A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry

Pre-laboratory exercises may help reduce cognitive load in the laboratory, boost confidence, develop theoretical understanding and skills, and improve grades on assessment tasks. This study compared pre-laboratory activities at two institutions, Go8-1 and Go8-2, to evaluate which attributes of pre-l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education 2022-06, Vol.30 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Scarborough, David L. A., George-Williams, Stephen R., Thompson, Christopher D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education
container_volume 30
creator Scarborough, David L. A.
George-Williams, Stephen R.
Thompson, Christopher D.
description Pre-laboratory exercises may help reduce cognitive load in the laboratory, boost confidence, develop theoretical understanding and skills, and improve grades on assessment tasks. This study compared pre-laboratory activities at two institutions, Go8-1 and Go8-2, to evaluate which attributes of pre-laboratory activities were perceived by students to best prepare them for laboratory classes. Students were surveyed towards the end of their laboratory course, and were asked a series of Likert-style and open response questions. Factor analysis was used to construct three scales, incorporating items relating to performance and understanding, items relating to affective and personal laboratory experience, and items relating to requiring support with laboratory equipment. No difference between cohorts was observed between the two institutions regarding requiring support with equipment. While Go8-1 students rated performance and understanding more highly than Go8-2 students, the opposite result was observed for affective and personal factors. The factor analysis results and responses to the open response questions indicated that students felt most prepared for laboratory exercises when the pre-class activities touched upon all aspects of the laboratory class. It is recommended that quizzes and video be used in pre-laboratory activities, with these resources covering theory, aims, methods, calculations and data analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.30722/IJISME.30.02.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2821288053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821288053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-6718151e4db4a217596d927ecbbaee8597f721963bd461d83a12b02749d1c83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLw0AQhRdRsGh_gLcFz6kzs0k2OZZQNVKxoD14WjbJRre0Sd3dCP33ptaDpzePeTx4H2M3CDMBkuiufCpfnxejmQHNAOIzNiECiGKScP7vvmRT7zcAQHkiMJET9j7nheu9j8rOBxuGYPtOb_nKOL83dbDfhvctXznDl7rqnQ69O_D58WGDNZ7bjq-7xrgPp5tBB8OLT7OzPrjDNbto9dab6Z9esfX94q14jJYvD2UxX0Y1ooijVGKGCZq4qWJNKJM8bXKSpq4qbUyW5LKVhHkqqiZOscmERqqAZJw3WGeiFlfs9tS7d_3XYHxQm35w4wivKCOkLINEjCk8perjWmdatXd2p91BIahfiOoEcTQKSI0QxQ8bV2SK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821288053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Scarborough, David L. A. ; George-Williams, Stephen R. ; Thompson, Christopher D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scarborough, David L. A. ; George-Williams, Stephen R. ; Thompson, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><description>Pre-laboratory exercises may help reduce cognitive load in the laboratory, boost confidence, develop theoretical understanding and skills, and improve grades on assessment tasks. This study compared pre-laboratory activities at two institutions, Go8-1 and Go8-2, to evaluate which attributes of pre-laboratory activities were perceived by students to best prepare them for laboratory classes. Students were surveyed towards the end of their laboratory course, and were asked a series of Likert-style and open response questions. Factor analysis was used to construct three scales, incorporating items relating to performance and understanding, items relating to affective and personal laboratory experience, and items relating to requiring support with laboratory equipment. No difference between cohorts was observed between the two institutions regarding requiring support with equipment. While Go8-1 students rated performance and understanding more highly than Go8-2 students, the opposite result was observed for affective and personal factors. The factor analysis results and responses to the open response questions indicated that students felt most prepared for laboratory exercises when the pre-class activities touched upon all aspects of the laboratory class. It is recommended that quizzes and video be used in pre-laboratory activities, with these resources covering theory, aims, methods, calculations and data analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2200-4270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2200-4270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30722/IJISME.30.02.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: University of Sydney</publisher><subject>Class Activities ; Data Analysis ; Factor Analysis ; Laboratories ; Laboratory Equipment ; Organic Chemistry ; Science education ; Students</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 2022-06, Vol.30 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/about .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0390-385X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scarborough, David L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George-Williams, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><title>A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry</title><title>International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education</title><description>Pre-laboratory exercises may help reduce cognitive load in the laboratory, boost confidence, develop theoretical understanding and skills, and improve grades on assessment tasks. This study compared pre-laboratory activities at two institutions, Go8-1 and Go8-2, to evaluate which attributes of pre-laboratory activities were perceived by students to best prepare them for laboratory classes. Students were surveyed towards the end of their laboratory course, and were asked a series of Likert-style and open response questions. Factor analysis was used to construct three scales, incorporating items relating to performance and understanding, items relating to affective and personal laboratory experience, and items relating to requiring support with laboratory equipment. No difference between cohorts was observed between the two institutions regarding requiring support with equipment. While Go8-1 students rated performance and understanding more highly than Go8-2 students, the opposite result was observed for affective and personal factors. The factor analysis results and responses to the open response questions indicated that students felt most prepared for laboratory exercises when the pre-class activities touched upon all aspects of the laboratory class. It is recommended that quizzes and video be used in pre-laboratory activities, with these resources covering theory, aims, methods, calculations and data analysis.</description><subject>Class Activities</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory Equipment</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>2200-4270</issn><issn>2200-4270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEFLw0AQhRdRsGh_gLcFz6kzs0k2OZZQNVKxoD14WjbJRre0Sd3dCP33ptaDpzePeTx4H2M3CDMBkuiufCpfnxejmQHNAOIzNiECiGKScP7vvmRT7zcAQHkiMJET9j7nheu9j8rOBxuGYPtOb_nKOL83dbDfhvctXznDl7rqnQ69O_D58WGDNZ7bjq-7xrgPp5tBB8OLT7OzPrjDNbto9dab6Z9esfX94q14jJYvD2UxX0Y1ooijVGKGCZq4qWJNKJM8bXKSpq4qbUyW5LKVhHkqqiZOscmERqqAZJw3WGeiFlfs9tS7d_3XYHxQm35w4wivKCOkLINEjCk8perjWmdatXd2p91BIahfiOoEcTQKSI0QxQ8bV2SK</recordid><startdate>20220617</startdate><enddate>20220617</enddate><creator>Scarborough, David L. A.</creator><creator>George-Williams, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Thompson, Christopher D.</creator><general>University of Sydney</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-385X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220617</creationdate><title>A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry</title><author>Scarborough, David L. A. ; George-Williams, Stephen R. ; Thompson, Christopher D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-6718151e4db4a217596d927ecbbaee8597f721963bd461d83a12b02749d1c83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Class Activities</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory Equipment</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scarborough, David L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George-Williams, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scarborough, David L. A.</au><au>George-Williams, Stephen R.</au><au>Thompson, Christopher D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education</jtitle><date>2022-06-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2200-4270</issn><eissn>2200-4270</eissn><abstract>Pre-laboratory exercises may help reduce cognitive load in the laboratory, boost confidence, develop theoretical understanding and skills, and improve grades on assessment tasks. This study compared pre-laboratory activities at two institutions, Go8-1 and Go8-2, to evaluate which attributes of pre-laboratory activities were perceived by students to best prepare them for laboratory classes. Students were surveyed towards the end of their laboratory course, and were asked a series of Likert-style and open response questions. Factor analysis was used to construct three scales, incorporating items relating to performance and understanding, items relating to affective and personal laboratory experience, and items relating to requiring support with laboratory equipment. No difference between cohorts was observed between the two institutions regarding requiring support with equipment. While Go8-1 students rated performance and understanding more highly than Go8-2 students, the opposite result was observed for affective and personal factors. The factor analysis results and responses to the open response questions indicated that students felt most prepared for laboratory exercises when the pre-class activities touched upon all aspects of the laboratory class. It is recommended that quizzes and video be used in pre-laboratory activities, with these resources covering theory, aims, methods, calculations and data analysis.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>University of Sydney</pub><doi>10.30722/IJISME.30.02.004</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-385X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2200-4270
ispartof International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 2022-06, Vol.30 (2)
issn 2200-4270
2200-4270
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2821288053
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Class Activities
Data Analysis
Factor Analysis
Laboratories
Laboratory Equipment
Organic Chemistry
Science education
Students
title A Cross-Institutional Perspective of Pre Laboratory Activities in Undergraduate Chemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A54%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cross-Institutional%20Perspective%20of%20Pre%20Laboratory%20Activities%20in%20Undergraduate%20Chemistry&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Innovation%20in%20Science%20and%20Mathematics%20Education&rft.au=Scarborough,%20David%20L.%20A.&rft.date=2022-06-17&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2200-4270&rft.eissn=2200-4270&rft_id=info:doi/10.30722/IJISME.30.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2821288053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821288053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true