Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance
An analytical model for a two-layer Timoshenko beam allowing for interlayer slip, uplift, and relative rotations of the layers’ cross-sections (distortion) is presented and solved in closed form. Each kinematic field at the interface is related to a corresponding traction by means of a linear-elasti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Meccanica (Milan) 2023, Vol.58 (5), p.893-918 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 918 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 893 |
container_title | Meccanica (Milan) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Siciliano, Alfio Francesco Škec, Leo Jelenić, Gordan |
description | An analytical model for a two-layer Timoshenko beam allowing for interlayer slip, uplift, and relative rotations of the layers’ cross-sections (distortion) is presented and solved in closed form. Each kinematic field at the interface is related to a corresponding traction by means of a linear-elastic law. The proposed model introduces the rotational stiffness at the interface, completely separate from the tangential and normal stiffness, that may restrict the amount of interlayer distortion at the interface. The derived closed-form solutions provide an exact stiffness matrix for any case of boundary and continuity conditions. All solutions are also valid if the effect of the rotational stiffness is excluded. Based on the presented parametric studies it can be concluded that in addition to the known effects of the tangential and normal stiffness of the interface, its rotational stiffness may strongly affect the behaviour of a composite beam. It has been also noticed that for certain combinations of parameters of the interface, a layer that is not directly loaded can bend opposite from the direction of the load. This peculiar effect has been discussed in detail, showing that it is not an artefact of the present model, but a possible physical behaviour that may have practical implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2811253629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811253629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-38fe3ae33ea3b85932d7e80fa2a8fa3ef825f8cd29ae8699162a1c3d4d302fa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAq9F8bLbZoxS_oOClnkO6O7Gpu5s1yVL6701dwZunYYbnfQcehK4ZvWOULu4jY5RxQrkglJVSkuIEzZhccFKVhTpFM0q5JGUh5Tm6iHFHaY5ROUNu2foIDbE-dDj6dkzO9xHnFae9J605QMBr1_m4hf7T4w2YLuK9S1vs-gRhAmLrhls8Dq2zCZu-wcEnc2zCte_y1fQ1XKIza9oIV79zjt6fHtfLF7J6e35dPqxILViViFAWhAEhwIiNkpXgzQIUtYYbZY0Aq7i0qm54ZUCVVcVKblgtmqIRlFsjxRzdTL1D8F8jxKR3fgx9fqm5YoxLUfIqU3yi6uBjDGD1EFxnwkEzqo9K9aRUZ6X6R6kuckhMoZjh_gPCX_U_qW_irXtc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811253629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco ; Škec, Leo ; Jelenić, Gordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco ; Škec, Leo ; Jelenić, Gordan</creatorcontrib><description>An analytical model for a two-layer Timoshenko beam allowing for interlayer slip, uplift, and relative rotations of the layers’ cross-sections (distortion) is presented and solved in closed form. Each kinematic field at the interface is related to a corresponding traction by means of a linear-elastic law. The proposed model introduces the rotational stiffness at the interface, completely separate from the tangential and normal stiffness, that may restrict the amount of interlayer distortion at the interface. The derived closed-form solutions provide an exact stiffness matrix for any case of boundary and continuity conditions. All solutions are also valid if the effect of the rotational stiffness is excluded. Based on the presented parametric studies it can be concluded that in addition to the known effects of the tangential and normal stiffness of the interface, its rotational stiffness may strongly affect the behaviour of a composite beam. It has been also noticed that for certain combinations of parameters of the interface, a layer that is not directly loaded can bend opposite from the direction of the load. This peculiar effect has been discussed in detail, showing that it is not an artefact of the present model, but a possible physical behaviour that may have practical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-6455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Automotive Engineering ; Civil Engineering ; Classical Mechanics ; Closed form solutions ; Composite beams ; Distortion ; Engineering ; Exact solutions ; Interlayers ; Kinematics ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical Engineering ; Modulus of elasticity ; Stiffness matrix ; Timoshenko beams ; Uplift</subject><ispartof>Meccanica (Milan), 2023, Vol.58 (5), p.893-918</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-38fe3ae33ea3b85932d7e80fa2a8fa3ef825f8cd29ae8699162a1c3d4d302fa53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-38fe3ae33ea3b85932d7e80fa2a8fa3ef825f8cd29ae8699162a1c3d4d302fa53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0074-7169</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelenić, Gordan</creatorcontrib><title>Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance</title><title>Meccanica (Milan)</title><addtitle>Meccanica</addtitle><description>An analytical model for a two-layer Timoshenko beam allowing for interlayer slip, uplift, and relative rotations of the layers’ cross-sections (distortion) is presented and solved in closed form. Each kinematic field at the interface is related to a corresponding traction by means of a linear-elastic law. The proposed model introduces the rotational stiffness at the interface, completely separate from the tangential and normal stiffness, that may restrict the amount of interlayer distortion at the interface. The derived closed-form solutions provide an exact stiffness matrix for any case of boundary and continuity conditions. All solutions are also valid if the effect of the rotational stiffness is excluded. Based on the presented parametric studies it can be concluded that in addition to the known effects of the tangential and normal stiffness of the interface, its rotational stiffness may strongly affect the behaviour of a composite beam. It has been also noticed that for certain combinations of parameters of the interface, a layer that is not directly loaded can bend opposite from the direction of the load. This peculiar effect has been discussed in detail, showing that it is not an artefact of the present model, but a possible physical behaviour that may have practical implications.</description><subject>Automotive Engineering</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Closed form solutions</subject><subject>Composite beams</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Interlayers</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Stiffness matrix</subject><subject>Timoshenko beams</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><issn>0025-6455</issn><issn>1572-9648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAq9F8bLbZoxS_oOClnkO6O7Gpu5s1yVL6701dwZunYYbnfQcehK4ZvWOULu4jY5RxQrkglJVSkuIEzZhccFKVhTpFM0q5JGUh5Tm6iHFHaY5ROUNu2foIDbE-dDj6dkzO9xHnFae9J605QMBr1_m4hf7T4w2YLuK9S1vs-gRhAmLrhls8Dq2zCZu-wcEnc2zCte_y1fQ1XKIza9oIV79zjt6fHtfLF7J6e35dPqxILViViFAWhAEhwIiNkpXgzQIUtYYbZY0Aq7i0qm54ZUCVVcVKblgtmqIRlFsjxRzdTL1D8F8jxKR3fgx9fqm5YoxLUfIqU3yi6uBjDGD1EFxnwkEzqo9K9aRUZ6X6R6kuckhMoZjh_gPCX_U_qW_irXtc</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco</creator><creator>Škec, Leo</creator><creator>Jelenić, Gordan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-7169</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance</title><author>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco ; Škec, Leo ; Jelenić, Gordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-38fe3ae33ea3b85932d7e80fa2a8fa3ef825f8cd29ae8699162a1c3d4d302fa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Automotive Engineering</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Closed form solutions</topic><topic>Composite beams</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Interlayers</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Stiffness matrix</topic><topic>Timoshenko beams</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škec, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelenić, Gordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Meccanica (Milan)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siciliano, Alfio Francesco</au><au>Škec, Leo</au><au>Jelenić, Gordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance</atitle><jtitle>Meccanica (Milan)</jtitle><stitle>Meccanica</stitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>893</spage><epage>918</epage><pages>893-918</pages><issn>0025-6455</issn><eissn>1572-9648</eissn><abstract>An analytical model for a two-layer Timoshenko beam allowing for interlayer slip, uplift, and relative rotations of the layers’ cross-sections (distortion) is presented and solved in closed form. Each kinematic field at the interface is related to a corresponding traction by means of a linear-elastic law. The proposed model introduces the rotational stiffness at the interface, completely separate from the tangential and normal stiffness, that may restrict the amount of interlayer distortion at the interface. The derived closed-form solutions provide an exact stiffness matrix for any case of boundary and continuity conditions. All solutions are also valid if the effect of the rotational stiffness is excluded. Based on the presented parametric studies it can be concluded that in addition to the known effects of the tangential and normal stiffness of the interface, its rotational stiffness may strongly affect the behaviour of a composite beam. It has been also noticed that for certain combinations of parameters of the interface, a layer that is not directly loaded can bend opposite from the direction of the load. This peculiar effect has been discussed in detail, showing that it is not an artefact of the present model, but a possible physical behaviour that may have practical implications.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-7169</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-6455 |
ispartof | Meccanica (Milan), 2023, Vol.58 (5), p.893-918 |
issn | 0025-6455 1572-9648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2811253629 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering Classical Mechanics Closed form solutions Composite beams Distortion Engineering Exact solutions Interlayers Kinematics Mathematical models Mechanical Engineering Modulus of elasticity Stiffness matrix Timoshenko beams Uplift |
title | Closed-form solutions for two-layer Timoshenko beams with interlayer slip, uplift and rotation compliance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closed-form%20solutions%20for%20two-layer%20Timoshenko%20beams%20with%20interlayer%20slip,%20uplift%20and%20rotation%20compliance&rft.jtitle=Meccanica%20(Milan)&rft.au=Siciliano,%20Alfio%20Francesco&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=893&rft.epage=918&rft.pages=893-918&rft.issn=0025-6455&rft.eissn=1572-9648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11012-023-01655-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811253629%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811253629&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |