Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a form of expert knowledge that is central to migration governance. This article analyses M&E of the EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), created in 2015 to ‘fight the root causes of migration’. Combining institutionalist accounts with practice theory, we exami...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of common market studies 2023-07, Vol.61 (4), p.951-969 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 969 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 951 |
container_title | Journal of common market studies |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Welfens, Natalie Bonjour, Saskia |
description | Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a form of expert knowledge that is central to migration governance. This article analyses M&E of the EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), created in 2015 to ‘fight the root causes of migration’. Combining institutionalist accounts with practice theory, we examine whether M&E knowledge production served the instrumental purpose of assessing policy impact or mainly legitimated particular policy actors and positions. We find that M&E did not produce evidence on whether the EUTF met its objectives. However, in the context of the EU's multiple crises, M&E knowledge production served to seek legitimacy not only for the EUTF, but also for the further fusion of development and migration policies, and for the EU as a competent and transparent actor. Our analysis highlights that knowledge use and knowledge production are connected, and that M&E knowledge politics allow for the legitimation of both actors and policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcms.13434 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2822166211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2822166211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-df2cce6b376e604b5048ac79d8ec422461eb65dc777cfab1757c72e708c8cf043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PwkAQxRujiYhevJts4s2kuLvdj-KNEPALoglwbtrpFoqli7utBP96t1ajXpzLzOb98mb2ed45wT3i6noNG9sjAQvYgdchTIQ-7wt--Gs-9k6sXWOMCce8473PlHrJyyWaqGVe5ZsY9mi-MrpertBjqXeFSpcKPRud1lDlurxxqnvrwsFgkc7QVJd5pU3jEZcpGr3FRR03aCNWDh4t0NzUtkLj2umZNmiQmRziU-8oiwurzr5611uMR_PhnT95ur0fDiY-MCKYn2YUQIkkkEIJzBKOWRiD7KehAkYpE0QlgqcgpYQsTojkEiRVEocQQoZZ0PUuW9-t0a-1slW01rUp3cqIhpQSISghjrpqKTDaWqOyaGtcHGYfERw12UZNttFntg5GLazA_d7-oCF3B1HKhUNIi-zyQu3_MYsehtPZt-3FH9umWZetuzPEFAcfhHKQ-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822166211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Welfens, Natalie ; Bonjour, Saskia</creator><creatorcontrib>Welfens, Natalie ; Bonjour, Saskia</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a form of expert knowledge that is central to migration governance. This article analyses M&E of the EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), created in 2015 to ‘fight the root causes of migration’. Combining institutionalist accounts with practice theory, we examine whether M&E knowledge production served the instrumental purpose of assessing policy impact or mainly legitimated particular policy actors and positions. We find that M&E did not produce evidence on whether the EUTF met its objectives. However, in the context of the EU's multiple crises, M&E knowledge production served to seek legitimacy not only for the EUTF, but also for the further fusion of development and migration policies, and for the EU as a competent and transparent actor. Our analysis highlights that knowledge use and knowledge production are connected, and that M&E knowledge politics allow for the legitimation of both actors and policies.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-5965</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>EU Trust Fund for Africa ; evaluation ; Governance ; knowledge production ; Legitimacy ; Legitimation ; Migration ; monitoring ; Politics ; Production ; Trusts</subject><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2023-07, Vol.61 (4), p.951-969</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies published by University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-df2cce6b376e604b5048ac79d8ec422461eb65dc777cfab1757c72e708c8cf043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-df2cce6b376e604b5048ac79d8ec422461eb65dc777cfab1757c72e708c8cf043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9025-4167</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjcms.13434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjcms.13434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Welfens, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonjour, Saskia</creatorcontrib><title>Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description><![CDATA[Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a form of expert knowledge that is central to migration governance. This article analyses M&E of the EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), created in 2015 to ‘fight the root causes of migration’. Combining institutionalist accounts with practice theory, we examine whether M&E knowledge production served the instrumental purpose of assessing policy impact or mainly legitimated particular policy actors and positions. We find that M&E did not produce evidence on whether the EUTF met its objectives. However, in the context of the EU's multiple crises, M&E knowledge production served to seek legitimacy not only for the EUTF, but also for the further fusion of development and migration policies, and for the EU as a competent and transparent actor. Our analysis highlights that knowledge use and knowledge production are connected, and that M&E knowledge politics allow for the legitimation of both actors and policies.]]></description><subject>EU Trust Fund for Africa</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>knowledge production</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Legitimation</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><issn>1468-5965</issn><issn>0021-9886</issn><issn>1468-5965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1PwkAQxRujiYhevJts4s2kuLvdj-KNEPALoglwbtrpFoqli7utBP96t1ajXpzLzOb98mb2ed45wT3i6noNG9sjAQvYgdchTIQ-7wt--Gs-9k6sXWOMCce8473PlHrJyyWaqGVe5ZsY9mi-MrpertBjqXeFSpcKPRud1lDlurxxqnvrwsFgkc7QVJd5pU3jEZcpGr3FRR03aCNWDh4t0NzUtkLj2umZNmiQmRziU-8oiwurzr5611uMR_PhnT95ur0fDiY-MCKYn2YUQIkkkEIJzBKOWRiD7KehAkYpE0QlgqcgpYQsTojkEiRVEocQQoZZ0PUuW9-t0a-1slW01rUp3cqIhpQSISghjrpqKTDaWqOyaGtcHGYfERw12UZNttFntg5GLazA_d7-oCF3B1HKhUNIi-zyQu3_MYsehtPZt-3FH9umWZetuzPEFAcfhHKQ-Q</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Welfens, Natalie</creator><creator>Bonjour, Saskia</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-4167</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa</title><author>Welfens, Natalie ; Bonjour, Saskia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-df2cce6b376e604b5048ac79d8ec422461eb65dc777cfab1757c72e708c8cf043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>EU Trust Fund for Africa</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>knowledge production</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Legitimation</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Welfens, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonjour, Saskia</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Welfens, Natalie</au><au>Bonjour, Saskia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>951</spage><epage>969</epage><pages>951-969</pages><issn>1468-5965</issn><issn>0021-9886</issn><eissn>1468-5965</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a form of expert knowledge that is central to migration governance. This article analyses M&E of the EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), created in 2015 to ‘fight the root causes of migration’. Combining institutionalist accounts with practice theory, we examine whether M&E knowledge production served the instrumental purpose of assessing policy impact or mainly legitimated particular policy actors and positions. We find that M&E did not produce evidence on whether the EUTF met its objectives. However, in the context of the EU's multiple crises, M&E knowledge production served to seek legitimacy not only for the EUTF, but also for the further fusion of development and migration policies, and for the EU as a competent and transparent actor. Our analysis highlights that knowledge use and knowledge production are connected, and that M&E knowledge politics allow for the legitimation of both actors and policies.]]></abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/jcms.13434</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-4167</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-5965 |
ispartof | Journal of common market studies, 2023-07, Vol.61 (4), p.951-969 |
issn | 1468-5965 0021-9886 1468-5965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2822166211 |
source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
subjects | EU Trust Fund for Africa evaluation Governance knowledge production Legitimacy Legitimation Migration monitoring Politics Production Trusts |
title | Seeking Legitimacy Through Knowledge Production: The Politics of Monitoring and Evaluation of the EU Trust Fund for Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A51%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seeking%20Legitimacy%20Through%20Knowledge%20Production:%20The%20Politics%20of%20Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20EU%20Trust%20Fund%20for%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Welfens,%20Natalie&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=951&rft.epage=969&rft.pages=951-969&rft.issn=1468-5965&rft.eissn=1468-5965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcms.13434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2822166211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822166211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |