Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review

Schools rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs). However, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices. Traditional methods of professional development are not effective at producin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teacher education and special education 2023-08, Vol.46 (3), p.223-242
Hauptverfasser: Borosh, Amanda M., Newson, Alexandra, Mason, Rose A., Richards, Charissa D., Collins Crosley, Hannah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Teacher education and special education
container_volume 46
creator Borosh, Amanda M.
Newson, Alexandra
Mason, Rose A.
Richards, Charissa D.
Collins Crosley, Hannah
description Schools rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs). However, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices. Traditional methods of professional development are not effective at producing long-term changes in classroom staff. Prior research shows that paraeducators can implement skills with high fidelity when provided experiential training or coaching; however, most research has included researcher-as-trainer for paraeducators. Training delivered by special education teachers (SETs) may be a more sustainable training framework. We conducted a systematic and quality review of research on SET-delivered training to improve paraeducators’ implementation of skills for supporting SWDs. We identified 11 studies with moderate or high methodological rigor and found behavioral skills training was the most common method used by SETs to train paraeducators. Contextual variables including participant characteristics, target skills, and procedural fidelity were synthesized to provide a summary of strengths and gaps in the research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/08884064231160575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2833544352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1384045</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_08884064231160575</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2833544352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-71d0e5f49f9810c9b8059fe64d6b90e6991a60fb5a8a9c738438aef387cf1f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwASyQLLFOsWs7sdlVpeWhSjxa1pHrXBdXaVLspKh_T0IQLBCru5gzM1eD0DklA0qT5IpIKTmJ-ZBRGhORiAPUo4rziCtGD1Gv1aMWOEYnIawJIZyIuIfS-RaM0zmeZLXRlSsLvABt3sBHN5C7HXjI8MJrV7hihW3p8ZP2Gr7g0odrPMLzfahg03gN1kWGn2udu2qPX2Dn4OMUHVmdBzj7vn30Op0sxnfR7PH2fjyaRYYxXkUJzQgIy5VVkhKjlpIIZSHmWbxUBGKlqI6JXQottTIJk5xJDZbJxFhqacb66LLL3fryvYZQpeuy9kVTmQ4lY4JzJoYNRTvK-DIEDzbderfRfp9SkrY7pn92bDwXnQe8Mz_85IE2TxDe6oNOD3oFv63_B34CSVN7rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833544352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Borosh, Amanda M. ; Newson, Alexandra ; Mason, Rose A. ; Richards, Charissa D. ; Collins Crosley, Hannah</creator><creatorcontrib>Borosh, Amanda M. ; Newson, Alexandra ; Mason, Rose A. ; Richards, Charissa D. ; Collins Crosley, Hannah</creatorcontrib><description>Schools rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs). However, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices. Traditional methods of professional development are not effective at producing long-term changes in classroom staff. Prior research shows that paraeducators can implement skills with high fidelity when provided experiential training or coaching; however, most research has included researcher-as-trainer for paraeducators. Training delivered by special education teachers (SETs) may be a more sustainable training framework. We conducted a systematic and quality review of research on SET-delivered training to improve paraeducators’ implementation of skills for supporting SWDs. We identified 11 studies with moderate or high methodological rigor and found behavioral skills training was the most common method used by SETs to train paraeducators. Contextual variables including participant characteristics, target skills, and procedural fidelity were synthesized to provide a summary of strengths and gaps in the research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4064</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-4931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08884064231160575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Classrooms ; Coaching ; Coaching (Performance) ; Educational Research ; Educational Strategies ; Evidence-based practice ; Fidelity ; Intervention ; Job Training ; Participant Characteristics ; Professional development ; Research Methodology ; Skill Development ; Special education ; Special Education Teachers ; Students with disabilities ; Teacher Aides ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Training</subject><ispartof>Teacher education and special education, 2023-08, Vol.46 (3), p.223-242</ispartof><rights>2023 Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-71d0e5f49f9810c9b8059fe64d6b90e6991a60fb5a8a9c738438aef387cf1f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-71d0e5f49f9810c9b8059fe64d6b90e6991a60fb5a8a9c738438aef387cf1f1d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5387-8023 ; 0000-0002-2265-5329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08884064231160575$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08884064231160575$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1384045$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borosh, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newson, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Rose A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Charissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins Crosley, Hannah</creatorcontrib><title>Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review</title><title>Teacher education and special education</title><description>Schools rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs). However, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices. Traditional methods of professional development are not effective at producing long-term changes in classroom staff. Prior research shows that paraeducators can implement skills with high fidelity when provided experiential training or coaching; however, most research has included researcher-as-trainer for paraeducators. Training delivered by special education teachers (SETs) may be a more sustainable training framework. We conducted a systematic and quality review of research on SET-delivered training to improve paraeducators’ implementation of skills for supporting SWDs. We identified 11 studies with moderate or high methodological rigor and found behavioral skills training was the most common method used by SETs to train paraeducators. Contextual variables including participant characteristics, target skills, and procedural fidelity were synthesized to provide a summary of strengths and gaps in the research.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Coaching</subject><subject>Coaching (Performance)</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Job Training</subject><subject>Participant Characteristics</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Special Education Teachers</subject><subject>Students with disabilities</subject><subject>Teacher Aides</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0888-4064</issn><issn>1944-4931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwASyQLLFOsWs7sdlVpeWhSjxa1pHrXBdXaVLspKh_T0IQLBCru5gzM1eD0DklA0qT5IpIKTmJ-ZBRGhORiAPUo4rziCtGD1Gv1aMWOEYnIawJIZyIuIfS-RaM0zmeZLXRlSsLvABt3sBHN5C7HXjI8MJrV7hihW3p8ZP2Gr7g0odrPMLzfahg03gN1kWGn2udu2qPX2Dn4OMUHVmdBzj7vn30Op0sxnfR7PH2fjyaRYYxXkUJzQgIy5VVkhKjlpIIZSHmWbxUBGKlqI6JXQottTIJk5xJDZbJxFhqacb66LLL3fryvYZQpeuy9kVTmQ4lY4JzJoYNRTvK-DIEDzbderfRfp9SkrY7pn92bDwXnQe8Mz_85IE2TxDe6oNOD3oFv63_B34CSVN7rw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Borosh, Amanda M.</creator><creator>Newson, Alexandra</creator><creator>Mason, Rose A.</creator><creator>Richards, Charissa D.</creator><creator>Collins Crosley, Hannah</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-8023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-5329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review</title><author>Borosh, Amanda M. ; Newson, Alexandra ; Mason, Rose A. ; Richards, Charissa D. ; Collins Crosley, Hannah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-71d0e5f49f9810c9b8059fe64d6b90e6991a60fb5a8a9c738438aef387cf1f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Coaching</topic><topic>Coaching (Performance)</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Job Training</topic><topic>Participant Characteristics</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Special Education Teachers</topic><topic>Students with disabilities</topic><topic>Teacher Aides</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borosh, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newson, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Rose A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Charissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins Crosley, Hannah</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borosh, Amanda M.</au><au>Newson, Alexandra</au><au>Mason, Rose A.</au><au>Richards, Charissa D.</au><au>Collins Crosley, Hannah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1384045</ericid><atitle>Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review</atitle><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>223-242</pages><issn>0888-4064</issn><eissn>1944-4931</eissn><abstract>Schools rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs). However, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices. Traditional methods of professional development are not effective at producing long-term changes in classroom staff. Prior research shows that paraeducators can implement skills with high fidelity when provided experiential training or coaching; however, most research has included researcher-as-trainer for paraeducators. Training delivered by special education teachers (SETs) may be a more sustainable training framework. We conducted a systematic and quality review of research on SET-delivered training to improve paraeducators’ implementation of skills for supporting SWDs. We identified 11 studies with moderate or high methodological rigor and found behavioral skills training was the most common method used by SETs to train paraeducators. Contextual variables including participant characteristics, target skills, and procedural fidelity were synthesized to provide a summary of strengths and gaps in the research.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/08884064231160575</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-8023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-5329</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4064
ispartof Teacher education and special education, 2023-08, Vol.46 (3), p.223-242
issn 0888-4064
1944-4931
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2833544352
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Behavior
Classrooms
Coaching
Coaching (Performance)
Educational Research
Educational Strategies
Evidence-based practice
Fidelity
Intervention
Job Training
Participant Characteristics
Professional development
Research Methodology
Skill Development
Special education
Special Education Teachers
Students with disabilities
Teacher Aides
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Training
title Special Education Teacher-Delivered Training for Paraeducators: A Systematic and Quality Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A16%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Education%20Teacher-Delivered%20Training%20for%20Paraeducators:%20A%20Systematic%20and%20Quality%20Review&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20education%20and%20special%20education&rft.au=Borosh,%20Amanda%20M.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=223-242&rft.issn=0888-4064&rft.eissn=1944-4931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08884064231160575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833544352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833544352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1384045&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08884064231160575&rfr_iscdi=true