Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program
Teachers in professional development (PD) programs need time to adopt, enact and reflect on what they are learning in the PD within their own situations. To encourage reflective implementation and adaptation of ideas and practices promoted in the PD studied in this article, participants were asked t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Canadian journal of action research 2019-01, Vol.20 (3), p.3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | The Canadian journal of action research |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Gruver, John Bowers, Janet |
description | Teachers in professional development (PD) programs need time to adopt, enact and reflect on what they are learning in the PD within their own situations. To encourage reflective implementation and adaptation of ideas and practices promoted in the PD studied in this article, participants were asked to engage in several small action research projects over time. To gain insights into how the cyclic process of implementation and reflection effected changes in practice and knowledge, we examined the nature of the research questions asked by a cohort of teacher-researchers (n=31) as they engaged in several cycles of action research over a three-year period. We found the nature of the questions they asked shifted over time from investigating the efficacy of particular interventions in terms of students' performance to exploring how to support students as they reason about mathematics. These results provoke questions about why these particular changes occurred and why others did not. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2822652412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2822652412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28226524123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM0KgkAUhYcoSMp3uNBa0Ktmrs0o2hS0l0HGGBlndK4Kvn0KLVq2Oofv_KyYE6QYe0kQJesfv2UuUe37PqaIaRg67J6PRg29NBpMBTfdDdJO8BwELYxAauCQTaWSJTysqQTRzLmCsxiFMm0jdL8Eb8ubPdtUXJFwv7pjh0v-yq5ea023PBa1Gew8pgJPiMcYowDD_1oft3U_Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822652412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gruver, John ; Bowers, Janet</creator><creatorcontrib>Gruver, John ; Bowers, Janet</creatorcontrib><description>Teachers in professional development (PD) programs need time to adopt, enact and reflect on what they are learning in the PD within their own situations. To encourage reflective implementation and adaptation of ideas and practices promoted in the PD studied in this article, participants were asked to engage in several small action research projects over time. To gain insights into how the cyclic process of implementation and reflection effected changes in practice and knowledge, we examined the nature of the research questions asked by a cohort of teacher-researchers (n=31) as they engaged in several cycles of action research over a three-year period. We found the nature of the questions they asked shifted over time from investigating the efficacy of particular interventions in terms of students' performance to exploring how to support students as they reason about mathematics. These results provoke questions about why these particular changes occurred and why others did not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1925-7147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-7147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>North Bay: Canadian Association of Action Research in Education</publisher><subject>Action research ; Professional development ; Teacher education</subject><ispartof>The Canadian journal of action research, 2019-01, Vol.20 (3), p.3</ispartof><rights>2019. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://journals.nipissingu.ca/index.php/cjar/about</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2822652412?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,33721,43781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gruver, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Janet</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program</title><title>The Canadian journal of action research</title><description>Teachers in professional development (PD) programs need time to adopt, enact and reflect on what they are learning in the PD within their own situations. To encourage reflective implementation and adaptation of ideas and practices promoted in the PD studied in this article, participants were asked to engage in several small action research projects over time. To gain insights into how the cyclic process of implementation and reflection effected changes in practice and knowledge, we examined the nature of the research questions asked by a cohort of teacher-researchers (n=31) as they engaged in several cycles of action research over a three-year period. We found the nature of the questions they asked shifted over time from investigating the efficacy of particular interventions in terms of students' performance to exploring how to support students as they reason about mathematics. These results provoke questions about why these particular changes occurred and why others did not.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><issn>1925-7147</issn><issn>1925-7147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM0KgkAUhYcoSMp3uNBa0Ktmrs0o2hS0l0HGGBlndK4Kvn0KLVq2Oofv_KyYE6QYe0kQJesfv2UuUe37PqaIaRg67J6PRg29NBpMBTfdDdJO8BwELYxAauCQTaWSJTysqQTRzLmCsxiFMm0jdL8Eb8ubPdtUXJFwv7pjh0v-yq5ea023PBa1Gew8pgJPiMcYowDD_1oft3U_Ug</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Gruver, John</creator><creator>Bowers, Janet</creator><general>Canadian Association of Action Research in Education</general><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program</title><author>Gruver, John ; Bowers, Janet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28226524123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gruver, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Janet</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>The Canadian journal of action research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gruver, John</au><au>Bowers, Janet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program</atitle><jtitle>The Canadian journal of action research</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>1925-7147</issn><eissn>1925-7147</eissn><abstract>Teachers in professional development (PD) programs need time to adopt, enact and reflect on what they are learning in the PD within their own situations. To encourage reflective implementation and adaptation of ideas and practices promoted in the PD studied in this article, participants were asked to engage in several small action research projects over time. To gain insights into how the cyclic process of implementation and reflection effected changes in practice and knowledge, we examined the nature of the research questions asked by a cohort of teacher-researchers (n=31) as they engaged in several cycles of action research over a three-year period. We found the nature of the questions they asked shifted over time from investigating the efficacy of particular interventions in terms of students' performance to exploring how to support students as they reason about mathematics. These results provoke questions about why these particular changes occurred and why others did not.</abstract><cop>North Bay</cop><pub>Canadian Association of Action Research in Education</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1925-7147 |
ispartof | The Canadian journal of action research, 2019-01, Vol.20 (3), p.3 |
issn | 1925-7147 1925-7147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2822652412 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Action research Professional development Teacher education |
title | Evolution of Inquiry Questions in a Cyclic Professional Development Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A26%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20Inquiry%20Questions%20in%20a%20Cyclic%20Professional%20Development%20Program&rft.jtitle=The%20Canadian%20journal%20of%20action%20research&rft.au=Gruver,%20John&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=1925-7147&rft.eissn=1925-7147&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2822652412%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822652412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |