An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community

At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arctic 2023-03, Vol.76 (1), p.60-71
Hauptverfasser: Wilton, Meaghan J., Karagatzides, Jim D., Solomon, Andrew, Tsuji, Leonard J.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Arctic
container_volume 76
creator Wilton, Meaghan J.
Karagatzides, Jim D.
Solomon, Andrew
Tsuji, Leonard J.S.
description At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. 
doi_str_mv 10.14430/arctic77061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836275799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836275799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-5c67ff0fda7679cbd9213c6bb7d56e6c02b80f3b42300dd0964794cf2b7ce1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7HyDg1tE_l0lmlrXWKhS6UNdDrpLiJDWZAfv2FseFq29z-A4chK4J3BHOGdyrbIZgpARBTtCMtJRVhPL6FM0AgFfQcHaOLkrZARAgEmZotYh49a36ENUQUsTJ4-042JQyXqtsXcQPzuJHV8JHLDhErPDrqCcPXqa-H2MYDpfozKvP4q7-do7en1Zvy-dqs12_LBebytC6GaraCOk9eKukkK3RtqWEGaG1tLVwwgDVDXimOWUA1kIruGy58VRL44gXbI5upt99Tl-jK0O3S2OOR2VHGyaorGXbHqnbiTI5lZKd7_Y59CofOgLdb6juXyj2A8nfW38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836275799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilton, Meaghan J. ; Karagatzides, Jim D. ; Solomon, Andrew ; Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Meaghan J. ; Karagatzides, Jim D. ; Solomon, Andrew ; Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</creatorcontrib><description>At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. </description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-1245</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14430/arctic77061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary: Arctic Institute of North America</publisher><subject>Arctic zone ; Boxes ; Climate change ; Climatic conditions ; Crop management ; Culture ; Divers ; Food ; Food production ; Foods ; Gardens &amp; gardening ; Ground treatment ; Height ; Ice environments ; Indigenous peoples ; Lowlands ; Moisture effects ; Shelterbelts ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil improvement ; Soil moisture ; Soil temperature ; Statistical analysis ; Surface area ; Variance analysis ; Water erosion</subject><ispartof>Arctic, 2023-03, Vol.76 (1), p.60-71</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2915-3863</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Meaghan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagatzides, Jim D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</creatorcontrib><title>An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community</title><title>Arctic</title><description>At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. </description><subject>Arctic zone</subject><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Divers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Gardens &amp; gardening</subject><subject>Ground treatment</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Ice environments</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Lowlands</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Shelterbelts</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Water erosion</subject><issn>0004-0843</issn><issn>1923-1245</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7HyDg1tE_l0lmlrXWKhS6UNdDrpLiJDWZAfv2FseFq29z-A4chK4J3BHOGdyrbIZgpARBTtCMtJRVhPL6FM0AgFfQcHaOLkrZARAgEmZotYh49a36ENUQUsTJ4-042JQyXqtsXcQPzuJHV8JHLDhErPDrqCcPXqa-H2MYDpfozKvP4q7-do7en1Zvy-dqs12_LBebytC6GaraCOk9eKukkK3RtqWEGaG1tLVwwgDVDXimOWUA1kIruGy58VRL44gXbI5upt99Tl-jK0O3S2OOR2VHGyaorGXbHqnbiTI5lZKd7_Y59CofOgLdb6juXyj2A8nfW38</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Wilton, Meaghan J.</creator><creator>Karagatzides, Jim D.</creator><creator>Solomon, Andrew</creator><creator>Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</creator><general>Arctic Institute of North America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2915-3863</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community</title><author>Wilton, Meaghan J. ; Karagatzides, Jim D. ; Solomon, Andrew ; Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-5c67ff0fda7679cbd9213c6bb7d56e6c02b80f3b42300dd0964794cf2b7ce1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Arctic zone</topic><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Divers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Gardens &amp; gardening</topic><topic>Ground treatment</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Ice environments</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Lowlands</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Shelterbelts</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Water erosion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Meaghan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagatzides, Jim D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Arctic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilton, Meaghan J.</au><au>Karagatzides, Jim D.</au><au>Solomon, Andrew</au><au>Tsuji, Leonard J.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community</atitle><jtitle>Arctic</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>60-71</pages><issn>0004-0843</issn><eissn>1923-1245</eissn><abstract>At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. </abstract><cop>Calgary</cop><pub>Arctic Institute of North America</pub><doi>10.14430/arctic77061</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2915-3863</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0843
ispartof Arctic, 2023-03, Vol.76 (1), p.60-71
issn 0004-0843
1923-1245
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2836275799
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arctic zone
Boxes
Climate change
Climatic conditions
Crop management
Culture
Divers
Food
Food production
Foods
Gardens & gardening
Ground treatment
Height
Ice environments
Indigenous peoples
Lowlands
Moisture effects
Shelterbelts
Soil
Soil conditions
Soil improvement
Soil moisture
Soil temperature
Statistical analysis
Surface area
Variance analysis
Water erosion
title An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Examination%20of%20Outdoor%20Garden%20Bed%20Designs%20in%20a%20Subarctic%20Community&rft.jtitle=Arctic&rft.au=Wilton,%20Meaghan%20J.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=60-71&rft.issn=0004-0843&rft.eissn=1923-1245&rft_id=info:doi/10.14430/arctic77061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836275799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836275799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true