Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences
The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to gener...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2023-05, Vol.100 (5), p.1917-1925 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1925 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1917 |
container_title | Journal of chemical education |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Woodside, Audra J. Weber, Peter M. Williard, Paul G. Morton, Charles I. Colvin, Vicki L. Robinson, Jerome R. |
description | The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students’ (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2814051551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2814051551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-98f8a0b1d4557d553c77a2c1bc0956d573f4af56f9701e86a6d7d2fc97d55203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC7hY4pzWjuPEOVYRj0gVIOjdcv2gLklc7KRV-fW4tFw57Ur7zcxqALjFaIJRiqdChslarnSr1YRIhFCWnYERLglLMEnZORihiCUlZdkluAphjRBOaclG4LvujPvwYrOyMkDRKVj32ovebjV81dpPn7XwyWGDb3pr9Q6KABfONQH2DtbtxrtIVjHaht7vYeXaduisjA6ug--ftonkzvYr-Ki7aNzA2aCs7qQO1-DCiCbom9Mcg8XD_aJ6SuYvj3U1myeC4KJPSmaYQEusMkoLRSmRRSFSiZcSlTRXtCAmE4bmpiwQ1iwXuSpUamR5gFNExuDuaBtf_Rp06PnaDb6LiTxlOEMUU4ojRY6U9C4Erw3feNsKv-cY8UPHPHbMTx3zU8dRNT2qfo9_tv8pfgDi0IOH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2814051551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Woodside, Audra J. ; Weber, Peter M. ; Williard, Paul G. ; Morton, Charles I. ; Colvin, Vicki L. ; Robinson, Jerome R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodside, Audra J. ; Weber, Peter M. ; Williard, Paul G. ; Morton, Charles I. ; Colvin, Vicki L. ; Robinson, Jerome R.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students’ (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic discourse ; Audiences ; Chemistry ; Classroom communication ; College students ; Communication ; Communication skills ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Feedback ; Graduate students ; Grammatical aspect ; Iterative methods ; Organic Chemistry ; Organometallic compounds ; Outcomes of Education ; Peer review ; Science Curriculum ; Scientific Concepts ; Self assessment ; Self evaluation ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Technical education ; Technical information ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate study</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2023-05, Vol.100 (5), p.1917-1925</ispartof><rights>2023 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society May 9, 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-98f8a0b1d4557d553c77a2c1bc0956d573f4af56f9701e86a6d7d2fc97d55203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-98f8a0b1d4557d553c77a2c1bc0956d573f4af56f9701e86a6d7d2fc97d55203</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0893-1582 ; 0000-0002-8526-515X ; 0000-0002-9111-3822 ; 0000-0003-3017-336X ; 0000-0002-4343-8980</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodside, Audra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williard, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colvin, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jerome R.</creatorcontrib><title>Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students’ (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed.</description><subject>Academic discourse</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication skills</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Organometallic compounds</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Self assessment</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Technical education</subject><subject>Technical information</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate study</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwC7hY4pzWjuPEOVYRj0gVIOjdcv2gLklc7KRV-fW4tFw57Ur7zcxqALjFaIJRiqdChslarnSr1YRIhFCWnYERLglLMEnZORihiCUlZdkluAphjRBOaclG4LvujPvwYrOyMkDRKVj32ovebjV81dpPn7XwyWGDb3pr9Q6KABfONQH2DtbtxrtIVjHaht7vYeXaduisjA6ug--ftonkzvYr-Ki7aNzA2aCs7qQO1-DCiCbom9Mcg8XD_aJ6SuYvj3U1myeC4KJPSmaYQEusMkoLRSmRRSFSiZcSlTRXtCAmE4bmpiwQ1iwXuSpUamR5gFNExuDuaBtf_Rp06PnaDb6LiTxlOEMUU4ojRY6U9C4Erw3feNsKv-cY8UPHPHbMTx3zU8dRNT2qfo9_tv8pfgDi0IOH</recordid><startdate>20230509</startdate><enddate>20230509</enddate><creator>Woodside, Audra J.</creator><creator>Weber, Peter M.</creator><creator>Williard, Paul G.</creator><creator>Morton, Charles I.</creator><creator>Colvin, Vicki L.</creator><creator>Robinson, Jerome R.</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-515X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-336X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-8980</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230509</creationdate><title>Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences</title><author>Woodside, Audra J. ; Weber, Peter M. ; Williard, Paul G. ; Morton, Charles I. ; Colvin, Vicki L. ; Robinson, Jerome R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a317t-98f8a0b1d4557d553c77a2c1bc0956d573f4af56f9701e86a6d7d2fc97d55203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic discourse</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication skills</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Organometallic compounds</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Self assessment</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Technical education</topic><topic>Technical information</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodside, Audra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williard, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, Charles I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colvin, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jerome R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodside, Audra J.</au><au>Weber, Peter M.</au><au>Williard, Paul G.</au><au>Morton, Charles I.</au><au>Colvin, Vicki L.</au><au>Robinson, Jerome R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2023-05-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1917</spage><epage>1925</epage><pages>1917-1925</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students’ (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-515X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-336X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-8980</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2023-05, Vol.100 (5), p.1917-1925 |
issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2814051551 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Academic discourse Audiences Chemistry Classroom communication College students Communication Communication skills Educational Facilities Improvement Feedback Graduate students Grammatical aspect Iterative methods Organic Chemistry Organometallic compounds Outcomes of Education Peer review Science Curriculum Scientific Concepts Self assessment Self evaluation Students Teachers Teaching methods Technical education Technical information Undergraduate Students Undergraduate study |
title | Infographics and Iterative Peer/Near-Peer Review as Tools to Improve Chemistry Communication Skills with General Audiences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infographics%20and%20Iterative%20Peer/Near-Peer%20Review%20as%20Tools%20to%20Improve%20Chemistry%20Communication%20Skills%20with%20General%20Audiences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Woodside,%20Audra%20J.&rft.date=2023-05-09&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1917&rft.epage=1925&rft.pages=1917-1925&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2814051551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2814051551&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |