A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources

Despite this being the era of migration, no systematic theory of international migration has emerged, nor is there an academic or political agreement on ways in which migration is a ‘gendered’ process. Both theoretically and as inputs in the policy‐making process, gender‐blind approaches have actual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International migration 2023-08, Vol.61 (4), p.170-185
Hauptverfasser: Bircan, Tuba, Yilmaz, Sinem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 4
container_start_page 170
container_title International migration
container_volume 61
creator Bircan, Tuba
Yilmaz, Sinem
description Despite this being the era of migration, no systematic theory of international migration has emerged, nor is there an academic or political agreement on ways in which migration is a ‘gendered’ process. Both theoretically and as inputs in the policy‐making process, gender‐blind approaches have actually rendered the gender dimension of migration more or less invisible. Through an in‐depth examination of the place of gender in the key theories of migration and relevant sources of data, the paper seeks to take stock of how these theories treat this dimension and investigate the cross‐sectional challenges in uncovering gender in international migration data. It, therefore, provides a critical review of both theory and data by shedding much‐needed light on their neglect of the gender aspects. Our findings based on a conceptual review of the literature and a case study based on Eurostat data on migration drivers demonstrate that migration theories and statistics typically equate gender with sex, which limits our ability to develop a comprehensive understanding of how complex gender dimensions shape the migration process. Moreover, given the extent to which existing data and theories overlook the intersectionality between the drivers of migration and diversity within migrant groups, this gap in knowledge presents an obstacle to gender‐responsive migration governance. In light of this, the paper discusses priorities for ‘gendering’ international migration research. We argue that in addition to improving accuracy and coverage of sex‐disaggregated statistics on international migration, both regular and irregular, it is crucial to develop quantitative as well as qualitative indicators to monitor the gender dimension in this area.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/imig.13088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2838181212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2838181212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-2fbda3299f4d678db930b6e5746140d1d9a8bd2cf6f21ddf04e169532fb55433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsbvyDgTpial2Qyyc5StBYqbroPmUlSU9qZmkwRd36C3-iXmDqufZsHj3Pvu1yEroFMIM9d2IX1BBiR8gSNgAtZUM7KUzQihJKiUrI8RxcpbQghXIlqhO6nuImhD28HhzuP1661Ln5_ftXb0Fqc3aLpQ9fi_tV1MbiETT5b0xucukNsXLpEZ95sk7v622O0enxYzZ6K5ct8MZsui4axKsfwtTWMKuW5FZW0tWKkFq6suABOLFhlZG1p44WnYK0n3IFQJcu6suSMjdHNYLuPXc6aer3J_9v8UVPJJEigQDN1O1BN7FKKzut9DDsTPzQQfSxIHwvSvwVlGAb4PWzdxz-kXjwv5oPmB9YuaIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838181212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Bircan, Tuba ; Yilmaz, Sinem</creator><creatorcontrib>Bircan, Tuba ; Yilmaz, Sinem</creatorcontrib><description>Despite this being the era of migration, no systematic theory of international migration has emerged, nor is there an academic or political agreement on ways in which migration is a ‘gendered’ process. Both theoretically and as inputs in the policy‐making process, gender‐blind approaches have actually rendered the gender dimension of migration more or less invisible. Through an in‐depth examination of the place of gender in the key theories of migration and relevant sources of data, the paper seeks to take stock of how these theories treat this dimension and investigate the cross‐sectional challenges in uncovering gender in international migration data. It, therefore, provides a critical review of both theory and data by shedding much‐needed light on their neglect of the gender aspects. Our findings based on a conceptual review of the literature and a case study based on Eurostat data on migration drivers demonstrate that migration theories and statistics typically equate gender with sex, which limits our ability to develop a comprehensive understanding of how complex gender dimensions shape the migration process. Moreover, given the extent to which existing data and theories overlook the intersectionality between the drivers of migration and diversity within migrant groups, this gap in knowledge presents an obstacle to gender‐responsive migration governance. In light of this, the paper discusses priorities for ‘gendering’ international migration research. We argue that in addition to improving accuracy and coverage of sex‐disaggregated statistics on international migration, both regular and irregular, it is crucial to develop quantitative as well as qualitative indicators to monitor the gender dimension in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/imig.13088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Data ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Governance ; Internal migration ; International migration ; Intersectionality ; Literature reviews ; Migrants ; Migration ; Sex ; Statistics ; Theory</subject><ispartof>International migration, 2023-08, Vol.61 (4), p.170-185</ispartof><rights>2022 International Organization for Migration.</rights><rights>International Migration © 2023 International Organization for Migration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-2fbda3299f4d678db930b6e5746140d1d9a8bd2cf6f21ddf04e169532fb55433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-2fbda3299f4d678db930b6e5746140d1d9a8bd2cf6f21ddf04e169532fb55433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fimig.13088$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fimig.13088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,33772,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bircan, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Sinem</creatorcontrib><title>A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources</title><title>International migration</title><description>Despite this being the era of migration, no systematic theory of international migration has emerged, nor is there an academic or political agreement on ways in which migration is a ‘gendered’ process. Both theoretically and as inputs in the policy‐making process, gender‐blind approaches have actually rendered the gender dimension of migration more or less invisible. Through an in‐depth examination of the place of gender in the key theories of migration and relevant sources of data, the paper seeks to take stock of how these theories treat this dimension and investigate the cross‐sectional challenges in uncovering gender in international migration data. It, therefore, provides a critical review of both theory and data by shedding much‐needed light on their neglect of the gender aspects. Our findings based on a conceptual review of the literature and a case study based on Eurostat data on migration drivers demonstrate that migration theories and statistics typically equate gender with sex, which limits our ability to develop a comprehensive understanding of how complex gender dimensions shape the migration process. Moreover, given the extent to which existing data and theories overlook the intersectionality between the drivers of migration and diversity within migrant groups, this gap in knowledge presents an obstacle to gender‐responsive migration governance. In light of this, the paper discusses priorities for ‘gendering’ international migration research. We argue that in addition to improving accuracy and coverage of sex‐disaggregated statistics on international migration, both regular and irregular, it is crucial to develop quantitative as well as qualitative indicators to monitor the gender dimension in this area.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Internal migration</subject><subject>International migration</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0020-7985</issn><issn>1468-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsbvyDgTpial2Qyyc5StBYqbroPmUlSU9qZmkwRd36C3-iXmDqufZsHj3Pvu1yEroFMIM9d2IX1BBiR8gSNgAtZUM7KUzQihJKiUrI8RxcpbQghXIlqhO6nuImhD28HhzuP1661Ln5_ftXb0Fqc3aLpQ9fi_tV1MbiETT5b0xucukNsXLpEZ95sk7v622O0enxYzZ6K5ct8MZsui4axKsfwtTWMKuW5FZW0tWKkFq6suABOLFhlZG1p44WnYK0n3IFQJcu6suSMjdHNYLuPXc6aer3J_9v8UVPJJEigQDN1O1BN7FKKzut9DDsTPzQQfSxIHwvSvwVlGAb4PWzdxz-kXjwv5oPmB9YuaIs</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Bircan, Tuba</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Sinem</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources</title><author>Bircan, Tuba ; Yilmaz, Sinem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-2fbda3299f4d678db930b6e5746140d1d9a8bd2cf6f21ddf04e169532fb55433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Internal migration</topic><topic>International migration</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bircan, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Sinem</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International migration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bircan, Tuba</au><au>Yilmaz, Sinem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources</atitle><jtitle>International migration</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>170-185</pages><issn>0020-7985</issn><eissn>1468-2435</eissn><abstract>Despite this being the era of migration, no systematic theory of international migration has emerged, nor is there an academic or political agreement on ways in which migration is a ‘gendered’ process. Both theoretically and as inputs in the policy‐making process, gender‐blind approaches have actually rendered the gender dimension of migration more or less invisible. Through an in‐depth examination of the place of gender in the key theories of migration and relevant sources of data, the paper seeks to take stock of how these theories treat this dimension and investigate the cross‐sectional challenges in uncovering gender in international migration data. It, therefore, provides a critical review of both theory and data by shedding much‐needed light on their neglect of the gender aspects. Our findings based on a conceptual review of the literature and a case study based on Eurostat data on migration drivers demonstrate that migration theories and statistics typically equate gender with sex, which limits our ability to develop a comprehensive understanding of how complex gender dimensions shape the migration process. Moreover, given the extent to which existing data and theories overlook the intersectionality between the drivers of migration and diversity within migrant groups, this gap in knowledge presents an obstacle to gender‐responsive migration governance. In light of this, the paper discusses priorities for ‘gendering’ international migration research. We argue that in addition to improving accuracy and coverage of sex‐disaggregated statistics on international migration, both regular and irregular, it is crucial to develop quantitative as well as qualitative indicators to monitor the gender dimension in this area.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/imig.13088</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7985
ispartof International migration, 2023-08, Vol.61 (4), p.170-185
issn 0020-7985
1468-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2838181212
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Political Science Complete
subjects Case studies
Data
Gender
Gender aspects
Governance
Internal migration
International migration
Intersectionality
Literature reviews
Migrants
Migration
Sex
Statistics
Theory
title A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critique%20of%20gender%E2%80%90blind%20migration%20theories%20and%20data%20sources&rft.jtitle=International%20migration&rft.au=Bircan,%20Tuba&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=170-185&rft.issn=0020-7985&rft.eissn=1468-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/imig.13088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2838181212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838181212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true