An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran
Satellite precipitation products are one of the sources of precipitation estimates. However, their spatial resolution is often too coarse for use in local areas or parameterization of meteorological and hydrological models at basin and plain scales. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modeling earth systems and environment 2023-06, Vol.9 (2), p.2829-2843 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2843 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2829 |
container_title | Modeling earth systems and environment |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Nakhaei, Mohammad Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin Saadi, Tofigh |
description | Satellite precipitation products are one of the sources of precipitation estimates. However, their spatial resolution is often too coarse for use in local areas or parameterization of meteorological and hydrological models at basin and plain scales. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and uncertainty analysis of the downscaled monthly precipitation modeling of the CHIRPS satellite product based on rain gage station data. Five high-resolution ancillary data were used for this purpose including land surface temperature (LST), leaf area index (LAI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) extracted from the MODIS/Terra satellite database, and elevation data obtained from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) of NASA JPL satellite database. In addition, precipitation data were extracted from CHIRPS satellite data. Four machine learning models were used to model the downscaling, including support vector machine (SVM), gradient tree boost (GTB), random forest (RF), and classification and regression tree (CART). For accuracy evaluation, root mean square error (RMSE), Bias, multiplicative bias (mBias), correlation coefficient (CC), and optimum index factor (OIF) error estimators were applied. The results of the accuracy evaluation results showed that the CART and GTB models with the best performance according to the error estimators were the best models for stations at lower altitudes and latitudes (Karim Abad, Najm Abad, and Somea) and stations at higher altitudes and latitudes (Valian, Sorheh, and Fashand), respectively. The uncertainty analysis was performed using the bootstrap method. The results showed that the CART and GBT models had a more reliable estimate and lower uncertainty than the other models. This study highlights the power of the Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms in downscaling modeling to improve the resolution of satellite precipitation data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2815857860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2815857860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ea58e673eba7a7a64a71cf89c759ecb3f552ee627949ab9bacc0ac63a97670e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1PAjEQ3RhNJMgf8NTEq6v9YNvtkRAVEhI96LmZLbNQUrrYLhj-vQtr9GbmMF_vvcm8LLtl9IFRqh7TmJa0zCnnOWVSlfnxIhtwIUUuOWOXvzUV19kopQ2lHYxLqfUgO0wCwQP4PbSuCaSpSYIWvXctkl1E63au7VfL5iskC96FFdk2S_SJ7NO5Abt2AYlHiOE0AL9qomvX20RcIDNI63aFcUnePLhwT-YRwk12VYNPOPrJw-zj-el9OssXry_z6WSRW8F0myMUJUolsALVhRyDYrYutVWFRluJuig4ouRKjzVUugJrKVgpQCupKDIxzO563V1sPveYWrNp9jF0Jw0vWVEWqpS0Q_EeZWOTUsTa7KLbQjwaRs3JYtNbbDqLzdlic-xIoielDhy6B_-k_2F9AxTmgeM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2815857860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nakhaei, Mohammad ; Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin ; Saadi, Tofigh</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakhaei, Mohammad ; Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin ; Saadi, Tofigh</creatorcontrib><description>Satellite precipitation products are one of the sources of precipitation estimates. However, their spatial resolution is often too coarse for use in local areas or parameterization of meteorological and hydrological models at basin and plain scales. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and uncertainty analysis of the downscaled monthly precipitation modeling of the CHIRPS satellite product based on rain gage station data. Five high-resolution ancillary data were used for this purpose including land surface temperature (LST), leaf area index (LAI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) extracted from the MODIS/Terra satellite database, and elevation data obtained from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) of NASA JPL satellite database. In addition, precipitation data were extracted from CHIRPS satellite data. Four machine learning models were used to model the downscaling, including support vector machine (SVM), gradient tree boost (GTB), random forest (RF), and classification and regression tree (CART). For accuracy evaluation, root mean square error (RMSE), Bias, multiplicative bias (mBias), correlation coefficient (CC), and optimum index factor (OIF) error estimators were applied. The results of the accuracy evaluation results showed that the CART and GTB models with the best performance according to the error estimators were the best models for stations at lower altitudes and latitudes (Karim Abad, Najm Abad, and Somea) and stations at higher altitudes and latitudes (Valian, Sorheh, and Fashand), respectively. The uncertainty analysis was performed using the bootstrap method. The results showed that the CART and GBT models had a more reliable estimate and lower uncertainty than the other models. This study highlights the power of the Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms in downscaling modeling to improve the resolution of satellite precipitation data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2363-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2363-6211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Altitude ; Atmospheric models ; Bias ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computer Science ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth System Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Estimators ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Land surface temperature ; Latitude ; Leaf area ; Leaf area index ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; Mathematical Applications in the Physical Sciences ; Modelling ; Normalized difference vegetative index ; Original Article ; Parameterization ; Physics ; Precipitation ; Radar ; Rain gauges ; Regression analysis ; Resolution ; Root-mean-square errors ; Satellites ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistics for Engineering ; Support vector machines ; Surface temperature ; Uncertainty ; Uncertainty analysis ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Modeling earth systems and environment, 2023-06, Vol.9 (2), p.2829-2843</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ea58e673eba7a7a64a71cf89c759ecb3f552ee627949ab9bacc0ac63a97670e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ea58e673eba7a7a64a71cf89c759ecb3f552ee627949ab9bacc0ac63a97670e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4727-125X ; 0000-0002-4823-5197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakhaei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Tofigh</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran</title><title>Modeling earth systems and environment</title><addtitle>Model. Earth Syst. Environ</addtitle><description>Satellite precipitation products are one of the sources of precipitation estimates. However, their spatial resolution is often too coarse for use in local areas or parameterization of meteorological and hydrological models at basin and plain scales. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and uncertainty analysis of the downscaled monthly precipitation modeling of the CHIRPS satellite product based on rain gage station data. Five high-resolution ancillary data were used for this purpose including land surface temperature (LST), leaf area index (LAI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) extracted from the MODIS/Terra satellite database, and elevation data obtained from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) of NASA JPL satellite database. In addition, precipitation data were extracted from CHIRPS satellite data. Four machine learning models were used to model the downscaling, including support vector machine (SVM), gradient tree boost (GTB), random forest (RF), and classification and regression tree (CART). For accuracy evaluation, root mean square error (RMSE), Bias, multiplicative bias (mBias), correlation coefficient (CC), and optimum index factor (OIF) error estimators were applied. The results of the accuracy evaluation results showed that the CART and GTB models with the best performance according to the error estimators were the best models for stations at lower altitudes and latitudes (Karim Abad, Najm Abad, and Somea) and stations at higher altitudes and latitudes (Valian, Sorheh, and Fashand), respectively. The uncertainty analysis was performed using the bootstrap method. The results showed that the CART and GBT models had a more reliable estimate and lower uncertainty than the other models. This study highlights the power of the Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms in downscaling modeling to improve the resolution of satellite precipitation data.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth System Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Land surface temperature</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>Mathematical Applications in the Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Normalized difference vegetative index</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2363-6203</issn><issn>2363-6211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1PAjEQ3RhNJMgf8NTEq6v9YNvtkRAVEhI96LmZLbNQUrrYLhj-vQtr9GbmMF_vvcm8LLtl9IFRqh7TmJa0zCnnOWVSlfnxIhtwIUUuOWOXvzUV19kopQ2lHYxLqfUgO0wCwQP4PbSuCaSpSYIWvXctkl1E63au7VfL5iskC96FFdk2S_SJ7NO5Abt2AYlHiOE0AL9qomvX20RcIDNI63aFcUnePLhwT-YRwk12VYNPOPrJw-zj-el9OssXry_z6WSRW8F0myMUJUolsALVhRyDYrYutVWFRluJuig4ouRKjzVUugJrKVgpQCupKDIxzO563V1sPveYWrNp9jF0Jw0vWVEWqpS0Q_EeZWOTUsTa7KLbQjwaRs3JYtNbbDqLzdlic-xIoielDhy6B_-k_2F9AxTmgeM</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Nakhaei, Mohammad</creator><creator>Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin</creator><creator>Saadi, Tofigh</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-125X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-5197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran</title><author>Nakhaei, Mohammad ; Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin ; Saadi, Tofigh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ea58e673eba7a7a64a71cf89c759ecb3f552ee627949ab9bacc0ac63a97670e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth System Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Land surface temperature</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>Mathematical Applications in the Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Normalized difference vegetative index</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakhaei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Tofigh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Modeling earth systems and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakhaei, Mohammad</au><au>Mohebbi Tafreshi, Amin</au><au>Saadi, Tofigh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran</atitle><jtitle>Modeling earth systems and environment</jtitle><stitle>Model. Earth Syst. Environ</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2829</spage><epage>2843</epage><pages>2829-2843</pages><issn>2363-6203</issn><eissn>2363-6211</eissn><abstract>Satellite precipitation products are one of the sources of precipitation estimates. However, their spatial resolution is often too coarse for use in local areas or parameterization of meteorological and hydrological models at basin and plain scales. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and uncertainty analysis of the downscaled monthly precipitation modeling of the CHIRPS satellite product based on rain gage station data. Five high-resolution ancillary data were used for this purpose including land surface temperature (LST), leaf area index (LAI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) extracted from the MODIS/Terra satellite database, and elevation data obtained from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) of NASA JPL satellite database. In addition, precipitation data were extracted from CHIRPS satellite data. Four machine learning models were used to model the downscaling, including support vector machine (SVM), gradient tree boost (GTB), random forest (RF), and classification and regression tree (CART). For accuracy evaluation, root mean square error (RMSE), Bias, multiplicative bias (mBias), correlation coefficient (CC), and optimum index factor (OIF) error estimators were applied. The results of the accuracy evaluation results showed that the CART and GTB models with the best performance according to the error estimators were the best models for stations at lower altitudes and latitudes (Karim Abad, Najm Abad, and Somea) and stations at higher altitudes and latitudes (Valian, Sorheh, and Fashand), respectively. The uncertainty analysis was performed using the bootstrap method. The results showed that the CART and GBT models had a more reliable estimate and lower uncertainty than the other models. This study highlights the power of the Google Earth Engine and machine learning algorithms in downscaling modeling to improve the resolution of satellite precipitation data.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-125X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-5197</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2363-6203 |
ispartof | Modeling earth systems and environment, 2023-06, Vol.9 (2), p.2829-2843 |
issn | 2363-6203 2363-6211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2815857860 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Altitude Atmospheric models Bias Chemistry and Earth Sciences Computer Science Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth System Sciences Ecosystems Environment Estimators Hydrologic data Hydrologic models Hydrology Land surface temperature Latitude Leaf area Leaf area index Learning algorithms Machine learning Math. Appl. in Environmental Science Mathematical Applications in the Physical Sciences Modelling Normalized difference vegetative index Original Article Parameterization Physics Precipitation Radar Rain gauges Regression analysis Resolution Root-mean-square errors Satellites Spatial discrimination Spatial resolution Statistical analysis Statistical methods Statistics for Engineering Support vector machines Surface temperature Uncertainty Uncertainty analysis Vegetation |
title | An evaluation of satellite precipitation downscaling models using machine learning algorithms in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T17%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20satellite%20precipitation%20downscaling%20models%20using%20machine%20learning%20algorithms%20in%20Hashtgerd%20Plain,%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Modeling%20earth%20systems%20and%20environment&rft.au=Nakhaei,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2829&rft.epage=2843&rft.pages=2829-2843&rft.issn=2363-6203&rft.eissn=2363-6211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40808-022-01678-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2815857860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2815857860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |