Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas
Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q., and Liu, R., 2020. Geolocation accuracy evaluation of GF-4 geostationary high-resolution optical images over coastal zones and offshore areas. In: Jung, H.-S.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.H., and Cui, T. (eds.), Advances in Geospatial Research of Coastal Environment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of coastal research 2020-09, Vol.102 (sp1), p.326-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | sp1 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Journal of coastal research |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Wei, Yunhong Zhang, Ziye Mu, Bing Li, Ying Wang, Quanbin Liu, Rongjie |
description | Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q., and Liu, R., 2020. Geolocation accuracy evaluation of GF-4 geostationary high-resolution optical images over coastal zones and offshore areas. In: Jung, H.-S.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.H., and Cui, T. (eds.), Advances in Geospatial Research of Coastal Environments. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 102, pp. 326-333. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. GF-4 is the first high-resolution geostationary satellite launched by China in 2015 for disaster prevention and mitigation. It can provide high spatial (up to 50 m) and temporal resolution optical images. Autonomous geolocation accuracy is key for the application of satellite images, particularly for coastal zones, offshore areas, and even oceans with few ground control points (GCPs). Hence, this study characterizes the autonomous geometric accuracy of GF-4 panchromatic and multispectral sensor images over coastal zones and offshore areas, which is of particular importance for the monitoring of moving targets. The evaluation of nine GF-4 images based on 630 GCPs in coastal zones and offshore areas of the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea indicates a geolocation uncertainty of 1925 ± 976 m (39 ± 20 pixels). For GF-4 images with similar imaging geometry, the geolocation discrepancy is lower than that with different imaging geometry, with the geolocation discrepancy of 1 ± 1 and 30 ± 13 pixels, respectively. Although with the lower geolocation discrepancy, noticeable uncertainty occurs in the estimated velocity of moving targets for images with similar imaging geometry, particularly for low-speed targets, such as macro-algae. This suggests that geometric correction is needed before the speed of the moving target is extracted. The geolocation accuracy of GF-4 images through rational polynomial coefficient orthorectification without GCPs is also poor, with the geolocation uncertainty of 1350 ± 864 m, whereas the geolocation accuracy significantly improved by 8.2 times after five GCPs were added (distributed in the four corners and center of the image). |
doi_str_mv | 10.2112/SI102-039.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812430468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48639250</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48639250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4f1a4db719bf8eb5b33dfeb8a94574bb3c095348f3b36c3473368c7adacb722c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsr10LAlchoXjPJLEvpCwoFHxs3Q5JJ2inTSU1mCvXXGzvi0tWFc797LucAcIvRE8GYPL8uMCIJovkTPgMDnKY4SRHNzsEAcZYniCBxCa5C2CKEM8H4AHzNjKudlm3lGjjSuvNSH-HkIOuu15yFs2nCYORCe5KkP8J5td4kLya4ujtRq31baVnDxU6uTYDuYDwcOxkvavjhmijJpoQra8PGeQNH3shwDS6srIO5-Z1D8D6dvI3nyXI1W4xHy0RRzNuEWSxZqTjOlRVGpYrS0holZM5SzpSiGuUpZcJSRTNNGac0E5rLUmrFCdF0CO573713n50JbbF1nW_iy4IITBhFLBOReuwp7V0I3thi76tdzFpgVPyUW5zKLWK5BY70XU9vQ-v8H8pERnMSKx-Ch36vKhfj_-v1DQVyg5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812430468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Wei, Yunhong ; Zhang, Ziye ; Mu, Bing ; Li, Ying ; Wang, Quanbin ; Liu, Rongjie</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yunhong ; Zhang, Ziye ; Mu, Bing ; Li, Ying ; Wang, Quanbin ; Liu, Rongjie</creatorcontrib><description>Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q., and Liu, R., 2020. Geolocation accuracy evaluation of GF-4 geostationary high-resolution optical images over coastal zones and offshore areas. In: Jung, H.-S.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.H., and Cui, T. (eds.), Advances in Geospatial Research of Coastal Environments. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 102, pp. 326-333. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. GF-4 is the first high-resolution geostationary satellite launched by China in 2015 for disaster prevention and mitigation. It can provide high spatial (up to 50 m) and temporal resolution optical images. Autonomous geolocation accuracy is key for the application of satellite images, particularly for coastal zones, offshore areas, and even oceans with few ground control points (GCPs). Hence, this study characterizes the autonomous geometric accuracy of GF-4 panchromatic and multispectral sensor images over coastal zones and offshore areas, which is of particular importance for the monitoring of moving targets. The evaluation of nine GF-4 images based on 630 GCPs in coastal zones and offshore areas of the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea indicates a geolocation uncertainty of 1925 ± 976 m (39 ± 20 pixels). For GF-4 images with similar imaging geometry, the geolocation discrepancy is lower than that with different imaging geometry, with the geolocation discrepancy of 1 ± 1 and 30 ± 13 pixels, respectively. Although with the lower geolocation discrepancy, noticeable uncertainty occurs in the estimated velocity of moving targets for images with similar imaging geometry, particularly for low-speed targets, such as macro-algae. This suggests that geometric correction is needed before the speed of the moving target is extracted. The geolocation accuracy of GF-4 images through rational polynomial coefficient orthorectification without GCPs is also poor, with the geolocation uncertainty of 1350 ± 864 m, whereas the geolocation accuracy significantly improved by 8.2 times after five GCPs were added (distributed in the four corners and center of the image).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-0208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2112/SI102-039.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: Coastal Education and Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algae ; Coastal environments ; Coastal inlets ; Coastal research ; Coastal zone ; Coastal zones ; Deforestation ; Emergency preparedness ; geolocation ; Geometric accuracy ; Geometry ; geostationary satellite ; GF-4 ; High resolution ; Image resolution ; Imaging techniques ; Low speed ; Mitigation ; Moving targets ; ocean ; Oceans ; Offshore ; Pixels ; Polynomials ; Resolution ; Satellite imagery ; Synchronous satellites ; Temporal resolution ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal research, 2020-09, Vol.102 (sp1), p.326-333</ispartof><rights>Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Inc. Fall 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4f1a4db719bf8eb5b33dfeb8a94574bb3c095348f3b36c3473368c7adacb722c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48639250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48639250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Quanbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rongjie</creatorcontrib><title>Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas</title><title>Journal of coastal research</title><description>Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q., and Liu, R., 2020. Geolocation accuracy evaluation of GF-4 geostationary high-resolution optical images over coastal zones and offshore areas. In: Jung, H.-S.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.H., and Cui, T. (eds.), Advances in Geospatial Research of Coastal Environments. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 102, pp. 326-333. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. GF-4 is the first high-resolution geostationary satellite launched by China in 2015 for disaster prevention and mitigation. It can provide high spatial (up to 50 m) and temporal resolution optical images. Autonomous geolocation accuracy is key for the application of satellite images, particularly for coastal zones, offshore areas, and even oceans with few ground control points (GCPs). Hence, this study characterizes the autonomous geometric accuracy of GF-4 panchromatic and multispectral sensor images over coastal zones and offshore areas, which is of particular importance for the monitoring of moving targets. The evaluation of nine GF-4 images based on 630 GCPs in coastal zones and offshore areas of the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea indicates a geolocation uncertainty of 1925 ± 976 m (39 ± 20 pixels). For GF-4 images with similar imaging geometry, the geolocation discrepancy is lower than that with different imaging geometry, with the geolocation discrepancy of 1 ± 1 and 30 ± 13 pixels, respectively. Although with the lower geolocation discrepancy, noticeable uncertainty occurs in the estimated velocity of moving targets for images with similar imaging geometry, particularly for low-speed targets, such as macro-algae. This suggests that geometric correction is needed before the speed of the moving target is extracted. The geolocation accuracy of GF-4 images through rational polynomial coefficient orthorectification without GCPs is also poor, with the geolocation uncertainty of 1350 ± 864 m, whereas the geolocation accuracy significantly improved by 8.2 times after five GCPs were added (distributed in the four corners and center of the image).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Coastal research</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Coastal zones</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>geolocation</subject><subject>Geometric accuracy</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>geostationary satellite</subject><subject>GF-4</subject><subject>High resolution</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Low speed</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Moving targets</subject><subject>ocean</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Synchronous satellites</subject><subject>Temporal resolution</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0749-0208</issn><issn>1551-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsr10LAlchoXjPJLEvpCwoFHxs3Q5JJ2inTSU1mCvXXGzvi0tWFc797LucAcIvRE8GYPL8uMCIJovkTPgMDnKY4SRHNzsEAcZYniCBxCa5C2CKEM8H4AHzNjKudlm3lGjjSuvNSH-HkIOuu15yFs2nCYORCe5KkP8J5td4kLya4ujtRq31baVnDxU6uTYDuYDwcOxkvavjhmijJpoQra8PGeQNH3shwDS6srIO5-Z1D8D6dvI3nyXI1W4xHy0RRzNuEWSxZqTjOlRVGpYrS0holZM5SzpSiGuUpZcJSRTNNGac0E5rLUmrFCdF0CO573713n50JbbF1nW_iy4IITBhFLBOReuwp7V0I3thi76tdzFpgVPyUW5zKLWK5BY70XU9vQ-v8H8pERnMSKx-Ch36vKhfj_-v1DQVyg5Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Wei, Yunhong</creator><creator>Zhang, Ziye</creator><creator>Mu, Bing</creator><creator>Li, Ying</creator><creator>Wang, Quanbin</creator><creator>Liu, Rongjie</creator><general>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</general><general>Allen Press Publishing</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas</title><author>Wei, Yunhong ; Zhang, Ziye ; Mu, Bing ; Li, Ying ; Wang, Quanbin ; Liu, Rongjie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-4f1a4db719bf8eb5b33dfeb8a94574bb3c095348f3b36c3473368c7adacb722c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Coastal research</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Coastal zones</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>geolocation</topic><topic>Geometric accuracy</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>geostationary satellite</topic><topic>GF-4</topic><topic>High resolution</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Low speed</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Moving targets</topic><topic>ocean</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Synchronous satellites</topic><topic>Temporal resolution</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Quanbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rongjie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Yunhong</au><au>Zhang, Ziye</au><au>Mu, Bing</au><au>Li, Ying</au><au>Wang, Quanbin</au><au>Liu, Rongjie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>sp1</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>326-333</pages><issn>0749-0208</issn><eissn>1551-5036</eissn><abstract>Wei, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q., and Liu, R., 2020. Geolocation accuracy evaluation of GF-4 geostationary high-resolution optical images over coastal zones and offshore areas. In: Jung, H.-S.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.H., and Cui, T. (eds.), Advances in Geospatial Research of Coastal Environments. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 102, pp. 326-333. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. GF-4 is the first high-resolution geostationary satellite launched by China in 2015 for disaster prevention and mitigation. It can provide high spatial (up to 50 m) and temporal resolution optical images. Autonomous geolocation accuracy is key for the application of satellite images, particularly for coastal zones, offshore areas, and even oceans with few ground control points (GCPs). Hence, this study characterizes the autonomous geometric accuracy of GF-4 panchromatic and multispectral sensor images over coastal zones and offshore areas, which is of particular importance for the monitoring of moving targets. The evaluation of nine GF-4 images based on 630 GCPs in coastal zones and offshore areas of the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea indicates a geolocation uncertainty of 1925 ± 976 m (39 ± 20 pixels). For GF-4 images with similar imaging geometry, the geolocation discrepancy is lower than that with different imaging geometry, with the geolocation discrepancy of 1 ± 1 and 30 ± 13 pixels, respectively. Although with the lower geolocation discrepancy, noticeable uncertainty occurs in the estimated velocity of moving targets for images with similar imaging geometry, particularly for low-speed targets, such as macro-algae. This suggests that geometric correction is needed before the speed of the moving target is extracted. The geolocation accuracy of GF-4 images through rational polynomial coefficient orthorectification without GCPs is also poor, with the geolocation uncertainty of 1350 ± 864 m, whereas the geolocation accuracy significantly improved by 8.2 times after five GCPs were added (distributed in the four corners and center of the image).</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</pub><doi>10.2112/SI102-039.1</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-0208 |
ispartof | Journal of coastal research, 2020-09, Vol.102 (sp1), p.326-333 |
issn | 0749-0208 1551-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2812430468 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Accuracy Algae Coastal environments Coastal inlets Coastal research Coastal zone Coastal zones Deforestation Emergency preparedness geolocation Geometric accuracy Geometry geostationary satellite GF-4 High resolution Image resolution Imaging techniques Low speed Mitigation Moving targets ocean Oceans Offshore Pixels Polynomials Resolution Satellite imagery Synchronous satellites Temporal resolution Uncertainty |
title | Geolocation Accuracy Evaluation of GF-4 Geostationary High-Resolution Optical Images over Coastal Zones and Offshore Areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geolocation%20Accuracy%20Evaluation%20of%20GF-4%20Geostationary%20High-Resolution%20Optical%20Images%20over%20Coastal%20Zones%20and%20Offshore%20Areas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20research&rft.au=Wei,%20Yunhong&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=sp1&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=326-333&rft.issn=0749-0208&rft.eissn=1551-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.2112/SI102-039.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48639250%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812430468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48639250&rfr_iscdi=true |