Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness
Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family court review 2023-07, Vol.61 (3), p.545-562 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 562 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | Family court review |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Jones, Ashley C. T. Batastini, Ashley B. Vitacco, Michael J. Standridge, Rheanna L. Knuth, Sean B. |
description | Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared forensic evaluators' perceptions of data trustworthiness, usefulness, and initial opinion of parental fitness in a fictitious case in which parental fitness was questioned. Perceptions of a parent's behavior were compared across two types of data in which it was presented (an Instagram post or a medical record note) and across genders of the parent (mother or father) being hypothetically evaluated. As hypothesized, information documented on social media was viewed more critically than information documented by a healthcare provider. Further, information primarily referencing the father in the case was viewed as less trustworthy than information referencing the mother, which appeared influenced by evaluators' identified self-reported sexist attitudes. Results suggest that family law attorneys, regardless of which parent they are representing, should advise their clients of the risks to using social media. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fcre.12736 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836192851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230721091822</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2836192851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-1ddad020fae7f0d9a6a98793dd2d0491c495660f6330aeedfe83bc3486775f893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFv1DAQhSMEUkvh0l9giRsixWMnTsKtWrUUqQiJlrM1tcddl2wcbG9XufaX4-3SK3OZ8eh7b-RXVafAz6DUZ2cinYHopHpVHUPXNDUo6F6XuZVQi6Zpj6q3KT1wDqJt--Pq6TznECda0ieWaRzZEraRmdHTlBPLgeW1n36zO3IhUnnQwuaQ8hd2E4zHkW3IemQWM7LvuDA_uXFLkyG2DjtGjzhusfgn9uhpt5f7yGaMxbxonc8TpfSueuNwTPT-Xz-pfl1e3K6u6usfX7-tzq9rI5VSNViLlgvukDrH7YAKh74bpLXC8mYA0wytUtwpKTkSWUe9vDOy6VXXta4f5En14eA7x_BnSynrh_LXqZzUopcKBtG3UKiPB8rEkFIkp-foNxgXDVzvM9b7jPVzxgWGA7zzIy3_IfXl6ufFi-bqoIkbnzXe-zRnnQijWesSX3heh3ivbfB7JylBvWCCC8k7AXyAXgj5F0_OmVU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836192851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Jones, Ashley C. T. ; Batastini, Ashley B. ; Vitacco, Michael J. ; Standridge, Rheanna L. ; Knuth, Sean B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ashley C. T. ; Batastini, Ashley B. ; Vitacco, Michael J. ; Standridge, Rheanna L. ; Knuth, Sean B.</creatorcontrib><description>Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared forensic evaluators' perceptions of data trustworthiness, usefulness, and initial opinion of parental fitness in a fictitious case in which parental fitness was questioned. Perceptions of a parent's behavior were compared across two types of data in which it was presented (an Instagram post or a medical record note) and across genders of the parent (mother or father) being hypothetically evaluated. As hypothesized, information documented on social media was viewed more critically than information documented by a healthcare provider. Further, information primarily referencing the father in the case was viewed as less trustworthy than information referencing the mother, which appeared influenced by evaluators' identified self-reported sexist attitudes. Results suggest that family law attorneys, regardless of which parent they are representing, should advise their clients of the risks to using social media.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1617</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>collateral data ; custody evaluation ; Custody of children ; Domestic relations ; Domestic relations courts ; evidence ; family court ; forensic evaluator ; forensic mental health assessment ; Forensic psychiatry ; Mental health ; Parent and child ; parent gender ; parent roles ; parental fitness ; Social media ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>Family court review, 2023-07, Vol.61 (3), p.545-562</ispartof><rights>2023 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts.</rights><rights>2023 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-1ddad020fae7f0d9a6a98793dd2d0491c495660f6330aeedfe83bc3486775f893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-1ddad020fae7f0d9a6a98793dd2d0491c495660f6330aeedfe83bc3486775f893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5608-603X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffcre.12736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffcre.12736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27925,27926,45575,45576</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ashley C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batastini, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitacco, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standridge, Rheanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuth, Sean B.</creatorcontrib><title>Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness</title><title>Family court review</title><description>Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared forensic evaluators' perceptions of data trustworthiness, usefulness, and initial opinion of parental fitness in a fictitious case in which parental fitness was questioned. Perceptions of a parent's behavior were compared across two types of data in which it was presented (an Instagram post or a medical record note) and across genders of the parent (mother or father) being hypothetically evaluated. As hypothesized, information documented on social media was viewed more critically than information documented by a healthcare provider. Further, information primarily referencing the father in the case was viewed as less trustworthy than information referencing the mother, which appeared influenced by evaluators' identified self-reported sexist attitudes. Results suggest that family law attorneys, regardless of which parent they are representing, should advise their clients of the risks to using social media.</description><subject>collateral data</subject><subject>custody evaluation</subject><subject>Custody of children</subject><subject>Domestic relations</subject><subject>Domestic relations courts</subject><subject>evidence</subject><subject>family court</subject><subject>forensic evaluator</subject><subject>forensic mental health assessment</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Parent and child</subject><subject>parent gender</subject><subject>parent roles</subject><subject>parental fitness</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>1531-2445</issn><issn>1744-1617</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFv1DAQhSMEUkvh0l9giRsixWMnTsKtWrUUqQiJlrM1tcddl2wcbG9XufaX4-3SK3OZ8eh7b-RXVafAz6DUZ2cinYHopHpVHUPXNDUo6F6XuZVQi6Zpj6q3KT1wDqJt--Pq6TznECda0ieWaRzZEraRmdHTlBPLgeW1n36zO3IhUnnQwuaQ8hd2E4zHkW3IemQWM7LvuDA_uXFLkyG2DjtGjzhusfgn9uhpt5f7yGaMxbxonc8TpfSueuNwTPT-Xz-pfl1e3K6u6usfX7-tzq9rI5VSNViLlgvukDrH7YAKh74bpLXC8mYA0wytUtwpKTkSWUe9vDOy6VXXta4f5En14eA7x_BnSynrh_LXqZzUopcKBtG3UKiPB8rEkFIkp-foNxgXDVzvM9b7jPVzxgWGA7zzIy3_IfXl6ufFi-bqoIkbnzXe-zRnnQijWesSX3heh3ivbfB7JylBvWCCC8k7AXyAXgj5F0_OmVU</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Jones, Ashley C. T.</creator><creator>Batastini, Ashley B.</creator><creator>Vitacco, Michael J.</creator><creator>Standridge, Rheanna L.</creator><creator>Knuth, Sean B.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-603X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness</title><author>Jones, Ashley C. T. ; Batastini, Ashley B. ; Vitacco, Michael J. ; Standridge, Rheanna L. ; Knuth, Sean B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-1ddad020fae7f0d9a6a98793dd2d0491c495660f6330aeedfe83bc3486775f893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>collateral data</topic><topic>custody evaluation</topic><topic>Custody of children</topic><topic>Domestic relations</topic><topic>Domestic relations courts</topic><topic>evidence</topic><topic>family court</topic><topic>forensic evaluator</topic><topic>forensic mental health assessment</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Parent and child</topic><topic>parent gender</topic><topic>parent roles</topic><topic>parental fitness</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Ashley C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batastini, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitacco, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standridge, Rheanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuth, Sean B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Family court review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Ashley C. T.</au><au>Batastini, Ashley B.</au><au>Vitacco, Michael J.</au><au>Standridge, Rheanna L.</au><au>Knuth, Sean B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness</atitle><jtitle>Family court review</jtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>545-562</pages><issn>1531-2445</issn><eissn>1744-1617</eissn><abstract>Information from social media is used in evaluations of parental fitness with some regularity. Yet, research is lacking on perceptions of this information and no research has examined how social media data impacts forensic evaluators' opinions related to parental fitness. This study compared forensic evaluators' perceptions of data trustworthiness, usefulness, and initial opinion of parental fitness in a fictitious case in which parental fitness was questioned. Perceptions of a parent's behavior were compared across two types of data in which it was presented (an Instagram post or a medical record note) and across genders of the parent (mother or father) being hypothetically evaluated. As hypothesized, information documented on social media was viewed more critically than information documented by a healthcare provider. Further, information primarily referencing the father in the case was viewed as less trustworthy than information referencing the mother, which appeared influenced by evaluators' identified self-reported sexist attitudes. Results suggest that family law attorneys, regardless of which parent they are representing, should advise their clients of the risks to using social media.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fcre.12736</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-603X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-2445 |
ispartof | Family court review, 2023-07, Vol.61 (3), p.545-562 |
issn | 1531-2445 1744-1617 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2836192851 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | collateral data custody evaluation Custody of children Domestic relations Domestic relations courts evidence family court forensic evaluator forensic mental health assessment Forensic psychiatry Mental health Parent and child parent gender parent roles parental fitness Social media Social networks |
title | Attorneys, tell your clients to think before they post: Social media data May influence how evaluators view their parental fitness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A44%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attorneys,%20tell%20your%20clients%20to%20think%20before%20they%20post:%20Social%20media%20data%20May%20influence%20how%20evaluators%20view%20their%20parental%20fitness&rft.jtitle=Family%20court%20review&rft.au=Jones,%20Ashley%20C.%20T.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=545-562&rft.issn=1531-2445&rft.eissn=1744-1617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fcre.12736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836192851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836192851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230721091822&rfr_iscdi=true |