Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation

The success of in situ remediation techniques such as bioremediation and chemical oxidation is often limited by the presence of contaminants in low‐permeability silts and clays, as remediation reagents cannot be effectively delivered into these materials to promote and achieve treatment. A novel ele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ground water monitoring & remediation 2023-06, Vol.43 (3), p.70-78
Hauptverfasser: Riis, Charlotte, Cox, Evan E., Wang, James, Gent, David, Bymose, Martin Brandi, Pade, Dorte Moon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 3
container_start_page 70
container_title Ground water monitoring & remediation
container_volume 43
creator Riis, Charlotte
Cox, Evan E.
Wang, James
Gent, David
Bymose, Martin Brandi
Pade, Dorte Moon
description The success of in situ remediation techniques such as bioremediation and chemical oxidation is often limited by the presence of contaminants in low‐permeability silts and clays, as remediation reagents cannot be effectively delivered into these materials to promote and achieve treatment. A novel electrokinetic (EK) technique, referred to as EK‐BIO, was demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation with respect to reagent delivery. Electron donor and dehalorespiring bacteria (KB‐1®) were effectively and uniformly delivered throughout a tetrachloroethene (PCE) source area in clay till using the EK‐BIO technique. Lactate, as electron donor, was effectively delivered through the clay soils over a sustained operational period of 720 days. A one‐time bioaugmentation of the treatment area with KB‐1® dehalorespiring culture was conducted within the first month of operation. Vinyl chloride reductase functional gene counts increased by several orders of magnitude in treatment area wells, with ensuing PCE dechlorination to ethene and chloride observed at all treatment area wells. Remediation goals for site soil of 10 mg PCE/kg were met within 2 years of system operation. Average soil concentrations in the treatment area were reduced by 98.75% (PCE eq.). Rebound testing 6 months after cessation of EK‐BIO operation showed sustained dechlorination and compliance with remedial goals. These results document the first large field‐scale remediation of a PCE source area in clay using EK‐BIO. A novel technique, EK‐BIO, was successfully demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the reagent delivery limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation in low‐permeability soils.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gwmr.12592
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2843978101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2843978101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-3ea9b0117c87da386a51b649af92a6a13405d50766e6aae3c6a30720c89c4d233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFYvfoIFb0Lq_kk22WMNsRYqSmvx5jLdbOvWdFM3CSXf3tTo1bnMg_nNG-YhdE3JiHZ1tzns_IiySLITNKBxGAWi06edJkIGXDB5ji6qaksIF1ESDdD73OxMbqG2boMBv6QZXpSN1waPvQFsHU4LaPGyOs6zwujal5_WmdpqKIoWZ-4DnDY5njq8sHWD723p_yxLd4nO1lBU5uq3D9HyIXtNH4PZ82SajmeB5oSygBuQK0JprJM4B54IiOhKhBLWkoEAykMS5RGJhTACwHAtgJOYEZ1IHeaM8yG66X33vvxqTFWrbfeF604qloRcxgkltKNue0r7sqq8Wau9tzvwraJEHfNTx_zUT34dTHv4YAvT_kOqydvTvN_5BvSmcc0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843978101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Riis, Charlotte ; Cox, Evan E. ; Wang, James ; Gent, David ; Bymose, Martin Brandi ; Pade, Dorte Moon</creator><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte ; Cox, Evan E. ; Wang, James ; Gent, David ; Bymose, Martin Brandi ; Pade, Dorte Moon</creatorcontrib><description>The success of in situ remediation techniques such as bioremediation and chemical oxidation is often limited by the presence of contaminants in low‐permeability silts and clays, as remediation reagents cannot be effectively delivered into these materials to promote and achieve treatment. A novel electrokinetic (EK) technique, referred to as EK‐BIO, was demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation with respect to reagent delivery. Electron donor and dehalorespiring bacteria (KB‐1®) were effectively and uniformly delivered throughout a tetrachloroethene (PCE) source area in clay till using the EK‐BIO technique. Lactate, as electron donor, was effectively delivered through the clay soils over a sustained operational period of 720 days. A one‐time bioaugmentation of the treatment area with KB‐1® dehalorespiring culture was conducted within the first month of operation. Vinyl chloride reductase functional gene counts increased by several orders of magnitude in treatment area wells, with ensuing PCE dechlorination to ethene and chloride observed at all treatment area wells. Remediation goals for site soil of 10 mg PCE/kg were met within 2 years of system operation. Average soil concentrations in the treatment area were reduced by 98.75% (PCE eq.). Rebound testing 6 months after cessation of EK‐BIO operation showed sustained dechlorination and compliance with remedial goals. These results document the first large field‐scale remediation of a PCE source area in clay using EK‐BIO. A novel technique, EK‐BIO, was successfully demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the reagent delivery limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation in low‐permeability soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Bioremediation ; Clay ; Clay soils ; Contaminants ; Dechlorination ; Electrokinetics ; Ethene ; Ethylene ; Lactate ; Oxidation ; Permeability ; Reagents ; Reductases ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil permeability ; Soil remediation ; Tetrachloroethylene ; Vinyl chloride</subject><ispartof>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation, 2023-06, Vol.43 (3), p.70-78</ispartof><rights>2023 National Ground Water Association.</rights><rights>2023 National Ground Water Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-3ea9b0117c87da386a51b649af92a6a13405d50766e6aae3c6a30720c89c4d233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-3ea9b0117c87da386a51b649af92a6a13405d50766e6aae3c6a30720c89c4d233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6021-2967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Evan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bymose, Martin Brandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pade, Dorte Moon</creatorcontrib><title>Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation</title><title>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</title><description>The success of in situ remediation techniques such as bioremediation and chemical oxidation is often limited by the presence of contaminants in low‐permeability silts and clays, as remediation reagents cannot be effectively delivered into these materials to promote and achieve treatment. A novel electrokinetic (EK) technique, referred to as EK‐BIO, was demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation with respect to reagent delivery. Electron donor and dehalorespiring bacteria (KB‐1®) were effectively and uniformly delivered throughout a tetrachloroethene (PCE) source area in clay till using the EK‐BIO technique. Lactate, as electron donor, was effectively delivered through the clay soils over a sustained operational period of 720 days. A one‐time bioaugmentation of the treatment area with KB‐1® dehalorespiring culture was conducted within the first month of operation. Vinyl chloride reductase functional gene counts increased by several orders of magnitude in treatment area wells, with ensuing PCE dechlorination to ethene and chloride observed at all treatment area wells. Remediation goals for site soil of 10 mg PCE/kg were met within 2 years of system operation. Average soil concentrations in the treatment area were reduced by 98.75% (PCE eq.). Rebound testing 6 months after cessation of EK‐BIO operation showed sustained dechlorination and compliance with remedial goals. These results document the first large field‐scale remediation of a PCE source area in clay using EK‐BIO. A novel technique, EK‐BIO, was successfully demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the reagent delivery limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation in low‐permeability soils.</description><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Dechlorination</subject><subject>Electrokinetics</subject><subject>Ethene</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>Lactate</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Reductases</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil permeability</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Tetrachloroethylene</subject><subject>Vinyl chloride</subject><issn>1069-3629</issn><issn>1745-6592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFYvfoIFb0Lq_kk22WMNsRYqSmvx5jLdbOvWdFM3CSXf3tTo1bnMg_nNG-YhdE3JiHZ1tzns_IiySLITNKBxGAWi06edJkIGXDB5ji6qaksIF1ESDdD73OxMbqG2boMBv6QZXpSN1waPvQFsHU4LaPGyOs6zwujal5_WmdpqKIoWZ-4DnDY5njq8sHWD723p_yxLd4nO1lBU5uq3D9HyIXtNH4PZ82SajmeB5oSygBuQK0JprJM4B54IiOhKhBLWkoEAykMS5RGJhTACwHAtgJOYEZ1IHeaM8yG66X33vvxqTFWrbfeF604qloRcxgkltKNue0r7sqq8Wau9tzvwraJEHfNTx_zUT34dTHv4YAvT_kOqydvTvN_5BvSmcc0</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Riis, Charlotte</creator><creator>Cox, Evan E.</creator><creator>Wang, James</creator><creator>Gent, David</creator><creator>Bymose, Martin Brandi</creator><creator>Pade, Dorte Moon</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-2967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation</title><author>Riis, Charlotte ; Cox, Evan E. ; Wang, James ; Gent, David ; Bymose, Martin Brandi ; Pade, Dorte Moon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-3ea9b0117c87da386a51b649af92a6a13405d50766e6aae3c6a30720c89c4d233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Dechlorination</topic><topic>Electrokinetics</topic><topic>Ethene</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>Lactate</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Reductases</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil permeability</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Tetrachloroethylene</topic><topic>Vinyl chloride</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riis, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Evan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gent, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bymose, Martin Brandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pade, Dorte Moon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riis, Charlotte</au><au>Cox, Evan E.</au><au>Wang, James</au><au>Gent, David</au><au>Bymose, Martin Brandi</au><au>Pade, Dorte Moon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation</atitle><jtitle>Ground water monitoring &amp; remediation</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>70-78</pages><issn>1069-3629</issn><eissn>1745-6592</eissn><abstract>The success of in situ remediation techniques such as bioremediation and chemical oxidation is often limited by the presence of contaminants in low‐permeability silts and clays, as remediation reagents cannot be effectively delivered into these materials to promote and achieve treatment. A novel electrokinetic (EK) technique, referred to as EK‐BIO, was demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation with respect to reagent delivery. Electron donor and dehalorespiring bacteria (KB‐1®) were effectively and uniformly delivered throughout a tetrachloroethene (PCE) source area in clay till using the EK‐BIO technique. Lactate, as electron donor, was effectively delivered through the clay soils over a sustained operational period of 720 days. A one‐time bioaugmentation of the treatment area with KB‐1® dehalorespiring culture was conducted within the first month of operation. Vinyl chloride reductase functional gene counts increased by several orders of magnitude in treatment area wells, with ensuing PCE dechlorination to ethene and chloride observed at all treatment area wells. Remediation goals for site soil of 10 mg PCE/kg were met within 2 years of system operation. Average soil concentrations in the treatment area were reduced by 98.75% (PCE eq.). Rebound testing 6 months after cessation of EK‐BIO operation showed sustained dechlorination and compliance with remedial goals. These results document the first large field‐scale remediation of a PCE source area in clay using EK‐BIO. A novel technique, EK‐BIO, was successfully demonstrated at full‐scale to overcome the reagent delivery limitations of conventional in situ bioremediation in low‐permeability soils.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gwmr.12592</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-2967</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-3629
ispartof Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2023-06, Vol.43 (3), p.70-78
issn 1069-3629
1745-6592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2843978101
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bioremediation
Clay
Clay soils
Contaminants
Dechlorination
Electrokinetics
Ethene
Ethylene
Lactate
Oxidation
Permeability
Reagents
Reductases
Soil
Soil contamination
Soil permeability
Soil remediation
Tetrachloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
title Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remediating%20a%20PCE%20Source%20Area%20in%20Clay%20Using%20Electrokinetically%20Enhanced%20In%20Situ%20Bioremediation&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water%20monitoring%20&%20remediation&rft.au=Riis,%20Charlotte&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=70-78&rft.issn=1069-3629&rft.eissn=1745-6592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwmr.12592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2843978101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843978101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true