China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation
The 1994–1998 housing reform in China allowed state employees to buy their rented public houses at considerably subsidized prices. By exploiting housing reform as an exogenous change in homeownership and employing a differences-in-differences framework, this paper examines the effect of housing refo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of real estate finance and economics 2023-08, Vol.67 (2), p.218-242 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 218 |
container_title | The journal of real estate finance and economics |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Chen, Jie Hu, Mingzhi Lin, Zhenguo |
description | The 1994–1998 housing reform in China allowed state employees to buy their rented public houses at considerably subsidized prices. By exploiting housing reform as an exogenous change in homeownership and employing a differences-in-differences framework, this paper examines the effect of housing reform on labor market participation. Using the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey, we find that individuals who are affected by the housing reform are 15.1 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after controlling for observables. We further find that married women are 18.9 percentage points more likely to drop out of labor market after the housing reform, while their male counterparts are only 10.0 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after the reform. We also explore mechanisms through which the housing reform may affect married women more greatly. Family division of labor hypothesis suggests that, in an efficient family husband should act as the “breadwinners” and wife be a caregiver and responsible for raising the family. We test this hypothesis and find strong evidence that married women in fact spend more time in family chores after the housing reform. Our findings are robust to alternative estimations and functional misspecifications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836664366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836664366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6baa30acbf221022f3e4329759f814f5cc43119bde10f4bfa7242551c2f6ac8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4GrAdfTmP7OUolaoKKLgLmTSpE61k5pMF-58DV_PJzE6Qndu7l3c75xzOQgdEzglAOosE0K4xEAJhlpThdkOGhGhGAYunnbRCHQtsJBM76ODnJcAIJWGEVKT57azXx-fuZrGTW67RXXvQ0yrynbzamabmKobm158X93Z1LeuXdu-jd0h2gv2Nfujvz1Gj5cXD5Mpnt1eXU_OZ9hxqHssG2sZWNcESglQGpjnjNZK1EETHoRznBFSN3NPIPAmWEU5FYI4GqR12rMxOhl81ym-bXzuzTJuUlciDdVMSsnLKBQdKJdizskHs07tyqZ3Q8D8FGSGgkwpyPwWZFgRVYPIu9i1eSvR5QEqOIWCsAHJ5dgtfNqm_2P8DRohcpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836664366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, Jie ; Hu, Mingzhi ; Lin, Zhenguo</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie ; Hu, Mingzhi ; Lin, Zhenguo</creatorcontrib><description>The 1994–1998 housing reform in China allowed state employees to buy their rented public houses at considerably subsidized prices. By exploiting housing reform as an exogenous change in homeownership and employing a differences-in-differences framework, this paper examines the effect of housing reform on labor market participation. Using the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey, we find that individuals who are affected by the housing reform are 15.1 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after controlling for observables. We further find that married women are 18.9 percentage points more likely to drop out of labor market after the housing reform, while their male counterparts are only 10.0 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after the reform. We also explore mechanisms through which the housing reform may affect married women more greatly. Family division of labor hypothesis suggests that, in an efficient family husband should act as the “breadwinners” and wife be a caregiver and responsible for raising the family. We test this hypothesis and find strong evidence that married women in fact spend more time in family chores after the housing reform. Our findings are robust to alternative estimations and functional misspecifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial Services ; Government employees ; Home ownership ; Housing market ; Housing policy ; Hypotheses ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; Nutrition ; Prices ; Public houses ; Reforms ; Regional/Spatial Science ; State employees ; Wives</subject><ispartof>The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-08, Vol.67 (2), p.218-242</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6baa30acbf221022f3e4329759f814f5cc43119bde10f4bfa7242551c2f6ac8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6baa30acbf221022f3e4329759f814f5cc43119bde10f4bfa7242551c2f6ac8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5377-5278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Zhenguo</creatorcontrib><title>China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation</title><title>The journal of real estate finance and economics</title><addtitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</addtitle><description>The 1994–1998 housing reform in China allowed state employees to buy their rented public houses at considerably subsidized prices. By exploiting housing reform as an exogenous change in homeownership and employing a differences-in-differences framework, this paper examines the effect of housing reform on labor market participation. Using the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey, we find that individuals who are affected by the housing reform are 15.1 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after controlling for observables. We further find that married women are 18.9 percentage points more likely to drop out of labor market after the housing reform, while their male counterparts are only 10.0 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after the reform. We also explore mechanisms through which the housing reform may affect married women more greatly. Family division of labor hypothesis suggests that, in an efficient family husband should act as the “breadwinners” and wife be a caregiver and responsible for raising the family. We test this hypothesis and find strong evidence that married women in fact spend more time in family chores after the housing reform. Our findings are robust to alternative estimations and functional misspecifications.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Government employees</subject><subject>Home ownership</subject><subject>Housing market</subject><subject>Housing policy</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Public houses</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>State employees</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0895-5638</issn><issn>1573-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4GrAdfTmP7OUolaoKKLgLmTSpE61k5pMF-58DV_PJzE6Qndu7l3c75xzOQgdEzglAOosE0K4xEAJhlpThdkOGhGhGAYunnbRCHQtsJBM76ODnJcAIJWGEVKT57azXx-fuZrGTW67RXXvQ0yrynbzamabmKobm158X93Z1LeuXdu-jd0h2gv2Nfujvz1Gj5cXD5Mpnt1eXU_OZ9hxqHssG2sZWNcESglQGpjnjNZK1EETHoRznBFSN3NPIPAmWEU5FYI4GqR12rMxOhl81ym-bXzuzTJuUlciDdVMSsnLKBQdKJdizskHs07tyqZ3Q8D8FGSGgkwpyPwWZFgRVYPIu9i1eSvR5QEqOIWCsAHJ5dgtfNqm_2P8DRohcpE</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Chen, Jie</creator><creator>Hu, Mingzhi</creator><creator>Lin, Zhenguo</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-5278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation</title><author>Chen, Jie ; Hu, Mingzhi ; Lin, Zhenguo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6baa30acbf221022f3e4329759f814f5cc43119bde10f4bfa7242551c2f6ac8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Government employees</topic><topic>Home ownership</topic><topic>Housing market</topic><topic>Housing policy</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Public houses</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>State employees</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Zhenguo</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jie</au><au>Hu, Mingzhi</au><au>Lin, Zhenguo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle><stitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>218-242</pages><issn>0895-5638</issn><eissn>1573-045X</eissn><abstract>The 1994–1998 housing reform in China allowed state employees to buy their rented public houses at considerably subsidized prices. By exploiting housing reform as an exogenous change in homeownership and employing a differences-in-differences framework, this paper examines the effect of housing reform on labor market participation. Using the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey, we find that individuals who are affected by the housing reform are 15.1 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after controlling for observables. We further find that married women are 18.9 percentage points more likely to drop out of labor market after the housing reform, while their male counterparts are only 10.0 percentage points less likely to participate in labor market after the reform. We also explore mechanisms through which the housing reform may affect married women more greatly. Family division of labor hypothesis suggests that, in an efficient family husband should act as the “breadwinners” and wife be a caregiver and responsible for raising the family. We test this hypothesis and find strong evidence that married women in fact spend more time in family chores after the housing reform. Our findings are robust to alternative estimations and functional misspecifications.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-5278</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-5638 |
ispartof | The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2023-08, Vol.67 (2), p.218-242 |
issn | 0895-5638 1573-045X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2836664366 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Caregivers Economics Economics and Finance Financial Services Government employees Home ownership Housing market Housing policy Hypotheses Labor force participation Labor market Nutrition Prices Public houses Reforms Regional/Spatial Science State employees Wives |
title | China’s Housing Reform and Labor Market Participation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China%E2%80%99s%20Housing%20Reform%20and%20Labor%20Market%20Participation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20real%20estate%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Chen,%20Jie&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=218-242&rft.issn=0895-5638&rft.eissn=1573-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11146-021-09827-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836664366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836664366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |