DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC
"20 Other Republicans also inflamed the crowd.21 Following the rally, the crowd marched on the Capitol, overwhelmed the police, and broke into the building.22 In addition to property damage and stolen items from the Capitol, five people died during the storming of the Capitol, including a Capit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | St. John's law review 2022-01, Vol.96 (3), p.543-589 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 589 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | St. John's law review |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Henricksen, Wes |
description | "20 Other Republicans also inflamed the crowd.21 Following the rally, the crowd marched on the Capitol, overwhelmed the police, and broke into the building.22 In addition to property damage and stolen items from the Capitol, five people died during the storming of the Capitol, including a Capitol Police officer.23 At least 138 police officers were injured, including fifteen hospitalized with severe injuries.24 For example, one D.C. Metro police officer "was hit six times with a stun gun," suffered a heart attack, and "lost the tip of' one of his fingers.25 Another officer suffered "two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs," another lost an eye, another "lost three fingers," another was impaled "with a metal fence stake," and a large number of officers suffered brain trauma, including several with concussions.26 The Big Lie's harmful consequences extended beyond the Capitol. [...]Dominion Voting Systems incurred significant reputational and financial damages as a result.27 In the effort to spread the false claim that the election was stolen, several prominent Republican leaders and their allies made accusations against Dominion Voting Systems, a company that makes and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators.28 In the 2020 election, its devices and technology were used to process votes in twentyeight states, including several swing states.29 Fox News and other conservative media outlets served as a platform for individuals associated with Trump and the Republican Party to spread false allegations about Dominion.30 These included, but were not limited to, the accusation that the company was founded and run by (dead) former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, the votes it tabulated were counted overseas, the company was owned by radical-left extremists affiliated with Antifa, the company had switched millions of votes from Trump to Biden, and the company was largely responsible for stealing the election away from Trump, and that its employees bragged about rigging the election in favor of Biden.31 Rightwing media greatly amplified these claims and repeated them, rather than debunking, fact-checking, or even questioning them.32 The disinformation campaign against Dominion led to its employees being "stalked, harassed and receiv[ing] death threats. Under the law, admitting you purposefully spread demonstrably false claims on national TV about nonexistent widespread voter fraud, undermining the legitimacy of a pr |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2826427505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2826427505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28264275053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjSz0LUwtzRjYeA0MDA20zWyNDDlYOAqLs4yMDA0NDIx5WSwdvEM9vRz8w_ydQzx9PdTcPRzUQjxcFVw8wwKDlFw9HX1cwHiECsFtyDHUBcFoAqQbECok4-nMw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRtZGJmZGJmbGpgaE6cKAPw8Mjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2826427505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Henricksen, Wes</creator><creatorcontrib>Henricksen, Wes</creatorcontrib><description>"20 Other Republicans also inflamed the crowd.21 Following the rally, the crowd marched on the Capitol, overwhelmed the police, and broke into the building.22 In addition to property damage and stolen items from the Capitol, five people died during the storming of the Capitol, including a Capitol Police officer.23 At least 138 police officers were injured, including fifteen hospitalized with severe injuries.24 For example, one D.C. Metro police officer "was hit six times with a stun gun," suffered a heart attack, and "lost the tip of' one of his fingers.25 Another officer suffered "two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs," another lost an eye, another "lost three fingers," another was impaled "with a metal fence stake," and a large number of officers suffered brain trauma, including several with concussions.26 The Big Lie's harmful consequences extended beyond the Capitol. [...]Dominion Voting Systems incurred significant reputational and financial damages as a result.27 In the effort to spread the false claim that the election was stolen, several prominent Republican leaders and their allies made accusations against Dominion Voting Systems, a company that makes and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators.28 In the 2020 election, its devices and technology were used to process votes in twentyeight states, including several swing states.29 Fox News and other conservative media outlets served as a platform for individuals associated with Trump and the Republican Party to spread false allegations about Dominion.30 These included, but were