Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture

The Red Sea is an ideal location for studying rifting processes, offering a young and active intra‐continental rift at the final stages of breakup. We explore the 3D lithospheric structure of the Red Sea by analyzing the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift architecture, including two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2023-05, Vol.128 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Issachar, Ran, Gómez‐García, Ángela María, Ebbing, Jörg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 128
creator Issachar, Ran
Gómez‐García, Ángela María
Ebbing, Jörg
description The Red Sea is an ideal location for studying rifting processes, offering a young and active intra‐continental rift at the final stages of breakup. We explore the 3D lithospheric structure of the Red Sea by analyzing the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift architecture, including two end‐member types margin architecture Type I—narrow margins and exhumed lithospheric mantle, and Type II—(ultra)wide margins and removal of lithospheric mantle. Additionally, we test two options for the distribution of the oceanic crust (a) limited, that is, confined only to regions of magnetic stripes, and (b) extended, that is, available in vast areas within the basin. South of latitude 23°N, our results suggest the presence of ultrawide margins and limited oceanic crust. North of this latitude, the model of exhumed mantle and limited oceanic crust has minimized residuals compared to the observed gravity field, and agrees with a previously published regional tomographic model. Additionally, we find evidence for the presence of a high‐density body along the southern Arabian coast, probably associated with magmatic underplating. We discuss the lithospheric structure of the Red Sea with respect to the nearby Afar plume, agreeing that the close proximity of the central‐southern regions to the plume promoted a reduction in the strength of the lithosphere, and led to the development of ultrawide margins in these areas. Plain Language Summary The Red Sea is a young example of continental break‐up, a process in which a continent disintegrate into smaller pieces and an ocean is formed between them. We explore the sub‐surface structure of the Red Sea, down to 140 km, aiming to better understand the mechanisms that allowed the Arabian plate to separate from Africa ∼23 million years ago. We examine the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift structures and compare them to the gravity signal measured in this region. We find that the sub‐surface structure in the central‐southern region is different than in the northern regions. Toward the south, the crust is thin and stretched, the lithospheric mantle is absent, and the asthenosphere is rising in a wide region. In the north the lithospheric mantle is exhumed and the asthenosphere is rising in narrow regions below the center of the basin. We discuss the reasons for these differences and support the possibility that the Afar Plume, currently located to the south of the Red Sea, had a thermal weakening effect on the
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022JB025458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2818787352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2818787352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4116-2befbc1748ac2e908aab91b4fd745bfb5d44e381422f1fe347024592525678f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsNTu_AEDbo3OM5m460OrpSK0ug6T5I6ZUjN1ZoL03xutiCvv5p57-TgHDkLnlFxRwvJrRhhbTAiTQqojNGA0zZOcy_T4V1N-ikYhbEg_qn9RMUDV0sbGhV0D3lZ4HX1Xxc4DdgbHBvAKarwGjSc69Mq1mM_wDNpg4x4_uhq2tn29wWM8dW30OsT-xCtrIh77qrERvs3O0InR2wCjnz1EL3e3z9P7ZPk0f5iOl4kWlKYJK8GUFc2E0hWDnCity5yWwtSZkKUpZS0EcEUFY4Ya4CIjTMicSSbTTJmUD9HFwXfn3XsHIRYb1_m2jyyYoipTGZespy4PVOVdCB5MsfP2Tft9QUnx1WTxt8ke5wf8w25h_y9bLOariUwZT_knndNyyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2818787352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Issachar, Ran ; Gómez‐García, Ángela María ; Ebbing, Jörg</creator><creatorcontrib>Issachar, Ran ; Gómez‐García, Ángela María ; Ebbing, Jörg</creatorcontrib><description>The Red Sea is an ideal location for studying rifting processes, offering a young and active intra‐continental rift at the final stages of breakup. We explore the 3D lithospheric structure of the Red Sea by analyzing the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift architecture, including two end‐member types margin architecture Type I—narrow margins and exhumed lithospheric mantle, and Type II—(ultra)wide margins and removal of lithospheric mantle. Additionally, we test two options for the distribution of the oceanic crust (a) limited, that is, confined only to regions of magnetic stripes, and (b) extended, that is, available in vast areas within the basin. South of latitude 23°N, our results suggest the presence of ultrawide margins and limited oceanic crust. North of this latitude, the model of exhumed mantle and limited oceanic crust has minimized residuals compared to the observed gravity field, and agrees with a previously published regional tomographic model. Additionally, we find evidence for the presence of a high‐density body along the southern Arabian coast, probably associated with magmatic underplating. We discuss the lithospheric structure of the Red Sea with respect to the nearby Afar plume, agreeing that the close proximity of the central‐southern regions to the plume promoted a reduction in the strength of the lithosphere, and led to the development of ultrawide margins in these areas. Plain Language Summary The Red Sea is a young example of continental break‐up, a process in which a continent disintegrate into smaller pieces and an ocean is formed between them. We explore the sub‐surface structure of the Red Sea, down to 140 km, aiming to better understand the mechanisms that allowed the Arabian plate to separate from Africa ∼23 million years ago. We examine the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift structures and compare them to the gravity signal measured in this region. We find that the sub‐surface structure in the central‐southern region is different than in the northern regions. Toward the south, the crust is thin and stretched, the lithospheric mantle is absent, and the asthenosphere is rising in a wide region. In the north the lithospheric mantle is exhumed and the asthenosphere is rising in narrow regions below the center of the basin. We discuss the reasons for these differences and support the possibility that the Afar Plume, currently located to the south of the Red Sea, had a thermal weakening effect on the central‐southern regions of the Red Sea, which allowed the lithosphere to deform more easily, having direct implications in the present‐day architecture of the Red Sea. Key Points Gravity modeling in the Red Sea suggests a contrasting rift architecture in the central‐southern regions and in the northern regions In the central‐southern regions, ultrawide margins and thinned continental crust are underlaid by a broad asthenosphere upwelling In the northern regions, we infer exhumed mantle lithosphere and a narrow asthenosphere upwelling</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JB025458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Afro Arabian rift ; Architecture ; Asthenosphere ; Density ; Geophysics ; Gravitational fields ; gravity anomaly ; Gravity field ; Latitude ; Lava ; Lithosphere ; Modelling ; Oceanic crust ; passive margins ; Plates ; Red Sea ; Regions ; Rifting ; Sediment thickness ; Surface structure ; Three dimensional models</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2023-05, Vol.128 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4116-2befbc1748ac2e908aab91b4fd745bfb5d44e381422f1fe347024592525678f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4116-2befbc1748ac2e908aab91b4fd745bfb5d44e381422f1fe347024592525678f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7492-5338 ; 0000-0001-8689-2449 ; 0000-0001-5847-2826</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022JB025458$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022JB025458$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Issachar, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐García, Ángela María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, Jörg</creatorcontrib><title>Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>The Red Sea is an ideal location for studying rifting processes, offering a young and active intra‐continental rift at the final stages of breakup. We explore the 3D lithospheric structure of the Red Sea by analyzing the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift architecture, including two end‐member types margin architecture Type I—narrow margins and exhumed lithospheric mantle, and Type II—(ultra)wide margins and removal of lithospheric mantle. Additionally, we test two options for the distribution of the oceanic crust (a) limited, that is, confined only to regions of magnetic stripes, and (b) extended, that is, available in vast areas within the basin. South of latitude 23°N, our results suggest the presence of ultrawide margins and limited oceanic crust. North of this latitude, the model of exhumed mantle and limited oceanic crust has minimized residuals compared to the observed gravity field, and agrees with a previously published regional tomographic model. Additionally, we find evidence for the presence of a high‐density body along the southern Arabian coast, probably associated with magmatic underplating. We discuss the lithospheric structure of the Red Sea with respect to the nearby Afar plume, agreeing that the close proximity of the central‐southern regions to the plume promoted a reduction in the strength of the lithosphere, and led to the development of ultrawide margins in these areas. Plain Language Summary The Red Sea is a young example of continental break‐up, a process in which a continent disintegrate into smaller pieces and an ocean is formed between them. We explore the sub‐surface structure of the Red Sea, down to 140 km, aiming to better understand the mechanisms that allowed the Arabian plate to separate from Africa ∼23 million years ago. We examine the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift structures and compare them to the gravity signal measured in this region. We find that the sub‐surface structure in the central‐southern region is different than in the northern regions. Toward the south, the crust is thin and stretched, the lithospheric mantle is absent, and the asthenosphere is rising in a wide region. In the north the lithospheric mantle is exhumed and the asthenosphere is rising in narrow regions below the center of the basin. We discuss the reasons for these differences and support the possibility that the Afar Plume, currently located to the south of the Red Sea, had a thermal weakening effect on the central‐southern regions of the Red Sea, which allowed the lithosphere to deform more easily, having direct implications in the present‐day architecture of the Red Sea. Key Points Gravity modeling in the Red Sea suggests a contrasting rift architecture in the central‐southern regions and in the northern regions In the central‐southern regions, ultrawide margins and thinned continental crust are underlaid by a broad asthenosphere upwelling In the northern regions, we infer exhumed mantle lithosphere and a narrow asthenosphere upwelling</description><subject>Afro Arabian rift</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Asthenosphere</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gravitational fields</subject><subject>gravity anomaly</subject><subject>Gravity field</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Oceanic crust</subject><subject>passive margins</subject><subject>Plates</subject><subject>Red Sea</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Rifting</subject><subject>Sediment thickness</subject><subject>Surface structure</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsNTu_AEDbo3OM5m460OrpSK0ug6T5I6ZUjN1ZoL03xutiCvv5p57-TgHDkLnlFxRwvJrRhhbTAiTQqojNGA0zZOcy_T4V1N-ikYhbEg_qn9RMUDV0sbGhV0D3lZ4HX1Xxc4DdgbHBvAKarwGjSc69Mq1mM_wDNpg4x4_uhq2tn29wWM8dW30OsT-xCtrIh77qrERvs3O0InR2wCjnz1EL3e3z9P7ZPk0f5iOl4kWlKYJK8GUFc2E0hWDnCity5yWwtSZkKUpZS0EcEUFY4Ya4CIjTMicSSbTTJmUD9HFwXfn3XsHIRYb1_m2jyyYoipTGZespy4PVOVdCB5MsfP2Tft9QUnx1WTxt8ke5wf8w25h_y9bLOariUwZT_knndNyyA</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Issachar, Ran</creator><creator>Gómez‐García, Ángela María</creator><creator>Ebbing, Jörg</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-5338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-2826</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture</title><author>Issachar, Ran ; Gómez‐García, Ángela María ; Ebbing, Jörg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4116-2befbc1748ac2e908aab91b4fd745bfb5d44e381422f1fe347024592525678f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Afro Arabian rift</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Asthenosphere</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gravitational fields</topic><topic>gravity anomaly</topic><topic>Gravity field</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Oceanic crust</topic><topic>passive margins</topic><topic>Plates</topic><topic>Red Sea</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Rifting</topic><topic>Sediment thickness</topic><topic>Surface structure</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Issachar, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐García, Ángela María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebbing, Jörg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Issachar, Ran</au><au>Gómez‐García, Ángela María</au><au>Ebbing, Jörg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>The Red Sea is an ideal location for studying rifting processes, offering a young and active intra‐continental rift at the final stages of breakup. We explore the 3D lithospheric structure of the Red Sea by analyzing the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift architecture, including two end‐member types margin architecture Type I—narrow margins and exhumed lithospheric mantle, and Type II—(ultra)wide margins and removal of lithospheric mantle. Additionally, we test two options for the distribution of the oceanic crust (a) limited, that is, confined only to regions of magnetic stripes, and (b) extended, that is, available in vast areas within the basin. South of latitude 23°N, our results suggest the presence of ultrawide margins and limited oceanic crust. North of this latitude, the model of exhumed mantle and limited oceanic crust has minimized residuals compared to the observed gravity field, and agrees with a previously published regional tomographic model. Additionally, we find evidence for the presence of a high‐density body along the southern Arabian coast, probably associated with magmatic underplating. We discuss the lithospheric structure of the Red Sea with respect to the nearby Afar plume, agreeing that the close proximity of the central‐southern regions to the plume promoted a reduction in the strength of the lithosphere, and led to the development of ultrawide margins in these areas. Plain Language Summary The Red Sea is a young example of continental break‐up, a process in which a continent disintegrate into smaller pieces and an ocean is formed between them. We explore the sub‐surface structure of the Red Sea, down to 140 km, aiming to better understand the mechanisms that allowed the Arabian plate to separate from Africa ∼23 million years ago. We examine the gravity response of four end‐member models of rift structures and compare them to the gravity signal measured in this region. We find that the sub‐surface structure in the central‐southern region is different than in the northern regions. Toward the south, the crust is thin and stretched, the lithospheric mantle is absent, and the asthenosphere is rising in a wide region. In the north the lithospheric mantle is exhumed and the asthenosphere is rising in narrow regions below the center of the basin. We discuss the reasons for these differences and support the possibility that the Afar Plume, currently located to the south of the Red Sea, had a thermal weakening effect on the central‐southern regions of the Red Sea, which allowed the lithosphere to deform more easily, having direct implications in the present‐day architecture of the Red Sea. Key Points Gravity modeling in the Red Sea suggests a contrasting rift architecture in the central‐southern regions and in the northern regions In the central‐southern regions, ultrawide margins and thinned continental crust are underlaid by a broad asthenosphere upwelling In the northern regions, we infer exhumed mantle lithosphere and a narrow asthenosphere upwelling</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022JB025458</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-5338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-2826</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2023-05, Vol.128 (5), p.n/a
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2818787352
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Afro Arabian rift
Architecture
Asthenosphere
Density
Geophysics
Gravitational fields
gravity anomaly
Gravity field
Latitude
Lava
Lithosphere
Modelling
Oceanic crust
passive margins
Plates
Red Sea
Regions
Rifting
Sediment thickness
Surface structure
Three dimensional models
title Lithospheric Structure of the Red Sea Based on 3D Density Modeling: A Contrasting Rift Architecture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A17%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithospheric%20Structure%20of%20the%20Red%20Sea%20Based%20on%203D%20Density%20Modeling:%20A%20Contrasting%20Rift%20Architecture&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Issachar,%20Ran&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JB025458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2818787352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2818787352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true