Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations
Intensities (central pressures) of 28 cases of 22 tropical cyclones (TCs) that approached Japan were estimated by using single ground-based Doppler radar observations, and the accuracy and utility of the estimation method were evaluated. The method uses the ground-based velocity track display (GBVTD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2016-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1823-1840 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1840 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1823 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Shimada, Udai Sawada, Masahiro Yamada, Hiroyuki |
description | Intensities (central pressures) of 28 cases of 22 tropical cyclones (TCs) that approached Japan were estimated by using single ground-based Doppler radar observations, and the accuracy and utility of the estimation method were evaluated. The method uses the ground-based velocity track display (GBVTD) technique, which retrieves tangential winds, and the gradient wind balance equation. Before application of the method to the 28 cases, a preliminary experiment was performed with pseudo-Doppler velocities obtained by numerical simulation to confirm that the method could reasonably estimate central pressures. Compared with best track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo, the estimated intensities of the 28 cases had a root-mean-square error of 8.37 hPa and showed a bias of 1.51 hPa. This level of accuracy is comparable to or better than the accuracies of Dvorak and satellite microwave-derived estimates. Two distance metrics are defined: 1) the distance between the TC center and the radar location and 2) the distance between the TC center and the weather station whose sea level pressure was used as an anchor for pressure measurement. In general, the accuracy of the Doppler radar estimates was higher when the distance metrics were shorter, as well as when wind retrieval accuracy was better and radar coverage was denser. For TCs with a radius of maximum wind of 20–70 km, the estimated central pressures had a root-mean-square error of 5.55 hPa. These results confirm that Doppler radar intensity estimates have sufficient accuracy and utility for operational use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0254.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2827710814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4059189211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-57164ee515be66c7092989bcca2f72957b382b36d7c97276522feac514bbf7c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1pidms7_kjG0pZSqahSacVoOY4DqUIc7KRSdv5wEsrMcje8372T3gPgnuAJIZJPX952aIEIR5hyNiEXYEQ4xQizJLoEI4ypRFgwdg1uQjhijIVgdAS-lyddtropXAVdDpsPC2fGtF6bDuoqg4emKIumG7S9d3VhdAnnnSldZeG6amwVBnUZmuLzbHIIRfUOX_tRWrjyrq0y9KiDzeDC1XVpPdzpTHu4TYP1p9-bcAuucl0Ge_e3x-DwtNzPn9Fmu1rPZxtkGMcN4pIIZi0nPLVCGIkTmsRJaoymuaQJl2kU0zQSmTSJpFJwSnOrDScsTXNpeDQGD2ff2ruv1oZGHV3rq_6lojGVkuCYsP8oIuOEY8xk3FPTM2W8C8HbXNW-z8B3imA1FKL6QtRCEa6GQhSJfgCM3H7N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789500478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shimada, Udai ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Yamada, Hiroyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Udai ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Yamada, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Intensities (central pressures) of 28 cases of 22 tropical cyclones (TCs) that approached Japan were estimated by using single ground-based Doppler radar observations, and the accuracy and utility of the estimation method were evaluated. The method uses the ground-based velocity track display (GBVTD) technique, which retrieves tangential winds, and the gradient wind balance equation. Before application of the method to the 28 cases, a preliminary experiment was performed with pseudo-Doppler velocities obtained by numerical simulation to confirm that the method could reasonably estimate central pressures. Compared with best track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo, the estimated intensities of the 28 cases had a root-mean-square error of 8.37 hPa and showed a bias of 1.51 hPa. This level of accuracy is comparable to or better than the accuracies of Dvorak and satellite microwave-derived estimates. Two distance metrics are defined: 1) the distance between the TC center and the radar location and 2) the distance between the TC center and the weather station whose sea level pressure was used as an anchor for pressure measurement. In general, the accuracy of the Doppler radar estimates was higher when the distance metrics were shorter, as well as when wind retrieval accuracy was better and radar coverage was denser. For TCs with a radius of maximum wind of 20–70 km, the estimated central pressures had a root-mean-square error of 5.55 hPa. These results confirm that Doppler radar intensity estimates have sufficient accuracy and utility for operational use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0254.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Altitude ; Bias ; Cyclones ; Distance ; Doppler effect ; Doppler radar ; Doppler radar observation ; Doppler sonar ; Estimates ; Gradient winds ; Ground-based observation ; Hurricanes ; Mathematical models ; Maximum winds ; Methods ; Numerical simulations ; Pressure measurement ; Radar ; Root-mean-square errors ; Sea level ; Sea level pressure ; Studies ; Tropical cyclone intensities ; Tropical cyclones ; Velocity ; Weather stations ; Wind ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2016-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1823-1840</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society May 2016</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-57164ee515be66c7092989bcca2f72957b382b36d7c97276522feac514bbf7c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-57164ee515be66c7092989bcca2f72957b382b36d7c97276522feac514bbf7c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Udai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Intensities (central pressures) of 28 cases of 22 tropical cyclones (TCs) that approached Japan were estimated by using single ground-based Doppler radar observations, and the accuracy and utility of the estimation method were evaluated. The method uses the ground-based velocity track display (GBVTD) technique, which retrieves tangential winds, and the gradient wind