Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage

Colour is an important component of many different defensive strategies, but signal efficacy and detectability will also depend on the size of the coloured structures, and how pattern size interacts with the background. Consequently, size‐dependent changes in colouration are common among many differ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2023-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1010-1019
Hauptverfasser: Barnett, James B., Yeager, Justin, McEwen, Brendan L., Kinley, Isaac, Anderson, Hannah M., Guevara, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1019
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1010
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 36
creator Barnett, James B.
Yeager, Justin
McEwen, Brendan L.
Kinley, Isaac
Anderson, Hannah M.
Guevara, Jennifer
description Colour is an important component of many different defensive strategies, but signal efficacy and detectability will also depend on the size of the coloured structures, and how pattern size interacts with the background. Consequently, size‐dependent changes in colouration are common among many different species as juveniles and adults frequently use colour for different purposes in different environmental contexts. A widespread strategy in many species is switching from crypsis to conspicuous aposematic signalling as increasing body size can reduce the efficacy of camouflage, while other antipredator defences may strengthen. Curiously, despite being chemically defended, the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus, Leptodactylidae) appears to do the opposite, with bright yellow stripes found in smaller individuals, whereas larger frogs exhibit dull brown stripes. Here, we investigated whether size‐dependent differences in colour support distinct defensive strategies. We first used visual modelling of potential predators to assess how colour contrast varied among frogs of different sizes. We found that contrast peaked in mid‐sized individuals while the largest individuals had the least contrasting patterns. We then used two detection experiments with human participants to evaluate how colour and body size affected overall detectability. These experiments revealed that larger body sizes were easier to detect, but that the colours of smaller frogs were more detectable than those of larger frogs. Taken together our data support the hypothesis that the primary defensive strategy changes from conspicuous aposematism to camouflage with increasing size, implying size‐dependent differences in the efficacy of defensive colouration. We discuss our data in relation to theories of size‐dependent aposematism and evaluate the evidence for and against a possible size‐dependent mimicry complex with sympatric poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). For chemically defended species, colouration evolves as a balance between the benefits of a salient and recognisable warning signal (aposematism) and the benefits of avoiding unnecessary attention from predators (camouflage). Detectability will depend on many factors, including colour, pattern, and body size. Here, we examined size‐dependent colouration in the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus), where small frogs have bright blue‐white stripes, mid‐sized frogs have bright yellow stripes, and large frogs have dull‐brown stripes. We found
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jeb.14143
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836936735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836936735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-760e14084e487351971d9b7de59c2aff59e62210b0747819c0ff6bda36ce14733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8AIoEhNDWl_sOPEIVfmnSgyAxGY5zgWlSuIQN0Jl4hF4Rp4EQwobXs46fffd6UfIMdAp-DdbYTYFDpztkDHwiIYSKOz6PwUaUgFPI3Lg3IpSEDyO98mIiRh4yqMxWd6Xb_j5_pFji02OzTowtrJ9p9elbYJMV7ox6HyzcW1petu7QLfWYe0BVwe6yQOja9sXlX7GQ7JX6Mrh0bZOyOPl4mF-HS7vrm7m58vQMGAsTARF4DTlyNOExSATyGWW5BhLE-miiCWKKAKa0YQnKUhDi0JkuWbC-LmEsQk5HbxtZ196dGu18ic3fqWKUiYkE17rqbOBMp11rsNCtV1Z626jgKrv3JTPTf3k5tmTrbHPasz_yN-gPDAbgNeyws3_JnW7uBiUX1c5d20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836936735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Barnett, James B. ; Yeager, Justin ; McEwen, Brendan L. ; Kinley, Isaac ; Anderson, Hannah M. ; Guevara, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnett, James B. ; Yeager, Justin ; McEwen, Brendan L. ; Kinley, Isaac ; Anderson, Hannah M. ; Guevara, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Colour is an important component of many different defensive strategies, but signal efficacy and detectability will also depend on the size of the coloured structures, and how pattern size interacts with the background. Consequently, size‐dependent changes in colouration are common among many different species as juveniles and adults frequently use colour for different purposes in different environmental contexts. A widespread strategy in many species is switching from crypsis to conspicuous aposematic signalling as increasing body size can reduce the efficacy of camouflage, while other antipredator defences may strengthen. Curiously, despite being chemically defended, the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus, Leptodactylidae) appears to do the opposite, with bright yellow stripes found in smaller individuals, whereas larger frogs exhibit dull brown stripes. Here, we investigated whether size‐dependent differences in colour support distinct defensive strategies. We first used visual modelling of potential predators to assess how colour contrast varied among frogs of different sizes. We found that contrast peaked in mid‐sized individuals while the largest individuals had the least contrasting patterns. We then used two detection experiments with human participants to evaluate how colour and body size affected overall detectability. These experiments revealed that larger body sizes were easier to detect, but that the colours of smaller frogs were more detectable than those of larger frogs. Taken together our data support the hypothesis that the primary defensive strategy changes from conspicuous aposematism to camouflage with increasing size, implying size‐dependent differences in the efficacy of defensive colouration. We discuss our data in relation to theories of size‐dependent aposematism and evaluate the evidence for and against a possible size‐dependent mimicry complex with sympatric poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). For chemically defended species, colouration evolves as a balance between the benefits of a salient and recognisable warning signal (aposematism) and the benefits of avoiding unnecessary attention from predators (camouflage). Detectability will depend on many factors, including colour, pattern, and body size. Here, we examined size‐dependent colouration in the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus), where small frogs have bright blue‐white stripes, mid‐sized frogs have bright yellow stripes, and large frogs have dull‐brown stripes. We found that the trade‐off between aposematism and camouflage depends on both colour and body size, such that frogs of different sizes employ different defensive strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14143</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36514842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amphibians ; Animals ; Anura ; Aposematism ; Biological Mimicry ; Body Size ; Camouflage ; Color ; Coloration ; colour change ; Crypsis ; Dendrobatidae ; Effectiveness ; Frogs ; Humans ; Leptodactylidae ; Microbalances ; Mimicry ; Müllerian mimicry ; ontogeny ; Predators ; Sympatric populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2023-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1010-1019</ispartof><rights>2022 European Society for Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 European Society for Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-760e14084e487351971d9b7de59c2aff59e62210b0747819c0ff6bda36ce14733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2309-9088 ; 0000-0002-3620-4641 ; 0000-0003-2057-9606 ; 0000-0001-9789-4132 ; 0000-0001-8692-6311 ; 0000-0003-1672-0638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.14143$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.14143$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnett, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeager, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Brendan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinley, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guevara, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Colour is an important component of many different defensive strategies, but signal efficacy and detectability will also depend on the size of the coloured structures, and how pattern size interacts with the background. Consequently, size‐dependent changes in colouration are common among many different species as juveniles and adults frequently use colour for different purposes in different environmental contexts. A widespread strategy in many species is switching from crypsis to conspicuous aposematic signalling as increasing body size can reduce the efficacy of camouflage, while other antipredator defences may strengthen. Curiously, despite being chemically defended, the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus, Leptodactylidae) appears to do the opposite, with bright yellow stripes found in smaller individuals, whereas larger frogs exhibit dull brown stripes. Here, we investigated whether size‐dependent differences in colour support distinct defensive strategies. We first used visual modelling of potential predators to assess how colour contrast varied among frogs of different sizes. We found that contrast peaked in mid‐sized individuals while the largest individuals had the least contrasting patterns. We then used two detection experiments with human participants to evaluate how colour and body size affected overall detectability. These experiments revealed that larger body sizes were easier to detect, but that the colours of smaller frogs were more detectable than those of larger frogs. Taken together our data support the hypothesis that the primary defensive strategy changes from conspicuous aposematism to camouflage with increasing size, implying size‐dependent differences in the efficacy of defensive colouration. We discuss our data in relation to theories of size‐dependent aposematism and evaluate the evidence for and against a possible size‐dependent mimicry complex with sympatric poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). For chemically defended species, colouration evolves as a balance between the benefits of a salient and recognisable warning signal (aposematism) and the benefits of avoiding unnecessary attention from predators (camouflage). Detectability will depend on many factors, including colour, pattern, and body size. Here, we examined size‐dependent colouration in the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus), where small frogs have bright blue‐white stripes, mid‐sized frogs have bright yellow stripes, and large frogs have dull‐brown stripes. We found that the trade‐off between aposematism and camouflage depends on both colour and body size, such that frogs of different sizes employ different defensive strategies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Aposematism</subject><subject>Biological Mimicry</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Camouflage</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Coloration</subject><subject>colour change</subject><subject>Crypsis</subject><subject>Dendrobatidae</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leptodactylidae</subject><subject>Microbalances</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Müllerian mimicry</subject><subject>ontogeny</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8AIoEhNDWl_sOPEIVfmnSgyAxGY5zgWlSuIQN0Jl4hF4Rp4EQwobXs46fffd6UfIMdAp-DdbYTYFDpztkDHwiIYSKOz6PwUaUgFPI3Lg3IpSEDyO98mIiRh4yqMxWd6Xb_j5_pFji02OzTowtrJ9p9elbYJMV7ox6HyzcW1petu7QLfWYe0BVwe6yQOja9sXlX7GQ7JX6Mrh0bZOyOPl4mF-HS7vrm7m58vQMGAsTARF4DTlyNOExSATyGWW5BhLE-miiCWKKAKa0YQnKUhDi0JkuWbC-LmEsQk5HbxtZ196dGu18ic3fqWKUiYkE17rqbOBMp11rsNCtV1Z626jgKrv3JTPTf3k5tmTrbHPasz_yN-gPDAbgNeyws3_JnW7uBiUX1c5d20</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Barnett, James B.</creator><creator>Yeager, Justin</creator><creator>McEwen, Brendan L.</creator><creator>Kinley, Isaac</creator><creator>Anderson, Hannah M.</creator><creator>Guevara, Jennifer</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-9088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-4641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-9606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-4132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8692-6311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-0638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage</title><author>Barnett, James B. ; Yeager, Justin ; McEwen, Brendan L. ; Kinley, Isaac ; Anderson, Hannah M. ; Guevara, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-760e14084e487351971d9b7de59c2aff59e62210b0747819c0ff6bda36ce14733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Aposematism</topic><topic>Biological Mimicry</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Camouflage</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Coloration</topic><topic>colour change</topic><topic>Crypsis</topic><topic>Dendrobatidae</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leptodactylidae</topic><topic>Microbalances</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Müllerian mimicry</topic><topic>ontogeny</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnett, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeager, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Brendan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinley, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guevara, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnett, James B.</au><au>Yeager, Justin</au><au>McEwen, Brendan L.</au><au>Kinley, Isaac</au><au>Anderson, Hannah M.</au><au>Guevara, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1019</epage><pages>1010-1019</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Colour is an important component of many different defensive strategies, but signal efficacy and detectability will also depend on the size of the coloured structures, and how pattern size interacts with the background. Consequently, size‐dependent changes in colouration are common among many different species as juveniles and adults frequently use colour for different purposes in different environmental contexts. A widespread strategy in many species is switching from crypsis to conspicuous aposematic signalling as increasing body size can reduce the efficacy of camouflage, while other antipredator defences may strengthen. Curiously, despite being chemically defended, the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus, Leptodactylidae) appears to do the opposite, with bright yellow stripes found in smaller individuals, whereas larger frogs exhibit dull brown stripes. Here, we investigated whether size‐dependent differences in colour support distinct defensive strategies. We first used visual modelling of potential predators to assess how colour contrast varied among frogs of different sizes. We found that contrast peaked in mid‐sized individuals while the largest individuals had the least contrasting patterns. We then used two detection experiments with human participants to evaluate how colour and body size affected overall detectability. These experiments revealed that larger body sizes were easier to detect, but that the colours of smaller frogs were more detectable than those of larger frogs. Taken together our data support the hypothesis that the primary defensive strategy changes from conspicuous aposematism to camouflage with increasing size, implying size‐dependent differences in the efficacy of defensive colouration. We discuss our data in relation to theories of size‐dependent aposematism and evaluate the evidence for and against a possible size‐dependent mimicry complex with sympatric poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). For chemically defended species, colouration evolves as a balance between the benefits of a salient and recognisable warning signal (aposematism) and the benefits of avoiding unnecessary attention from predators (camouflage). Detectability will depend on many factors, including colour, pattern, and body size. Here, we examined size‐dependent colouration in the gold‐striped frog (Lithodytes lineatus), where small frogs have bright blue‐white stripes, mid‐sized frogs have bright yellow stripes, and large frogs have dull‐brown stripes. We found that the trade‐off between aposematism and camouflage depends on both colour and body size, such that frogs of different sizes employ different defensive strategies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36514842</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.14143</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-9088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-4641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-9606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-4132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8692-6311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-0638</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2023-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1010-1019
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2836936735
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Blackwell Single Titles
subjects Adult
Amphibians
Animals
Anura
Aposematism
Biological Mimicry
Body Size
Camouflage
Color
Coloration
colour change
Crypsis
Dendrobatidae
Effectiveness
Frogs
Humans
Leptodactylidae
Microbalances
Mimicry
Müllerian mimicry
ontogeny
Predators
Sympatric populations
title Size‐dependent colouration balances conspicuous aposematism and camouflage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A46%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size%E2%80%90dependent%20colouration%20balances%20conspicuous%20aposematism%20and%20camouflage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Barnett,%20James%20B.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1019&rft.pages=1010-1019&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.14143&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836936735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836936735&rft_id=info:pmid/36514842&rfr_iscdi=true