Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study
Joining similar or dissimilar materials has recently become a hot topic in industries. In this study, an adhesive technique was used to join plastic materials produced by additive manufacturing (3D printing) with metal materials. The effects of the type of material that forms the joint pairs on the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2023-04, Vol.11 (5), p.1312 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1312 |
| container_title | Processes |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Anaç, Nergizhan |
| description | Joining similar or dissimilar materials has recently become a hot topic in industries. In this study, an adhesive technique was used to join plastic materials produced by additive manufacturing (3D printing) with metal materials. The effects of the type of material that forms the joint pairs on the joint strength were investigated. In addition, a case study was carried out on the “rubber-metal buffer” part, which is a rubber industry product. The “rubber-metal buffer” part, traditionally produced by vulcanization, was re-manufactured by changing the body material and production technique. Samples were produced from Tough PLA and TPU materials using a 3D printer at 80% and 100% fill rates. Adhesive joints were made by bonding dissimilar (Tough PLA/Galvanized steel, TPU/Galvanized steel, Tough PLA/TPU) and similar materials (Tough PLA/Tough PLA, TPU/TPU, Galvanized steel/Galvanized steel) using Loctite 9466 adhesive. The mechanical properties of the joints were determined using tensile and hardness tests, and then the damage mechanisms were examined. The highest strength value in similar material pairs (3D printed) was found in Tough PLA/Tough PLA joints (4 MPa). In dissimilar material pairs, the highest strength value was determined to be Tough PLA/Galvanized steel (4.17 MPa). As a result, it was found that TPU and Tough PLA materials produced by 3D printing can be used as an alternative to rubber. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr11051312 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2819452538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750994522</galeid><sourcerecordid>A750994522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e1d4760ec8a2d817ecb4a946f8c3812956c656e947d6cb8c0ee0f549387495773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQjBBIVKUXvsASN6QUP-LY5hbKq6iIQ-EcufYGXOVRbAepf0-iVoLdw-7szuxKkySXBM8ZU_hm5wnBnDBCT5IJpVSkShBx-q8_T2YhbPEQijDJ80miixAghAbaiLoKFfYLgvuBeo_uutaCRS-da2MYd2vXuFp7pFuL7l0IR_iqI3in63CLlq3tQxwBWugAaB17u79IzqphC7NjnSYfjw_vi-d09fa0XBSr1DCWxRSIzUSOwUhNrSQCzCbTKssraZgkVPHc5DwHlQmbm400GABXPFNMikxxIdg0uTrc3fnuu4cQy23X-3Z4WVJJVMYpZ3JgzQ-sT11D6dqqi16bIS00znQtVG6YF4JjNUroILg-CIzvQvBQlTvvGu33JcHlaHv5Zzv7BdPQc70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819452538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Anaç, Nergizhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Anaç, Nergizhan</creatorcontrib><description>Joining similar or dissimilar materials has recently become a hot topic in industries. In this study, an adhesive technique was used to join plastic materials produced by additive manufacturing (3D printing) with metal materials. The effects of the type of material that forms the joint pairs on the joint strength were investigated. In addition, a case study was carried out on the “rubber-metal buffer” part, which is a rubber industry product. The “rubber-metal buffer” part, traditionally produced by vulcanization, was re-manufactured by changing the body material and production technique. Samples were produced from Tough PLA and TPU materials using a 3D printer at 80% and 100% fill rates. Adhesive joints were made by bonding dissimilar (Tough PLA/Galvanized steel, TPU/Galvanized steel, Tough PLA/TPU) and similar materials (Tough PLA/Tough PLA, TPU/TPU, Galvanized steel/Galvanized steel) using Loctite 9466 adhesive. The mechanical properties of the joints were determined using tensile and hardness tests, and then the damage mechanisms were examined. The highest strength value in similar material pairs (3D printed) was found in Tough PLA/Tough PLA joints (4 MPa). In dissimilar material pairs, the highest strength value was determined to be Tough PLA/Galvanized steel (4.17 MPa). As a result, it was found that TPU and Tough PLA materials produced by 3D printing can be used as an alternative to rubber.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr11051312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; 3D printing ; Additive manufacturing ; Adhesive bonding ; Adhesive joints ; Aluminum ; Bond strength ; Bonded joints ; Buffers ; Case studies ; Corrosion ; Crosslinked polymers ; Dissimilar material joining ; Dissimilar materials ; Epoxy adhesives ; Galvanized steel ; Galvanized steels ; Galvanizing ; Hardness ; Hardness tests ; Heat resistance ; Mechanical properties ; Metals ; Methods ; Physical properties ; Polymers ; Rubber ; Shear strength ; Steel ; Temperature ; Tensile strength ; Three dimensional printing ; Vulcanization</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2023-04, Vol.11 (5), p.1312</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e1d4760ec8a2d817ecb4a946f8c3812956c656e947d6cb8c0ee0f549387495773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e1d4760ec8a2d817ecb4a946f8c3812956c656e947d6cb8c0ee0f549387495773</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6738-9741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anaç, Nergizhan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study</title><title>Processes</title><description>Joining similar or dissimilar materials has recently become a hot topic in industries. In this study, an adhesive technique was used to join plastic materials produced by additive manufacturing (3D printing) with metal materials. The effects of the type of material that forms the joint pairs on the joint strength were investigated. In addition, a case study was carried out on the “rubber-metal buffer” part, which is a rubber industry product. The “rubber-metal buffer” part, traditionally produced by vulcanization, was re-manufactured by changing the body material and production technique. Samples were produced from Tough PLA and TPU materials using a 3D printer at 80% and 100% fill rates. Adhesive joints were made by bonding dissimilar (Tough PLA/Galvanized steel, TPU/Galvanized steel, Tough PLA/TPU) and similar materials (Tough PLA/Tough PLA, TPU/TPU, Galvanized steel/Galvanized steel) using Loctite 9466 adhesive. The mechanical properties of the joints were determined using tensile and hardness tests, and then the damage mechanisms were examined. The highest strength value in similar material pairs (3D printed) was found in Tough PLA/Tough PLA joints (4 MPa). In dissimilar material pairs, the highest strength value was determined to be Tough PLA/Galvanized steel (4.17 MPa). As a result, it was found that TPU and Tough PLA materials produced by 3D printing can be used as an alternative to rubber.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesive joints</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonded joints</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Crosslinked polymers</subject><subject>Dissimilar material joining</subject><subject>Dissimilar materials</subject><subject>Epoxy adhesives</subject><subject>Galvanized steel</subject><subject>Galvanized steels</subject><subject>Galvanizing</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Hardness tests</subject><subject>Heat resistance</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><subject>Vulcanization</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQjBBIVKUXvsASN6QUP-LY5hbKq6iIQ-EcufYGXOVRbAepf0-iVoLdw-7szuxKkySXBM8ZU_hm5wnBnDBCT5IJpVSkShBx-q8_T2YhbPEQijDJ80miixAghAbaiLoKFfYLgvuBeo_uutaCRS-da2MYd2vXuFp7pFuL7l0IR_iqI3in63CLlq3tQxwBWugAaB17u79IzqphC7NjnSYfjw_vi-d09fa0XBSr1DCWxRSIzUSOwUhNrSQCzCbTKssraZgkVPHc5DwHlQmbm400GABXPFNMikxxIdg0uTrc3fnuu4cQy23X-3Z4WVJJVMYpZ3JgzQ-sT11D6dqqi16bIS00znQtVG6YF4JjNUroILg-CIzvQvBQlTvvGu33JcHlaHv5Zzv7BdPQc70</recordid><startdate>20230424</startdate><enddate>20230424</enddate><creator>Anaç, Nergizhan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-9741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230424</creationdate><title>Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study</title><author>Anaç, Nergizhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e1d4760ec8a2d817ecb4a946f8c3812956c656e947d6cb8c0ee0f549387495773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesive joints</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonded joints</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Crosslinked polymers</topic><topic>Dissimilar material joining</topic><topic>Dissimilar materials</topic><topic>Epoxy adhesives</topic><topic>Galvanized steel</topic><topic>Galvanized steels</topic><topic>Galvanizing</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Hardness tests</topic><topic>Heat resistance</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><topic>Vulcanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anaç, Nergizhan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anaç, Nergizhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2023-04-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1312</spage><pages>1312-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>Joining similar or dissimilar materials has recently become a hot topic in industries. In this study, an adhesive technique was used to join plastic materials produced by additive manufacturing (3D printing) with metal materials. The effects of the type of material that forms the joint pairs on the joint strength were investigated. In addition, a case study was carried out on the “rubber-metal buffer” part, which is a rubber industry product. The “rubber-metal buffer” part, traditionally produced by vulcanization, was re-manufactured by changing the body material and production technique. Samples were produced from Tough PLA and TPU materials using a 3D printer at 80% and 100% fill rates. Adhesive joints were made by bonding dissimilar (Tough PLA/Galvanized steel, TPU/Galvanized steel, Tough PLA/TPU) and similar materials (Tough PLA/Tough PLA, TPU/TPU, Galvanized steel/Galvanized steel) using Loctite 9466 adhesive. The mechanical properties of the joints were determined using tensile and hardness tests, and then the damage mechanisms were examined. The highest strength value in similar material pairs (3D printed) was found in Tough PLA/Tough PLA joints (4 MPa). In dissimilar material pairs, the highest strength value was determined to be Tough PLA/Galvanized steel (4.17 MPa). As a result, it was found that TPU and Tough PLA materials produced by 3D printing can be used as an alternative to rubber.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr11051312</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-9741</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
| ispartof | Processes, 2023-04, Vol.11 (5), p.1312 |
| issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2819452538 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | 3-D printers 3D printing Additive manufacturing Adhesive bonding Adhesive joints Aluminum Bond strength Bonded joints Buffers Case studies Corrosion Crosslinked polymers Dissimilar material joining Dissimilar materials Epoxy adhesives Galvanized steel Galvanized steels Galvanizing Hardness Hardness tests Heat resistance Mechanical properties Metals Methods Physical properties Polymers Rubber Shear strength Steel Temperature Tensile strength Three dimensional printing Vulcanization |
| title | Assessment of Adhesively Bonded Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Materials: Industrial Case Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T21%3A39%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Adhesively%20Bonded%20Joints%20of%20Similar%20and%20Dissimilar%20Materials:%20Industrial%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Ana%C3%A7,%20Nergizhan&rft.date=2023-04-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1312&rft.pages=1312-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr11051312&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA750994522%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819452538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A750994522&rfr_iscdi=true |