balance equation. Before application of the method to the 28 cases, a preliminary experiment was performed with pseudo-Doppler velocities obtained by numerical simulation to confirm that the method could reasonably estimate central pressures. Compared with best track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo, the estimated intensities of the 28 cases had a root-mean-square error of 8.37 hPa and showed a bias of 1.51 hPa. This level of accuracy is comparable to or better than the accuracies of Dvorak and satellite microwave-derived estimates. Two distance metrics are defined: 1) the distance between the TC center and the radar location and 2) the distance between the TC center and the weather station whose sea level pressure was used as an anchor for pressure measurement. In general, the accuracy of the Doppler radar estimates was higher when the distance metrics were shorter, as well as when wind retrieval accuracy was better and radar coverage was denser. For TCs with a radius of maximum wind of 20–70 km, the estimated central pressures had a root-mean-square error of 5.55 hPa. These results confirm that Doppler radar intensity estimates have sufficient accuracy and utility for operational use.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Doppler radar</subject><subject>Doppler radar observation</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Gradient winds</subject><subject>Ground-based observation</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maximum winds</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Pressure measurement</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Sea level pressure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tropical cyclone intensities</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb1PwzAQxS0EEqUws1pidms7_kjG0pZSqahSacVoOY4DqUIc7KRSdv5wEsrMcje8372T3gPgnuAJIZJPX952aIEIR5hyNiEXYEQ4xQizJLoEI4ypRFgwdg1uQjhijIVgdAS-lyddtropXAVdDpsPC2fGtF6bDuoqg4emKIumG7S9d3VhdAnnnSldZeG6amwVBnUZmuLzbHIIRfUOX_tRWrjyrq0y9KiDzeDC1XVpPdzpTHu4TYP1p9-bcAuucl0Ge_e3x-DwtNzPn9Fmu1rPZxtkGMcN4pIIZi0nPLVCGIkTmsRJaoymuaQJl2kU0zQSmTSJpFJwSnOrDScsTXNpeDQGD2ff2ruv1oZGHV3rq_6lojGVkuCYsP8oIuOEY8xk3FPTM2W8C8HbXNW-z8B3imA1FKL6QtRCEa6GQhSJfgCM3H7N</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Shimada, Udai</creator><creator>Sawada, Masahiro</creator><creator>Yamada, Hiroyuki</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations</title><author>Shimada, Udai ; Sawada, Masahiro ; Yamada, Hiroyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-57164ee515be66c7092989bcca2f72957b382b36d7c97276522feac514bbf7c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Doppler radar</topic><topic>Doppler radar observation</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Gradient winds</topic><topic>Ground-based observation</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maximum winds</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Pressure measurement</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Sea level pressure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tropical cyclone intensities</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Udai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimada, Udai</au><au>Sawada, Masahiro</au><au>Yamada, Hiroyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1823</spage><epage>1840</epage><pages>1823-1840</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Intensities (central pressures) of 28 cases of 22 tropical cyclones (TCs) that approached Japan were estimated by using single ground-based Doppler radar observations, and the accuracy and utility of the estimation method were evaluated. The method uses the ground-based velocity track display (GBVTD) technique, which retrieves tangential winds, and the gradient wind balance equation. Before application of the method to the 28 cases, a preliminary experiment was performed with pseudo-Doppler velocities obtained by numerical simulation to confirm that the method could reasonably estimate central pressures. Compared with best track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo, the estimated intensities of the 28 cases had a root-mean-square error of 8.37 hPa and showed a bias of 1.51 hPa. This level of accuracy is comparable to or better than the accuracies of Dvorak and satellite microwave-derived estimates. Two distance metrics are defined: 1) the distance between the TC center and the radar location and 2) the distance between the TC center and the weather station whose sea level pressure was used as an anchor for pressure measurement. In general, the accuracy of the Doppler radar estimates was higher when the distance metrics were shorter, as well as when wind retrieval accuracy was better and radar coverage was denser. For TCs with a radius of maximum wind of 20–70 km, the estimated central pressures had a root-mean-square error of 5.55 hPa. These results confirm that Doppler radar intensity estimates have sufficient accuracy and utility for operational use.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/MWR-D-15-0254.1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2016-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1823-1840 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2827710814 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Altitude Bias Cyclones Distance Doppler effect Doppler radar Doppler radar observation Doppler sonar Estimates Gradient winds Ground-based observation Hurricanes Mathematical models Maximum winds Methods Numerical simulations Pressure measurement Radar Root-mean-square errors Sea level Sea level pressure Studies Tropical cyclone intensities Tropical cyclones Velocity Weather stations Wind Winds |
title | Evaluation of the Accuracy and Utility of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation Using Single Ground-Based Doppler Radar Observations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Accuracy%20and%20Utility%20of%20Tropical%20Cyclone%20Intensity%20Estimation%20Using%20Single%20Ground-Based%20Doppler%20Radar%20Observations&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=Shimada,%20Udai&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1823&rft.epage=1840&rft.pages=1823-1840&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0254.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4059189211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789500478&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |