Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure
AbstractFailure modes of flexurally strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be broadly classified into full-bond response and partial-bond response. Among these, peeling (premature failure) and shear-block failure are closely related and cause catastrophic collapse. Provisions in current des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Practice periodical on structural design and construction 2023-08, Vol.28 (3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Practice periodical on structural design and construction |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Khan, Mohammad Arsalan El-Rimawi, Jamal |
description | AbstractFailure modes of flexurally strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be broadly classified into full-bond response and partial-bond response. Among these, peeling (premature failure) and shear-block failure are closely related and cause catastrophic collapse. Provisions in current design standards are largely generalized (too simplified or too complex), and tend to ignore some key parameters. In particular, design standards have not clearly characterized the effect of shear on the peeling. In this work, experiments and numerical studies have been conducted to investigate the shear-peeling failure and differentiate it from other failure modes. The results have been used to extend the existing design recommendations. The proposed design procedure and the finite element (FE) models are validated, and the outcome is compared with the literature. The comparison and the use of the Chi-squared test showed that the proposed design formulations are more appropriate for calculating the moment capacity and predicting the sequence of failure modes of plated RC beams.
Practical ApplicationsDeterioration of the structure, an increased applied load, or an error in the design are only a few of the causes for the requirement for external strengthening. For example, the beams of many bridges and other constructed facilities urgently need strengthening (external reinforcement). After being retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel plate at the soffit, RC beams are vulnerable to various failure modes, including conventional failures and undesired early failures (such as plate debonding and peeling). The current design standards either include provisions that could be more generic (too simplistic) or more complicated for practitioners to utilize. Further, the focus is needed on some critical aspects and parameters that determine the failure type. For instance, since shear failure (not a premature failure type) and peeling (a premature failure type) may seem to be comparable in certain circumstances, it is essential that design guidelines accurately specify the influence of shear on the peeling. Although shear failure is also an abrupt failure, it is not uncertain. Therefore, this study provides handy guidelines (in the form of a graphic/diagram/chart) to help professionals evaluate existing structures that have undergone flexural strengthening in the past or to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of such failures occurring during the design |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2810936175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2810936175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a264t-9a736e4274d7a04d7584329cd171d0fc4f6a863059cf4d3a9918e5ffb2f81f173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuC15lJmybNpZZ1CkOLVdldiO3J1tG1M2nB_XszK3jlzfmA5z0HHoSuKZlRwultnhdptpoV6fxpgWkYshM0oZJFOI4FP_UzSRgmPCHn6MK5LSGUCcInaJUDNHW7xu9g3eBwsQFtg0zXzWDBBXUb5BZ2uvdbcwjSrmn03nk-eEmDe9A7FxS9hXbdb6CF6shnDXx5-hKdGd04uPrtU_SWzV_TB7x8Xjymd0usQ856LLWIOLBQsEpo4kucsCiUZUUFrYgpmeE64RGJZWlYFWkpaQKxMR-hSaihIpqim_Hu3nafA7hebbvBtv6lChNKZMSpiD1FR6q0nXMWjNrbeqftQVGijgLVKFD9CFRHgT4zGzPalfB39f_ANwDXcuM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2810936175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan ; El-Rimawi, Jamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan ; El-Rimawi, Jamal</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractFailure modes of flexurally strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be broadly classified into full-bond response and partial-bond response. Among these, peeling (premature failure) and shear-block failure are closely related and cause catastrophic collapse. Provisions in current design standards are largely generalized (too simplified or too complex), and tend to ignore some key parameters. In particular, design standards have not clearly characterized the effect of shear on the peeling. In this work, experiments and numerical studies have been conducted to investigate the shear-peeling failure and differentiate it from other failure modes. The results have been used to extend the existing design recommendations. The proposed design procedure and the finite element (FE) models are validated, and the outcome is compared with the literature. The comparison and the use of the Chi-squared test showed that the proposed design formulations are more appropriate for calculating the moment capacity and predicting the sequence of failure modes of plated RC beams.
Practical ApplicationsDeterioration of the structure, an increased applied load, or an error in the design are only a few of the causes for the requirement for external strengthening. For example, the beams of many bridges and other constructed facilities urgently need strengthening (external reinforcement). After being retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel plate at the soffit, RC beams are vulnerable to various failure modes, including conventional failures and undesired early failures (such as plate debonding and peeling). The current design standards either include provisions that could be more generic (too simplistic) or more complicated for practitioners to utilize. Further, the focus is needed on some critical aspects and parameters that determine the failure type. For instance, since shear failure (not a premature failure type) and peeling (a premature failure type) may seem to be comparable in certain circumstances, it is essential that design guidelines accurately specify the influence of shear on the peeling. Although shear failure is also an abrupt failure, it is not uncertain. Therefore, this study provides handy guidelines (in the form of a graphic/diagram/chart) to help professionals evaluate existing structures that have undergone flexural strengthening in the past or to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of such failures occurring during the design phase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-0680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Catastrophic collapse ; Catastrophic failure analysis ; Chi-square test ; Design parameters ; Design standards ; Failure ; Failure modes ; Finite element method ; Peeling ; Reinforced concrete ; Shear ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 2023-08, Vol.28 (3)</ispartof><rights>2023 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a264t-9a736e4274d7a04d7584329cd171d0fc4f6a863059cf4d3a9918e5ffb2f81f173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2841-6473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,75939,75947</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Rimawi, Jamal</creatorcontrib><title>Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure</title><title>Practice periodical on structural design and construction</title><description>AbstractFailure modes of flexurally strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be broadly classified into full-bond response and partial-bond response. Among these, peeling (premature failure) and shear-block failure are closely related and cause catastrophic collapse. Provisions in current design standards are largely generalized (too simplified or too complex), and tend to ignore some key parameters. In particular, design standards have not clearly characterized the effect of shear on the peeling. In this work, experiments and numerical studies have been conducted to investigate the shear-peeling failure and differentiate it from other failure modes. The results have been used to extend the existing design recommendations. The proposed design procedure and the finite element (FE) models are validated, and the outcome is compared with the literature. The comparison and the use of the Chi-squared test showed that the proposed design formulations are more appropriate for calculating the moment capacity and predicting the sequence of failure modes of plated RC beams.
Practical ApplicationsDeterioration of the structure, an increased applied load, or an error in the design are only a few of the causes for the requirement for external strengthening. For example, the beams of many bridges and other constructed facilities urgently need strengthening (external reinforcement). After being retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel plate at the soffit, RC beams are vulnerable to various failure modes, including conventional failures and undesired early failures (such as plate debonding and peeling). The current design standards either include provisions that could be more generic (too simplistic) or more complicated for practitioners to utilize. Further, the focus is needed on some critical aspects and parameters that determine the failure type. For instance, since shear failure (not a premature failure type) and peeling (a premature failure type) may seem to be comparable in certain circumstances, it is essential that design guidelines accurately specify the influence of shear on the peeling. Although shear failure is also an abrupt failure, it is not uncertain. Therefore, this study provides handy guidelines (in the form of a graphic/diagram/chart) to help professionals evaluate existing structures that have undergone flexural strengthening in the past or to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of such failures occurring during the design phase.</description><subject>Catastrophic collapse</subject><subject>Catastrophic failure analysis</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Peeling</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>1084-0680</issn><issn>1943-5576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuC15lJmybNpZZ1CkOLVdldiO3J1tG1M2nB_XszK3jlzfmA5z0HHoSuKZlRwultnhdptpoV6fxpgWkYshM0oZJFOI4FP_UzSRgmPCHn6MK5LSGUCcInaJUDNHW7xu9g3eBwsQFtg0zXzWDBBXUb5BZ2uvdbcwjSrmn03nk-eEmDe9A7FxS9hXbdb6CF6shnDXx5-hKdGd04uPrtU_SWzV_TB7x8Xjymd0usQ856LLWIOLBQsEpo4kucsCiUZUUFrYgpmeE64RGJZWlYFWkpaQKxMR-hSaihIpqim_Hu3nafA7hebbvBtv6lChNKZMSpiD1FR6q0nXMWjNrbeqftQVGijgLVKFD9CFRHgT4zGzPalfB39f_ANwDXcuM</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan</creator><creator>El-Rimawi, Jamal</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2841-6473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure</title><author>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan ; El-Rimawi, Jamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a264t-9a736e4274d7a04d7584329cd171d0fc4f6a863059cf4d3a9918e5ffb2f81f173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Catastrophic collapse</topic><topic>Catastrophic failure analysis</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Peeling</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Rimawi, Jamal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Practice periodical on structural design and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Mohammad Arsalan</au><au>El-Rimawi, Jamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure</atitle><jtitle>Practice periodical on structural design and construction</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1084-0680</issn><eissn>1943-5576</eissn><abstract>AbstractFailure modes of flexurally strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be broadly classified into full-bond response and partial-bond response. Among these, peeling (premature failure) and shear-block failure are closely related and cause catastrophic collapse. Provisions in current design standards are largely generalized (too simplified or too complex), and tend to ignore some key parameters. In particular, design standards have not clearly characterized the effect of shear on the peeling. In this work, experiments and numerical studies have been conducted to investigate the shear-peeling failure and differentiate it from other failure modes. The results have been used to extend the existing design recommendations. The proposed design procedure and the finite element (FE) models are validated, and the outcome is compared with the literature. The comparison and the use of the Chi-squared test showed that the proposed design formulations are more appropriate for calculating the moment capacity and predicting the sequence of failure modes of plated RC beams.
Practical ApplicationsDeterioration of the structure, an increased applied load, or an error in the design are only a few of the causes for the requirement for external strengthening. For example, the beams of many bridges and other constructed facilities urgently need strengthening (external reinforcement). After being retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) or steel plate at the soffit, RC beams are vulnerable to various failure modes, including conventional failures and undesired early failures (such as plate debonding and peeling). The current design standards either include provisions that could be more generic (too simplistic) or more complicated for practitioners to utilize. Further, the focus is needed on some critical aspects and parameters that determine the failure type. For instance, since shear failure (not a premature failure type) and peeling (a premature failure type) may seem to be comparable in certain circumstances, it is essential that design guidelines accurately specify the influence of shear on the peeling. Although shear failure is also an abrupt failure, it is not uncertain. Therefore, this study provides handy guidelines (in the form of a graphic/diagram/chart) to help professionals evaluate existing structures that have undergone flexural strengthening in the past or to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of such failures occurring during the design phase.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2841-6473</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1084-0680 |
ispartof | Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 2023-08, Vol.28 (3) |
issn | 1084-0680 1943-5576 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2810936175 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Catastrophic collapse Catastrophic failure analysis Chi-square test Design parameters Design standards Failure Failure modes Finite element method Peeling Reinforced concrete Shear Technical Papers |
title | Peeling-Versus-Shear Failures in Prematurely Collapsing RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A37%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peeling-Versus-Shear%20Failures%20in%20Prematurely%20Collapsing%20RC%20Beams%20Strengthened%20in%20Flexure&rft.jtitle=Practice%20periodical%20on%20structural%20design%20and%20construction&rft.au=Khan,%20Mohammad%20Arsalan&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1084-0680&rft.eissn=1943-5576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2810936175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2810936175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |