Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management
The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent age...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2023-07, Vol.11 (7), p.2226 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2226 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Gao, Meng Wei, Chenji Zhao, Xiangguo Huang, Ruijie Li, Baozhu Yang, Jian Gao, Yan Liu, Shuangshuang Xiong, Lihui |
description | The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent agent model based on the Transformer framework with the assistance of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm has been utilized to optimize the gas flooding injection–production parameters in a well pattern in the Middle East. Firstly, 10 types of surveillance data covering 12 years from the target reservoir were gathered to provide a data foundation for model training and analysis. The prediction performance of the Transformer model reflected its higher accuracy compared to traditional reservoir numerical simulation (RNS) and other intelligent methods. The production prediction results based on the Transformer model were 21, 12, and 4 percentage points higher than those of RNS, bagging, and the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) in terms of accuracy, and it showed similar trends in the gas–oil ratio (GOR) prediction results. Secondly, the Pareto-based MOPSO algorithm was utilized to fulfil the two contradictory objectives of maximizing oil production and minimizing GOR simultaneously. After 10,000 iterations, the optimal injection–production parameters were proposed based on the generated Pareto frontier. To validate the feasibility and superiority of the developed approach, the development effects of three injection–production schemes were predicted in the intelligent agent model. In the next 400 days of production, the cumulative oil production increased by 25.3% compared to the average distribution method and 12.7% compared to the reservoir engineering method, while GOR was reduced by 27.1% and 15.3%, respectively. The results show that MOPSO results in a strategy that more appropriately optimizes oil production and GOR compared to some previous efforts published in the literature. The injection–production parameter optimization method based on the intelligent agent model and MOPSO algorithm can help decision makers to update the conservative development strategy and improve the development effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr11072226 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2843105311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759192743</galeid><sourcerecordid>A759192743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f5b7b668623a6d6577a4cecfecd61b8d41e2348cbf2b54e792d802de5ba31fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUVFLwzAQLqLgmHvxFwR8EzqbpEnaxzm2OdgYiD6XNL3MjLapSTbQX2_GBL17-I6777s7-JLkHmdTSsvsaXAYZ4IQwq-SUQSRlgKL63_1bTLx_pDFKDEtGB8l3boP0LZmD31AuyGYznzLYGyPrEYr6dGytbYx_R49Sw8NioPtsQ0m3dUHUMGcAM2GwVmpPpC2Di20Nsqcl72CB3eyxqGt7OUeuti8S260bD1MfnGcvC8Xb_OXdLNbreezTaoozUOqWS1qzgtOqOQNZ0LIXIHSoBqO66LJMRCaF6rWpGY5iJI0RUYaYLWkWNeMjpOHy9742ecRfKgO9uj6eLIiRU5xxijGkTW9sPayhcr02gYnVcwGOqNsD9rE_kywEpdE5DQKHi8C5az3DnQ1ONNJ91XhrDpbUP1ZQH8AREV5oQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843105311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gao, Meng ; Wei, Chenji ; Zhao, Xiangguo ; Huang, Ruijie ; Li, Baozhu ; Yang, Jian ; Gao, Yan ; Liu, Shuangshuang ; Xiong, Lihui</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng ; Wei, Chenji ; Zhao, Xiangguo ; Huang, Ruijie ; Li, Baozhu ; Yang, Jian ; Gao, Yan ; Liu, Shuangshuang ; Xiong, Lihui</creatorcontrib><description>The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent agent model based on the Transformer framework with the assistance of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm has been utilized to optimize the gas flooding injection–production parameters in a well pattern in the Middle East. Firstly, 10 types of surveillance data covering 12 years from the target reservoir were gathered to provide a data foundation for model training and analysis. The prediction performance of the Transformer model reflected its higher accuracy compared to traditional reservoir numerical simulation (RNS) and other intelligent methods. The production prediction results based on the Transformer model were 21, 12, and 4 percentage points higher than those of RNS, bagging, and the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) in terms of accuracy, and it showed similar trends in the gas–oil ratio (GOR) prediction results. Secondly, the Pareto-based MOPSO algorithm was utilized to fulfil the two contradictory objectives of maximizing oil production and minimizing GOR simultaneously. After 10,000 iterations, the optimal injection–production parameters were proposed based on the generated Pareto frontier. To validate the feasibility and superiority of the developed approach, the development effects of three injection–production schemes were predicted in the intelligent agent model. In the next 400 days of production, the cumulative oil production increased by 25.3% compared to the average distribution method and 12.7% compared to the reservoir engineering method, while GOR was reduced by 27.1% and 15.3%, respectively. The results show that MOPSO results in a strategy that more appropriately optimizes oil production and GOR compared to some previous efforts published in the literature. The injection–production parameter optimization method based on the intelligent agent model and MOPSO algorithm can help decision makers to update the conservative development strategy and improve the development effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr11072226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Control algorithms ; Floods ; Fluid flow ; Genetic algorithms ; Injection ; Intelligent agents ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical optimization ; Multiple objective analysis ; Net present value ; Numerical analysis ; Objectives ; Oil recovery ; Oil reservoirs ; Optimization algorithms ; Optimization techniques ; Parameters ; Pareto optimization ; Petroleum mining ; Predictions ; Production methods ; Reservoir engineering ; Statistical methods ; Swarm intelligence ; Transformers</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2023-07, Vol.11 (7), p.2226</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f5b7b668623a6d6577a4cecfecd61b8d41e2348cbf2b54e792d802de5ba31fb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f5b7b668623a6d6577a4cecfecd61b8d41e2348cbf2b54e792d802de5ba31fb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6877-4489 ; 0000-0003-4910-1972</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Chenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiangguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Baozhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuangshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lihui</creatorcontrib><title>Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management</title><title>Processes</title><description>The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent agent model based on the Transformer framework with the assistance of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm has been utilized to optimize the gas flooding injection–production parameters in a well pattern in the Middle East. Firstly, 10 types of surveillance data covering 12 years from the target reservoir were gathered to provide a data foundation for model training and analysis. The prediction performance of the Transformer model reflected its higher accuracy compared to traditional reservoir numerical simulation (RNS) and other intelligent methods. The production prediction results based on the Transformer model were 21, 12, and 4 percentage points higher than those of RNS, bagging, and the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) in terms of accuracy, and it showed similar trends in the gas–oil ratio (GOR) prediction results. Secondly, the Pareto-based MOPSO algorithm was utilized to fulfil the two contradictory objectives of maximizing oil production and minimizing GOR simultaneously. After 10,000 iterations, the optimal injection–production parameters were proposed based on the generated Pareto frontier. To validate the feasibility and superiority of the developed approach, the development effects of three injection–production schemes were predicted in the intelligent agent model. In the next 400 days of production, the cumulative oil production increased by 25.3% compared to the average distribution method and 12.7% compared to the reservoir engineering method, while GOR was reduced by 27.1% and 15.3%, respectively. The results show that MOPSO results in a strategy that more appropriately optimizes oil production and GOR compared to some previous efforts published in the literature. The injection–production parameter optimization method based on the intelligent agent model and MOPSO algorithm can help decision makers to update the conservative development strategy and improve the development effect.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Control algorithms</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Intelligent agents</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical optimization</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Net present value</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>Oil reservoirs</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Petroleum mining</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Reservoir engineering</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Swarm intelligence</subject><subject>Transformers</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUVFLwzAQLqLgmHvxFwR8EzqbpEnaxzm2OdgYiD6XNL3MjLapSTbQX2_GBL17-I6777s7-JLkHmdTSsvsaXAYZ4IQwq-SUQSRlgKL63_1bTLx_pDFKDEtGB8l3boP0LZmD31AuyGYznzLYGyPrEYr6dGytbYx_R49Sw8NioPtsQ0m3dUHUMGcAM2GwVmpPpC2Di20Nsqcl72CB3eyxqGt7OUeuti8S260bD1MfnGcvC8Xb_OXdLNbreezTaoozUOqWS1qzgtOqOQNZ0LIXIHSoBqO66LJMRCaF6rWpGY5iJI0RUYaYLWkWNeMjpOHy9742ecRfKgO9uj6eLIiRU5xxijGkTW9sPayhcr02gYnVcwGOqNsD9rE_kywEpdE5DQKHi8C5az3DnQ1ONNJ91XhrDpbUP1ZQH8AREV5oQ</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Gao, Meng</creator><creator>Wei, Chenji</creator><creator>Zhao, Xiangguo</creator><creator>Huang, Ruijie</creator><creator>Li, Baozhu</creator><creator>Yang, Jian</creator><creator>Gao, Yan</creator><creator>Liu, Shuangshuang</creator><creator>Xiong, Lihui</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-1972</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management</title><author>Gao, Meng ; Wei, Chenji ; Zhao, Xiangguo ; Huang, Ruijie ; Li, Baozhu ; Yang, Jian ; Gao, Yan ; Liu, Shuangshuang ; Xiong, Lihui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f5b7b668623a6d6577a4cecfecd61b8d41e2348cbf2b54e792d802de5ba31fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Control algorithms</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Intelligent agents</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical optimization</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Net present value</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>Oil reservoirs</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Petroleum mining</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Reservoir engineering</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Swarm intelligence</topic><topic>Transformers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Chenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiangguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ruijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Baozhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuangshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lihui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Meng</au><au>Wei, Chenji</au><au>Zhao, Xiangguo</au><au>Huang, Ruijie</au><au>Li, Baozhu</au><au>Yang, Jian</au><au>Gao, Yan</au><au>Liu, Shuangshuang</au><au>Xiong, Lihui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2226</spage><pages>2226-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent agent model based on the Transformer framework with the assistance of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm has been utilized to optimize the gas flooding injection–production parameters in a well pattern in the Middle East. Firstly, 10 types of surveillance data covering 12 years from the target reservoir were gathered to provide a data foundation for model training and analysis. The prediction performance of the Transformer model reflected its higher accuracy compared to traditional reservoir numerical simulation (RNS) and other intelligent methods. The production prediction results based on the Transformer model were 21, 12, and 4 percentage points higher than those of RNS, bagging, and the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) in terms of accuracy, and it showed similar trends in the gas–oil ratio (GOR) prediction results. Secondly, the Pareto-based MOPSO algorithm was utilized to fulfil the two contradictory objectives of maximizing oil production and minimizing GOR simultaneously. After 10,000 iterations, the optimal injection–production parameters were proposed based on the generated Pareto frontier. To validate the feasibility and superiority of the developed approach, the development effects of three injection–production schemes were predicted in the intelligent agent model. In the next 400 days of production, the cumulative oil production increased by 25.3% compared to the average distribution method and 12.7% compared to the reservoir engineering method, while GOR was reduced by 27.1% and 15.3%, respectively. The results show that MOPSO results in a strategy that more appropriately optimizes oil production and GOR compared to some previous efforts published in the literature. The injection–production parameter optimization method based on the intelligent agent model and MOPSO algorithm can help decision makers to update the conservative development strategy and improve the development effect.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr11072226</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-1972</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2023-07, Vol.11 (7), p.2226 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2843105311 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Artificial intelligence Control algorithms Floods Fluid flow Genetic algorithms Injection Intelligent agents Mathematical models Mathematical optimization Multiple objective analysis Net present value Numerical analysis Objectives Oil recovery Oil reservoirs Optimization algorithms Optimization techniques Parameters Pareto optimization Petroleum mining Predictions Production methods Reservoir engineering Statistical methods Swarm intelligence Transformers |
title | Intelligent Optimization of Gas Flooding Based on Multi-Objective Approach for Efficient Reservoir Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A11%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intelligent%20Optimization%20of%20Gas%20Flooding%20Based%20on%20Multi-Objective%20Approach%20for%20Efficient%20Reservoir%20Management&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Gao,%20Meng&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2226&rft.pages=2226-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr11072226&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA759192743%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843105311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A759192743&rfr_iscdi=true |