Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production

Shrimp production has been one of the most important sectors of aquaculture for the last few decades for both its market value and consumer acceptance. The majority of shrimp feeding protocols in typical production setups rely on a combination of feed trays and predetermined feed plans which do not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture international 2023-06, Vol.31 (3), p.1643-1657
Hauptverfasser: Reis, João, Hussain, Aya S., Weldon, Alexis, Walsh, Samuel, Stites, William, Rhodes, Melanie, Davis, D. Allen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1657
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1643
container_title Aquaculture international
container_volume 31
creator Reis, João
Hussain, Aya S.
Weldon, Alexis
Walsh, Samuel
Stites, William
Rhodes, Melanie
Davis, D. Allen
description Shrimp production has been one of the most important sectors of aquaculture for the last few decades for both its market value and consumer acceptance. The majority of shrimp feeding protocols in typical production setups rely on a combination of feed trays and predetermined feed plans which do not account for real-time consumption or feed preferences. However, for the last decade, the development of passive acoustic monitoring has allowed a much more direct measurement of shrimp feed intake by capturing and integrating clicking sounds produced by shrimp while eating. Integrating acoustic responses with automated feeding systems has allowed the development of on-demand feeding systems for shrimp. Hence, this technology is a potential tool to help understand feed preferences when the feeding protocol is based on real-time demand for feed rather than predetermined quantities. Building on previous research, the goal of this trial was to use passive feedback acoustic feeders as a tool to evaluate if shrimp prefer diets with different protein sources when given the option to eat as much as requested. A 13-week trial was conducted in 16, 0.1-ha outdoor ponds, stocked at 30 shrimp/m 2 and equipped with the AQ1 acoustic feeding system. At day 45, the acoustic system was initiated, and four treatments were assigned with a 35% crude protein diet with different protein sources: all-plant, 8% poultry meal (PM), 8% fish meal (FM), and 12% FM. A second growth trial was conducted in 20, 800-L outdoor recirculating system with similar density (30 shrimp/tank), and shrimp were offered a predetermined feeding rate. We did not find statistical differences in any of the main production parameters. Results of this study indicate that shrimp did not clearly favor a particular diet. This suggests that, irrespective of ingredient matrix, a well-balanced feed will produce suitable growth even when shrimp are allowed to determine their feed intake. The use of acoustic feeders opens the door for nutrition research in which the shrimp are fed on demand.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2819766295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2819766295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ad8f5331efd2b589e927508d488d4f56e73551f9d76b2b0f24f54307bf716513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8RydJ0zRHWfyCBT0oeAttk-x2WZs10yr-e-NW8CbMBzPz3szwCDnncMkB9BVyKIxhICQDDkoyeUBmXGnJeCFfD8kMTKlZyQUckxPEDQBIXfAZsU81Yvfhad3GEYeupcF75xPSOhsdYtzmkAv0iPsZTR53scdM6R1dpfg5rGnXU1yn7m1H88jRXYpubIcu9qfkKNRb9Ge_eU5ebm-eF_ds-Xj3sLheslZyMzBduyooKbkPTjSqMt4IraByRZU9qNJrqRQPxumyEQ0EkZuFBN0EzUvF5ZxcTHvz6ffR42A3cUx9PmlFxY0uS2FURokJ1aaImHywu_x0nb4sB_sjpJ2EtFlIuxfSykySEwkzuF_59Lf6H9Y36WR2Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819766295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Reis, João ; Hussain, Aya S. ; Weldon, Alexis ; Walsh, Samuel ; Stites, William ; Rhodes, Melanie ; Davis, D. Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Reis, João ; Hussain, Aya S. ; Weldon, Alexis ; Walsh, Samuel ; Stites, William ; Rhodes, Melanie ; Davis, D. Allen</creatorcontrib><description>Shrimp production has been one of the most important sectors of aquaculture for the last few decades for both its market value and consumer acceptance. The majority of shrimp feeding protocols in typical production setups rely on a combination of feed trays and predetermined feed plans which do not account for real-time consumption or feed preferences. However, for the last decade, the development of passive acoustic monitoring has allowed a much more direct measurement of shrimp feed intake by capturing and integrating clicking sounds produced by shrimp while eating. Integrating acoustic responses with automated feeding systems has allowed the development of on-demand feeding systems for shrimp. Hence, this technology is a potential tool to help understand feed preferences when the feeding protocol is based on real-time demand for feed rather than predetermined quantities. Building on previous research, the goal of this trial was to use passive feedback acoustic feeders as a tool to evaluate if shrimp prefer diets with different protein sources when given the option to eat as much as requested. A 13-week trial was conducted in 16, 0.1-ha outdoor ponds, stocked at 30 shrimp/m 2 and equipped with the AQ1 acoustic feeding system. At day 45, the acoustic system was initiated, and four treatments were assigned with a 35% crude protein diet with different protein sources: all-plant, 8% poultry meal (PM), 8% fish meal (FM), and 12% FM. A second growth trial was conducted in 20, 800-L outdoor recirculating system with similar density (30 shrimp/tank), and shrimp were offered a predetermined feeding rate. We did not find statistical differences in any of the main production parameters. Results of this study indicate that shrimp did not clearly favor a particular diet. This suggests that, irrespective of ingredient matrix, a well-balanced feed will produce suitable growth even when shrimp are allowed to determine their feed intake. The use of acoustic feeders opens the door for nutrition research in which the shrimp are fed on demand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-6120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-143X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Aquaculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Diet ; Feeding habits ; Feeding rates ; Feeds ; Fish ; Fishmeal ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Growth ; Life Sciences ; Marine crustaceans ; Nutrition ; Nutrition research ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Ponds ; Proteins ; Recirculating aquaculture systems ; Shrimp culture ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture international, 2023-06, Vol.31 (3), p.1643-1657</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ad8f5331efd2b589e927508d488d4f56e73551f9d76b2b0f24f54307bf716513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ad8f5331efd2b589e927508d488d4f56e73551f9d76b2b0f24f54307bf716513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reis, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Aya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weldon, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stites, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Allen</creatorcontrib><title>Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production</title><title>Aquaculture international</title><addtitle>Aquacult Int</addtitle><description>Shrimp production has been one of the most important sectors of aquaculture for the last few decades for both its market value and consumer acceptance. The majority of shrimp feeding protocols in typical production setups rely on a combination of feed trays and predetermined feed plans which do not account for real-time consumption or feed preferences. However, for the last decade, the development of passive acoustic monitoring has allowed a much more direct measurement of shrimp feed intake by capturing and integrating clicking sounds produced by shrimp while eating. Integrating acoustic responses with automated feeding systems has allowed the development of on-demand feeding systems for shrimp. Hence, this technology is a potential tool to help understand feed preferences when the feeding protocol is based on real-time demand for feed rather than predetermined quantities. Building on previous research, the goal of this trial was to use passive feedback acoustic feeders as a tool to evaluate if shrimp prefer diets with different protein sources when given the option to eat as much as requested. A 13-week trial was conducted in 16, 0.1-ha outdoor ponds, stocked at 30 shrimp/m 2 and equipped with the AQ1 acoustic feeding system. At day 45, the acoustic system was initiated, and four treatments were assigned with a 35% crude protein diet with different protein sources: all-plant, 8% poultry meal (PM), 8% fish meal (FM), and 12% FM. A second growth trial was conducted in 20, 800-L outdoor recirculating system with similar density (30 shrimp/tank), and shrimp were offered a predetermined feeding rate. We did not find statistical differences in any of the main production parameters. Results of this study indicate that shrimp did not clearly favor a particular diet. This suggests that, irrespective of ingredient matrix, a well-balanced feed will produce suitable growth even when shrimp are allowed to determine their feed intake. The use of acoustic feeders opens the door for nutrition research in which the shrimp are fed on demand.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeding habits</subject><subject>Feeding rates</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishmeal</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine crustaceans</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recirculating aquaculture systems</subject><subject>Shrimp culture</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0967-6120</issn><issn>1573-143X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8RydJ0zRHWfyCBT0oeAttk-x2WZs10yr-e-NW8CbMBzPz3szwCDnncMkB9BVyKIxhICQDDkoyeUBmXGnJeCFfD8kMTKlZyQUckxPEDQBIXfAZsU81Yvfhad3GEYeupcF75xPSOhsdYtzmkAv0iPsZTR53scdM6R1dpfg5rGnXU1yn7m1H88jRXYpubIcu9qfkKNRb9Ge_eU5ebm-eF_ds-Xj3sLheslZyMzBduyooKbkPTjSqMt4IraByRZU9qNJrqRQPxumyEQ0EkZuFBN0EzUvF5ZxcTHvz6ffR42A3cUx9PmlFxY0uS2FURokJ1aaImHywu_x0nb4sB_sjpJ2EtFlIuxfSykySEwkzuF_59Lf6H9Y36WR2Bw</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Reis, João</creator><creator>Hussain, Aya S.</creator><creator>Weldon, Alexis</creator><creator>Walsh, Samuel</creator><creator>Stites, William</creator><creator>Rhodes, Melanie</creator><creator>Davis, D. Allen</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production</title><author>Reis, João ; Hussain, Aya S. ; Weldon, Alexis ; Walsh, Samuel ; Stites, William ; Rhodes, Melanie ; Davis, D. Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ad8f5331efd2b589e927508d488d4f56e73551f9d76b2b0f24f54307bf716513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeding habits</topic><topic>Feeding rates</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishmeal</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine crustaceans</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recirculating aquaculture systems</topic><topic>Shrimp culture</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reis, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Aya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weldon, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stites, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Allen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reis, João</au><au>Hussain, Aya S.</au><au>Weldon, Alexis</au><au>Walsh, Samuel</au><au>Stites, William</au><au>Rhodes, Melanie</au><au>Davis, D. Allen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle><stitle>Aquacult Int</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1643</spage><epage>1657</epage><pages>1643-1657</pages><issn>0967-6120</issn><eissn>1573-143X</eissn><abstract>Shrimp production has been one of the most important sectors of aquaculture for the last few decades for both its market value and consumer acceptance. The majority of shrimp feeding protocols in typical production setups rely on a combination of feed trays and predetermined feed plans which do not account for real-time consumption or feed preferences. However, for the last decade, the development of passive acoustic monitoring has allowed a much more direct measurement of shrimp feed intake by capturing and integrating clicking sounds produced by shrimp while eating. Integrating acoustic responses with automated feeding systems has allowed the development of on-demand feeding systems for shrimp. Hence, this technology is a potential tool to help understand feed preferences when the feeding protocol is based on real-time demand for feed rather than predetermined quantities. Building on previous research, the goal of this trial was to use passive feedback acoustic feeders as a tool to evaluate if shrimp prefer diets with different protein sources when given the option to eat as much as requested. A 13-week trial was conducted in 16, 0.1-ha outdoor ponds, stocked at 30 shrimp/m 2 and equipped with the AQ1 acoustic feeding system. At day 45, the acoustic system was initiated, and four treatments were assigned with a 35% crude protein diet with different protein sources: all-plant, 8% poultry meal (PM), 8% fish meal (FM), and 12% FM. A second growth trial was conducted in 20, 800-L outdoor recirculating system with similar density (30 shrimp/tank), and shrimp were offered a predetermined feeding rate. We did not find statistical differences in any of the main production parameters. Results of this study indicate that shrimp did not clearly favor a particular diet. This suggests that, irrespective of ingredient matrix, a well-balanced feed will produce suitable growth even when shrimp are allowed to determine their feed intake. The use of acoustic feeders opens the door for nutrition research in which the shrimp are fed on demand.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-6120
ispartof Aquaculture international, 2023-06, Vol.31 (3), p.1643-1657
issn 0967-6120
1573-143X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2819766295
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acoustics
Aquaculture
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Diet
Feeding habits
Feeding rates
Feeds
Fish
Fishmeal
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Growth
Life Sciences
Marine crustaceans
Nutrition
Nutrition research
Polyculture (aquaculture)
Ponds
Proteins
Recirculating aquaculture systems
Shrimp culture
Zoology
title Passive acoustic feeders as a tool to assess feed response and growth in shrimp pond production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A17%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Passive%20acoustic%20feeders%20as%20a%20tool%20to%20assess%20feed%20response%20and%20growth%20in%20shrimp%20pond%20production&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20international&rft.au=Reis,%20Jo%C3%A3o&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1643&rft.epage=1657&rft.pages=1643-1657&rft.issn=0967-6120&rft.eissn=1573-143X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10499-023-01053-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2819766295%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819766295&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true