Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis
Introduction This paper examines ethnic disparities in the effective coverage (EC) of maternal healthcare for interventions carried out among Mexican women in the last decade. It also explores the proportion of this gap that can be explained by observable characteristics in indigenous and nonindigen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sexuality research & social policy 2023-06, Vol.20 (2), p.561-574 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 574 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 561 |
| container_title | Sexuality research & social policy |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Serván-Mori, Edson Juárez-Ramírez, Clara Meneses-Navarro, Sergio Heredia-Pi, Ileana Armenta-Paulino, Nancy Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel Nigenda, Gustavo |
| description | Introduction
This paper examines ethnic disparities in the effective coverage (EC) of maternal healthcare for interventions carried out among Mexican women in the last decade. It also explores the proportion of this gap that can be explained by observable characteristics in indigenous and nonindigenous women, as well as by structural discrimination against indigenous women.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective and repeated cross-sectional study using data from the two latest Health and Nutrition Surveys carried out in 2011/2012 and 2018/2019. We analyzed a total of 11,304 Mexican women aged 12–49 years at the time of their last pregnancy, who reported having received obstetric services from 2006 to 2018, the result of which was a live birth. We adjusted EC according to indigenous status and the time of the most recent obstetric episode using a pooled fixed-effects and robust logistic model. In order to analyze which ethnic disparities in EC might be attributable to discrimination, we used the nonlinear Blinder–Oaxaca (BO) decomposition technique.
Results
Indigenous women were less likely to enjoy EC for maternal health than their nonindigenous peers (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75,0.98). Interventions aimed at providing adequate antenatal care (ANC) and skilled, institutional delivery care were the EC components registering the largest gaps by ethnicity. BO decomposition results demonstrated that structural discrimination accounted for 33.29% of this gap.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
It is possible that the largest proportion of the gap in EC attributable to differences in unobservable characteristics between women in both groups could be explained by omitted variables that are often predictors of EC. However, these differences in EC may also be related to discriminatory practices experienced by indigenous women. Such practices could also jeopardize the aspirations of LMICs for achieving universal health coverage. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2819156347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2819156347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b8149357e14adb5bbce4472e56d0bd900c440b6afc6b1647bf2a2c796fbf7b7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEURidGExF9AVdN3DrazvRv3BFAMZG40XXTllsogenYDkR2voNv6JM4iIk7V_cuzvnuzZdllwTfEIzFbSIlETLHBckx5pLl7CjrEcbKnHOCj7tdcplXUtLT7CylJcYlk4z2smbcLmpv0cinRkffekjI12jsHNjWbwENwxaingMKDk11C7HWKzQBvWoXVkfYw1N49zZco6I7_fXxWWAi75BGI7Bh3YTUhYYaDTpvl3w6z06cXiW4-J397PV-_DKc5E_PD4_DwVNuS1K1uZGEViUTQKieGWaMBUpFAYzPsJlVGFtKseHaWW4Ip8K4QhdWVNwZJ4ywZT-7OuQ2MbxtILVqGTb755MqJKkI4yUVHVUcKBtDShGcaqJf67hTBKt9s-rQrOqaVT_NKtZJ5UFKHVzPIf5F_2N9A3vIfBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819156347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Serván-Mori, Edson ; Juárez-Ramírez, Clara ; Meneses-Navarro, Sergio ; Heredia-Pi, Ileana ; Armenta-Paulino, Nancy ; Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel ; Nigenda, Gustavo</creator><creatorcontrib>Serván-Mori, Edson ; Juárez-Ramírez, Clara ; Meneses-Navarro, Sergio ; Heredia-Pi, Ileana ; Armenta-Paulino, Nancy ; Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel ; Nigenda, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
This paper examines ethnic disparities in the effective coverage (EC) of maternal healthcare for interventions carried out among Mexican women in the last decade. It also explores the proportion of this gap that can be explained by observable characteristics in indigenous and nonindigenous women, as well as by structural discrimination against indigenous women.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective and repeated cross-sectional study using data from the two latest Health and Nutrition Surveys carried out in 2011/2012 and 2018/2019. We analyzed a total of 11,304 Mexican women aged 12–49 years at the time of their last pregnancy, who reported having received obstetric services from 2006 to 2018, the result of which was a live birth. We adjusted EC according to indigenous status and the time of the most recent obstetric episode using a pooled fixed-effects and robust logistic model. In order to analyze which ethnic disparities in EC might be attributable to discrimination, we used the nonlinear Blinder–Oaxaca (BO) decomposition technique.
Results
Indigenous women were less likely to enjoy EC for maternal health than their nonindigenous peers (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75,0.98). Interventions aimed at providing adequate antenatal care (ANC) and skilled, institutional delivery care were the EC components registering the largest gaps by ethnicity. BO decomposition results demonstrated that structural discrimination accounted for 33.29% of this gap.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
It is possible that the largest proportion of the gap in EC attributable to differences in unobservable characteristics between women in both groups could be explained by omitted variables that are often predictors of EC. However, these differences in EC may also be related to discriminatory practices experienced by indigenous women. Such practices could also jeopardize the aspirations of LMICs for achieving universal health coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-9884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cross-sectional studies ; Cultural differences ; Decomposition ; Discrimination ; Ethnic differences ; Ethnicity ; Health services ; Health status ; Indigenous peoples ; Intervention ; Maternal characteristics ; Mothers ; Nutrition ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Psychology ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Sexuality research & social policy, 2023-06, Vol.20 (2), p.561-574</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b8149357e14adb5bbce4472e56d0bd900c440b6afc6b1647bf2a2c796fbf7b7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b8149357e14adb5bbce4472e56d0bd900c440b6afc6b1647bf2a2c796fbf7b7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1844-772X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serván-Mori, Edson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Ramírez, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses-Navarro, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heredia-Pi, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenta-Paulino, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigenda, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><title>Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis</title><title>Sexuality research & social policy</title><addtitle>Sex Res Soc Policy</addtitle><description>Introduction
This paper examines ethnic disparities in the effective coverage (EC) of maternal healthcare for interventions carried out among Mexican women in the last decade. It also explores the proportion of this gap that can be explained by observable characteristics in indigenous and nonindigenous women, as well as by structural discrimination against indigenous women.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective and repeated cross-sectional study using data from the two latest Health and Nutrition Surveys carried out in 2011/2012 and 2018/2019. We analyzed a total of 11,304 Mexican women aged 12–49 years at the time of their last pregnancy, who reported having received obstetric services from 2006 to 2018, the result of which was a live birth. We adjusted EC according to indigenous status and the time of the most recent obstetric episode using a pooled fixed-effects and robust logistic model. In order to analyze which ethnic disparities in EC might be attributable to discrimination, we used the nonlinear Blinder–Oaxaca (BO) decomposition technique.
Results
Indigenous women were less likely to enjoy EC for maternal health than their nonindigenous peers (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75,0.98). Interventions aimed at providing adequate antenatal care (ANC) and skilled, institutional delivery care were the EC components registering the largest gaps by ethnicity. BO decomposition results demonstrated that structural discrimination accounted for 33.29% of this gap.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
It is possible that the largest proportion of the gap in EC attributable to differences in unobservable characteristics between women in both groups could be explained by omitted variables that are often predictors of EC. However, these differences in EC may also be related to discriminatory practices experienced by indigenous women. Such practices could also jeopardize the aspirations of LMICs for achieving universal health coverage.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Ethnic differences</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal characteristics</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1868-9884</issn><issn>1553-6610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEURidGExF9AVdN3DrazvRv3BFAMZG40XXTllsogenYDkR2voNv6JM4iIk7V_cuzvnuzZdllwTfEIzFbSIlETLHBckx5pLl7CjrEcbKnHOCj7tdcplXUtLT7CylJcYlk4z2smbcLmpv0cinRkffekjI12jsHNjWbwENwxaingMKDk11C7HWKzQBvWoXVkfYw1N49zZco6I7_fXxWWAi75BGI7Bh3YTUhYYaDTpvl3w6z06cXiW4-J397PV-_DKc5E_PD4_DwVNuS1K1uZGEViUTQKieGWaMBUpFAYzPsJlVGFtKseHaWW4Ip8K4QhdWVNwZJ4ywZT-7OuQ2MbxtILVqGTb755MqJKkI4yUVHVUcKBtDShGcaqJf67hTBKt9s-rQrOqaVT_NKtZJ5UFKHVzPIf5F_2N9A3vIfBs</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Serván-Mori, Edson</creator><creator>Juárez-Ramírez, Clara</creator><creator>Meneses-Navarro, Sergio</creator><creator>Heredia-Pi, Ileana</creator><creator>Armenta-Paulino, Nancy</creator><creator>Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel</creator><creator>Nigenda, Gustavo</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-772X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis</title><author>Serván-Mori, Edson ; Juárez-Ramírez, Clara ; Meneses-Navarro, Sergio ; Heredia-Pi, Ileana ; Armenta-Paulino, Nancy ; Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel ; Nigenda, Gustavo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b8149357e14adb5bbce4472e56d0bd900c440b6afc6b1647bf2a2c796fbf7b7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Ethnic differences</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal characteristics</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serván-Mori, Edson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Ramírez, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses-Navarro, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heredia-Pi, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenta-Paulino, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigenda, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sexuality research & social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serván-Mori, Edson</au><au>Juárez-Ramírez, Clara</au><au>Meneses-Navarro, Sergio</au><au>Heredia-Pi, Ileana</au><au>Armenta-Paulino, Nancy</au><au>Orozco-Núñez, Emanuel</au><au>Nigenda, Gustavo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Sexuality research & social policy</jtitle><stitle>Sex Res Soc Policy</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>574</epage><pages>561-574</pages><issn>1868-9884</issn><eissn>1553-6610</eissn><abstract>Introduction
This paper examines ethnic disparities in the effective coverage (EC) of maternal healthcare for interventions carried out among Mexican women in the last decade. It also explores the proportion of this gap that can be explained by observable characteristics in indigenous and nonindigenous women, as well as by structural discrimination against indigenous women.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective and repeated cross-sectional study using data from the two latest Health and Nutrition Surveys carried out in 2011/2012 and 2018/2019. We analyzed a total of 11,304 Mexican women aged 12–49 years at the time of their last pregnancy, who reported having received obstetric services from 2006 to 2018, the result of which was a live birth. We adjusted EC according to indigenous status and the time of the most recent obstetric episode using a pooled fixed-effects and robust logistic model. In order to analyze which ethnic disparities in EC might be attributable to discrimination, we used the nonlinear Blinder–Oaxaca (BO) decomposition technique.
Results
Indigenous women were less likely to enjoy EC for maternal health than their nonindigenous peers (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75,0.98). Interventions aimed at providing adequate antenatal care (ANC) and skilled, institutional delivery care were the EC components registering the largest gaps by ethnicity. BO decomposition results demonstrated that structural discrimination accounted for 33.29% of this gap.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
It is possible that the largest proportion of the gap in EC attributable to differences in unobservable characteristics between women in both groups could be explained by omitted variables that are often predictors of EC. However, these differences in EC may also be related to discriminatory practices experienced by indigenous women. Such practices could also jeopardize the aspirations of LMICs for achieving universal health coverage.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-772X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1868-9884 |
| ispartof | Sexuality research & social policy, 2023-06, Vol.20 (2), p.561-574 |
| issn | 1868-9884 1553-6610 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2819156347 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals (MCLS); Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cross-sectional studies Cultural differences Decomposition Discrimination Ethnic differences Ethnicity Health services Health status Indigenous peoples Intervention Maternal characteristics Mothers Nutrition Obstetrics Pregnancy Prenatal care Psychology Sexual Behavior Social Sciences Women Womens health |
| title | Ethnic Disparities in Effective Coverage of Maternal Healthcare in Mexico, 2006–2018: a Decomposition Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A22%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethnic%20Disparities%20in%20Effective%20Coverage%20of%20Maternal%20Healthcare%20in%20Mexico,%202006%E2%80%932018:%20a%20Decomposition%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Sexuality%20research%20&%20social%20policy&rft.au=Serv%C3%A1n-Mori,%20Edson&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=574&rft.pages=561-574&rft.issn=1868-9884&rft.eissn=1553-6610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13178-021-00685-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2819156347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819156347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |