Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops
This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of criminology 2023-07, Vol.20 (4), p.1430-1445 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1445 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1430 |
container_title | European journal of criminology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Jacques, Scott Jacobs, Bruce A. |
description | This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personnel's reaction to it is used as the empirical vessel to examine proterrence. Proterrence permits examination of the interface between order maintenance and social control against a backdrop of perceived sanction illegitimacy. It also permits exploration of the process by which formal sanctions thread through informal mechanisms—where that threading is enforcement rather than consequence-based and where rule implementers face the brunt of the sanction that a third party violates. Data are based on in-depth fieldwork in Amsterdam coffeeshops. The wider applicability of proterrence is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/14773708211037264 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2842872019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14773708211037264</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2842872019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-4d2a01d9cd5cda0f0d5c74b9c5d1eb6d6151ae2e8dc312cd6ddb1a8386fca77f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEgUtTvE4aJ8eq4iVVggOIY-Ss132QxMVOD_17XAWJA2Ivs9LOzO4OY9cgpgBK3UGmVKpEIQFEqmSenbARqAwSmYvyNPZxnhwJ5-wihK0QaSwxYh-v3vXkPXVIE-73DfFN09Bq029ajYcJ153h_Zp4rTvuOt67WiM6Hlr3Gakdn7ch6o1ubwNHZy1RWLtduGRnVjeBrn5wzN4f7t8WT8ny5fF5MV8mGG_sk8xILcCUaGZotLAiosrqEmcGqM5NDjPQJKkwmIJEkxtTgy7SIreolbLpmN0MvjvvvvYU-mrr9r6LKytZZLJQUkAZWTCw0LsQPNlq5-N__lCBqI75VX_yi5rpoAl6Rb-u_wu-Ab-UcIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842872019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Jacques, Scott ; Jacobs, Bruce A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Scott ; Jacobs, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personnel's reaction to it is used as the empirical vessel to examine proterrence. Proterrence permits examination of the interface between order maintenance and social control against a backdrop of perceived sanction illegitimacy. It also permits exploration of the process by which formal sanctions thread through informal mechanisms—where that threading is enforcement rather than consequence-based and where rule implementers face the brunt of the sanction that a third party violates. Data are based on in-depth fieldwork in Amsterdam coffeeshops. The wider applicability of proterrence is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-3708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14773708211037264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bans ; Deterrence ; Enforcement ; Illegitimacy ; Sanctions ; Social control ; Tobacco ; Tobacco smoke</subject><ispartof>European journal of criminology, 2023-07, Vol.20 (4), p.1430-1445</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-4d2a01d9cd5cda0f0d5c74b9c5d1eb6d6151ae2e8dc312cd6ddb1a8386fca77f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2089-4078</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14773708211037264$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14773708211037264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><title>Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops</title><title>European journal of criminology</title><addtitle>European Journal of Criminology</addtitle><description>This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personnel's reaction to it is used as the empirical vessel to examine proterrence. Proterrence permits examination of the interface between order maintenance and social control against a backdrop of perceived sanction illegitimacy. It also permits exploration of the process by which formal sanctions thread through informal mechanisms—where that threading is enforcement rather than consequence-based and where rule implementers face the brunt of the sanction that a third party violates. Data are based on in-depth fieldwork in Amsterdam coffeeshops. The wider applicability of proterrence is discussed.</description><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Illegitimacy</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><issn>1477-3708</issn><issn>1741-2609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEgUtTvE4aJ8eq4iVVggOIY-Ss132QxMVOD_17XAWJA2Ivs9LOzO4OY9cgpgBK3UGmVKpEIQFEqmSenbARqAwSmYvyNPZxnhwJ5-wihK0QaSwxYh-v3vXkPXVIE-73DfFN09Bq029ajYcJ153h_Zp4rTvuOt67WiM6Hlr3Gakdn7ch6o1ubwNHZy1RWLtduGRnVjeBrn5wzN4f7t8WT8ny5fF5MV8mGG_sk8xILcCUaGZotLAiosrqEmcGqM5NDjPQJKkwmIJEkxtTgy7SIreolbLpmN0MvjvvvvYU-mrr9r6LKytZZLJQUkAZWTCw0LsQPNlq5-N__lCBqI75VX_yi5rpoAl6Rb-u_wu-Ab-UcIk</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Jacques, Scott</creator><creator>Jacobs, Bruce A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-4078</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops</title><author>Jacques, Scott ; Jacobs, Bruce A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-4d2a01d9cd5cda0f0d5c74b9c5d1eb6d6151ae2e8dc312cd6ddb1a8386fca77f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Illegitimacy</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacques, Scott</au><au>Jacobs, Bruce A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops</atitle><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle><addtitle>European Journal of Criminology</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1430</spage><epage>1445</epage><pages>1430-1445</pages><issn>1477-3708</issn><eissn>1741-2609</eissn><abstract>This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personnel's reaction to it is used as the empirical vessel to examine proterrence. Proterrence permits examination of the interface between order maintenance and social control against a backdrop of perceived sanction illegitimacy. It also permits exploration of the process by which formal sanctions thread through informal mechanisms—where that threading is enforcement rather than consequence-based and where rule implementers face the brunt of the sanction that a third party violates. Data are based on in-depth fieldwork in Amsterdam coffeeshops. The wider applicability of proterrence is discussed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14773708211037264</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-4078</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-3708 |
ispartof | European journal of criminology, 2023-07, Vol.20 (4), p.1430-1445 |
issn | 1477-3708 1741-2609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2842872019 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Bans Deterrence Enforcement Illegitimacy Sanctions Social control Tobacco Tobacco smoke |
title | Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proterrence,%20rule%20illegitimacy,%20and%20the%20ban%20on%20tobacco%20smoke%20in%20Amsterdam's%20coffeeshops&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Jacques,%20Scott&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1430&rft.epage=1445&rft.pages=1430-1445&rft.issn=1477-3708&rft.eissn=1741-2609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14773708211037264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2842872019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842872019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14773708211037264&rfr_iscdi=true |