Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions

Randomized response survey methods use noise to mask respondents’ answers to stigmatizing questions in an attempt to elicit honest responses. Respondents weigh the preference for honesty against the disutility of stigmatization when deciding how to answer. Since the disutility of stigmatization depe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of economic design 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.635-667
Hauptverfasser: Fisher, James C. D., Flannery, Timothy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 667
container_issue 3
container_start_page 635
container_title Review of economic design
container_volume 27
creator Fisher, James C. D.
Flannery, Timothy J.
description Randomized response survey methods use noise to mask respondents’ answers to stigmatizing questions in an attempt to elicit honest responses. Respondents weigh the preference for honesty against the disutility of stigmatization when deciding how to answer. Since the disutility of stigmatization depends on the degree of noise, the interviewer designs the survey to balance two goals: (i) honest reporting by respondents and (ii) maximization of the accuracy of estimates based on the survey. We fully characterize the non-linear set of design parameters that lead to truth-telling, as well as the interviewer’s equilibrium survey design.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2836114385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836114385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55bb51697c37fe6553a10f0e2b214364646bc82e5c448e29f1f135054e2599e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPBU8VyfPpkdZn7DgRQ-eQtud1ixuUpOusvvrjVtxbzKQGfhe4SPknMIlBSiuYnqlzoGxHIBTkasDMqGCi1wUEg7_bsGOyUmMSwBQoPWEvN5gtJ2zrstC5RZ-Zbe4yALG3ruIWVyHT9zEbPDp7HsfhuzNO4xDVrn4hWFEBtutqsFuf1w-1gm1SXxKjtrqPeLZ756Sl7vb59lDPn-6f5xdz_OGKxhyKetaUlUWDS9aVFLyikILyGqW_qxEmrrRDGUjhEZWtrSlXIIUyGRZouZTcjH69sHvws3Sr4NLkYZprmhy0TKx2Mhqgo8xYGv6YFdV2BgK5qdCM1ZoUoVmV6FRSZSNImy8s3Ev0VIVJQCFROEjJSbQdRj26f8YfwOtt38C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836114385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Fisher, James C. D. ; Flannery, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, James C. D. ; Flannery, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>Randomized response survey methods use noise to mask respondents’ answers to stigmatizing questions in an attempt to elicit honest responses. Respondents weigh the preference for honesty against the disutility of stigmatization when deciding how to answer. Since the disutility of stigmatization depends on the degree of noise, the interviewer designs the survey to balance two goals: (i) honest reporting by respondents and (ii) maximization of the accuracy of estimates based on the survey. We fully characterize the non-linear set of design parameters that lead to truth-telling, as well as the interviewer’s equilibrium survey design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-4742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Design ; Digital archives ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Employee theft ; Equilibrium ; Estimates ; Game Theory ; Honesty ; Microeconomics ; Original Paper ; Payoffs ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Stigma</subject><ispartof>Review of economic design, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.635-667</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55bb51697c37fe6553a10f0e2b214364646bc82e5c448e29f1f135054e2599e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3188-3785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, James C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flannery, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions</title><title>Review of economic design</title><addtitle>Rev Econ Design</addtitle><description>Randomized response survey methods use noise to mask respondents’ answers to stigmatizing questions in an attempt to elicit honest responses. Respondents weigh the preference for honesty against the disutility of stigmatization when deciding how to answer. Since the disutility of stigmatization depends on the degree of noise, the interviewer designs the survey to balance two goals: (i) honest reporting by respondents and (ii) maximization of the accuracy of estimates based on the survey. We fully characterize the non-linear set of design parameters that lead to truth-telling, as well as the interviewer’s equilibrium survey design.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Digital archives</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Employee theft</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Honesty</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Payoffs</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><issn>1434-4742</issn><issn>1434-4750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPBU8VyfPpkdZn7DgRQ-eQtud1ixuUpOusvvrjVtxbzKQGfhe4SPknMIlBSiuYnqlzoGxHIBTkasDMqGCi1wUEg7_bsGOyUmMSwBQoPWEvN5gtJ2zrstC5RZ-Zbe4yALG3ruIWVyHT9zEbPDp7HsfhuzNO4xDVrn4hWFEBtutqsFuf1w-1gm1SXxKjtrqPeLZ756Sl7vb59lDPn-6f5xdz_OGKxhyKetaUlUWDS9aVFLyikILyGqW_qxEmrrRDGUjhEZWtrSlXIIUyGRZouZTcjH69sHvws3Sr4NLkYZprmhy0TKx2Mhqgo8xYGv6YFdV2BgK5qdCM1ZoUoVmV6FRSZSNImy8s3Ev0VIVJQCFROEjJSbQdRj26f8YfwOtt38C</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Fisher, James C. D.</creator><creator>Flannery, Timothy J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-3785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions</title><author>Fisher, James C. D. ; Flannery, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55bb51697c37fe6553a10f0e2b214364646bc82e5c448e29f1f135054e2599e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Digital archives</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Employee theft</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Honesty</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Payoffs</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, James C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flannery, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of economic design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, James C. D.</au><au>Flannery, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions</atitle><jtitle>Review of economic design</jtitle><stitle>Rev Econ Design</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>635-667</pages><issn>1434-4742</issn><eissn>1434-4750</eissn><abstract>Randomized response survey methods use noise to mask respondents’ answers to stigmatizing questions in an attempt to elicit honest responses. Respondents weigh the preference for honesty against the disutility of stigmatization when deciding how to answer. Since the disutility of stigmatization depends on the degree of noise, the interviewer designs the survey to balance two goals: (i) honest reporting by respondents and (ii) maximization of the accuracy of estimates based on the survey. We fully characterize the non-linear set of design parameters that lead to truth-telling, as well as the interviewer’s equilibrium survey design.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-3785</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-4742
ispartof Review of economic design, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.635-667
issn 1434-4742
1434-4750
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2836114385
source SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Accuracy
Behavioral/Experimental Economics
Design
Digital archives
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Employee theft
Equilibrium
Estimates
Game Theory
Honesty
Microeconomics
Original Paper
Payoffs
Polls & surveys
Social and Behav. Sciences
Stigma
title Designing randomized response surveys to support honest answers to stigmatizing questions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20randomized%20response%20surveys%20to%20support%20honest%20answers%20to%20stigmatizing%20questions&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20economic%20design&rft.au=Fisher,%20James%20C.%20D.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=635-667&rft.issn=1434-4742&rft.eissn=1434-4750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10058-022-00314-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2836114385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836114385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true