Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data

Real risk status detection is an effective way to reflect risky or dangerous driving behaviors and therefore to prevent road traffic accidents. However, a driver’s risk status is not only difficult to define but also uncontrollable and uncertain. In this study, a simulated experiment with 30 drivers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personal and ubiquitous computing 2023-06, Vol.27 (3), p.1303-1319
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Lixin, Gong, Yike, Chen, Zhijun, Li, Zhenyun, Guo, Junhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1319
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1303
container_title Personal and ubiquitous computing
container_volume 27
creator Yan, Lixin
Gong, Yike
Chen, Zhijun
Li, Zhenyun
Guo, Junhua
description Real risk status detection is an effective way to reflect risky or dangerous driving behaviors and therefore to prevent road traffic accidents. However, a driver’s risk status is not only difficult to define but also uncontrollable and uncertain. In this study, a simulated experiment with 30 drivers was conducted using a driving simulator to collect the multi-sensor data of road conditions, humans, and vehicles. The driving risk status was classified into three states (0 - incident, 1 - near crash, or 2 - crash) on the basis of the playback system of the driving simulator. The experimental data were pre-processed using the cubic spline interpolation method and the time-windows theory. A driving risk status identification model was established using the C5.0 decision tree algorithm, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to evaluate the performance of the identification model. The results indicated that respiration (RESP), vehicle speed (SPE), SM_FATIGUE, distance to the left lane (LLD), course angle (CA), and skin conductivity (SC) had a significant correlation (p < 0.05) with the driving risk status. The identification accuracy of the C5.0 decision tree algorithm was 78%, and the areas under the ROC were 0.934, 0.77, and 0.845, respectively. Moreover, compared with other four identification algorithms, the algorithm performance evaluation indexes TPR (0.780), precision (0.753), recall (0.78), F-measure (0.756), and kappa (0.884) of the C5.0 decision tree were all the best. The conclusion can provide reference evidence for danger warning systems and intelligent vehicle design.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2819139370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2819139370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-6e590347dbd08fd7cbccb3c462330c603d288256b08fb090aa69e85728a6f2623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB9_wFXAdfQmmUkmy1J8QUEQXYdMkqmp7UxNMlL_vakV3bm5D-53zoWD0AWFKwogr1MpUhFglACtGyDbAzShgkpSKSoPf2dQx-gkpSUAlaISE_Q0HfOwNjlYHJzvc-iCLdvQ47XPr4PD3RCxi-Ej9AscQ3rDKZs8Jtya5B3eceMqB5J8n3akyeYMHXVmlfz5Tz9FL7c3z7N7Mn-8e5hN58QyCZQIXyvglXStg6Zz0rbWttxWgnEOVgB3rGlYLdpybUGBMUL5ppasMaJjhTpFl3vfTRzeR5-yXg5j7MtLzRqqKFdcQqHYnrJxSCn6Tm9iWJv4qSnoXXZ6n50u2env7PS2iPhelArcL3z8s_5H9QXG1XJT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819139370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yan, Lixin ; Gong, Yike ; Chen, Zhijun ; Li, Zhenyun ; Guo, Junhua</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lixin ; Gong, Yike ; Chen, Zhijun ; Li, Zhenyun ; Guo, Junhua</creatorcontrib><description>Real risk status detection is an effective way to reflect risky or dangerous driving behaviors and therefore to prevent road traffic accidents. However, a driver’s risk status is not only difficult to define but also uncontrollable and uncertain. In this study, a simulated experiment with 30 drivers was conducted using a driving simulator to collect the multi-sensor data of road conditions, humans, and vehicles. The driving risk status was classified into three states (0 - incident, 1 - near crash, or 2 - crash) on the basis of the playback system of the driving simulator. The experimental data were pre-processed using the cubic spline interpolation method and the time-windows theory. A driving risk status identification model was established using the C5.0 decision tree algorithm, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to evaluate the performance of the identification model. The results indicated that respiration (RESP), vehicle speed (SPE), SM_FATIGUE, distance to the left lane (LLD), course angle (CA), and skin conductivity (SC) had a significant correlation (p &lt; 0.05) with the driving risk status. The identification accuracy of the C5.0 decision tree algorithm was 78%, and the areas under the ROC were 0.934, 0.77, and 0.845, respectively. Moreover, compared with other four identification algorithms, the algorithm performance evaluation indexes TPR (0.780), precision (0.753), recall (0.78), F-measure (0.756), and kappa (0.884) of the C5.0 decision tree were all the best. The conclusion can provide reference evidence for danger warning systems and intelligent vehicle design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-4909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-4917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Computer Science ; Decision trees ; Driving ; Identification methods ; Intelligent vehicles ; Interpolation ; Mobile Computing ; Original Paper ; Performance evaluation ; Performance indices ; Personal Computing ; Risk ; Road conditions ; Simulation ; Traffic accidents ; Traffic speed ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Warning systems</subject><ispartof>Personal and ubiquitous computing, 2023-06, Vol.27 (3), p.1303-1319</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-6e590347dbd08fd7cbccb3c462330c603d288256b08fb090aa69e85728a6f2623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-6e590347dbd08fd7cbccb3c462330c603d288256b08fb090aa69e85728a6f2623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0992-2656</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Junhua</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data</title><title>Personal and ubiquitous computing</title><addtitle>Pers Ubiquit Comput</addtitle><description>Real risk status detection is an effective way to reflect risky or dangerous driving behaviors and therefore to prevent road traffic accidents. However, a driver’s risk status is not only difficult to define but also uncontrollable and uncertain. In this study, a simulated experiment with 30 drivers was conducted using a driving simulator to collect the multi-sensor data of road conditions, humans, and vehicles. The driving risk status was classified into three states (0 - incident, 1 - near crash, or 2 - crash) on the basis of the playback system of the driving simulator. The experimental data were pre-processed using the cubic spline interpolation method and the time-windows theory. A driving risk status identification model was established using the C5.0 decision tree algorithm, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to evaluate the performance of the identification model. The results indicated that respiration (RESP), vehicle speed (SPE), SM_FATIGUE, distance to the left lane (LLD), course angle (CA), and skin conductivity (SC) had a significant correlation (p &lt; 0.05) with the driving risk status. The identification accuracy of the C5.0 decision tree algorithm was 78%, and the areas under the ROC were 0.934, 0.77, and 0.845, respectively. Moreover, compared with other four identification algorithms, the algorithm performance evaluation indexes TPR (0.780), precision (0.753), recall (0.78), F-measure (0.756), and kappa (0.884) of the C5.0 decision tree were all the best. The conclusion can provide reference evidence for danger warning systems and intelligent vehicle design.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Driving</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Intelligent vehicles</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Mobile Computing</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Personal Computing</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Road conditions</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Traffic accidents</subject><subject>Traffic speed</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Warning systems</subject><issn>1617-4909</issn><issn>1617-4917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB9_wFXAdfQmmUkmy1J8QUEQXYdMkqmp7UxNMlL_vakV3bm5D-53zoWD0AWFKwogr1MpUhFglACtGyDbAzShgkpSKSoPf2dQx-gkpSUAlaISE_Q0HfOwNjlYHJzvc-iCLdvQ47XPr4PD3RCxi-Ej9AscQ3rDKZs8Jtya5B3eceMqB5J8n3akyeYMHXVmlfz5Tz9FL7c3z7N7Mn-8e5hN58QyCZQIXyvglXStg6Zz0rbWttxWgnEOVgB3rGlYLdpybUGBMUL5ppasMaJjhTpFl3vfTRzeR5-yXg5j7MtLzRqqKFdcQqHYnrJxSCn6Tm9iWJv4qSnoXXZ6n50u2env7PS2iPhelArcL3z8s_5H9QXG1XJT</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Yan, Lixin</creator><creator>Gong, Yike</creator><creator>Chen, Zhijun</creator><creator>Li, Zhenyun</creator><creator>Guo, Junhua</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-2656</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data</title><author>Yan, Lixin ; Gong, Yike ; Chen, Zhijun ; Li, Zhenyun ; Guo, Junhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2701-6e590347dbd08fd7cbccb3c462330c603d288256b08fb090aa69e85728a6f2623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Driving</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Intelligent vehicles</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Mobile Computing</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Personal Computing</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Road conditions</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Traffic accidents</topic><topic>Traffic speed</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Warning systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Junhua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Personal and ubiquitous computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Lixin</au><au>Gong, Yike</au><au>Chen, Zhijun</au><au>Li, Zhenyun</au><au>Guo, Junhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data</atitle><jtitle>Personal and ubiquitous computing</jtitle><stitle>Pers Ubiquit Comput</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1303</spage><epage>1319</epage><pages>1303-1319</pages><issn>1617-4909</issn><eissn>1617-4917</eissn><abstract>Real risk status detection is an effective way to reflect risky or dangerous driving behaviors and therefore to prevent road traffic accidents. However, a driver’s risk status is not only difficult to define but also uncontrollable and uncertain. In this study, a simulated experiment with 30 drivers was conducted using a driving simulator to collect the multi-sensor data of road conditions, humans, and vehicles. The driving risk status was classified into three states (0 - incident, 1 - near crash, or 2 - crash) on the basis of the playback system of the driving simulator. The experimental data were pre-processed using the cubic spline interpolation method and the time-windows theory. A driving risk status identification model was established using the C5.0 decision tree algorithm, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to evaluate the performance of the identification model. The results indicated that respiration (RESP), vehicle speed (SPE), SM_FATIGUE, distance to the left lane (LLD), course angle (CA), and skin conductivity (SC) had a significant correlation (p &lt; 0.05) with the driving risk status. The identification accuracy of the C5.0 decision tree algorithm was 78%, and the areas under the ROC were 0.934, 0.77, and 0.845, respectively. Moreover, compared with other four identification algorithms, the algorithm performance evaluation indexes TPR (0.780), precision (0.753), recall (0.78), F-measure (0.756), and kappa (0.884) of the C5.0 decision tree were all the best. The conclusion can provide reference evidence for danger warning systems and intelligent vehicle design.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-2656</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-4909
ispartof Personal and ubiquitous computing, 2023-06, Vol.27 (3), p.1303-1319
issn 1617-4909
1617-4917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2819139370
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Computer Science
Decision trees
Driving
Identification methods
Intelligent vehicles
Interpolation
Mobile Computing
Original Paper
Performance evaluation
Performance indices
Personal Computing
Risk
Road conditions
Simulation
Traffic accidents
Traffic speed
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Warning systems
title Automatic identification method for driving risk status based on multi-sensor data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20identification%20method%20for%20driving%20risk%20status%20based%20on%20multi-sensor%20data&rft.jtitle=Personal%20and%20ubiquitous%20computing&rft.au=Yan,%20Lixin&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1303&rft.epage=1319&rft.pages=1303-1319&rft.issn=1617-4909&rft.eissn=1617-4917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00779-021-01580-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2819139370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819139370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true