Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models

Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soils and sediments 2023-08, Vol.23 (8), p.3241-3261
Hauptverfasser: Cox, Terry, Laceby, J. Patrick, Roth, Till, Alewell, Christine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3261
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3241
container_title Journal of soils and sediments
container_volume 23
creator Cox, Terry
Laceby, J. Patrick
Roth, Till
Alewell, Christine
description Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined using the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR with compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSI). Here, we investigate CSSIs of fatty acid (FA) tracer selection with a novel method to identify and investigate the effect of non-informative tracers on model performance. Methods To evaluate CSSI tracer selection, mathematical mixtures were generated using source soils (n = 28) from the Rhine catchment upstream of Basel (Switzerland). Using the continuous ranked probability (CRP) skill score, MixSIAR’s performance was evaluated for 11 combinations of FAs and 15 combinations of FAs with δ 15 N as a mixing line offset tracer. A novel scaling and discrimination analysis (SDA) was also developed to identify tracers with non-unique mixing spaces. Results FA only tracer combinations overestimated pasture contributions while underestimating arable contributions. When compared to models with only FA tracers, utilizing δ 15 N to offset the mixing line resulted in a 28% improvement in the CRP skill score. δ 15 N + δ 13 C FA 26 was the optimal tracer set resulting in a 62% model improvement relative to δ 15 N + all δ 13 C FAs. The novel SDA method demonstrated how δ 13 C FA tracers have a non-unique mixing space and thus behave as non-informative tracers. Importantly, the inclusion of non-informative tracers decreased model performance. Conclusions These results indicate that MixSIAR did not handle non-informative CSSI tracers effectively. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to remove non-informative tracers, and where feasible, all combinations and permutations of tracers should be assessed to optimize tracer selection. Application of these tracer selection steps can help improve and advance the performance of sediment fingerprinting models and ultimately aid in improving erosion mitigation and management strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2839649516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839649516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5c434378035aad8985b22c38f5696263d0ff45bc2d3ca48926e1fb794c83bfa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6Aq4Dr0bwmk6ykFF9QcKPrkMmjTplJajIt9u9NHcGdm_vgnnPuvQeAa4xuMULNXcaYclEhQitE66bEEzDDHLOqYQKdlppRWSGMxDm4yHmDEG3KeAbGlcsZdhkOMbl7uIAh7l0PBzd-RAt9TLCzLoydP3RhDXWw0O11v9PjsQ0xVF0ooKH0ewfHpI1LRS7A7Gw3FCLMcZeMg0P3dWQM0bo-X4Izr_vsrn7zHLw_Prwtn6vV69PLcrGqDOV0rGrDKKONKB9pbYUUdUuIocLXXHLCqUXes7o1xFKjmZCEO-zbRjIjaOu1pHNwM-luU_zcuTyqTbkmlJWKCCo5kzXmBUUmlEkx5-S82qZu0OmgMFJHd9Xkriruqh93S5wDOpFyAYe1S3_S_7C-AbuSfjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839649516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cox, Terry ; Laceby, J. Patrick ; Roth, Till ; Alewell, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, Terry ; Laceby, J. Patrick ; Roth, Till ; Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined using the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR with compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSI). Here, we investigate CSSIs of fatty acid (FA) tracer selection with a novel method to identify and investigate the effect of non-informative tracers on model performance. Methods To evaluate CSSI tracer selection, mathematical mixtures were generated using source soils (n = 28) from the Rhine catchment upstream of Basel (Switzerland). Using the continuous ranked probability (CRP) skill score, MixSIAR’s performance was evaluated for 11 combinations of FAs and 15 combinations of FAs with δ 15 N as a mixing line offset tracer. A novel scaling and discrimination analysis (SDA) was also developed to identify tracers with non-unique mixing spaces. Results FA only tracer combinations overestimated pasture contributions while underestimating arable contributions. When compared to models with only FA tracers, utilizing δ 15 N to offset the mixing line resulted in a 28% improvement in the CRP skill score. δ 15 N + δ 13 C FA 26 was the optimal tracer set resulting in a 62% model improvement relative to δ 15 N + all δ 13 C FAs. The novel SDA method demonstrated how δ 13 C FA tracers have a non-unique mixing space and thus behave as non-informative tracers. Importantly, the inclusion of non-informative tracers decreased model performance. Conclusions These results indicate that MixSIAR did not handle non-informative CSSI tracers effectively. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to remove non-informative tracers, and where feasible, all combinations and permutations of tracers should be assessed to optimize tracer selection. Application of these tracer selection steps can help improve and advance the performance of sediment fingerprinting models and ultimately aid in improving erosion mitigation and management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accelerated erosion ; Arable land ; Bayesian analysis ; Carbon 13 ; Catchment area ; Combinations (mathematics) ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Fatty acids ; Fingerprinting ; Identification methods ; Isotopes ; Land use ; Mathematical models ; Mitigation ; Optimization ; Pasture ; Performance evaluation ; Permutations ; Probability theory ; Scaling ; Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article ; Sediment ; Sediment fingerprinting ; Sediments ; Soil erosion ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Stable isotopes ; Tracers</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2023-08, Vol.23 (8), p.3241-3261</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5c434378035aad8985b22c38f5696263d0ff45bc2d3ca48926e1fb794c83bfa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5c434378035aad8985b22c38f5696263d0ff45bc2d3ca48926e1fb794c83bfa93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3268-7148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laceby, J. Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined using the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR with compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSI). Here, we investigate CSSIs of fatty acid (FA) tracer selection with a novel method to identify and investigate the effect of non-informative tracers on model performance. Methods To evaluate CSSI tracer selection, mathematical mixtures were generated using source soils (n = 28) from the Rhine catchment upstream of Basel (Switzerland). Using the continuous ranked probability (CRP) skill score, MixSIAR’s performance was evaluated for 11 combinations of FAs and 15 combinations of FAs with δ 15 N as a mixing line offset tracer. A novel scaling and discrimination analysis (SDA) was also developed to identify tracers with non-unique mixing spaces. Results FA only tracer combinations overestimated pasture contributions while underestimating arable contributions. When compared to models with only FA tracers, utilizing δ 15 N to offset the mixing line resulted in a 28% improvement in the CRP skill score. δ 15 N + δ 13 C FA 26 was the optimal tracer set resulting in a 62% model improvement relative to δ 15 N + all δ 13 C FAs. The novel SDA method demonstrated how δ 13 C FA tracers have a non-unique mixing space and thus behave as non-informative tracers. Importantly, the inclusion of non-informative tracers decreased model performance. Conclusions These results indicate that MixSIAR did not handle non-informative CSSI tracers effectively. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to remove non-informative tracers, and where feasible, all combinations and permutations of tracers should be assessed to optimize tracer selection. Application of these tracer selection steps can help improve and advance the performance of sediment fingerprinting models and ultimately aid in improving erosion mitigation and management strategies.</description><subject>Accelerated erosion</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Carbon 13</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Combinations (mathematics)</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Permutations</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment fingerprinting</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrf6Aq4Dr0bwmk6ykFF9QcKPrkMmjTplJajIt9u9NHcGdm_vgnnPuvQeAa4xuMULNXcaYclEhQitE66bEEzDDHLOqYQKdlppRWSGMxDm4yHmDEG3KeAbGlcsZdhkOMbl7uIAh7l0PBzd-RAt9TLCzLoydP3RhDXWw0O11v9PjsQ0xVF0ooKH0ewfHpI1LRS7A7Gw3FCLMcZeMg0P3dWQM0bo-X4Izr_vsrn7zHLw_Prwtn6vV69PLcrGqDOV0rGrDKKONKB9pbYUUdUuIocLXXHLCqUXes7o1xFKjmZCEO-zbRjIjaOu1pHNwM-luU_zcuTyqTbkmlJWKCCo5kzXmBUUmlEkx5-S82qZu0OmgMFJHd9Xkriruqh93S5wDOpFyAYe1S3_S_7C-AbuSfjI</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Cox, Terry</creator><creator>Laceby, J. Patrick</creator><creator>Roth, Till</creator><creator>Alewell, Christine</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-7148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models</title><author>Cox, Terry ; Laceby, J. Patrick ; Roth, Till ; Alewell, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5c434378035aad8985b22c38f5696263d0ff45bc2d3ca48926e1fb794c83bfa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accelerated erosion</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Carbon 13</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Combinations (mathematics)</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Permutations</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment fingerprinting</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laceby, J. Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Till</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, Terry</au><au>Laceby, J. Patrick</au><au>Roth, Till</au><au>Alewell, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3241</spage><epage>3261</epage><pages>3241-3261</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose Accelerated soil erosion poses a global hazard to soil health. Understanding soil and sediment behaviour through sediment fingerprinting enables the monitoring and identification of areas with high sediment delivery. Land-use specific sediment source apportionment is increasingly determined using the Bayesian mixing model MixSIAR with compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSI). Here, we investigate CSSIs of fatty acid (FA) tracer selection with a novel method to identify and investigate the effect of non-informative tracers on model performance. Methods To evaluate CSSI tracer selection, mathematical mixtures were generated using source soils (n = 28) from the Rhine catchment upstream of Basel (Switzerland). Using the continuous ranked probability (CRP) skill score, MixSIAR’s performance was evaluated for 11 combinations of FAs and 15 combinations of FAs with δ 15 N as a mixing line offset tracer. A novel scaling and discrimination analysis (SDA) was also developed to identify tracers with non-unique mixing spaces. Results FA only tracer combinations overestimated pasture contributions while underestimating arable contributions. When compared to models with only FA tracers, utilizing δ 15 N to offset the mixing line resulted in a 28% improvement in the CRP skill score. δ 15 N + δ 13 C FA 26 was the optimal tracer set resulting in a 62% model improvement relative to δ 15 N + all δ 13 C FAs. The novel SDA method demonstrated how δ 13 C FA tracers have a non-unique mixing space and thus behave as non-informative tracers. Importantly, the inclusion of non-informative tracers decreased model performance. Conclusions These results indicate that MixSIAR did not handle non-informative CSSI tracers effectively. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to remove non-informative tracers, and where feasible, all combinations and permutations of tracers should be assessed to optimize tracer selection. Application of these tracer selection steps can help improve and advance the performance of sediment fingerprinting models and ultimately aid in improving erosion mitigation and management strategies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-7148</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-0108
ispartof Journal of soils and sediments, 2023-08, Vol.23 (8), p.3241-3261
issn 1439-0108
1614-7480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2839649516
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accelerated erosion
Arable land
Bayesian analysis
Carbon 13
Catchment area
Combinations (mathematics)
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Physics
Fatty acids
Fingerprinting
Identification methods
Isotopes
Land use
Mathematical models
Mitigation
Optimization
Pasture
Performance evaluation
Permutations
Probability theory
Scaling
Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article
Sediment
Sediment fingerprinting
Sediments
Soil erosion
Soil Science & Conservation
Stable isotopes
Tracers
title Less is more? A novel method for identifying and evaluating non-informative tracers in sediment source mixing models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A26%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less%20is%20more?%20A%20novel%20method%20for%20identifying%20and%20evaluating%20non-informative%20tracers%20in%20sediment%20source%20mixing%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Cox,%20Terry&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3241&rft.epage=3261&rft.pages=3241-3261&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-023-03573-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839649516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839649516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true