not limited to, the accusation that the company was founded and run by (dead) former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, the votes it tabulated were counted overseas, the company was owned by radical-left extremists affiliated with Antifa, the company had switched millions of votes from Trump to Biden, and the company was largely responsible for stealing the election away from Trump, and that its employees bragged about rigging the election in favor of Biden.31 Rightwing media greatly amplified these claims and repeated them, rather than debunking, fact-checking, or even questioning them.32 The disinformation campaign against Dominion led to its employees being "stalked, harassed and receiv[ing] death threats. Under the law, admitting you purposefully spread demonstrably false claims on national TV about nonexistent widespread voter fraud, undermining the legitimacy of a presidential election and causing millions to believe a sitting President had "stolen" the election, was raised as a defense to a defamation claim. [...]not only is it legal to knowingly spread false claims to the public on matters of national importance and which cause widespread physical and economic harm, but admitting to doing so may actually shield you from liability. [...]the falser the information you spread-for example, if "[n]o reasonable person" would believe it-the more legal it may be to spread.40 With the defamation claims pending, it is far from clear what liability, if any, will be imposed on those who purposefully spread the Big Lie.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-2905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn: St. John's Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Election results ; Pelosi, Nancy ; Presidential elections ; Voter fraud ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>St. John's law review, 2022-01, Vol.96 (3), p.543-589</ispartof><rights>Copyright St. John's Law Review Association 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henricksen, Wes</creatorcontrib><title>DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC</title><title>St. John's law review</title><description>"20 Other Republicans also inflamed the crowd.21 Following the rally, the crowd marched on the Capitol, overwhelmed the police, and broke into the building.22 In addition to property damage and stolen items from the Capitol, five people died during the storming of the Capitol, including a Capitol Police officer.23 At least 138 police officers were injured, including fifteen hospitalized with severe injuries.24 For example, one D.C. Metro police officer "was hit six times with a stun gun," suffered a heart attack, and "lost the tip of' one of his fingers.25 Another officer suffered "two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs," another lost an eye, another "lost three fingers," another was impaled "with a metal fence stake," and a large number of officers suffered brain trauma, including several with concussions.26 The Big Lie's harmful consequences extended beyond the Capitol. [...]Dominion Voting Systems incurred significant reputational and financial damages as a result.27 In the effort to spread the false claim that the election was stolen, several prominent Republican leaders and their allies made accusations against Dominion Voting Systems, a company that makes and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators.28 In the 2020 election, its devices and technology were used to process votes in twentyeight states, including several swing states.29 Fox News and other conservative media outlets served as a platform for individuals associated with Trump and the Republican Party to spread false allegations about Dominion.30 These included, but were not limited to, the accusation that the company was founded and run by (dead) former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, the votes it tabulated were counted overseas, the company was owned by radical-left extremists affiliated with Antifa, the company had switched millions of votes from Trump to Biden, and the company was largely responsible for stealing the election away from Trump, and that its employees bragged about rigging the election in favor of Biden.31 Rightwing media greatly amplified these claims and repeated them, rather than debunking, fact-checking, or even questioning them.32 The disinformation campaign against Dominion led to its employees being "stalked, harassed and receiv[ing] death threats. Under the law, admitting you purposefully spread demonstrably false claims on national TV about nonexistent widespread voter fraud, undermining the legitimacy of a presidential election and causing millions to believe a sitting President had "stolen" the election, was raised as a defense to a defamation claim. [...]not only is it legal to knowingly spread false claims to the public on matters of national importance and which cause widespread physical and economic harm, but admitting to doing so may actually shield you from liability. [...]the falser the information you spread-for example, if "[n]o reasonable person" would believe it-the more legal it may be to spread.40 With the defamation claims pending, it is far from clear what liability, if any, will be imposed on those who purposefully spread the Big Lie.