COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references

According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for br...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.4791-4823
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yujie, Li, Hongzhen, Mao, Jingyi, He, Guoxiu, Yang, Yunhan, Jiang, Zhuoren, Duan, Yufeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4823
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4791
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 128
creator Zhang, Yujie
Li, Hongzhen
Mao, Jingyi
He, Guoxiu
Yang, Yunhan
Jiang, Zhuoren
Duan, Yufeng
description According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for breakthrough research, such as vaccinations or treatments, became increasingly pressing. Under such circumstances, can the accumulated coronavirus-related knowledge still give solid support for COVID-19 research? The manner of utilizing and absorbing new knowledge in the citing publications is reflected in the reference analysis. To investigate this proposition, we employ reference analysis to conduct retrospectives on relevant scientific articles. We locate 309,517 related papers and their references in the CORD-19 data from 2000 to 2021. We analyze the knowledge support capacity of previous studies from three aspects: the quantity, timeliness, and textual support of references. Among them, textual support is divided into lexical, topic, and semantic support, which are respectively based on TF-IDF, LDA, and fine-tuned sentence-BERT. Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has caused unprecedented destruction of the original knowledge support pattern in the early stages of research (which is at odds with the knowledge support pattern in the general scientific background). The long-term accumulated and non-direct knowledge provides brief support for the COVID-19 investigation. Follow-up research will swiftly replace outdated information with new study findings. The appeal of the scientific community has moved from “return to the past” to “innovative alternatives”. We divide the process into three stages: rearrangement, iteration, and growth. The loss in knowledge support capacity following a disruptive event such as COVID-19 enhances the difficulty of research. However, it cannot be ignored that it has also considerably sped the pace of knowledge production.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836401800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836401800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-24a1b9a44f60f31252e9837b1f0b18fe6e5f1bd5915908f3b5df3db4b77c9443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqHwA6wssTbM2E5is0Mtj0qVuqnYWnnYJaVNgp2A-HsMQWLHahZzz53RIeQS4RoB8puAiJoz4IKBzDPJ9BFJMFWKcZXhMUkAhWIaBZySsxB2ECEBKiGL-fp5uWCob2lB6yb4sR-ad0ubQ19UA-1aOrxY-tp2H3tbby0NY993Pi4c9dZZb9vKhnNy4op9sBe_c0Y2D_eb-RNbrR-X87sVq3gOA-OywFIXUroMnECecquVyEt0UKJyNrOpw7JONaYalBNlWjtRl7LM80pLKWbkaqrtffc22jCYXTf6Nl40XIlMAiqAmOJTqvJdCPFJ0_vmUPhPg2C-ZZlJlomyzI8soyMkJijEcLu1_q_6H-oL_uRrCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836401800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Yujie ; Li, Hongzhen ; Mao, Jingyi ; He, Guoxiu ; Yang, Yunhan ; Jiang, Zhuoren ; Duan, Yufeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yujie ; Li, Hongzhen ; Mao, Jingyi ; He, Guoxiu ; Yang, Yunhan ; Jiang, Zhuoren ; Duan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><description>According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for breakthrough research, such as vaccinations or treatments, became increasingly pressing. Under such circumstances, can the accumulated coronavirus-related knowledge still give solid support for COVID-19 research? The manner of utilizing and absorbing new knowledge in the citing publications is reflected in the reference analysis. To investigate this proposition, we employ reference analysis to conduct retrospectives on relevant scientific articles. We locate 309,517 related papers and their references in the CORD-19 data from 2000 to 2021. We analyze the knowledge support capacity of previous studies from three aspects: the quantity, timeliness, and textual support of references. Among them, textual support is divided into lexical, topic, and semantic support, which are respectively based on TF-IDF, LDA, and fine-tuned sentence-BERT. Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has caused unprecedented destruction of the original knowledge support pattern in the early stages of research (which is at odds with the knowledge support pattern in the general scientific background). The long-term accumulated and non-direct knowledge provides brief support for the COVID-19 investigation. Follow-up research will swiftly replace outdated information with new study findings. The appeal of the scientific community has moved from “return to the past” to “innovative alternatives”. We divide the process into three stages: rearrangement, iteration, and growth. The loss in knowledge support capacity following a disruptive event such as COVID-19 enhances the difficulty of research. However, it cannot be ignored that it has also considerably sped the pace of knowledge production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Knowledge ; Library Science ; Medical research ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.4791-4823</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-24a1b9a44f60f31252e9837b1f0b18fe6e5f1bd5915908f3b5df3db4b77c9443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1419-7495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhuoren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><title>COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for breakthrough research, such as vaccinations or treatments, became increasingly pressing. Under such circumstances, can the accumulated coronavirus-related knowledge still give solid support for COVID-19 research? The manner of utilizing and absorbing new knowledge in the citing publications is reflected in the reference analysis. To investigate this proposition, we employ reference analysis to conduct retrospectives on relevant scientific articles. We locate 309,517 related papers and their references in the CORD-19 data from 2000 to 2021. We analyze the knowledge support capacity of previous studies from three aspects: the quantity, timeliness, and textual support of references. Among them, textual support is divided into lexical, topic, and semantic support, which are respectively based on TF-IDF, LDA, and fine-tuned sentence-BERT. Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has caused unprecedented destruction of the original knowledge support pattern in the early stages of research (which is at odds with the knowledge support pattern in the general scientific background). The long-term accumulated and non-direct knowledge provides brief support for the COVID-19 investigation. Follow-up research will swiftly replace outdated information with new study findings. The appeal of the scientific community has moved from “return to the past” to “innovative alternatives”. We divide the process into three stages: rearrangement, iteration, and growth. The loss in knowledge support capacity following a disruptive event such as COVID-19 enhances the difficulty of research. However, it cannot be ignored that it has also considerably sped the pace of knowledge production.</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqHwA6wssTbM2E5is0Mtj0qVuqnYWnnYJaVNgp2A-HsMQWLHahZzz53RIeQS4RoB8puAiJoz4IKBzDPJ9BFJMFWKcZXhMUkAhWIaBZySsxB2ECEBKiGL-fp5uWCob2lB6yb4sR-ad0ubQ19UA-1aOrxY-tp2H3tbby0NY993Pi4c9dZZb9vKhnNy4op9sBe_c0Y2D_eb-RNbrR-X87sVq3gOA-OywFIXUroMnECecquVyEt0UKJyNrOpw7JONaYalBNlWjtRl7LM80pLKWbkaqrtffc22jCYXTf6Nl40XIlMAiqAmOJTqvJdCPFJ0_vmUPhPg2C-ZZlJlomyzI8soyMkJijEcLu1_q_6H-oL_uRrCA</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yujie</creator><creator>Li, Hongzhen</creator><creator>Mao, Jingyi</creator><creator>He, Guoxiu</creator><creator>Yang, Yunhan</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhuoren</creator><creator>Duan, Yufeng</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-7495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references</title><author>Zhang, Yujie ; Li, Hongzhen ; Mao, Jingyi ; He, Guoxiu ; Yang, Yunhan ; Jiang, Zhuoren ; Duan, Yufeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-24a1b9a44f60f31252e9837b1f0b18fe6e5f1bd5915908f3b5df3db4b77c9443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yujie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhuoren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yujie</au><au>Li, Hongzhen</au><au>Mao, Jingyi</au><au>He, Guoxiu</au><au>Yang, Yunhan</au><au>Jiang, Zhuoren</au><au>Duan, Yufeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4791</spage><epage>4823</epage><pages>4791-4823</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><abstract>According to existing research, in the general scientific backdrop, individuals prefer to employ old and well-established knowledge to promote scientific advancement, resulting in the progress of science in a set direction. When the disruption event COVID-19 occurred, however, people’s demand for breakthrough research, such as vaccinations or treatments, became increasingly pressing. Under such circumstances, can the accumulated coronavirus-related knowledge still give solid support for COVID-19 research? The manner of utilizing and absorbing new knowledge in the citing publications is reflected in the reference analysis. To investigate this proposition, we employ reference analysis to conduct retrospectives on relevant scientific articles. We locate 309,517 related papers and their references in the CORD-19 data from 2000 to 2021. We analyze the knowledge support capacity of previous studies from three aspects: the quantity, timeliness, and textual support of references. Among them, textual support is divided into lexical, topic, and semantic support, which are respectively based on TF-IDF, LDA, and fine-tuned sentence-BERT. Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has caused unprecedented destruction of the original knowledge support pattern in the early stages of research (which is at odds with the knowledge support pattern in the general scientific background). The long-term accumulated and non-direct knowledge provides brief support for the COVID-19 investigation. Follow-up research will swiftly replace outdated information with new study findings. The appeal of the scientific community has moved from “return to the past” to “innovative alternatives”. We divide the process into three stages: rearrangement, iteration, and growth. The loss in knowledge support capacity following a disruptive event such as COVID-19 enhances the difficulty of research. However, it cannot be ignored that it has also considerably sped the pace of knowledge production.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-7495</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.4791-4823
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2836401800
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Computer Science
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Information Storage and Retrieval
Knowledge
Library Science
Medical research
Vaccination
title COVID-19: a disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19:%20a%20disruptive%20impact%20on%20the%20knowledge%20support%20of%20references&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yujie&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4791&rft.epage=4823&rft.pages=4791-4823&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-023-04764-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836401800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836401800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true