Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model

Purpose:Chest X-ray (CXR) is an essential tool and one of the most prescribed imaging to detect pulmonary abnormalities, with a yearly estimate of over 2 billion imaging performed worldwide. However, the accurate and timely diagnosis of TB remains an unmet goal. The prevalence of TB is highest in lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-07
Hauptverfasser: Chattoraj, Subhankar, Bhargava Reddy, Tadepalli, Manoj, Putha, Preetham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Chattoraj, Subhankar
Bhargava Reddy
Tadepalli, Manoj
Putha, Preetham
description Purpose:Chest X-ray (CXR) is an essential tool and one of the most prescribed imaging to detect pulmonary abnormalities, with a yearly estimate of over 2 billion imaging performed worldwide. However, the accurate and timely diagnosis of TB remains an unmet goal. The prevalence of TB is highest in low-middle-income countries, and the requirement of a portable, automated, and reliable solution is required. In this study, we compared the performance of DL-based devices on digital and analog CXR. The evaluated DL-based device can be used in resource-constraint settings. Methods: A total of 10,000 CXR DICOMs(.dcm) and printed photos of the films acquired with three different cellular phones - Samsung S8, iPhone 8, and iPhone XS along with their radiological report were retrospectively collected from various sites across India from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: 10,000 chest X-rays were utilized to evaluate the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB. The AUC of qXR for detecting signs of tuberculosis on the original DICOMs dataset was 0.928 with a sensitivity of 0.841 at a specificity of 0.806. At an optimal threshold, the difference in the AUC of three cellular smartphones with the original DICOMs is 0.024 (2.55%), 0.048 (5.10%), and 0.038 (1.91%). The minimum difference demonstrates the robustness of the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB in both digital and analog CXR.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2843254761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2843254761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28432547613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFqwkAURQehoFj_4UHXgTiTqNsSUyq0m-JenuYlThjnJfNmBP_eFPoBXd174HLuTC20MetsV2g9VyuRPs9zvdnqsjQLNVZ8GzBgtHeC-o4uTZU9cAt729mIDtA38O7RcQfVlSTCDzaWu4DDVSAyHBry0bYPOKYzhUtyLFYgifUd7IkG-CIM_pe-uSH3ql5adEKrv1yqt4_6WH1mQ-AxTf5TzylMf3LSu8Losthu1uZ_qycYAksI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843254761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Chattoraj, Subhankar ; Bhargava Reddy ; Tadepalli, Manoj ; Putha, Preetham</creator><creatorcontrib>Chattoraj, Subhankar ; Bhargava Reddy ; Tadepalli, Manoj ; Putha, Preetham</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:Chest X-ray (CXR) is an essential tool and one of the most prescribed imaging to detect pulmonary abnormalities, with a yearly estimate of over 2 billion imaging performed worldwide. However, the accurate and timely diagnosis of TB remains an unmet goal. The prevalence of TB is highest in low-middle-income countries, and the requirement of a portable, automated, and reliable solution is required. In this study, we compared the performance of DL-based devices on digital and analog CXR. The evaluated DL-based device can be used in resource-constraint settings. Methods: A total of 10,000 CXR DICOMs(.dcm) and printed photos of the films acquired with three different cellular phones - Samsung S8, iPhone 8, and iPhone XS along with their radiological report were retrospectively collected from various sites across India from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: 10,000 chest X-rays were utilized to evaluate the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB. The AUC of qXR for detecting signs of tuberculosis on the original DICOMs dataset was 0.928 with a sensitivity of 0.841 at a specificity of 0.806. At an optimal threshold, the difference in the AUC of three cellular smartphones with the original DICOMs is 0.024 (2.55%), 0.048 (5.10%), and 0.038 (1.91%). The minimum difference demonstrates the robustness of the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB in both digital and analog CXR.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Smartphones ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-07</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chattoraj, Subhankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhargava Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadepalli, Manoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putha, Preetham</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Purpose:Chest X-ray (CXR) is an essential tool and one of the most prescribed imaging to detect pulmonary abnormalities, with a yearly estimate of over 2 billion imaging performed worldwide. However, the accurate and timely diagnosis of TB remains an unmet goal. The prevalence of TB is highest in low-middle-income countries, and the requirement of a portable, automated, and reliable solution is required. In this study, we compared the performance of DL-based devices on digital and analog CXR. The evaluated DL-based device can be used in resource-constraint settings. Methods: A total of 10,000 CXR DICOMs(.dcm) and printed photos of the films acquired with three different cellular phones - Samsung S8, iPhone 8, and iPhone XS along with their radiological report were retrospectively collected from various sites across India from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: 10,000 chest X-rays were utilized to evaluate the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB. The AUC of qXR for detecting signs of tuberculosis on the original DICOMs dataset was 0.928 with a sensitivity of 0.841 at a specificity of 0.806. At an optimal threshold, the difference in the AUC of three cellular smartphones with the original DICOMs is 0.024 (2.55%), 0.048 (5.10%), and 0.038 (1.91%). The minimum difference demonstrates the robustness of the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB in both digital and analog CXR.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcFqwkAURQehoFj_4UHXgTiTqNsSUyq0m-JenuYlThjnJfNmBP_eFPoBXd174HLuTC20MetsV2g9VyuRPs9zvdnqsjQLNVZ8GzBgtHeC-o4uTZU9cAt729mIDtA38O7RcQfVlSTCDzaWu4DDVSAyHBry0bYPOKYzhUtyLFYgifUd7IkG-CIM_pe-uSH3ql5adEKrv1yqt4_6WH1mQ-AxTf5TzylMf3LSu8Losthu1uZ_qycYAksI</recordid><startdate>20230727</startdate><enddate>20230727</enddate><creator>Chattoraj, Subhankar</creator><creator>Bhargava Reddy</creator><creator>Tadepalli, Manoj</creator><creator>Putha, Preetham</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230727</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model</title><author>Chattoraj, Subhankar ; Bhargava Reddy ; Tadepalli, Manoj ; Putha, Preetham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28432547613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chattoraj, Subhankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhargava Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadepalli, Manoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putha, Preetham</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chattoraj, Subhankar</au><au>Bhargava Reddy</au><au>Tadepalli, Manoj</au><au>Putha, Preetham</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-07-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Purpose:Chest X-ray (CXR) is an essential tool and one of the most prescribed imaging to detect pulmonary abnormalities, with a yearly estimate of over 2 billion imaging performed worldwide. However, the accurate and timely diagnosis of TB remains an unmet goal. The prevalence of TB is highest in low-middle-income countries, and the requirement of a portable, automated, and reliable solution is required. In this study, we compared the performance of DL-based devices on digital and analog CXR. The evaluated DL-based device can be used in resource-constraint settings. Methods: A total of 10,000 CXR DICOMs(.dcm) and printed photos of the films acquired with three different cellular phones - Samsung S8, iPhone 8, and iPhone XS along with their radiological report were retrospectively collected from various sites across India from April 2020 to March 2021. Results: 10,000 chest X-rays were utilized to evaluate the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB. The AUC of qXR for detecting signs of tuberculosis on the original DICOMs dataset was 0.928 with a sensitivity of 0.841 at a specificity of 0.806. At an optimal threshold, the difference in the AUC of three cellular smartphones with the original DICOMs is 0.024 (2.55%), 0.048 (5.10%), and 0.038 (1.91%). The minimum difference demonstrates the robustness of the DL-based device in identifying radiological signs of TB in both digital and analog CXR.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-07
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2843254761
source Free E- Journals
subjects Abnormalities
Smartphones
Tuberculosis
title Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Analog Chest Radiographs to Identify Tuberculosis using Deep Learning Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Digital%20and%20Analog%20Chest%20Radiographs%20to%20Identify%20Tuberculosis%20using%20Deep%20Learning%20Model&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Chattoraj,%20Subhankar&rft.date=2023-07-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2843254761%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843254761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true