</description><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Pelosi, Nancy</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Voter fraud</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0036-2905</issn><issn>2168-8796</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjSz0LUwtzRjYeA0MDA20zWyNDDlYOAqLs4yMDA0NDIx5WSwdvEM9vRz8w_ydQzx9PdTcPRzUQjxcFVw8wwKDlFw9HX1cwHiECsFtyDHUBcFoAqQbECok4-nMw8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRtZGJmZGJmbGpgaE6cKAPw8Mjs</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Henricksen, Wes</creator><general>St. John's Law Review Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC</title><author>Henricksen, Wes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28264275053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Pelosi, Nancy</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Voter fraud</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henricksen, Wes</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>St. John's law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henricksen, Wes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC</atitle><jtitle>St. John's law review</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>543-589</pages><issn>0036-2905</issn><eissn>2168-8796</eissn><abstract>"20 Other Republicans also inflamed the crowd.21 Following the rally, the crowd marched on the Capitol, overwhelmed the police, and broke into the building.22 In addition to property damage and stolen items from the Capitol, five people died during the storming of the Capitol, including a Capitol Police officer.23 At least 138 police officers were injured, including fifteen hospitalized with severe injuries.24 For example, one D.C. Metro police officer "was hit six times with a stun gun," suffered a heart attack, and "lost the tip of' one of his fingers.25 Another officer suffered "two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs," another lost an eye, another "lost three fingers," another was impaled "with a metal fence stake," and a large number of officers suffered brain trauma, including several with concussions.26 The Big Lie's harmful consequences extended beyond the Capitol. [...]Dominion Voting Systems incurred significant reputational and financial damages as a result.27 In the effort to spread the false claim that the election was stolen, several prominent Republican leaders and their allies made accusations against Dominion Voting Systems, a company that makes and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators.28 In the 2020 election, its devices and technology were used to process votes in twentyeight states, including several swing states.29 Fox News and other conservative media outlets served as a platform for individuals associated with Trump and the Republican Party to spread false allegations about Dominion.30 These included, but were not limited to, the accusation that the company was founded and run by (dead) former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, the votes it tabulated were counted overseas, the company was owned by radical-left extremists affiliated with Antifa, the company had switched millions of votes from Trump to Biden, and the company was largely responsible for stealing the election away from Trump, and that its employees bragged about rigging the election in favor of Biden.31 Rightwing media greatly amplified these claims and repeated them, rather than debunking, fact-checking, or even questioning them.32 The disinformation campaign against Dominion led to its employees being "stalked, harassed and receiv[ing] death threats. Under the law, admitting you purposefully spread demonstrably false claims on national TV about nonexistent widespread voter fraud, undermining the legitimacy of a presidential election and causing millions to believe a sitting President had "stolen" the election, was raised as a defense to a defamation claim. [...]not only is it legal to knowingly spread false claims to the public on matters of national importance and which cause widespread physical and economic harm, but admitting to doing so may actually shield you from liability. [...]the falser the information you spread-for example, if "[n]o reasonable person" would believe it-the more legal it may be to spread.40 With the defamation claims pending, it is far from clear what liability, if any, will be imposed on those who purposefully spread the Big Lie.</abstract><cop>Brooklyn</cop><pub>St. John's Law Review Association</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-2905 |
ispartof | St. John's law review, 2022-01, Vol.96 (3), p.543-589 |
issn | 0036-2905 2168-8796 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2826427505 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Election results Pelosi, Nancy Presidential elections Voter fraud Voting rights |
title | DISINFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: FRAUD ON THE PUBLIC |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A58%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DISINFORMATION%20AND%20THE%20FIRST%20AMENDMENT:%20FRAUD%20ON%20THE%20PUBLIC&rft.jtitle=St.%20John's%20law%20review&rft.au=Henricksen,%20Wes&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=543-589&rft.issn=0036-2905&rft.eissn=2168-8796&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2826427505%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2826427505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |