IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains

BackgroundThe consumption of prebiotics, non-digestible fiber, has been extended from diet supplementation to clinical applications in various health complications and is now frequently prescribed by health practitioners. Because prebiotics is selectively fermented/metabolized by gut microbiota (pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2023-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A124
Hauptverfasser: Alameri, Shaikha, Isingizwe, Viviane, Alnaqbi, Shaikha, Qureshi, Nayab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A124
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A123
container_title Gut
container_volume 72
creator Alameri, Shaikha
Isingizwe, Viviane
Alnaqbi, Shaikha
Qureshi, Nayab
description BackgroundThe consumption of prebiotics, non-digestible fiber, has been extended from diet supplementation to clinical applications in various health complications and is now frequently prescribed by health practitioners. Because prebiotics is selectively fermented/metabolized by gut microbiota (probiotics) to confer health benefits, therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of commercially available prebiotics from different brands on the growth of probiotics to evaluate their effectiveness in human health care.MethodsNine prebiotic supplements, from different brands, having diverse ingredients were purchased from pharmacies, health stores, or online. The water solubility of all samples was determined by dissolving 1g sample in 10 ml water. The effect of prebiotics on the growth of two probiotic strains, Y and S, was evaluated by culturing them in 100 ml NB medium supplemented with 5% prebiotic samples. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in the shaking incubator and microbial growth was monitored at regular intervals of time spectrophotometrically at 600nm. The culture’s supernatants were analyzed by TLC before and after microbial growth to monitor the utilization of fiber by probiotics.ResultsDifferent blends of fiber in different prebiotic brands showed 100% (completely soluble; prebiotic 4)- 0% (non-soluble; prebiotic 5) water solubility. Strain Y showed higher growth in the presence of prebiotics compared to the control, except in prebiotic number 8 in which the growth was lower, and prebiotic 4, which didn’t support extra growth. Unlike Y-strain, prebiotic samples didn’t support the growth of S-strain except prebiotics 1 and 7. Very interestingly, TLC analysis of the medium before and after microbial growth showed the absence of mono/oligosaccharides and the production of a new type of water-insoluble polysaccharides by both strains that look different than the parent prebiotic compound. Importantly, the Y-strain produced different exopolysaccharides than the S-strain indicating a distinct mechanism of action of different probiotics to metabolize different fibers.ConclusionsThe water solubility of commercial prebiotic samples depends on the type of fiber present in each blend. Different growth trends of probiotic strains in different prebiotic blends indicate the requirement of different fiber types for their proliferation. The unique water-insoluble exopolysaccharides produced by prebiotic’s metabolism could have biotechnological potential.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-IDDF.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2825093103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2825093103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b693-7bdfd77a716abbd78d05144d4164627333260b90100de54751766bed21790ebd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkL9OwzAQhy0EEqXwBgyRmF3ubMd2xtJSqFSJgYo1smsXOcqfEicDGwsvypOQUBDT6XTf3f30EXKNMEPk8va174q6pAwYp-vlcjVDUCdkgkJqypnWp2QCgIqmSmTn5CLGAgC0znBC_Mj_LM7vnikwmX19fL6YMjjThaZOmn1S-c7YpgyxGrtD621ourBLYn84lL7ydRcT-57smqry7S6YcmCaP6ZrTajjJTnbmzL6q986JdvV_XbxSDdPD-vFfEOtzDhV1u2dUkahNNY6pR2kKIQTKIVkinPOJNgMEMD5VKgUlZTWO4YqA28dn5Kb49khwFvvY5cXTd_Ww8ecaZZCxhH4QMGRslXxDyDko8v86DIfleSjm2Gg-DdvIWjS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825093103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alameri, Shaikha ; Isingizwe, Viviane ; Alnaqbi, Shaikha ; Qureshi, Nayab</creator><creatorcontrib>Alameri, Shaikha ; Isingizwe, Viviane ; Alnaqbi, Shaikha ; Qureshi, Nayab</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundThe consumption of prebiotics, non-digestible fiber, has been extended from diet supplementation to clinical applications in various health complications and is now frequently prescribed by health practitioners. Because prebiotics is selectively fermented/metabolized by gut microbiota (probiotics) to confer health benefits, therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of commercially available prebiotics from different brands on the growth of probiotics to evaluate their effectiveness in human health care.MethodsNine prebiotic supplements, from different brands, having diverse ingredients were purchased from pharmacies, health stores, or online. The water solubility of all samples was determined by dissolving 1g sample in 10 ml water. The effect of prebiotics on the growth of two probiotic strains, Y and S, was evaluated by culturing them in 100 ml NB medium supplemented with 5% prebiotic samples. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in the shaking incubator and microbial growth was monitored at regular intervals of time spectrophotometrically at 600nm. The culture’s supernatants were analyzed by TLC before and after microbial growth to monitor the utilization of fiber by probiotics.ResultsDifferent blends of fiber in different prebiotic brands showed 100% (completely soluble; prebiotic 4)- 0% (non-soluble; prebiotic 5) water solubility. Strain Y showed higher growth in the presence of prebiotics compared to the control, except in prebiotic number 8 in which the growth was lower, and prebiotic 4, which didn’t support extra growth. Unlike Y-strain, prebiotic samples didn’t support the growth of S-strain except prebiotics 1 and 7. Very interestingly, TLC analysis of the medium before and after microbial growth showed the absence of mono/oligosaccharides and the production of a new type of water-insoluble polysaccharides by both strains that look different than the parent prebiotic compound. Importantly, the Y-strain produced different exopolysaccharides than the S-strain indicating a distinct mechanism of action of different probiotics to metabolize different fibers.ConclusionsThe water solubility of commercial prebiotic samples depends on the type of fiber present in each blend. Different growth trends of probiotic strains in different prebiotic blends indicate the requirement of different fiber types for their proliferation. The unique water-insoluble exopolysaccharides produced by prebiotic’s metabolism could have biotechnological potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-IDDF.107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Basic Gastroenterology ; Dietary supplements ; Exopolysaccharides ; Intestinal microflora ; Metabolism ; Microbiota ; Oligosaccharides ; Polysaccharides ; Prebiotics ; Probiotics ; Solubility</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2023-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A124</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alameri, Shaikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isingizwe, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alnaqbi, Shaikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Nayab</creatorcontrib><title>IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>BackgroundThe consumption of prebiotics, non-digestible fiber, has been extended from diet supplementation to clinical applications in various health complications and is now frequently prescribed by health practitioners. Because prebiotics is selectively fermented/metabolized by gut microbiota (probiotics) to confer health benefits, therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of commercially available prebiotics from different brands on the growth of probiotics to evaluate their effectiveness in human health care.MethodsNine prebiotic supplements, from different brands, having diverse ingredients were purchased from pharmacies, health stores, or online. The water solubility of all samples was determined by dissolving 1g sample in 10 ml water. The effect of prebiotics on the growth of two probiotic strains, Y and S, was evaluated by culturing them in 100 ml NB medium supplemented with 5% prebiotic samples. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in the shaking incubator and microbial growth was monitored at regular intervals of time spectrophotometrically at 600nm. The culture’s supernatants were analyzed by TLC before and after microbial growth to monitor the utilization of fiber by probiotics.ResultsDifferent blends of fiber in different prebiotic brands showed 100% (completely soluble; prebiotic 4)- 0% (non-soluble; prebiotic 5) water solubility. Strain Y showed higher growth in the presence of prebiotics compared to the control, except in prebiotic number 8 in which the growth was lower, and prebiotic 4, which didn’t support extra growth. Unlike Y-strain, prebiotic samples didn’t support the growth of S-strain except prebiotics 1 and 7. Very interestingly, TLC analysis of the medium before and after microbial growth showed the absence of mono/oligosaccharides and the production of a new type of water-insoluble polysaccharides by both strains that look different than the parent prebiotic compound. Importantly, the Y-strain produced different exopolysaccharides than the S-strain indicating a distinct mechanism of action of different probiotics to metabolize different fibers.ConclusionsThe water solubility of commercial prebiotic samples depends on the type of fiber present in each blend. Different growth trends of probiotic strains in different prebiotic blends indicate the requirement of different fiber types for their proliferation. The unique water-insoluble exopolysaccharides produced by prebiotic’s metabolism could have biotechnological potential.</description><subject>Basic Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Exopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Oligosaccharides</subject><subject>Polysaccharides</subject><subject>Prebiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkL9OwzAQhy0EEqXwBgyRmF3ubMd2xtJSqFSJgYo1smsXOcqfEicDGwsvypOQUBDT6XTf3f30EXKNMEPk8va174q6pAwYp-vlcjVDUCdkgkJqypnWp2QCgIqmSmTn5CLGAgC0znBC_Mj_LM7vnikwmX19fL6YMjjThaZOmn1S-c7YpgyxGrtD621ourBLYn84lL7ydRcT-57smqry7S6YcmCaP6ZrTajjJTnbmzL6q986JdvV_XbxSDdPD-vFfEOtzDhV1u2dUkahNNY6pR2kKIQTKIVkinPOJNgMEMD5VKgUlZTWO4YqA28dn5Kb49khwFvvY5cXTd_Ww8ecaZZCxhH4QMGRslXxDyDko8v86DIfleSjm2Gg-DdvIWjS</recordid><startdate>20230609</startdate><enddate>20230609</enddate><creator>Alameri, Shaikha</creator><creator>Isingizwe, Viviane</creator><creator>Alnaqbi, Shaikha</creator><creator>Qureshi, Nayab</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230609</creationdate><title>IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains</title><author>Alameri, Shaikha ; Isingizwe, Viviane ; Alnaqbi, Shaikha ; Qureshi, Nayab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b693-7bdfd77a716abbd78d05144d4164627333260b90100de54751766bed21790ebd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Basic Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Exopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Oligosaccharides</topic><topic>Polysaccharides</topic><topic>Prebiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alameri, Shaikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isingizwe, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alnaqbi, Shaikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Nayab</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alameri, Shaikha</au><au>Isingizwe, Viviane</au><au>Alnaqbi, Shaikha</au><au>Qureshi, Nayab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><stitle>Gut</stitle><date>2023-06-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A123</spage><epage>A124</epage><pages>A123-A124</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>BackgroundThe consumption of prebiotics, non-digestible fiber, has been extended from diet supplementation to clinical applications in various health complications and is now frequently prescribed by health practitioners. Because prebiotics is selectively fermented/metabolized by gut microbiota (probiotics) to confer health benefits, therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of commercially available prebiotics from different brands on the growth of probiotics to evaluate their effectiveness in human health care.MethodsNine prebiotic supplements, from different brands, having diverse ingredients were purchased from pharmacies, health stores, or online. The water solubility of all samples was determined by dissolving 1g sample in 10 ml water. The effect of prebiotics on the growth of two probiotic strains, Y and S, was evaluated by culturing them in 100 ml NB medium supplemented with 5% prebiotic samples. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in the shaking incubator and microbial growth was monitored at regular intervals of time spectrophotometrically at 600nm. The culture’s supernatants were analyzed by TLC before and after microbial growth to monitor the utilization of fiber by probiotics.ResultsDifferent blends of fiber in different prebiotic brands showed 100% (completely soluble; prebiotic 4)- 0% (non-soluble; prebiotic 5) water solubility. Strain Y showed higher growth in the presence of prebiotics compared to the control, except in prebiotic number 8 in which the growth was lower, and prebiotic 4, which didn’t support extra growth. Unlike Y-strain, prebiotic samples didn’t support the growth of S-strain except prebiotics 1 and 7. Very interestingly, TLC analysis of the medium before and after microbial growth showed the absence of mono/oligosaccharides and the production of a new type of water-insoluble polysaccharides by both strains that look different than the parent prebiotic compound. Importantly, the Y-strain produced different exopolysaccharides than the S-strain indicating a distinct mechanism of action of different probiotics to metabolize different fibers.ConclusionsThe water solubility of commercial prebiotic samples depends on the type of fiber present in each blend. Different growth trends of probiotic strains in different prebiotic blends indicate the requirement of different fiber types for their proliferation. The unique water-insoluble exopolysaccharides produced by prebiotic’s metabolism could have biotechnological potential.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2023-IDDF.107</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2023-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A124
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2825093103
source PubMed Central
subjects Basic Gastroenterology
Dietary supplements
Exopolysaccharides
Intestinal microflora
Metabolism
Microbiota
Oligosaccharides
Polysaccharides
Prebiotics
Probiotics
Solubility
title IDDF2023-ABS-0269 Validation of metabolism of prebiotic supplements by commercial probiotic strains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A42%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IDDF2023-ABS-0269%E2%80%85Validation%20of%20metabolism%20of%20prebiotic%20supplements%20by%20commercial%20probiotic%20strains&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Alameri,%20Shaikha&rft.date=2023-06-09&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A123&rft.epage=A124&rft.pages=A123-A124&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-IDDF.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2825093103%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825093103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true