Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation

Accelerating aseismic slip events have been commonly observed during the rupture nucleation processes of the earthquake. While that accelerating aseismic slip is usually considered strong evidence for precursory activity, it remains unclear whether all accelerating aseismic slip events are precursor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2023-06, Vol.128 (6), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xiaoyu, Dal Zilio, Luca, Morgan, Julia K., Kammer, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 128
creator Wang, Xiaoyu
Dal Zilio, Luca
Morgan, Julia K.
Kammer, David S.
description Accelerating aseismic slip events have been commonly observed during the rupture nucleation processes of the earthquake. While that accelerating aseismic slip is usually considered strong evidence for precursory activity, it remains unclear whether all accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to an incoming earthquake. Two contrasting nucleation models have been introduced to explain the observations associated with the nucleation of unstable slip: the pre‐slip and cascade nucleation models. Each of these two‐end members, however, has its own limitations. In this study, we employ Discrete Element Method simulations of a 2‐D strike‐slip fault to simulate various rupture nucleation and triggering processes. Our simulation results manifest that the final seismic event is a product contributed by multiple pre‐slip nucleation sites, which may interact, causing clock advance or cascade nucleation rupture processes. We also introduce a strengthening perturbation zone to investigate the role of a single nucleation site in an imminent seismic event. The simulation results reveal a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region favoring the generation of the precursory slip process but not correlating to the incoming main event, which differs from the previous interpretation of precursory slip. Furthermore, we include weakening perturbation zones in some simulations to demonstrate how small earthquakes may or may not trigger a nucleation site depending on spatial and temporal conditions. Our simulation results imply that such non‐precursory but accelerating aseismic slip events may suggest a fault segment that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically. Plain Language Summary It is essential to understand the nucleation of unstable slip to predict an impending earthquake. Slow slip fault activities and their accelerations have been observed before large earthquakes. The accelerating aseismic slip events are usually considered an early warning sign of an incoming earthquake. However, it remains unclear whether all such accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to the incoming earthquake, and if not, how to distinguish between precursory and non‐precursory aseismic slip. This study employs the DEM to simulate earthquake nucleation along a 2‐D geometrically irregular fault plane. Our simplified DEM models can produce complex slip behavior. Our results manifest that the final seismic event is a produc
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022JB026066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2829986147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2829986147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3027-e35c0312dea05c53e4a9844b5f60442a292809d874445aca7bfcc40f886f19813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_AgCpbamw-w4NXVZPKxybGttVpKlarnkKZZ2bLdXZMG2ZuP4DP6JG6piCfnMsOfHzMwCJ0TfEUwqGvAALMRBoGFOEI9IEKlinJx_DsTeooGIWxwV7KLCOuhyaKuvj4-H72z0Yfat8nQWlc6b3ZF9ZoMgyvCtrDJU1k0yU30-3AZm130LllEW7rO1dUZOslNGdzgp_fRy-3keXyXzh-m9-PhPLUUQ5Y6yi2mBNbOYG45dcwoydiK5wIzBgYUSKzWMmOMcWNNtsqtZTiXUuRESUL76OKwt_H1W3Rhpzd19FV3UoMEpaQgLOvU5UFZX4fgXa4bX2yNbzXBev8r_fdXHacH_l6Urv3X6tl0OeKC0ox-A4oGac8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2829986147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Xiaoyu ; Dal Zilio, Luca ; Morgan, Julia K. ; Kammer, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoyu ; Dal Zilio, Luca ; Morgan, Julia K. ; Kammer, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>Accelerating aseismic slip events have been commonly observed during the rupture nucleation processes of the earthquake. While that accelerating aseismic slip is usually considered strong evidence for precursory activity, it remains unclear whether all accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to an incoming earthquake. Two contrasting nucleation models have been introduced to explain the observations associated with the nucleation of unstable slip: the pre‐slip and cascade nucleation models. Each of these two‐end members, however, has its own limitations. In this study, we employ Discrete Element Method simulations of a 2‐D strike‐slip fault to simulate various rupture nucleation and triggering processes. Our simulation results manifest that the final seismic event is a product contributed by multiple pre‐slip nucleation sites, which may interact, causing clock advance or cascade nucleation rupture processes. We also introduce a strengthening perturbation zone to investigate the role of a single nucleation site in an imminent seismic event. The simulation results reveal a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region favoring the generation of the precursory slip process but not correlating to the incoming main event, which differs from the previous interpretation of precursory slip. Furthermore, we include weakening perturbation zones in some simulations to demonstrate how small earthquakes may or may not trigger a nucleation site depending on spatial and temporal conditions. Our simulation results imply that such non‐precursory but accelerating aseismic slip events may suggest a fault segment that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically. Plain Language Summary It is essential to understand the nucleation of unstable slip to predict an impending earthquake. Slow slip fault activities and their accelerations have been observed before large earthquakes. The accelerating aseismic slip events are usually considered an early warning sign of an incoming earthquake. However, it remains unclear whether all such accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to the incoming earthquake, and if not, how to distinguish between precursory and non‐precursory aseismic slip. This study employs the DEM to simulate earthquake nucleation along a 2‐D geometrically irregular fault plane. Our simplified DEM models can produce complex slip behavior. Our results manifest that the final seismic event is a product of multiple rupture nucleation sites, which may interact and then jointly influence the onset and propagation of the main dynamic rupture. Moreover, this work reveals a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region that favors the generation of the precursory slip process but does not correlate to the incoming earthquake. Such non‐precursory accelerating aseismic slip events may indicate a region that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically, which is a potential mechanism for unexpected earthquake origins. Key Points Aseismic and seismic slip events and their interactions are simulated in particle‐based models Regions favoring a generation of precursory accelerating slip can have a minimal effect on the incoming main seismic event Accelerating non‐precursory aseismic slip may indicate a large seismic potential that a preceding seismic event can trigger</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JB026066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Discrete element method ; discrete element models ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Fault lines ; Geophysics ; Nucleation ; Nucleation processes ; Perturbation ; Precursors ; precursory slip processes ; Rupture ; rupture nucleation ; Seismic activity ; seismic and aseismic slip ; shearing test ; Simulation ; Slip</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2023-06, Vol.128 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. The Authors.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3027-e35c0312dea05c53e4a9844b5f60442a292809d874445aca7bfcc40f886f19813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5642-0894 ; 0000-0003-3782-9368 ; 0000-0001-9315-3265</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022JB026066$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022JB026066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Zilio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Julia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kammer, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Accelerating aseismic slip events have been commonly observed during the rupture nucleation processes of the earthquake. While that accelerating aseismic slip is usually considered strong evidence for precursory activity, it remains unclear whether all accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to an incoming earthquake. Two contrasting nucleation models have been introduced to explain the observations associated with the nucleation of unstable slip: the pre‐slip and cascade nucleation models. Each of these two‐end members, however, has its own limitations. In this study, we employ Discrete Element Method simulations of a 2‐D strike‐slip fault to simulate various rupture nucleation and triggering processes. Our simulation results manifest that the final seismic event is a product contributed by multiple pre‐slip nucleation sites, which may interact, causing clock advance or cascade nucleation rupture processes. We also introduce a strengthening perturbation zone to investigate the role of a single nucleation site in an imminent seismic event. The simulation results reveal a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region favoring the generation of the precursory slip process but not correlating to the incoming main event, which differs from the previous interpretation of precursory slip. Furthermore, we include weakening perturbation zones in some simulations to demonstrate how small earthquakes may or may not trigger a nucleation site depending on spatial and temporal conditions. Our simulation results imply that such non‐precursory but accelerating aseismic slip events may suggest a fault segment that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically. Plain Language Summary It is essential to understand the nucleation of unstable slip to predict an impending earthquake. Slow slip fault activities and their accelerations have been observed before large earthquakes. The accelerating aseismic slip events are usually considered an early warning sign of an incoming earthquake. However, it remains unclear whether all such accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to the incoming earthquake, and if not, how to distinguish between precursory and non‐precursory aseismic slip. This study employs the DEM to simulate earthquake nucleation along a 2‐D geometrically irregular fault plane. Our simplified DEM models can produce complex slip behavior. Our results manifest that the final seismic event is a product of multiple rupture nucleation sites, which may interact and then jointly influence the onset and propagation of the main dynamic rupture. Moreover, this work reveals a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region that favors the generation of the precursory slip process but does not correlate to the incoming earthquake. Such non‐precursory accelerating aseismic slip events may indicate a region that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically, which is a potential mechanism for unexpected earthquake origins. Key Points Aseismic and seismic slip events and their interactions are simulated in particle‐based models Regions favoring a generation of precursory accelerating slip can have a minimal effect on the incoming main seismic event Accelerating non‐precursory aseismic slip may indicate a large seismic potential that a preceding seismic event can trigger</description><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>discrete element models</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Nucleation processes</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Precursors</subject><subject>precursory slip processes</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>rupture nucleation</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>seismic and aseismic slip</subject><subject>shearing test</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Slip</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_AgCpbamw-w4NXVZPKxybGttVpKlarnkKZZ2bLdXZMG2ZuP4DP6JG6piCfnMsOfHzMwCJ0TfEUwqGvAALMRBoGFOEI9IEKlinJx_DsTeooGIWxwV7KLCOuhyaKuvj4-H72z0Yfat8nQWlc6b3ZF9ZoMgyvCtrDJU1k0yU30-3AZm130LllEW7rO1dUZOslNGdzgp_fRy-3keXyXzh-m9-PhPLUUQ5Y6yi2mBNbOYG45dcwoydiK5wIzBgYUSKzWMmOMcWNNtsqtZTiXUuRESUL76OKwt_H1W3Rhpzd19FV3UoMEpaQgLOvU5UFZX4fgXa4bX2yNbzXBev8r_fdXHacH_l6Urv3X6tl0OeKC0ox-A4oGac8</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Dal Zilio, Luca</creator><creator>Morgan, Julia K.</creator><creator>Kammer, David S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-0894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-9368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-3265</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation</title><author>Wang, Xiaoyu ; Dal Zilio, Luca ; Morgan, Julia K. ; Kammer, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3027-e35c0312dea05c53e4a9844b5f60442a292809d874445aca7bfcc40f886f19813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>discrete element models</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Nucleation processes</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Precursors</topic><topic>precursory slip processes</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>rupture nucleation</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>seismic and aseismic slip</topic><topic>shearing test</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Slip</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Zilio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Julia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kammer, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiaoyu</au><au>Dal Zilio, Luca</au><au>Morgan, Julia K.</au><au>Kammer, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Accelerating aseismic slip events have been commonly observed during the rupture nucleation processes of the earthquake. While that accelerating aseismic slip is usually considered strong evidence for precursory activity, it remains unclear whether all accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to an incoming earthquake. Two contrasting nucleation models have been introduced to explain the observations associated with the nucleation of unstable slip: the pre‐slip and cascade nucleation models. Each of these two‐end members, however, has its own limitations. In this study, we employ Discrete Element Method simulations of a 2‐D strike‐slip fault to simulate various rupture nucleation and triggering processes. Our simulation results manifest that the final seismic event is a product contributed by multiple pre‐slip nucleation sites, which may interact, causing clock advance or cascade nucleation rupture processes. We also introduce a strengthening perturbation zone to investigate the role of a single nucleation site in an imminent seismic event. The simulation results reveal a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region favoring the generation of the precursory slip process but not correlating to the incoming main event, which differs from the previous interpretation of precursory slip. Furthermore, we include weakening perturbation zones in some simulations to demonstrate how small earthquakes may or may not trigger a nucleation site depending on spatial and temporal conditions. Our simulation results imply that such non‐precursory but accelerating aseismic slip events may suggest a fault segment that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically. Plain Language Summary It is essential to understand the nucleation of unstable slip to predict an impending earthquake. Slow slip fault activities and their accelerations have been observed before large earthquakes. The accelerating aseismic slip events are usually considered an early warning sign of an incoming earthquake. However, it remains unclear whether all such accelerating aseismic slip events are precursory to the incoming earthquake, and if not, how to distinguish between precursory and non‐precursory aseismic slip. This study employs the DEM to simulate earthquake nucleation along a 2‐D geometrically irregular fault plane. Our simplified DEM models can produce complex slip behavior. Our results manifest that the final seismic event is a product of multiple rupture nucleation sites, which may interact and then jointly influence the onset and propagation of the main dynamic rupture. Moreover, this work reveals a new type of non‐precursory aseismic slip, representing the region that favors the generation of the precursory slip process but does not correlate to the incoming earthquake. Such non‐precursory accelerating aseismic slip events may indicate a region that appears weakly coupled but possesses the potential to be triggered seismically, which is a potential mechanism for unexpected earthquake origins. Key Points Aseismic and seismic slip events and their interactions are simulated in particle‐based models Regions favoring a generation of precursory accelerating slip can have a minimal effect on the incoming main seismic event Accelerating non‐precursory aseismic slip may indicate a large seismic potential that a preceding seismic event can trigger</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022JB026066</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-0894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-9368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-3265</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2023-06, Vol.128 (6), p.n/a
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2829986147
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Discrete element method
discrete element models
Earthquake prediction
Earthquakes
Fault lines
Geophysics
Nucleation
Nucleation processes
Perturbation
Precursors
precursory slip processes
Rupture
rupture nucleation
Seismic activity
seismic and aseismic slip
shearing test
Simulation
Slip
title Non‐Precursory Accelerating Aseismic Slip During Rupture Nucleation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non%E2%80%90Precursory%20Accelerating%20Aseismic%20Slip%20During%20Rupture%20Nucleation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiaoyu&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JB026066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2829986147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2829986147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true