The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania

In this article, we examine selected sustainability initiatives from the perspective of local communities to improve our understanding of how putative participatory schemes manage legitimacy. Understanding the legitimacy dynamics of sustainability initiatives is important, as it potentially minimize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of development research 2023-06, Vol.35 (3), p.453-482
Hauptverfasser: Minja, Rasul Ahmed, Ponte, Stefano, Mwamfupe, Asubisye, Noe, Christine, Brockington, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 482
container_issue 3
container_start_page 453
container_title European journal of development research
container_volume 35
creator Minja, Rasul Ahmed
Ponte, Stefano
Mwamfupe, Asubisye
Noe, Christine
Brockington, Daniel
description In this article, we examine selected sustainability initiatives from the perspective of local communities to improve our understanding of how putative participatory schemes manage legitimacy. Understanding the legitimacy dynamics of sustainability initiatives is important, as it potentially minimizes the power gaps likely to open across scales and jurisdictions. We analyze selected sustainability initiatives in southern Tanzania dealing with wildlife, forest, and coastal resources and find that they have generally struggled to manage input, process, and impact legitimacy—except for the community-based forestry initiatives. They have been more inclined towards providing training on conservation issues than facilitating alternative livelihood activities. While they are perceived as having achieved some improvements in environmental conditions, they have had minimal effects on socio-economic and livelihood outcomes. This has culminated into significant levels of community dissatisfaction with their performance, which questions their long-term viability.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2818580079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2818580079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d21cf683e16dd723ecc66b8512667b6c582fd292eaf6a1280fc07d6ba43a3c423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_gKeC52jy0iSvRxnqBgMPznNI03RmzHQ2nTD_eqMVdvP0Dt9fvA8h15zdcib1XSo5oKYMgDImuaDyhEy4LgWtNOApmbBKaorI-Tm5SGnDGEdAmBBcvfli6ddhCO_WHYquLV72abAh2jpsw3AoFjFrdgifPhUhFisbv2wM9pKctXab_NXfnZLXx4fVbE6Xz0-L2f2SOqHYQBvgrlUoPFdNo0F455SqUXJQStfKSYS2gQq8bZXNP7DWMd2o2pbCCleCmJKbsXfXdx97nwaz6fZ9zJMGkKNExnSVXTC6XN-l1PvW7Pr8UH8wnJkfQmYkZDIh80vIyBwqxpB3XQzpGEFZCoFCqWwRoyVlMa59f1z_p_gb_f9yhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2818580079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Minja, Rasul Ahmed ; Ponte, Stefano ; Mwamfupe, Asubisye ; Noe, Christine ; Brockington, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Minja, Rasul Ahmed ; Ponte, Stefano ; Mwamfupe, Asubisye ; Noe, Christine ; Brockington, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we examine selected sustainability initiatives from the perspective of local communities to improve our understanding of how putative participatory schemes manage legitimacy. Understanding the legitimacy dynamics of sustainability initiatives is important, as it potentially minimizes the power gaps likely to open across scales and jurisdictions. We analyze selected sustainability initiatives in southern Tanzania dealing with wildlife, forest, and coastal resources and find that they have generally struggled to manage input, process, and impact legitimacy—except for the community-based forestry initiatives. They have been more inclined towards providing training on conservation issues than facilitating alternative livelihood activities. While they are perceived as having achieved some improvements in environmental conditions, they have had minimal effects on socio-economic and livelihood outcomes. This has culminated into significant levels of community dissatisfaction with their performance, which questions their long-term viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-8811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Artenschutz ; Career change ; Coastal resources ; Community ; Conservation ; Development and Social Change ; Development Economics ; Development Policy ; Development Studies ; Environmental conditions ; Forestry ; Gesellschaftliche Vereinigung ; Küste/Küstengebiet ; Legitimacy ; Legitimität/Legitimation ; Livelihood ; Local communities ; Nachhaltige Entwicklung ; Naturreservat ; Naturschutz ; Natürliche Ressourcen ; Original Article ; Perzeption ; Ressourcenmanagement ; Ressourcenschutz ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sustainability ; Tansania ; Wald ; Walderhaltung/Aufforstung ; Wild ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>European journal of development research, 2023-06, Vol.35 (3), p.453-482</ispartof><rights>European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2022</rights><rights>European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d21cf683e16dd723ecc66b8512667b6c582fd292eaf6a1280fc07d6ba43a3c423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9755-5269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minja, Rasul Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponte, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwamfupe, Asubisye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noe, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockington, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania</title><title>European journal of development research</title><addtitle>Eur J Dev Res</addtitle><description>In this article, we examine selected sustainability initiatives from the perspective of local communities to improve our understanding of how putative participatory schemes manage legitimacy. Understanding the legitimacy dynamics of sustainability initiatives is important, as it potentially minimizes the power gaps likely to open across scales and jurisdictions. We analyze selected sustainability initiatives in southern Tanzania dealing with wildlife, forest, and coastal resources and find that they have generally struggled to manage input, process, and impact legitimacy—except for the community-based forestry initiatives. They have been more inclined towards providing training on conservation issues than facilitating alternative livelihood activities. While they are perceived as having achieved some improvements in environmental conditions, they have had minimal effects on socio-economic and livelihood outcomes. This has culminated into significant levels of community dissatisfaction with their performance, which questions their long-term viability.</description><subject>Artenschutz</subject><subject>Career change</subject><subject>Coastal resources</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Development and Social Change</subject><subject>Development Economics</subject><subject>Development Policy</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Gesellschaftliche Vereinigung</subject><subject>Küste/Küstengebiet</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Legitimität/Legitimation</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Nachhaltige Entwicklung</subject><subject>Naturreservat</subject><subject>Naturschutz</subject><subject>Natürliche Ressourcen</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perzeption</subject><subject>Ressourcenmanagement</subject><subject>Ressourcenschutz</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tansania</subject><subject>Wald</subject><subject>Walderhaltung/Aufforstung</subject><subject>Wild</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>0957-8811</issn><issn>1743-9728</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_gKeC52jy0iSvRxnqBgMPznNI03RmzHQ2nTD_eqMVdvP0Dt9fvA8h15zdcib1XSo5oKYMgDImuaDyhEy4LgWtNOApmbBKaorI-Tm5SGnDGEdAmBBcvfli6ddhCO_WHYquLV72abAh2jpsw3AoFjFrdgifPhUhFisbv2wM9pKctXab_NXfnZLXx4fVbE6Xz0-L2f2SOqHYQBvgrlUoPFdNo0F455SqUXJQStfKSYS2gQq8bZXNP7DWMd2o2pbCCleCmJKbsXfXdx97nwaz6fZ9zJMGkKNExnSVXTC6XN-l1PvW7Pr8UH8wnJkfQmYkZDIh80vIyBwqxpB3XQzpGEFZCoFCqWwRoyVlMa59f1z_p_gb_f9yhA</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Minja, Rasul Ahmed</creator><creator>Ponte, Stefano</creator><creator>Mwamfupe, Asubisye</creator><creator>Noe, Christine</creator><creator>Brockington, Daniel</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9755-5269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania</title><author>Minja, Rasul Ahmed ; Ponte, Stefano ; Mwamfupe, Asubisye ; Noe, Christine ; Brockington, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d21cf683e16dd723ecc66b8512667b6c582fd292eaf6a1280fc07d6ba43a3c423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artenschutz</topic><topic>Career change</topic><topic>Coastal resources</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Development and Social Change</topic><topic>Development Economics</topic><topic>Development Policy</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Gesellschaftliche Vereinigung</topic><topic>Küste/Küstengebiet</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Legitimität/Legitimation</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Nachhaltige Entwicklung</topic><topic>Naturreservat</topic><topic>Naturschutz</topic><topic>Natürliche Ressourcen</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perzeption</topic><topic>Ressourcenmanagement</topic><topic>Ressourcenschutz</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tansania</topic><topic>Wald</topic><topic>Walderhaltung/Aufforstung</topic><topic>Wild</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minja, Rasul Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponte, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwamfupe, Asubisye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noe, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockington, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of development research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minja, Rasul Ahmed</au><au>Ponte, Stefano</au><au>Mwamfupe, Asubisye</au><au>Noe, Christine</au><au>Brockington, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>European journal of development research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Dev Res</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>482</epage><pages>453-482</pages><issn>0957-8811</issn><eissn>1743-9728</eissn><abstract>In this article, we examine selected sustainability initiatives from the perspective of local communities to improve our understanding of how putative participatory schemes manage legitimacy. Understanding the legitimacy dynamics of sustainability initiatives is important, as it potentially minimizes the power gaps likely to open across scales and jurisdictions. We analyze selected sustainability initiatives in southern Tanzania dealing with wildlife, forest, and coastal resources and find that they have generally struggled to manage input, process, and impact legitimacy—except for the community-based forestry initiatives. They have been more inclined towards providing training on conservation issues than facilitating alternative livelihood activities. While they are perceived as having achieved some improvements in environmental conditions, they have had minimal effects on socio-economic and livelihood outcomes. This has culminated into significant levels of community dissatisfaction with their performance, which questions their long-term viability.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9755-5269</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-8811
ispartof European journal of development research, 2023-06, Vol.35 (3), p.453-482
issn 0957-8811
1743-9728
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2818580079
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Artenschutz
Career change
Coastal resources
Community
Conservation
Development and Social Change
Development Economics
Development Policy
Development Studies
Environmental conditions
Forestry
Gesellschaftliche Vereinigung
Küste/Küstengebiet
Legitimacy
Legitimität/Legitimation
Livelihood
Local communities
Nachhaltige Entwicklung
Naturreservat
Naturschutz
Natürliche Ressourcen
Original Article
Perzeption
Ressourcenmanagement
Ressourcenschutz
Social Sciences
Socioeconomic factors
Sustainability
Tansania
Wald
Walderhaltung/Aufforstung
Wild
Wildlife
title The Legitimacy of Sustainability Initiatives in Tanzania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A42%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Legitimacy%20of%20Sustainability%20Initiatives%20in%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20development%20research&rft.au=Minja,%20Rasul%20Ahmed&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=482&rft.pages=453-482&rft.issn=0957-8811&rft.eissn=1743-9728&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41287-022-00513-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2818580079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2818580079&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true