Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories

A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-07, Vol.15 (14), p.10997
Hauptverfasser: Suratin, Aloysius, Utomo, Suyud Warno, Martono, Dwi Nowo, Mizuno, Kosuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 10997
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Suratin, Aloysius
Utomo, Suyud Warno
Martono, Dwi Nowo
Mizuno, Kosuke
description A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the conundrum of the new juncture. We reviewed 10 cases of NRM practices in Indonesia from 2019–2023 collected from the Scopus dataset by integrating the prisoner’s dilemma approach into the socio-ecological framework to analyze the practices and the anticipated gaps. Our finding revealed that socio-economic governance is the dominant view in interpreting the competition between personal and collective interests in NRM. Seeing NRM as an allocation problem and the excessive use of the legal normative approach in interpreting and addressing the problem are flaws in the approach. Combining the prisoner’s dilemma approach with the socio-ecological governance framework enabled us to address the flaws. Promoting polycentric governance that accommodates social trust, reciprocities, and socio-ecological beliefs and reduces uncertainties about ownership and the resources necessary to reduce defective behavior is a solution to transform the structure of the competition. Revising the socio-economic payoff into a socio-ecological value-oriented institution is the strategy to address the conundrum.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su151410997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2843128231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759235413</galeid><sourcerecordid>A759235413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9b2f400bc789f6654d41db0dfa922b05124a0a173003da422321cf2a4c30b17d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OwzAMxysEEgg48QKROCFUiJN0XbhNFR-TBkh8nCs3TUumLYEk5ePGa_B6PAmZxgHsgy3rZ1t_O8sOgJ5wLulpGKAAAVTKciPbYbSEHGhBN__k29l-CHOajHOQMNrJXqe2dVYHg9-fX4HcaavfsFlocoNx8LhIleAGrzS5Rou9XmobibEkPmkyc295hb5xljx4tMFE4-wZmZDK2cG2fliuyOoJbW9sv2LmWkXnjQ572VaHi6D3f-Nu9nhx_lBd5bPby2k1meWKMxlz2bBOUNqociy70agQrYC2oW2HkrGGFsAEUoSSJ0EtCsY4A9UxFIrTBsqW72aH67nP3r0MOsR6ntTYtLJmY8GBjRmHRJ2sqR4Xuja2c9GjSt7qpVHpPJ1J9UlZSMYLATw1HP1rSEzU77HHIYR6en_3nz1es8q7ELzu6mdvlug_aqD16nH1n8fxH7o3ilU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843128231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Suratin, Aloysius ; Utomo, Suyud Warno ; Martono, Dwi Nowo ; Mizuno, Kosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Suratin, Aloysius ; Utomo, Suyud Warno ; Martono, Dwi Nowo ; Mizuno, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><description>A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the conundrum of the new juncture. We reviewed 10 cases of NRM practices in Indonesia from 2019–2023 collected from the Scopus dataset by integrating the prisoner’s dilemma approach into the socio-ecological framework to analyze the practices and the anticipated gaps. Our finding revealed that socio-economic governance is the dominant view in interpreting the competition between personal and collective interests in NRM. Seeing NRM as an allocation problem and the excessive use of the legal normative approach in interpreting and addressing the problem are flaws in the approach. Combining the prisoner’s dilemma approach with the socio-ecological governance framework enabled us to address the flaws. Promoting polycentric governance that accommodates social trust, reciprocities, and socio-ecological beliefs and reduces uncertainties about ownership and the resources necessary to reduce defective behavior is a solution to transform the structure of the competition. Revising the socio-economic payoff into a socio-ecological value-oriented institution is the strategy to address the conundrum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su151410997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Carbon ; Computer &amp; video games ; Conservation ; Educational software ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Environmental economics ; Environmental impact ; Game theory ; Greenhouse gases ; Keywords ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Science ; Self interest ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-07, Vol.15 (14), p.10997</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9b2f400bc789f6654d41db0dfa922b05124a0a173003da422321cf2a4c30b17d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suratin, Aloysius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utomo, Suyud Warno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martono, Dwi Nowo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the conundrum of the new juncture. We reviewed 10 cases of NRM practices in Indonesia from 2019–2023 collected from the Scopus dataset by integrating the prisoner’s dilemma approach into the socio-ecological framework to analyze the practices and the anticipated gaps. Our finding revealed that socio-economic governance is the dominant view in interpreting the competition between personal and collective interests in NRM. Seeing NRM as an allocation problem and the excessive use of the legal normative approach in interpreting and addressing the problem are flaws in the approach. Combining the prisoner’s dilemma approach with the socio-ecological governance framework enabled us to address the flaws. Promoting polycentric governance that accommodates social trust, reciprocities, and socio-ecological beliefs and reduces uncertainties about ownership and the resources necessary to reduce defective behavior is a solution to transform the structure of the competition. Revising the socio-economic payoff into a socio-ecological value-oriented institution is the strategy to address the conundrum.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Computer &amp; video games</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Educational software</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1OwzAMxysEEgg48QKROCFUiJN0XbhNFR-TBkh8nCs3TUumLYEk5ePGa_B6PAmZxgHsgy3rZ1t_O8sOgJ5wLulpGKAAAVTKciPbYbSEHGhBN__k29l-CHOajHOQMNrJXqe2dVYHg9-fX4HcaavfsFlocoNx8LhIleAGrzS5Rou9XmobibEkPmkyc295hb5xljx4tMFE4-wZmZDK2cG2fliuyOoJbW9sv2LmWkXnjQ572VaHi6D3f-Nu9nhx_lBd5bPby2k1meWKMxlz2bBOUNqociy70agQrYC2oW2HkrGGFsAEUoSSJ0EtCsY4A9UxFIrTBsqW72aH67nP3r0MOsR6ntTYtLJmY8GBjRmHRJ2sqR4Xuja2c9GjSt7qpVHpPJ1J9UlZSMYLATw1HP1rSEzU77HHIYR6en_3nz1es8q7ELzu6mdvlug_aqD16nH1n8fxH7o3ilU</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Suratin, Aloysius</creator><creator>Utomo, Suyud Warno</creator><creator>Martono, Dwi Nowo</creator><creator>Mizuno, Kosuke</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories</title><author>Suratin, Aloysius ; Utomo, Suyud Warno ; Martono, Dwi Nowo ; Mizuno, Kosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-9b2f400bc789f6654d41db0dfa922b05124a0a173003da422321cf2a4c30b17d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Computer &amp; video games</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Educational software</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suratin, Aloysius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utomo, Suyud Warno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martono, Dwi Nowo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suratin, Aloysius</au><au>Utomo, Suyud Warno</au><au>Martono, Dwi Nowo</au><au>Mizuno, Kosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>10997</spage><pages>10997-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A paradigm shift is required to transform current natural resource management (NRM) in Indonesia’s decision to move into low-carbon development to achieve the greenhouse gas emission target. No study has been conducted to assess whether or not the current approaches are reliable in anticipating the conundrum of the new juncture. We reviewed 10 cases of NRM practices in Indonesia from 2019–2023 collected from the Scopus dataset by integrating the prisoner’s dilemma approach into the socio-ecological framework to analyze the practices and the anticipated gaps. Our finding revealed that socio-economic governance is the dominant view in interpreting the competition between personal and collective interests in NRM. Seeing NRM as an allocation problem and the excessive use of the legal normative approach in interpreting and addressing the problem are flaws in the approach. Combining the prisoner’s dilemma approach with the socio-ecological governance framework enabled us to address the flaws. Promoting polycentric governance that accommodates social trust, reciprocities, and socio-ecological beliefs and reduces uncertainties about ownership and the resources necessary to reduce defective behavior is a solution to transform the structure of the competition. Revising the socio-economic payoff into a socio-ecological value-oriented institution is the strategy to address the conundrum.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su151410997</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-07, Vol.15 (14), p.10997
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2843128231
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Analysis
Carbon
Computer & video games
Conservation
Educational software
Emissions (Pollution)
Environmental economics
Environmental impact
Game theory
Greenhouse gases
Keywords
Natural resource management
Natural resources
Science
Self interest
Sustainability
title Indonesia’s Renewable Natural Resource Management in the Low-Carbon Transition: A Conundrum in Changing Trajectories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A11%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indonesia%E2%80%99s%20Renewable%20Natural%20Resource%20Management%20in%20the%20Low-Carbon%20Transition:%20A%20Conundrum%20in%20Changing%20Trajectories&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Suratin,%20Aloysius&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=10997&rft.pages=10997-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su151410997&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA759235413%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843128231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A759235413&rfr_iscdi=true