Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”

Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, rese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342
Hauptverfasser: Yerushalmy, Michal, Olsher, Shai, Harel, Raz, Chazan, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 342
container_issue 2
container_start_page 315
container_title Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education
container_volume 9
creator Yerushalmy, Michal
Olsher, Shai
Harel, Raz
Chazan, Daniel
description Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2831996898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A755542804</galeid><ericid>EJ1383061</ericid><sourcerecordid>A755542804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIIOAHkJAicQ6s105qc6t4FhVxgJ4tx90UozRp7USIGx8CP8eXYAiCG_Jh7Zmd9ewkyQGDYwYwOgkCRjnLADEDYAgZ30h2kCmVcczF5u9dFNvJfgiuBM6w4AhqJ5nd96tV6zvXLNJJs-6df0mnZHwTgdPUNBHsqK7Jdr2p01vnfevT7tF06TkF611JIX3-ek669OP17Z4ofLy-7yVblakD7f_U3WR2efFwdp1N764mZ-NpZhGBZypnpkAQwkrKkaGwWKrSSmWiWRDSlmVVjnIV7SqDc5IIoFhh55xZKAXw3eRomLvy7bqn0OmntvdN_FKj5HHrQioZu46HroWpSbumajtvbDxzWjrbNlS5iI9HeZ4LlCCiAAeB9W0Iniq98m5p_ItmoL8i10PkOkauvyPXPIoOBxF5Z38FFzeMSw4Fizwf-BC5ZkH-z-s_Uz8B5eCM5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2831996898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-3246</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Descriptions ; Discovery learning ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Graphs ; Inquiry ; Inquiry method ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning strategies ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Concepts ; Mathematical Logic ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Motion ; Representations ; Students ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1383061$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsher, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harel, Raz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><title>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</title><addtitle>Digit Exp Math Educ</addtitle><description>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Descriptions</subject><subject>Discovery learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Inquiry</subject><subject>Inquiry method</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>2199-3246</issn><issn>2199-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIIOAHkJAicQ6s105qc6t4FhVxgJ4tx90UozRp7USIGx8CP8eXYAiCG_Jh7Zmd9ewkyQGDYwYwOgkCRjnLADEDYAgZ30h2kCmVcczF5u9dFNvJfgiuBM6w4AhqJ5nd96tV6zvXLNJJs-6df0mnZHwTgdPUNBHsqK7Jdr2p01vnfevT7tF06TkF611JIX3-ek669OP17Z4ofLy-7yVblakD7f_U3WR2efFwdp1N764mZ-NpZhGBZypnpkAQwkrKkaGwWKrSSmWiWRDSlmVVjnIV7SqDc5IIoFhh55xZKAXw3eRomLvy7bqn0OmntvdN_FKj5HHrQioZu46HroWpSbumajtvbDxzWjrbNlS5iI9HeZ4LlCCiAAeB9W0Iniq98m5p_ItmoL8i10PkOkauvyPXPIoOBxF5Z38FFzeMSw4Fizwf-BC5ZkH-z-s_Uz8B5eCM5Q</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Yerushalmy, Michal</creator><creator>Olsher, Shai</creator><creator>Harel, Raz</creator><creator>Chazan, Daniel</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</title><author>Yerushalmy, Michal ; Olsher, Shai ; Harel, Raz ; Chazan, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2203-951a62044c8e52124c2b9bc89a324048cbbfb7593129a2de8200916cd31c0b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Descriptions</topic><topic>Discovery learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Inquiry</topic><topic>Inquiry method</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmy, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsher, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harel, Raz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><jtitle>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yerushalmy, Michal</au><au>Olsher, Shai</au><au>Harel, Raz</au><au>Chazan, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1383061</ericid><atitle>Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”</atitle><jtitle>Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education</jtitle><stitle>Digit Exp Math Educ</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>315-342</pages><issn>2199-3246</issn><eissn>2199-3254</eissn><abstract>Much important research on the learning of mathematics with technology-supported inquiry has been devoted to learning with multiple-linked representations (MLR) as a mode of feedback. Like a mirror, MLR feedback helps students see their actions in one representation “reflected” in another. Yet, research has followed learning episodes where MLR feedback did not lead to concept formation and the achievement of curricular goals. This article reports on the potential of what might be thought of as a mirror that speaks. In response to example-eliciting tasks, students use interactive diagrams to create examples to which mathematical descriptions are automatically associated. Such descriptions may be thought of as another kind of linked mathematical representation system. Transitions feature in two ways in our analysis of students’ use of this representation. At the level of student activity, we examine when students move between attending to textual descriptions and to the graphs that they describe. We are also interested in how attention to these descriptions and co-ordination with their own use of these words can support students in making a transition in their thinking from considering distance as only total distance traveled, to a co-ordinated view of distance including both total distance traveled and distance from a starting point. This article focuses on two example-eliciting motion tasks and two sets of descriptive words. We found that these sets of words helped students, while and after they were working with the diagram, to distinguish between total distance traveled and position with respect to a starting point.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-8883</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-3246
ispartof Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2023-08, Vol.9 (2), p.315-342
issn 2199-3246
2199-3254
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2831996898
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Descriptions
Discovery learning
Education
Educational Technology
Feedback
Feedback (Response)
Graphs
Inquiry
Inquiry method
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Learning strategies
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Mathematical Logic
Mathematics Education
Mathematics Instruction
Motion
Representations
Students
Vocabulary
title Supporting Inquiry Learning: an Intellectual Mirror that Describes what It “Sees”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supporting%20Inquiry%20Learning:%20an%20Intellectual%20Mirror%20that%20Describes%20what%20It%20%E2%80%9CSees%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Digital%20Experiences%20in%20Mathematics%20Education&rft.au=Yerushalmy,%20Michal&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=315-342&rft.issn=2199-3246&rft.eissn=2199-3254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40751-022-00120-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA755542804%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2831996898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A755542804&rft_ericid=EJ1383061&rfr_iscdi=true