How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement
In the past three decades nonviolent social protest has become the most reliable path to democracy. However, not all nonviolent mobilization campaigns succeed. To examine why some nonviolent campaigns are more successful than others, we analyze the use of a particular type of activist campaign tacti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of democracy 2023, Vol.34 (1), p.110-125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 110 |
container_title | Journal of democracy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | McClennen, Sophia Popovic, Srdja Wright, Joseph |
description | In the past three decades nonviolent social protest has become the most reliable path to democracy. However, not all nonviolent mobilization campaigns succeed. To examine why some nonviolent campaigns are more successful than others, we analyze the use of a particular type of activist campaign tactic, the "dilemma action." The dilemma action is a nonviolent civil-disobedience tactic that provokes a "response dilemma" for the target. Collecting original data on dilemma actions during nonviolent activist campaigns, we find that roughly one-third of mass nonviolent campaigns in the past century deploy this strategy. We theorize four mechanisms linking dilemma actions to nonviolent activist campaign success: facilitating group formation, delegitimizing opponents, reducing fear, and generating sympathetic media coverage. Finally, we assess whether dilemma actions increase campaign success rates, finding that dilemma actions are associated with an increase of 11–16 percent in activist-campaign success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jod.2023.0007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2812065627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2812065627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ebf1a68ac0319935a767d48e57caad6ceeb375be2ff78f50b59d97fc57dab9693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhS0EEqUwskeCNcWP-DWiCihSgaEwW45zLRq1cbGTIv59YxXBdM_wnXOlD6FrgmeEcXbXhmZGMWUzjLE8QROClSgZJdVpzhUvuWTiHF2k1I6ErriaoNtF-C76UKw-bdxBV9jiNXT7ddhA1xcvYQ_bMVyiM283Ca5-7xR9PD68zxfl8u3peX6_LB2rdF9C7YkVyjrMiNaMWylkUyng0lnbCAdQM8lroN5L5TmuuW609I7LxtZaaDZFN8fdXQxfA6TetGGI3fjSUEUoFlxQOVLlkXIxpBTBm11cb238MQSbLGJsNSaLMFnEyFd_qy24fjsk-B9WkitMzSrLyq4oI7ml2AFTwV_d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2812065627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement</title><source>Project Muse</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>McClennen, Sophia ; Popovic, Srdja ; Wright, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>McClennen, Sophia ; Popovic, Srdja ; Wright, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>In the past three decades nonviolent social protest has become the most reliable path to democracy. However, not all nonviolent mobilization campaigns succeed. To examine why some nonviolent campaigns are more successful than others, we analyze the use of a particular type of activist campaign tactic, the "dilemma action." The dilemma action is a nonviolent civil-disobedience tactic that provokes a "response dilemma" for the target. Collecting original data on dilemma actions during nonviolent activist campaigns, we find that roughly one-third of mass nonviolent campaigns in the past century deploy this strategy. We theorize four mechanisms linking dilemma actions to nonviolent activist campaign success: facilitating group formation, delegitimizing opponents, reducing fear, and generating sympathetic media coverage. Finally, we assess whether dilemma actions increase campaign success rates, finding that dilemma actions are associated with an increase of 11–16 percent in activist-campaign success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-5736</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-3214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jod.2023.0007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Action ; Activists ; Campaigns ; Civil disobedience ; Curfews ; Democracy ; Demonstrations & protests ; Group formation ; Independence movements ; Media coverage ; Mobilization ; Nonviolence ; Propaganda ; Success ; Television sets</subject><ispartof>Journal of democracy, 2023, Vol.34 (1), p.110-125</ispartof><rights>Copyright © National Endowment for Democracy and the Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Jan 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ebf1a68ac0319935a767d48e57caad6ceeb375be2ff78f50b59d97fc57dab9693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/article/875802/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gprojectmuse$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/article/875802$$EHTML$$P50$$Gprojectmuse$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,12845,21127,27923,27924,27925,56842,57402</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClennen, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popovic, Srdja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement</title><title>Journal of democracy</title><description>In the past three decades nonviolent social protest has become the most reliable path to democracy. However, not all nonviolent mobilization campaigns succeed. To examine why some nonviolent campaigns are more successful than others, we analyze the use of a particular type of activist campaign tactic, the "dilemma action." The dilemma action is a nonviolent civil-disobedience tactic that provokes a "response dilemma" for the target. Collecting original data on dilemma actions during nonviolent activist campaigns, we find that roughly one-third of mass nonviolent campaigns in the past century deploy this strategy. We theorize four mechanisms linking dilemma actions to nonviolent activist campaign success: facilitating group formation, delegitimizing opponents, reducing fear, and generating sympathetic media coverage. Finally, we assess whether dilemma actions increase campaign success rates, finding that dilemma actions are associated with an increase of 11–16 percent in activist-campaign success.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Activists</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Civil disobedience</subject><subject>Curfews</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Group formation</subject><subject>Independence movements</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Television sets</subject><issn>1045-5736</issn><issn>1086-3214</issn><issn>1086-3214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhS0EEqUwskeCNcWP-DWiCihSgaEwW45zLRq1cbGTIv59YxXBdM_wnXOlD6FrgmeEcXbXhmZGMWUzjLE8QROClSgZJdVpzhUvuWTiHF2k1I6ErriaoNtF-C76UKw-bdxBV9jiNXT7ddhA1xcvYQ_bMVyiM283Ca5-7xR9PD68zxfl8u3peX6_LB2rdF9C7YkVyjrMiNaMWylkUyng0lnbCAdQM8lroN5L5TmuuW609I7LxtZaaDZFN8fdXQxfA6TetGGI3fjSUEUoFlxQOVLlkXIxpBTBm11cb238MQSbLGJsNSaLMFnEyFd_qy24fjsk-B9WkitMzSrLyq4oI7ml2AFTwV_d</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>McClennen, Sophia</creator><creator>Popovic, Srdja</creator><creator>Wright, Joseph</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement</title><author>McClennen, Sophia ; Popovic, Srdja ; Wright, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ebf1a68ac0319935a767d48e57caad6ceeb375be2ff78f50b59d97fc57dab9693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Activists</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Civil disobedience</topic><topic>Curfews</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Group formation</topic><topic>Independence movements</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Television sets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClennen, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popovic, Srdja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of democracy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClennen, Sophia</au><au>Popovic, Srdja</au><au>Wright, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of democracy</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>110-125</pages><issn>1045-5736</issn><issn>1086-3214</issn><eissn>1086-3214</eissn><abstract>In the past three decades nonviolent social protest has become the most reliable path to democracy. However, not all nonviolent mobilization campaigns succeed. To examine why some nonviolent campaigns are more successful than others, we analyze the use of a particular type of activist campaign tactic, the "dilemma action." The dilemma action is a nonviolent civil-disobedience tactic that provokes a "response dilemma" for the target. Collecting original data on dilemma actions during nonviolent activist campaigns, we find that roughly one-third of mass nonviolent campaigns in the past century deploy this strategy. We theorize four mechanisms linking dilemma actions to nonviolent activist campaign success: facilitating group formation, delegitimizing opponents, reducing fear, and generating sympathetic media coverage. Finally, we assess whether dilemma actions increase campaign success rates, finding that dilemma actions are associated with an increase of 11–16 percent in activist-campaign success.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jod.2023.0007</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-5736 |
ispartof | Journal of democracy, 2023, Vol.34 (1), p.110-125 |
issn | 1045-5736 1086-3214 1086-3214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2812065627 |
source | Project Muse; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Action Activists Campaigns Civil disobedience Curfews Democracy Demonstrations & protests Group formation Independence movements Media coverage Mobilization Nonviolence Propaganda Success Television sets |
title | How to Sharpen a Nonviolent Movement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Sharpen%20a%20Nonviolent%20Movement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20democracy&rft.au=McClennen,%20Sophia&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=110-125&rft.issn=1045-5736&rft.eissn=1086-3214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jod.2023.0007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2812065627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2812065627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |