Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation
We present the results of the forced-vibration experiments performed at the large-scale prototype structure of EuroProteas founded on gravel-rubber mixture (GRM) layers acting as a means of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI). Three GRM with different rubber content per mixture weight (0%, 10%, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2023-06, Vol.21 (8), p.3905-3922 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3922 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3905 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Vratsikidis, Athanasios Pitilakis, Dimitris |
description | We present the results of the forced-vibration experiments performed at the large-scale prototype structure of EuroProteas founded on gravel-rubber mixture (GRM) layers acting as a means of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI). Three GRM with different rubber content per mixture weight (0%, 10%, and 30%) but the same mean grain size ratio were used as foundation soil. Each GRM-structure system was subjected to harmonic forces in a wide range of excitation frequencies and force amplitude. It was found that a 0.5 m thick GRM foundation soil layer with 30% rubber content can effectively isolate the structure. The strong effect of the rubber fraction was expressed in the detected period elongation and the dominating rocking component which leads to a more “rigid-body” response of the structure. Moreover, the developed base shear and base moment are significantly reduced regardless of the excitation frequency, while the increased damping of the system and the important energy dissipation demonstrate the effectiveness of the GRM foundation soil layer. Overall, the experimental results demonstrated that the use of GRM as a GSI system can be considered as a low-cost alternative seismic isolation technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2821486237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821486237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7c1ea08ce1296890c30ff581a39b3992cbb89d3adc6530c77c54cb79c2ae964a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc3SSbL6OUqwtFLwoeAvZNLumbHdrsiv67127gjdPM4f3eWd4ELqmcEsB1F2mIKgmwBgBKgpK5AmaUaE4oYWQp8cdiJL09Rxd5LwDYEIZmKH1MoZmi_uQ-9jWuKtwndxHaEgayjIkvI-f_ZBCxi7jOnR98G9t9K7BOcS8jx7H3DWuj117ic4q1-Rw9Tvn6GX58LxYkc3T43pxvyGeS94T5WlwoH2gzEhtwHOoKqGp46bkxjBfltpsudt6KTh4pbwofKmMZy4YWTg-RzdT7yF178P4t911Q2rHk5ZpRgstGVdjik0pn7qcU6jsIcW9S1-Wgv1RZidldlRmj8qsHCE-QXkMt3VIf9X_UN8m828R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821486237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Vratsikidis, Athanasios ; Pitilakis, Dimitris</creator><creatorcontrib>Vratsikidis, Athanasios ; Pitilakis, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><description>We present the results of the forced-vibration experiments performed at the large-scale prototype structure of EuroProteas founded on gravel-rubber mixture (GRM) layers acting as a means of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI). Three GRM with different rubber content per mixture weight (0%, 10%, and 30%) but the same mean grain size ratio were used as foundation soil. Each GRM-structure system was subjected to harmonic forces in a wide range of excitation frequencies and force amplitude. It was found that a 0.5 m thick GRM foundation soil layer with 30% rubber content can effectively isolate the structure. The strong effect of the rubber fraction was expressed in the detected period elongation and the dominating rocking component which leads to a more “rigid-body” response of the structure. Moreover, the developed base shear and base moment are significantly reduced regardless of the excitation frequency, while the increased damping of the system and the important energy dissipation demonstrate the effectiveness of the GRM foundation soil layer. Overall, the experimental results demonstrated that the use of GRM as a GSI system can be considered as a low-cost alternative seismic isolation technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Damping ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Elongation ; Energy dissipation ; Energy exchange ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Excitation ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Grain size ; Gravel ; Hydrogeology ; Mixtures ; Prototypes ; Rubber ; S.I. : Geotechnical Seismic Isolation ; Seismic isolation ; Soil ; Soil layers ; Soil structure ; Soils ; Structural Geology ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2023-06, Vol.21 (8), p.3905-3922</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7c1ea08ce1296890c30ff581a39b3992cbb89d3adc6530c77c54cb79c2ae964a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7c1ea08ce1296890c30ff581a39b3992cbb89d3adc6530c77c54cb79c2ae964a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0412-6191</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vratsikidis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitilakis, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><title>Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>We present the results of the forced-vibration experiments performed at the large-scale prototype structure of EuroProteas founded on gravel-rubber mixture (GRM) layers acting as a means of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI). Three GRM with different rubber content per mixture weight (0%, 10%, and 30%) but the same mean grain size ratio were used as foundation soil. Each GRM-structure system was subjected to harmonic forces in a wide range of excitation frequencies and force amplitude. It was found that a 0.5 m thick GRM foundation soil layer with 30% rubber content can effectively isolate the structure. The strong effect of the rubber fraction was expressed in the detected period elongation and the dominating rocking component which leads to a more “rigid-body” response of the structure. Moreover, the developed base shear and base moment are significantly reduced regardless of the excitation frequency, while the increased damping of the system and the important energy dissipation demonstrate the effectiveness of the GRM foundation soil layer. Overall, the experimental results demonstrated that the use of GRM as a GSI system can be considered as a low-cost alternative seismic isolation technique.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>S.I. : Geotechnical Seismic Isolation</subject><subject>Seismic isolation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc3SSbL6OUqwtFLwoeAvZNLumbHdrsiv67127gjdPM4f3eWd4ELqmcEsB1F2mIKgmwBgBKgpK5AmaUaE4oYWQp8cdiJL09Rxd5LwDYEIZmKH1MoZmi_uQ-9jWuKtwndxHaEgayjIkvI-f_ZBCxi7jOnR98G9t9K7BOcS8jx7H3DWuj117ic4q1-Rw9Tvn6GX58LxYkc3T43pxvyGeS94T5WlwoH2gzEhtwHOoKqGp46bkxjBfltpsudt6KTh4pbwofKmMZy4YWTg-RzdT7yF178P4t911Q2rHk5ZpRgstGVdjik0pn7qcU6jsIcW9S1-Wgv1RZidldlRmj8qsHCE-QXkMt3VIf9X_UN8m828R</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Vratsikidis, Athanasios</creator><creator>Pitilakis, Dimitris</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6191</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation</title><author>Vratsikidis, Athanasios ; Pitilakis, Dimitris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7c1ea08ce1296890c30ff581a39b3992cbb89d3adc6530c77c54cb79c2ae964a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>S.I. : Geotechnical Seismic Isolation</topic><topic>Seismic isolation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vratsikidis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitilakis, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vratsikidis, Athanasios</au><au>Pitilakis, Dimitris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3905</spage><epage>3922</epage><pages>3905-3922</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>We present the results of the forced-vibration experiments performed at the large-scale prototype structure of EuroProteas founded on gravel-rubber mixture (GRM) layers acting as a means of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI). Three GRM with different rubber content per mixture weight (0%, 10%, and 30%) but the same mean grain size ratio were used as foundation soil. Each GRM-structure system was subjected to harmonic forces in a wide range of excitation frequencies and force amplitude. It was found that a 0.5 m thick GRM foundation soil layer with 30% rubber content can effectively isolate the structure. The strong effect of the rubber fraction was expressed in the detected period elongation and the dominating rocking component which leads to a more “rigid-body” response of the structure. Moreover, the developed base shear and base moment are significantly reduced regardless of the excitation frequency, while the increased damping of the system and the important energy dissipation demonstrate the effectiveness of the GRM foundation soil layer. Overall, the experimental results demonstrated that the use of GRM as a GSI system can be considered as a low-cost alternative seismic isolation technique.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6191</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2023-06, Vol.21 (8), p.3905-3922 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2821486237 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Civil Engineering Damping Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Elongation Energy dissipation Energy exchange Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Excitation Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Grain size Gravel Hydrogeology Mixtures Prototypes Rubber S.I. : Geotechnical Seismic Isolation Seismic isolation Soil Soil layers Soil structure Soils Structural Geology Vibration |
title | Field testing of gravel-rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-09T08%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20testing%20of%20gravel-rubber%20mixtures%20as%20geotechnical%20seismic%20isolation&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Vratsikidis,%20Athanasios&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3905&rft.epage=3922&rft.pages=3905-3922&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2821486237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821486237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |