Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?

Based on the 2013–2017 Chinese Family Database and China Household Finance Survey, this study examines the effect of farmland transfer on the income structure of agricultural households. We observe a significant rise in the income of transferred-out households, while that of transferred-in household...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7379
Hauptverfasser: Ke, Lian, Cheng, Shan, Chen, Diqiang, Li, Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 7379
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Ke, Lian
Cheng, Shan
Chen, Diqiang
Li, Ying
description Based on the 2013–2017 Chinese Family Database and China Household Finance Survey, this study examines the effect of farmland transfer on the income structure of agricultural households. We observe a significant rise in the income of transferred-out households, while that of transferred-in households is unchanged. A further empirical decomposition of income shows a significant increase in both the wage- and asset-generated incomes of transferred-out households. Although the income generated by transferred-in households through agricultural production and management increases significantly, the decrease in wage income is larger. The study’s empirical designs are robustly tested with propensity score matching and instrumental variables. Moreover, we conduct a comparative analysis of the external constraints faced by the two groups to explore the reasons for the divergence of the income effect. The results show that transferred-in households face highly pronounced external constraints in terms of capital, technology, and farmland size, while transferred-out households face relatively fewer impediments to non-agricultural employment. Our empirical results imply that external constraints can limit the social welfare improvements of agricultural land reform, suggesting that other complementary measures would be required for future policy improvements to function better.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su15097379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812741189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A749234601</galeid><sourcerecordid>A749234601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-1740d634eefa3e8215857863a100049f88f2e3a3cbddfc41dccb74e8726d1ae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4soOOZe_AQBnxQ6k6Zt2icZY3OFwUAnPpYsuWwdbbolKbpvb-ZE5-Xhjrvf_y7HBcEtwUNKc_xoO5LgnFGWXwS9CDMSEpzgy7P4OhhYu8XeKCU5SXvB_n1zQIVFbgOo0KJtAE2UAuFQq9CUm6bmWqKl4doqMN-ItpV1oB1agfsA0L9VAzJcdA6dK465QqNZ21nYtLW0TzfBleK1hcGP7wdv08lyPAvni-diPJqHgkbMhYTFWKY0BlCcQhaRJEtYllJO_O_jXGWZioByKlZSKhETKcSKxZCxKJWEA6X94O7Ud2fafQfWldu2M9qPLKOMRCwmJMs9NTxRa15DWWnVOsOFfxKayu8KqvL5EYvziMYpJl5w_0_gGQefbs07a8vi9eU_-3BihWmtNaDKnakabg4lweXxZOXfyegXiwyH0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812741189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ke, Lian ; Cheng, Shan ; Chen, Diqiang ; Li, Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Ke, Lian ; Cheng, Shan ; Chen, Diqiang ; Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><description>Based on the 2013–2017 Chinese Family Database and China Household Finance Survey, this study examines the effect of farmland transfer on the income structure of agricultural households. We observe a significant rise in the income of transferred-out households, while that of transferred-in households is unchanged. A further empirical decomposition of income shows a significant increase in both the wage- and asset-generated incomes of transferred-out households. Although the income generated by transferred-in households through agricultural production and management increases significantly, the decrease in wage income is larger. The study’s empirical designs are robustly tested with propensity score matching and instrumental variables. Moreover, we conduct a comparative analysis of the external constraints faced by the two groups to explore the reasons for the divergence of the income effect. The results show that transferred-in households face highly pronounced external constraints in terms of capital, technology, and farmland size, while transferred-out households face relatively fewer impediments to non-agricultural employment. Our empirical results imply that external constraints can limit the social welfare improvements of agricultural land reform, suggesting that other complementary measures would be required for future policy improvements to function better.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15097379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural resources ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Consumer finance companies ; Developing countries ; Efficient markets ; Employment ; Family income ; Farmers ; Farms ; Households ; Land reform ; LDCs ; Personal income ; Productivity ; Rural areas ; Surveys ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7379</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-1740d634eefa3e8215857863a100049f88f2e3a3cbddfc41dccb74e8726d1ae33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0391-0531</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ke, Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Diqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><title>Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Based on the 2013–2017 Chinese Family Database and China Household Finance Survey, this study examines the effect of farmland transfer on the income structure of agricultural households. We observe a significant rise in the income of transferred-out households, while that of transferred-in households is unchanged. A further empirical decomposition of income shows a significant increase in both the wage- and asset-generated incomes of transferred-out households. Although the income generated by transferred-in households through agricultural production and management increases significantly, the decrease in wage income is larger. The study’s empirical designs are robustly tested with propensity score matching and instrumental variables. Moreover, we conduct a comparative analysis of the external constraints faced by the two groups to explore the reasons for the divergence of the income effect. The results show that transferred-in households face highly pronounced external constraints in terms of capital, technology, and farmland size, while transferred-out households face relatively fewer impediments to non-agricultural employment. Our empirical results imply that external constraints can limit the social welfare improvements of agricultural land reform, suggesting that other complementary measures would be required for future policy improvements to function better.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Consumer finance companies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Efficient markets</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Personal income</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4soOOZe_AQBnxQ6k6Zt2icZY3OFwUAnPpYsuWwdbbolKbpvb-ZE5-Xhjrvf_y7HBcEtwUNKc_xoO5LgnFGWXwS9CDMSEpzgy7P4OhhYu8XeKCU5SXvB_n1zQIVFbgOo0KJtAE2UAuFQq9CUm6bmWqKl4doqMN-ItpV1oB1agfsA0L9VAzJcdA6dK465QqNZ21nYtLW0TzfBleK1hcGP7wdv08lyPAvni-diPJqHgkbMhYTFWKY0BlCcQhaRJEtYllJO_O_jXGWZioByKlZSKhETKcSKxZCxKJWEA6X94O7Ud2fafQfWldu2M9qPLKOMRCwmJMs9NTxRa15DWWnVOsOFfxKayu8KqvL5EYvziMYpJl5w_0_gGQefbs07a8vi9eU_-3BihWmtNaDKnakabg4lweXxZOXfyegXiwyH0Q</recordid><startdate>20230428</startdate><enddate>20230428</enddate><creator>Ke, Lian</creator><creator>Cheng, Shan</creator><creator>Chen, Diqiang</creator><creator>Li, Ying</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-0531</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230428</creationdate><title>Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?</title><author>Ke, Lian ; Cheng, Shan ; Chen, Diqiang ; Li, Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-1740d634eefa3e8215857863a100049f88f2e3a3cbddfc41dccb74e8726d1ae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Consumer finance companies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Efficient markets</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Personal income</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ke, Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Diqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ke, Lian</au><au>Cheng, Shan</au><au>Chen, Diqiang</au><au>Li, Ying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-04-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>7379</spage><pages>7379-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Based on the 2013–2017 Chinese Family Database and China Household Finance Survey, this study examines the effect of farmland transfer on the income structure of agricultural households. We observe a significant rise in the income of transferred-out households, while that of transferred-in households is unchanged. A further empirical decomposition of income shows a significant increase in both the wage- and asset-generated incomes of transferred-out households. Although the income generated by transferred-in households through agricultural production and management increases significantly, the decrease in wage income is larger. The study’s empirical designs are robustly tested with propensity score matching and instrumental variables. Moreover, we conduct a comparative analysis of the external constraints faced by the two groups to explore the reasons for the divergence of the income effect. The results show that transferred-in households face highly pronounced external constraints in terms of capital, technology, and farmland size, while transferred-out households face relatively fewer impediments to non-agricultural employment. Our empirical results imply that external constraints can limit the social welfare improvements of agricultural land reform, suggesting that other complementary measures would be required for future policy improvements to function better.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15097379</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-0531</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-04, Vol.15 (9), p.7379
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2812741189
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural land
Agricultural production
Agricultural resources
Agriculture
Analysis
Comparative analysis
Consumer finance companies
Developing countries
Efficient markets
Employment
Family income
Farmers
Farms
Households
Land reform
LDCs
Personal income
Productivity
Rural areas
Surveys
Sustainability
title Why Is the Income Effect of Farmland Transfer Inconsistent between Transferred-Out and Transferred-In Households?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A40%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Is%20the%20Income%20Effect%20of%20Farmland%20Transfer%20Inconsistent%20between%20Transferred-Out%20and%20Transferred-In%20Households?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Ke,%20Lian&rft.date=2023-04-28&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=7379&rft.pages=7379-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15097379&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA749234601%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812741189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A749234601&rfr_iscdi=true