CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH
The modern civil rights movement began more than a century ago in 1905, when W.E.B. Du Bois and other Black activists began organizing the "Niagara Movement" to call for political, social, and civil rights for African Americans.18 The group consisted of twenty-nine business owners, teacher...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law social policy & the law, 2023-01, Vol.30 (3), p.321-341 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Khaing, Hnin N |
description | The modern civil rights movement began more than a century ago in 1905, when W.E.B. Du Bois and other Black activists began organizing the "Niagara Movement" to call for political, social, and civil rights for African Americans.18 The group consisted of twenty-nine business owners, teachers, and clergy members.19 The deadly race riots of 1908, which began with an angry mob pursuing a Black man whom they believed had sexually assaulted a young White woman, led Du Bois, other African American activists, and White abolitionists, including Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, to form the nation's premier civil rights organization known as the National Association for Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP").20 In line with its mission to secure rights guaranteed under the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,21 the NAACP spent the next several decades successfully using the legal system to eliminate lynching, disenfranchisement and racial segregation.22 One of the NAACP's earliest legal successes included a 1913 case which challenged the so-called "grandfather clause" put in place in Oklahoma to effectively disqualify Black voters.23 Although the Fifteenth Amendment24 enabled Black men to vote, the Oklahoma clause provided that only residents whose grandfathers had voted in 1865 could vote.25 The Supreme Court agreed with the NAACP and found that the "grandfather clause" was in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment.26 On the heels of this success, the push for advancement of women's right to vote culminated in 1920 with the enactment of the Nineteenth Amendment.27 Soon thereafter, debates over the rights of Asian Americans followed in the aftermath of a 1923 Supreme Court decision,28 finding that an Indian Sikh man, as a nonwhite, was ineligible for citizenship under the Immigration Act of 1917. Unfortunately, this decision also had negative consequences as several states began to deny Asian Americans the right to own land.29 By 1939, additional civil rights movements developed, including gay and lesbian rights, and the "Congress of Spanish Speaking People" was established.30 In 1954, NAACP secured a landmark victory under the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the Supreme Court dismantled the notion of "separate but equal" in Brown v. Board of Education3 That same day, under the Fifth Amendment, the Court ruled similarly with respect to racial segregation in District of Columbia publ |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2819693335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2819693335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28196933353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNir0KwjAURoMoWH_e4YKDU8H0GmvdSowmWFtpbrWbOOggYrXR99eCD-DwceA7p8W8AJH7yMOyzTwuROhjKLDLes5dJxM-DXDuMSvN3iSQm7UmCyYF0goOWb7ZJbFUCzA0tkBmq4AykAVB9l3TqFIqayFOl7BW1NjmpbwgPWCdy-nmzsMf-2y0UiS1_6ir5_vsXsdr9a7vX3UM5jyaRYgo8L_qA6dbOIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819693335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Khaing, Hnin N</creator><creatorcontrib>Khaing, Hnin N</creatorcontrib><description>The modern civil rights movement began more than a century ago in 1905, when W.E.B. Du Bois and other Black activists began organizing the "Niagara Movement" to call for political, social, and civil rights for African Americans.18 The group consisted of twenty-nine business owners, teachers, and clergy members.19 The deadly race riots of 1908, which began with an angry mob pursuing a Black man whom they believed had sexually assaulted a young White woman, led Du Bois, other African American activists, and White abolitionists, including Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, to form the nation's premier civil rights organization known as the National Association for Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP").20 In line with its mission to secure rights guaranteed under the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,21 the NAACP spent the next several decades successfully using the legal system to eliminate lynching, disenfranchisement and racial segregation.22 One of the NAACP's earliest legal successes included a 1913 case which challenged the so-called "grandfather clause" put in place in Oklahoma to effectively disqualify Black voters.23 Although the Fifteenth Amendment24 enabled Black men to vote, the Oklahoma clause provided that only residents whose grandfathers had voted in 1865 could vote.25 The Supreme Court agreed with the NAACP and found that the "grandfather clause" was in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment.26 On the heels of this success, the push for advancement of women's right to vote culminated in 1920 with the enactment of the Nineteenth Amendment.27 Soon thereafter, debates over the rights of Asian Americans followed in the aftermath of a 1923 Supreme Court decision,28 finding that an Indian Sikh man, as a nonwhite, was ineligible for citizenship under the Immigration Act of 1917. Unfortunately, this decision also had negative consequences as several states began to deny Asian Americans the right to own land.29 By 1939, additional civil rights movements developed, including gay and lesbian rights, and the "Congress of Spanish Speaking People" was established.30 In 1954, NAACP secured a landmark victory under the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the Supreme Court dismantled the notion of "separate but equal" in Brown v. Board of Education3 That same day, under the Fifth Amendment, the Court ruled similarly with respect to racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools.32 In the wake of these decisions, schools slowly began to desegregate. The following year, Rosa Parks, a long-time NAACP member, sat in the segregated White area of the bus and was arrested,33 which would lead to a public transit segregation case before the Supreme Court, where the Court affirmed that segregation on buses contravened the Fourteenth Amendment.34 In 1957, Congress passed the first civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction Era35 when it established the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice and added an enforcement mechanism to protect the right to vote.36 Though this legislation did little to achieve racial equity, it signaled a growing effort by the federal government to tackle such issues. [...]the judicial system plays a large role in the state of racism and bias in the U.S. today.51 The subject of civil rights is vast, and though the proposals discussed in this article can easily apply to other aspects of civil rights, this article proposes making adjustments in the legal process in order to make</description><identifier>ISSN: 1557-3753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-317X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American University</publisher><subject>Activism ; Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Asian Americans ; Civil rights ; Civil Rights Legislation ; Disability ; Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963) ; Employment discrimination ; Equal rights ; Fines & penalties ; Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008-US ; Legal fees ; Litigation ; Mediation ; Public transportation ; Race ; Racial discrimination ; Racial Segregation ; Religion ; Segregation ; Sex crimes ; Sex discrimination ; Sexual harassment ; Violations ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law, 2023-01, Vol.30 (3), p.321-341</ispartof><rights>Copyright American University 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khaing, Hnin N</creatorcontrib><title>CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH</title><title>The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law</title><description>The modern civil rights movement began more than a century ago in 1905, when W.E.B. Du Bois and other Black activists began organizing the "Niagara Movement" to call for political, social, and civil rights for African Americans.18 The group consisted of twenty-nine business owners, teachers, and clergy members.19 The deadly race riots of 1908, which began with an angry mob pursuing a Black man whom they believed had sexually assaulted a young White woman, led Du Bois, other African American activists, and White abolitionists, including Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, to form the nation's premier civil rights organization known as the National Association for Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP").20 In line with its mission to secure rights guaranteed under the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,21 the NAACP spent the next several decades successfully using the legal system to eliminate lynching, disenfranchisement and racial segregation.22 One of the NAACP's earliest legal successes included a 1913 case which challenged the so-called "grandfather clause" put in place in Oklahoma to effectively disqualify Black voters.23 Although the Fifteenth Amendment24 enabled Black men to vote, the Oklahoma clause provided that only residents whose grandfathers had voted in 1865 could vote.25 The Supreme Court agreed with the NAACP and found that the "grandfather clause" was in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment.26 On the heels of this success, the push for advancement of women's right to vote culminated in 1920 with the enactment of the Nineteenth Amendment.27 Soon thereafter, debates over the rights of Asian Americans followed in the aftermath of a 1923 Supreme Court decision,28 finding that an Indian Sikh man, as a nonwhite, was ineligible for citizenship under the Immigration Act of 1917. Unfortunately, this decision also had negative consequences as several states began to deny Asian Americans the right to own land.29 By 1939, additional civil rights movements developed, including gay and lesbian rights, and the "Congress of Spanish Speaking People" was established.30 In 1954, NAACP secured a landmark victory under the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the Supreme Court dismantled the notion of "separate but equal" in Brown v. Board of Education3 That same day, under the Fifth Amendment, the Court ruled similarly with respect to racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools.32 In the wake of these decisions, schools slowly began to desegregate. The following year, Rosa Parks, a long-time NAACP member, sat in the segregated White area of the bus and was arrested,33 which would lead to a public transit segregation case before the Supreme Court, where the Court affirmed that segregation on buses contravened the Fourteenth Amendment.34 In 1957, Congress passed the first civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction Era35 when it established the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice and added an enforcement mechanism to protect the right to vote.36 Though this legislation did little to achieve racial equity, it signaled a growing effort by the federal government to tackle such issues. [...]the judicial system plays a large role in the state of racism and bias in the U.S. today.51 The subject of civil rights is vast, and though the proposals discussed in this article can easily apply to other aspects of civil rights, this article proposes making adjustments in the legal process in order to make</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Asian Americans</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil Rights Legislation</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008-US</subject><subject>Legal fees</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Racial Segregation</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sexual harassment</subject><subject>Violations</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>1557-3753</issn><issn>2331-317X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqNir0KwjAURoMoWH_e4YKDU8H0GmvdSowmWFtpbrWbOOggYrXR99eCD-DwceA7p8W8AJH7yMOyzTwuROhjKLDLes5dJxM-DXDuMSvN3iSQm7UmCyYF0goOWb7ZJbFUCzA0tkBmq4AykAVB9l3TqFIqayFOl7BW1NjmpbwgPWCdy-nmzsMf-2y0UiS1_6ir5_vsXsdr9a7vX3UM5jyaRYgo8L_qA6dbOIU</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Khaing, Hnin N</creator><general>American University</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH</title><author>Khaing, Hnin N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28196933353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Asian Americans</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil Rights Legislation</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008-US</topic><topic>Legal fees</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Racial Segregation</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sexual harassment</topic><topic>Violations</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khaing, Hnin N</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khaing, Hnin N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH</atitle><jtitle>The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>321-341</pages><issn>1557-3753</issn><eissn>2331-317X</eissn><abstract>The modern civil rights movement began more than a century ago in 1905, when W.E.B. Du Bois and other Black activists began organizing the "Niagara Movement" to call for political, social, and civil rights for African Americans.18 The group consisted of twenty-nine business owners, teachers, and clergy members.19 The deadly race riots of 1908, which began with an angry mob pursuing a Black man whom they believed had sexually assaulted a young White woman, led Du Bois, other African American activists, and White abolitionists, including Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, to form the nation's premier civil rights organization known as the National Association for Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP").20 In line with its mission to secure rights guaranteed under the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,21 the NAACP spent the next several decades successfully using the legal system to eliminate lynching, disenfranchisement and racial segregation.22 One of the NAACP's earliest legal successes included a 1913 case which challenged the so-called "grandfather clause" put in place in Oklahoma to effectively disqualify Black voters.23 Although the Fifteenth Amendment24 enabled Black men to vote, the Oklahoma clause provided that only residents whose grandfathers had voted in 1865 could vote.25 The Supreme Court agreed with the NAACP and found that the "grandfather clause" was in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment.26 On the heels of this success, the push for advancement of women's right to vote culminated in 1920 with the enactment of the Nineteenth Amendment.27 Soon thereafter, debates over the rights of Asian Americans followed in the aftermath of a 1923 Supreme Court decision,28 finding that an Indian Sikh man, as a nonwhite, was ineligible for citizenship under the Immigration Act of 1917. Unfortunately, this decision also had negative consequences as several states began to deny Asian Americans the right to own land.29 By 1939, additional civil rights movements developed, including gay and lesbian rights, and the "Congress of Spanish Speaking People" was established.30 In 1954, NAACP secured a landmark victory under the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the Supreme Court dismantled the notion of "separate but equal" in Brown v. Board of Education3 That same day, under the Fifth Amendment, the Court ruled similarly with respect to racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools.32 In the wake of these decisions, schools slowly began to desegregate. The following year, Rosa Parks, a long-time NAACP member, sat in the segregated White area of the bus and was arrested,33 which would lead to a public transit segregation case before the Supreme Court, where the Court affirmed that segregation on buses contravened the Fourteenth Amendment.34 In 1957, Congress passed the first civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction Era35 when it established the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice and added an enforcement mechanism to protect the right to vote.36 Though this legislation did little to achieve racial equity, it signaled a growing effort by the federal government to tackle such issues. [...]the judicial system plays a large role in the state of racism and bias in the U.S. today.51 The subject of civil rights is vast, and though the proposals discussed in this article can easily apply to other aspects of civil rights, this article proposes making adjustments in the legal process in order to make</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American University</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1557-3753 |
ispartof | The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law, 2023-01, Vol.30 (3), p.321-341 |
issn | 1557-3753 2331-317X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2819693335 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Activism Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US Asian Americans Civil rights Civil Rights Legislation Disability Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963) Employment discrimination Equal rights Fines & penalties Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008-US Legal fees Litigation Mediation Public transportation Race Racial discrimination Racial Segregation Religion Segregation Sex crimes Sex discrimination Sexual harassment Violations Voting rights |
title | CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE: IT'S TIME TO CUT OUT THE EXCESS AND GET TO THE TRUTH |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CIVIL%20RIGHTS%20IN%20THE%20WORKPLACE:%20IT'S%20TIME%20TO%20CUT%20OUT%20THE%20EXCESS%20AND%20GET%20TO%20THE%20TRUTH&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20University%20journal%20of%20gender,%20social%20policy%20&%20the%20law&rft.au=Khaing,%20Hnin%20N&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=321-341&rft.issn=1557-3753&rft.eissn=2331-317X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2819693335%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819693335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |