinal disk bulging and eventual back injury. The observations suggest that proper coaching may foster a stacksitting position of the spine, which could foster a healthier posture than slouched or arched spinal positions.</description><subject>Back injuries</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Coaching</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>1081-5937</issn><issn>2158-348X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAURYMoWEd_gLuA69R8J10OxS8YcVEVdyGkqWbotDVphf57W0ZcvcU9793HAeCa4FzQQt8SrAkSBVOI65zlmJ2AjBKhEeP64xRk__k5uEhpjzHnStAMlGV_GGwM3Sd8npJrPdy6MfyEcYa2q2E1hM7D6ssOHoYOvi9kPyVYhXFcV6pxbn26BGeNbZO_-psb8HZ_91o-ot3Lw1O53SFHiGbIeSkVkVxYThlXykpaq4YUzuPlOaVYLXRhtVSeSuEaqiUtHOaKSuwXiLANuDneHWL_Pfk0mn0_xW6pNFRzQbHSnC0UOVIu9ilF35ghhoONsyHYrK7M6sKsLgzXhhnM2C9HkVno</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Peper, Erik</creator><creator>Krüger, Björn</creator><creator>Gokhale, Esther</creator><creator>Harvey, Richard</creator><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles</title><author>Peper, Erik ; Krüger, Björn ; Gokhale, Esther ; Harvey, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1183-ce6671645a423477a62d7f19ce0081773d589a867e265cf28629c047260e9ce13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Back injuries</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Coaching</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peper, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokhale, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peper, Erik</au><au>Krüger, Björn</au><au>Gokhale, Esther</au><au>Harvey, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles</atitle><jtitle>Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>62-67</pages><issn>1081-5937</issn><eissn>2158-348X</eissn><abstract>Lower back pain is experienced by approximately 70% of the world's population, contributing to the worldwide burden of disease. Americans experience lower back pain at an estimated economic cost of $560–$635 billion. One contributing factor for back pain is posture, and more particularly, lack of awareness of dysfunctional posture. For example, many people sit in a slouched or forward-bent position, exacerbated by poor ergonomics while sitting or extended use of handheld digital devices while standing, such as looking down at a smartphone for long periods of time. This report describes a stacksitting technique that is one of the components of the Gokhale Method® for healthy, relaxed sitting and increased awareness of posture. The stacksitting process is illustrated with a case study, where the shape of the spine and the muscle activity are analyzed in parallel during three sitting styles: slouching, arched, and stacksitting. The spine curvature was characterized by the Gokhale SpineTracker™ wearable, which consists of five sensor units attached along the subjects' spines that are used to plot the spinal curve on a digital device such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer. Surface electromyographic (SEMG) recordings were made from the right upper trapezius, left upper trapezius, right midback, and left midback with a second device (Myoscan Pro sensors recorded with Biograph Procomp Infinity) while participants were seated in three postures: a slouched (forward-bent) position, an upright arched position, and an upright stacksitting position as trained by a Gokhale Method teacher. The case observations showed no significant difference in trapezius SEMG activity during each of the three positions. There was a slight increase in SEMG activity of the midback during stacksitting (1.1 μV) as compared with when slouched (0.64 μV), and a significant increase in SEMG activity when sitting arched (4.9 μV). As expected, the spinal activity tracking device showed significant straightening of the lower spine during the stacksitting position as compared with the slouched and arched positions. The observations suggest that the stacksitting position can be taught to others in a way that allows the vertebrae to be parallel to each other with very low levels of corresponding muscle activity. In contrast, sitting in an arched or slouched position could increase asymmetrical pressure on the disks, contributing to vertebral wedging, which could also contribute to spinal disk bulging and eventual back injury. The observations suggest that proper coaching may foster a stacksitting position of the spine, which could foster a healthier posture than slouched or arched spinal positions.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>Allen Press Inc</pub><doi>10.5298/1081-5937-48.3.03</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-5937
ispartof Biofeedback (Wheat Ridge, Colo.), 2020-10, Vol.48 (3), p.62-67
issn 1081-5937
2158-348X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2845207843
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Back injuries
Back pain
Coaching
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Low back pain
Muscle function
Posture
Smartphones
Spine
Teachers
Tracking
Vertebrae
title Comparing Muscle Activity and Spine Shape in Various Sitting Styles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A48%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Muscle%20Activity%20and%20Spine%20Shape%20in%20Various%20Sitting%20Styles&rft.jtitle=Biofeedback%20(Wheat%20Ridge,%20Colo.)&rft.au=Peper,%20Erik&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=62-67&rft.issn=1081-5937&rft.eissn=2158-348X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5298/1081-5937-48.3.03&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2845207843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2845207843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true