Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”
Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yerushalmy, Michal Olsher, Shai Harel, Raz Chazan, Daniel |
description | Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2831996898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A755542804</galeid><ericid>EJ1383061</ericid><sourcerecordid>A755542804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIIOAHkJAicQ6s105qc6t4FhVxgJ4tx90UozRp7USIGx8CP8eXYAiCG_Jh7Zmd9ewkyQGDYwYwOgkCRjnLADEDYAgZ30h2kCmVcczF5u9dFNvJfgiuBM6w4AhqJ5nd96tV6zvXLNJJs-6df0mnZHwTgdPUNBHsqK7Jdr2p01vnfevT7tF06TkF611JIX3-ek669OP17Z4ofLy-7yVblakD7f_U3WR2efFwdp1N764mZ-NpZhGBZypnpkAQwkrKkaGwWKrSSmWiWRDSlmVVjnIV7SqDc5IIoFhh55xZKAXw3eRomLvy7bqn0OmntvdN_FKj5HHrQioZu46HroWpSbumajtvbDxzWjrbNlS5iI9HeZ4LlCCiAAeB9W0Iniq98m5p_ItmoL8i10PkOkauvyPXPIoOBxF5Z38FFzeMSw4Fizwf-BC5ZkH-z-s_Uz8B5eCM5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2831996898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-3246</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Descriptions ; Discovery learning ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Graphs ; Inquiry ; Inquiry method ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning strategies ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Concepts ; Mathematical Logic ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Motion ; Representations ; Students ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1383061$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsher, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harel, Raz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><title>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</title><addtitle>Digit Exp Math Educ</addtitle><description>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Descriptions</subject><subject>Discovery learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Inquiry</subject><subject>Inquiry method</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>2199-3246</issn><issn>2199-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIIOAHkJAicQ6s105qc6t4FhVxgJ4tx90UozRp7USIGx8CP8eXYAiCG_Jh7Zmd9ewkyQGDYwYwOgkCRjnLADEDYAgZ30h2kCmVcczF5u9dFNvJfgiuBM6w4AhqJ5nd96tV6zvXLNJJs-6df0mnZHwTgdPUNBHsqK7Jdr2p01vnfevT7tF06TkF611JIX3-ek669OP17Z4ofLy-7yVblakD7f_U3WR2efFwdp1N764mZ-NpZhGBZypnpkAQwkrKkaGwWKrSSmWiWRDSlmVVjnIV7SqDc5IIoFhh55xZKAXw3eRomLvy7bqn0OmntvdN_FKj5HHrQioZu46HroWpSbumajtvbDxzWjrbNlS5iI9HeZ4LlCCiAAeB9W0Iniq98m5p_ItmoL8i10PkOkauvyPXPIoOBxF5Z38FFzeMSw4Fizwf-BC5ZkH-z-s_Uz8B5eCM5Q</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Yerushalmy, Michal</creator><creator>Olsher, Shai</creator><creator>Harel, Raz</creator><creator>Chazan, Daniel</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><author>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Descriptions</topic><topic>Discovery learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Inquiry</topic><topic>Inquiry method</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsher, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harel, Raz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><jtitle>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yerushalmy, Michal</au><au>Olsher, Shai</au><au>Harel, Raz</au><au>Chazan, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1383061</ericid><atitle>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</atitle><jtitle>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</jtitle><stitle>Digit Exp Math Educ</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>315-342</pages><issn>2199-3246</issn><eissn>2199-3254</eissn><abstract>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2199-3246 |
ispartof | Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342 |
issn | 2199-3246 2199-3254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2831996898 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Descriptions Discovery learning Education Educational Technology Feedback Feedback (Response) Graphs Inquiry Inquiry method Learning Learning and Instruction Learning strategies Mathematical analysis Mathematical Concepts Mathematical Logic Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Motion Representations Students Vocabulary |
title | Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supporting%20Inquiry%20Learning:%20an%20Intellectual%20Mirror%20that%20Describes%20what%20It%20%E2%80%9CSees%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Digital%20Experiences%20in%20Mathematics%20Education&rft.au=Yerushalmy,%20Michal&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=315-342&rft.issn=2199-3246&rft.eissn=2199-3254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA755542804%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2831996898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A755542804&rft_ericid=EJ1383061&rfr_iscdi=true |