An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869

This article analyses the early years of the operation of copyright legislation in the colony of Victoria, Australia. The Copyright Act 1869 (Vic) was introduced into a thriving but volatile colonial literary marketplace. The law was based almost wholly on the UK law at the time, existing in a very...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Law, culture and the humanities culture and the humanities, 2023-06, Vol.19 (2), p.386-405
Hauptverfasser: Ailwood, Sarah, Sainsbury, Maree
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 405
container_issue 2
container_start_page 386
container_title Law, culture and the humanities
container_volume 19
creator Ailwood, Sarah
Sainsbury, Maree
description This article analyses the early years of the operation of copyright legislation in the colony of Victoria, Australia. The Copyright Act 1869 (Vic) was introduced into a thriving but volatile colonial literary marketplace. The law was based almost wholly on the UK law at the time, existing in a very different environment. This article notes that despite the rhetoric of the protection of the right of authors as an aim of the law, the effect was something quite different. We examine the use of copyright by some key players in that colonial market, both publishers and authors. That analysis reveals that the prophetic words of George Higinbotham, that the law was not for the protection of the author, but the publisher, can be demonstrated to be true. This is evident both in the implementation of the law itself and in a number of inconsistencies in its operation. We conclude that, despite public and parliamentary rhetoric drawing on the romantic conception of the author as creator, the law’s conception of the author as proprietor offered little protection to local Australian authors writing new literature for a new country.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1743872119885795
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2825419079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1743872119885795</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2825419079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ea85598e0a5573b3dd32a7e0d3e03da607415790a5c0e247e0ddd48ac2203e403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM1LwzAUD6Lg0N09BrxazUezpN7KmB9QnAcVPJWseV0jtZlJyth_b-sGguDpPX5fj_dD6IKSa0qlvKEy5UoySjOlhMzEEZqMUJJJwY4P-8ifomkIdkUYkSKVjExQm3d42Rpc6C2unccaP8EWFzaC17H3cIvzPjbOhyv83K9aGxrwAevO4NgAXmjf7vA76AFz9Q_0ZqvovNUdnrvNztt1E3FeRUzVLDtHJ7VuA0wP8wy93i1e5g9Jsbx_nOdFUrEZiwloJUSmgGghJF9xYzjTEojhQLjRMyJTOnw50BUBlo6MManSFWOEQ0r4Gbrc5268--ohxPLD9b4bTpZMMZHSjMhsUJG9qvIuBA91ufH2U_tdSUk51lr-rXWwJHtL0Gv4Df1X_w2EEnTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825419079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Ailwood, Sarah ; Sainsbury, Maree</creator><creatorcontrib>Ailwood, Sarah ; Sainsbury, Maree</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses the early years of the operation of copyright legislation in the colony of Victoria, Australia. The Copyright Act 1869 (Vic) was introduced into a thriving but volatile colonial literary marketplace. The law was based almost wholly on the UK law at the time, existing in a very different environment. This article notes that despite the rhetoric of the protection of the right of authors as an aim of the law, the effect was something quite different. We examine the use of copyright by some key players in that colonial market, both publishers and authors. That analysis reveals that the prophetic words of George Higinbotham, that the law was not for the protection of the author, but the publisher, can be demonstrated to be true. This is evident both in the implementation of the law itself and in a number of inconsistencies in its operation. We conclude that, despite public and parliamentary rhetoric drawing on the romantic conception of the author as creator, the law’s conception of the author as proprietor offered little protection to local Australian authors writing new literature for a new country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-8721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1743872119885795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Copyright ; Literary criticism ; Rhetoric ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Law, culture and the humanities, 2023-06, Vol.19 (2), p.386-405</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1743872119885795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1743872119885795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ailwood, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, Maree</creatorcontrib><title>An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869</title><title>Law, culture and the humanities</title><description>This article analyses the early years of the operation of copyright legislation in the colony of Victoria, Australia. The Copyright Act 1869 (Vic) was introduced into a thriving but volatile colonial literary marketplace. The law was based almost wholly on the UK law at the time, existing in a very different environment. This article notes that despite the rhetoric of the protection of the right of authors as an aim of the law, the effect was something quite different. We examine the use of copyright by some key players in that colonial market, both publishers and authors. That analysis reveals that the prophetic words of George Higinbotham, that the law was not for the protection of the author, but the publisher, can be demonstrated to be true. This is evident both in the implementation of the law itself and in a number of inconsistencies in its operation. We conclude that, despite public and parliamentary rhetoric drawing on the romantic conception of the author as creator, the law’s conception of the author as proprietor offered little protection to local Australian authors writing new literature for a new country.</description><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>1743-8721</issn><issn>1743-9752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UM1LwzAUD6Lg0N09BrxazUezpN7KmB9QnAcVPJWseV0jtZlJyth_b-sGguDpPX5fj_dD6IKSa0qlvKEy5UoySjOlhMzEEZqMUJJJwY4P-8ifomkIdkUYkSKVjExQm3d42Rpc6C2unccaP8EWFzaC17H3cIvzPjbOhyv83K9aGxrwAevO4NgAXmjf7vA76AFz9Q_0ZqvovNUdnrvNztt1E3FeRUzVLDtHJ7VuA0wP8wy93i1e5g9Jsbx_nOdFUrEZiwloJUSmgGghJF9xYzjTEojhQLjRMyJTOnw50BUBlo6MManSFWOEQ0r4Gbrc5268--ohxPLD9b4bTpZMMZHSjMhsUJG9qvIuBA91ufH2U_tdSUk51lr-rXWwJHtL0Gv4Df1X_w2EEnTM</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Ailwood, Sarah</creator><creator>Sainsbury, Maree</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869</title><author>Ailwood, Sarah ; Sainsbury, Maree</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ea85598e0a5573b3dd32a7e0d3e03da607415790a5c0e247e0ddd48ac2203e403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ailwood, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, Maree</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Law, culture and the humanities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ailwood, Sarah</au><au>Sainsbury, Maree</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869</atitle><jtitle>Law, culture and the humanities</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>386-405</pages><issn>1743-8721</issn><eissn>1743-9752</eissn><abstract>This article analyses the early years of the operation of copyright legislation in the colony of Victoria, Australia. The Copyright Act 1869 (Vic) was introduced into a thriving but volatile colonial literary marketplace. The law was based almost wholly on the UK law at the time, existing in a very different environment. This article notes that despite the rhetoric of the protection of the right of authors as an aim of the law, the effect was something quite different. We examine the use of copyright by some key players in that colonial market, both publishers and authors. That analysis reveals that the prophetic words of George Higinbotham, that the law was not for the protection of the author, but the publisher, can be demonstrated to be true. This is evident both in the implementation of the law itself and in a number of inconsistencies in its operation. We conclude that, despite public and parliamentary rhetoric drawing on the romantic conception of the author as creator, the law’s conception of the author as proprietor offered little protection to local Australian authors writing new literature for a new country.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1743872119885795</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-8721
ispartof Law, culture and the humanities, 2023-06, Vol.19 (2), p.386-405
issn 1743-8721
1743-9752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2825419079
source SAGE Complete
subjects Copyright
Literary criticism
Rhetoric
Writers
title An Old Law for a New Literature: Authors, Publishers and the Early Years of the Victorian Copyright Act 1869
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A44%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Old%20Law%20for%20a%20New%20Literature:%20Authors,%20Publishers%20and%20the%20Early%20Years%20of%20the%20Victorian%20Copyright%20Act%201869&rft.jtitle=Law,%20culture%20and%20the%20humanities&rft.au=Ailwood,%20Sarah&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=386-405&rft.issn=1743-8721&rft.eissn=1743-9752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1743872119885795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825419079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825419079&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1743872119885795&rfr_iscdi=true